Asus ROG Cetra Open

Asus ROG Cetra Open Review

Brand: ASUS
Released: February 23, 2026
Updated: 8 hours ago
3.8
Overall review score Expert score: 4.1 Customer score: 3.5
668
Review evidence points
57
Scored features
70
Total reviews
28 expert / 42 customer

Bottom Line

Choose these if you want open-ear comfort, strong awareness, secure fit, and low-latency gaming across devices. Skip them if you prioritize deep bass, isolation, seamless firmware, a compact case, or strong value at the asking price.

Best for

Gamers who dislike in-ear pressure or bulky headsets and want to hear family, traffic, doorbells, or room activity while keeping a low-latency gaming connection.

Not for

Buyers who want deep bass, strong isolation, effortless software reliability, a compact pocket case, or the best value for money.

Verdict

The ROG Cetra Open succeeds at the things that make open-ear gaming appealing: exceptional long-session comfort, excellent situational awareness, a secure fit, strong battery life, and genuinely low-latency play through the USB-C dongle. Dialogue, footsteps, and positional cues are usually clear, and the passthrough charging design is especially useful for handhelds. The tradeoff is that sound quality is inconsistent across listeners, with many complaints about weak sub-bass, sharp treble, coarse volume steps, and a less immersive presentation than sealed earbuds or headsets. Software is another dividing line: Gear Link offers useful EQ and customization, but firmware updates, multipoint behavior, and random disconnects cause real frustration for some owners. The unusually large case and premium price make the package harder to justify unless the open-ear gaming niche matches your needs closely.

Feature Scorecards

Summary

57 reviewed features
  • Very positive 4.5-5.0
    18 (32%)
  • Positive 3.5-4.4
    21 (37%)
  • Neutral 2.5-3.4
    11 (19%)
  • Negative 1.5-2.4
    5 (9%)
  • Very negative below 1.5
    2 (4%)

Pros

  • 4.9
    19 reviews strong consensus
    Audio-video sync accuracy: 4.9, 19 reviews, strong consensus
    Low-latency gaming is one of the clearest strengths. The 2.4GHz dongle repeatedly delivers near-wired responsiveness and excellent sync for shooters, rhythm games, handhelds, and console play.
  • 5.0
    16 reviews strong consensus
    Situational awareness: 5.0, 16 reviews, strong consensus
    Situational awareness is nearly universally praised. Reviewers can hear conversations, doorbells, traffic, children, and room activity without removing the earbuds.
  • 4.7
    17 reviews moderate consensus
    Stability: 4.7, 17 reviews, moderate consensus
    Physical fit is highly secure for most users. The hooks stay put during running, workouts, and active movement, though a few ear shapes struggle with fit.
  • 4.4
    46 reviews low consensus
    Comfort during long use: 4.4, 46 reviews, low consensus
    Comfort is the product’s strongest consensus advantage. Most reviewers can wear the buds for hours without ear-canal pressure, though a minority experience cartilage pain or poor fit depending on ear shape.
  • 4.6
    17 reviews low consensus
    Charging: 4.6, 17 reviews, low consensus
    Charging is a strong part of the package, especially the USB-C passthrough on the dongle and quick top-ups. One defective unit failed to charge, but most reviewers praise the convenience and speed.
  • 4.4
    31 reviews moderate consensus
    Battery: 4.4, 31 reviews, moderate consensus
    Battery life is usually strong, often lasting through long gaming sessions and in some tests approaching the advertised figures. Heavy use of RGB, Immersion Mode, Phantom Bass, or the mic can cut runtime substantially.

Cons

  • 1.0
    5 reviews strong consensus
    Noise isolation (passive): 1.0, 5 reviews, strong consensus
    Passive isolation is essentially nonexistent by design. That is useful for awareness, but it makes noisy environments and fully immersive gaming poor fits.
  • 2.1
    18 reviews low consensus
    Firmware/audio stability: 2.1, 18 reviews, low consensus
    Reliability is the biggest technical concern. Multiple customer reviews report disconnects, one-sided audio, distortion, failed updates, beeping, or erratic behavior, although some users find later firmware dramatically improves performance.
  • 2.0
    11 reviews strong consensus
    Portability/foldability: 2.0, 11 reviews, strong consensus
    Portability is a recurring weakness because the charging case is unusually large and thick. Several reviewers say it is barely pocketable or not pocket-friendly at all.
  • 2.4
    33 reviews low consensus
    Value for money: 2.4, 33 reviews, low consensus
    Price is the most consistent purchasing objection. Even positive reviewers often call the $230 class price steep, and several experts say cheaper gaming earbuds or headsets offer better overall value.
  • 1.8
    2 reviews limited evidence
    Maximum volume clarity: 1.8, 2 reviews, limited evidence
    At high levels, clarity can break down with sharp treble or bass distortion. The earbuds have plenty of headroom, but pushing them hard is not their best use.
  • 1.0
    1 review
    Packaging condition: 1.0, 1 review
    One customer received a unit that appeared used or refurbished, with misaligned protective films and a dead earbud.

