-
At least one detailed test credits the perimeter felt/squeegees for creating a good seal on hard floors and carpets. However, other reviewers still report hard-floor snowplowing or scattering with larger debris, suggesting sealing alone does not guarantee smooth intake.
-
Versatility
4.6
★
★
★
★
★
★
★
★
★
★
5 reviews
4.6
Versatility is a consistent strength: reviewers mention stick mode, handheld mode, and extended reach, plus the ability to swap tools for upholstery, corners, and high spots.
-
Cordless convenience is a major reason people reach for this model: the lightweight, grab-and-go design makes quick daily cleanups and room-to-room moves easy. Removable batteries further support cordless flexibility, though runtime limits can still require planning for larger homes.
-
Noise level
4.6
★
★
★
★
★
★
★
★
★
★
1 review
4.6
Noise is often described as quieter than similar cordless sticks, making it easier to use for quick daily cleanups without feeling disruptive.
-
Weight
4.6
★
★
★
★
★
★
★
★
★
★
6 reviews
4.6
Weight is a standout: multiple reviews cite roughly 5.9 lb and emphasize how easy it is to carry, maneuver, and use one-handed in handheld mode.
-
Most reviews position this as a pet-friendly vacuum: pet-focused attachments (turbo tool/fur brush) and strong hair pickup are common positives. A couple reviewers also mention allergen trapping benefits and the brand’s pet-oriented messaging.
-
Conversion to handheld is repeatedly described as quick and easy, turning the unit into a dustbuster-style cleaner for spot messes, stairs, and vehicles.
-
Ease of use
4.5
★
★
★
★
★
★
★
★
★
★
6 reviews
4.5
Ease of use is boosted by the press-on/press-off trigger style, readable battery/mode indicators, and comfortable handling. Usability drops when users encounter frequent clogs or messy emptying, which can overshadow the otherwise friendly design.
-
Tool changes are generally described as simple, using quick-release buttons and straightforward clicks. The learning curve tends to be more about the bin-emptying sequence or wall-mount setup than swapping attachments.
-
Crevice/groove cleaning is a bright spot. One test reports a perfect crevice-pickup score, and multiple reviewers note the crevice tool works well for tight areas and car interiors.
-
Packaging impressions are mostly positive, including sturdy cardboard organization and reduced mess from foam. Some dislike the amount of plastic wrapping used to protect parts.
-
Maneuverability is commonly rated above average, with reviewers praising swivel response, stable straight-line tracking, and easy navigation around furniture. Max suction can feel a bit too grabby for some users, making medium power the sweet spot.
-
Carpet hair pickup is repeatedly praised, especially for cat/dog hair. Reviewers often describe the XR as a standout in its price tier for keeping carpets and rugs looking clean.
-
The accessory set is widely considered a key advantage, especially on the Pet package. Reviewers highlight the motorized pet tool, crevice tool, dusting brushes, and tool clips/wall storage as genuinely useful rather than filler.
-
The LED headlights are repeatedly praised as genuinely useful, helping reveal debris in dark corners and under furniture. At least one hands-on reviewer calls them among the best in the category rather than a gimmick.
-
Stair Cleaning
4.4
★
★
★
★
★
★
★
★
★
★
4 reviews
4.4
Stair cleaning gets positive callouts due to the light weight and the ability to use the main head or a handheld tool on steps. Users who vacuum lots of stairs often describe the XR as much less of a hassle than full-size uprights.
-
Above-floor cleaning is generally good with the motorized pet tool and crevice attachments, with many calling it great for furniture and cars. One lab-style upholstery test notes it can leave some debris behind and may require extra passes.
-
Controls & UI
4.2
★
★
★
★
★
★
★
★
★
7 reviews
4.2
Controls are generally straightforward, with multiple power modes and a battery-level display (LEDs or a small screen). A recurring nit is that the wall-charging setup can make indicators harder to see or feel less intuitive.
-
On medium-pile carpet, a dedicated deep-clean test reported above-average results, and multiple hands-on reviewers call it excellent on typical carpeting. Complaints here tend to be about clogging/emptying rather than carpet agitation.
-
The brushroll is often marketed and described as tangle-free, with fins/combs helping manage long hair. Still, a few reviewers report hair ending up wrapped around the filter/bin area during emptying, so anti-tangle is better on the floor than in the bin.
-
Reviews frequently describe strong suction for the price, with one test citing very high sealed suction versus a pricier Dyson. That said, several reviewers argue real-world pickup can be limited by clogs or snowplowing on hard floors, so power is not always the bottleneck.
-
Onboard or nearby storage is a plus when using the tool clip or wall mount, keeping common tools within reach. Storage capacity is limited (some mounts hold only a couple tools), so not every accessory may live on the dock at once.
-
Routine maintenance is usually considered straightforward (washable filter, removable brush roll), but owners who experience clogs or hair buildup report more frequent cleaning and occasional mess when clearing the bin/filter area.
-
Rug and area-rug performance is generally positive, especially for routine dust, hair, and crumbs. Some reviewers still prefer keeping power in the middle setting to avoid the head feeling overly grabby at max suction.
-
Filtration is generally viewed as good for a budget cordless, with mentions of allergen trapping and solid particle containment in testing. It is also repeatedly described as less sealed or less refined than premium competitors, so allergy-focused buyers may want higher-end options.
-
Assembly for the vacuum itself is typically quick (click together a couple parts), but wall-mount installation/setup can be more involved or confusing depending on the kit.
-
Low-pile carpet performance is usually described as a strength, with several reviewers praising strong pickup and pet-hair removal. One reviewer disagrees and would not recommend it for carpeted homes, indicating performance can vary by expectations and surfaces.
-
Comparisons are mixed: one reviewer claims it outperforms the Dyson V8 in suction metrics and beats certain Sharks in motor power, while other reviewers still prefer Dyson/Shark for more consistent hard-floor pickup and fewer issues with scattering or clogs.
-
Price & Value
3.8
★
★
★
★
★
★
★
★
★
4 reviews
3.8
Value is a core selling point in many reviews, especially when priced around the low $200s or on sale. Conversely, reviewers who experienced frequent clogs or weak hard-floor performance say it is not worth the money even at a budget price.
-
Standard/low runtime is typically reported around 30–40 minutes, which works for quick whole-room sessions and spot cleaning. Lab measurement around the low 30-minute range suggests it may not cover a large multi-room home in one go.
-
The removable battery is appreciated for easy charging and the option to buy spares, but charging can take a few hours. Some versions require removing the battery to charge, while others integrate charging into the wall mount.
-
Storage is convenient with the wall mount/charging station, but there are complaints that the mount can stick out and that some versions do not stand upright on their own. Many owners still like the organized, grab-and-go footprint.
-
For fine dust and small crumbs on hard floors, feedback is generally better, including successful pickups of baking soda and everyday dust. A lab test, however, still scored hardwood performance very low due to repeated clogs during mixed-debris trials.