Compared With Category Average

Compared with other Open-Ear Headphones, this product is above average in Sensors, Touch control responsiveness, Audio-video sync accuracy, near average in Stability, Carry case quality, below average in Value for money, Portability/foldability, Software/setup simplicity.

Comparison summary

50 compared features
  • Above average 0.4+ pts higher
    16 (32%)
  • Same as average within 0.3 pts
    17 (34%)
  • Below average 0.4+ pts lower
    17 (34%)

Largest category differences

Attribute This product Category average Difference
Sensors 5.0 2.8 +2.2
Value for money 2.4 3.9 -1.4
Portability/foldability 2.0 3.7 -1.6
Touch control responsiveness 5.0 3.3 +1.7
Software/setup simplicity 2.8 4.1 -1.3
Firmware/audio stability 2.1 3.1 -1.0
Audio-video sync accuracy 4.9 4.0 +1.0
Voice assistant integration 2.5 3.8 -1.3

Consider This Instead

If you want better Value for money

Choose EarFun Clip 2. It scores 5.0 vs 2.4 for Value for money, with a 4.4 overall score.

Compare

If you want better Software/setup simplicity

Choose Shokz OpenFit Pro. It scores 4.4 vs 2.8 for Software/setup simplicity, with a 4.0 overall score.

Compare

If you want better Active noise cancellation

Choose JLab JBuds Open. It scores 3.9 vs 2.7 for Active noise cancellation, with a 4.1 overall score.

Compare

Compared in Reviews

Products reviewers directly compared with this model, grouped into quick takeaways.

  • Better: directional audio The Asus is good directionally, but the Audeze headset is judged better.
  • Better: overall gaming experience After a week with the Asus, the reviewer still prefers the Razer over-ear headset.

SteelSeries Arctis GameBuds

  • Better: value and versatility The SteelSeries option is expected to appeal more broadly thanks to price and conventional fit.
  • Worse: multipoint connectivity The Asus adds multipoint behavior the reviewer missed on the SteelSeries buds.
  • Cheaper: price The Asus carries a substantial premium over SteelSeries' premium gaming buds.

FAQ

Are they comfortable for long gaming sessions?

Usually yes. Comfort is the strongest consensus point, with many reviewers wearing them for hours, though some ear shapes develop pressure or cartilage soreness.

Are they good for competitive gaming?

The 2.4GHz USB-C dongle is repeatedly praised for very low latency, and footsteps and positional cues are usually easy to pick out.

How good is the bass?

It varies. Phantom Bass helps, but many reviewers still find sub-bass weaker than sealed in-ear or over-ear options.

Do they block outside noise?

Not much. Immersion Mode can soften steady background noise, but the open design intentionally keeps you aware of conversations, traffic, doorbells, and room activity.

Is the microphone good for Discord and calls?

Generally usable to good, with effective noise suppression in several tests, but some customers report robotic or poor voice quality during unstable connections.

Are they worth the premium price?

Only for buyers who specifically value open-ear comfort plus low-latency gaming. Price is one of the most consistent complaints, especially given the bulky case and software reliability issues.

Sample Expert Reviews We Analyzed

These are a few of the reviews included in our analysis.

Video Reviews

Article Reviews

Top Open-Ear Headphones to Consider

#1 Cleer ARC 5
4.5

Best for all-day comfort, secure open-ear awareness, long battery life, and a genuinely useful touchscreen case. Skip it if deep bass, strong isolation, compact size, or consistently premium music quality...

Pros: Instrument separation, Multipoint connectivity reliability

Cons: Noise isolation (passive)

#2 EarFun Clip 2
4.4

Best for lightweight all-day comfort, outstanding battery life, dependable physical controls, and premium features at a budget price. Skip it if you need deep bass, noise isolation, flawless high-volume sound,...

Pros: Weight comfort, Hinge durability

Cons: Active noise cancellation, Sensors

#3 Shokz OpenFit 2
4.4

Best for secure, comfortable open-ear workouts, strong battery life, and easier physical controls. Skip them if you need ANC, sealed-earbud sound, or the best value at full price.

Pros: Microphone noise reduction, Bluetooth

Cons: Active noise cancellation, Codec support

#4 Shokz OpenFit 2+
4.2

Best for open-ear comfort, secure runs, long battery life, and convenient wireless charging. Skip it if you need ANC, deep bass, LDAC, or earbuds that never shift under helmets, buffs,...

Pros: Clamping force comfort, Battery

Cons: Active noise cancellation, Noise isolation (passive)