-
Assembly is consistently described as fast and easy, often with snap-in parts and clear directions. Setup is rarely cited as a pain point.
-
Pet-focused cleaning is a core strength: reviewers repeatedly cite pet hair pickup, pet tools, and reduced brush tangling as key benefits. Multi-pet households often describe noticeable improvements versus prior vacuums.
-
Carpet hair pickup is one of the most consistently praised attributes, with reviewers describing large amounts of hair and deep dust removed even after other vacuums had been used. Several note carpets and rugs look fluffed and cleaner after passes.
-
Headlights and LED lighting are near-universally praised, with many saying the lights reveal hair and crumbs they would otherwise miss. Lights on the wand/attachments are also repeatedly called out as useful for tight spaces.
-
HEPA/sealed filtration is repeatedly highlighted as a plus for allergens, with some users noting better allergies or less dusty smell during use. Maintenance is mostly about keeping filters clean and fully dry after washing.
-
Versatility
4.3
★
★
★
★
★
★
★
★
★
★
7 reviews
4.3
Versatility is a major highlight thanks to lift-off cleaning, multi-surface settings, and bright lights. The main limitations are under-bed cleaning and the extra effort sometimes needed to finish hard-floor edges or manage hose reach.
-
Suction is frequently described as strong, especially on carpets/rugs and when using the wand, and several comparisons claim it pulls out more debris than older vacuums. Still, some owners feel suction is underwhelming on hard floors or declines over time.
-
-
Many owners praise reduced tangling and like the self-cleaning concept, especially for long human hair and heavy-shedding pets. However, there are also notable reports of hair still wrapping, the brush locking up, or needing screw-based disassembly to clear it.
-
Above-floor cleaning is often strong thanks to the turbo tool and lift-off pod, with many calling couch and pet-bed results excellent. The limiting factor is frequently the short hose and occasional awkwardness holding the pod while cleaning higher areas.
-
Overall sentiment trends positive for carpet/rug pet hair removal and visibility from headlights. The most repeated negatives are short hose reach, mixed hard-floor finishing (especially edges), and occasional durability problems.
-
Ease of use
4.3
★
★
★
★
★
★
★
★
★
★
4 reviews
4.3
-
Controls & UI
4.3
★
★
★
★
★
★
★
★
★
★
6 reviews
4.3
Controls for brush on/off, surface settings, and suction adjustments are usually described as straightforward and accessible. Some mention clear labeling, while others still struggle with handling quirks rather than the controls themselves.
-
-
Bin & Bag
4.2
★
★
★
★
★
★
★
★
★
6 reviews
4.2
The bagless clear bin is praised for letting users see what is collected and for easy removal. Capacity feedback varies by home size and shedding level: some say it is large, others say it fills quickly and needs frequent emptying.
-
Area rugs are a strong use case, with multiple reviewers describing rugs looking refreshed and hair being pulled out quickly. A few note it can be harder to push or track straight on thicker rugs.
-
The included pet turbo/pivot tool and lighted crevice/dusting tools are widely appreciated, especially for furniture and stairs. Common requests are for more attachments overall and a longer or wider brush/crevice tool.
-
Aesthetics are generally positive, with mentions of a sleek look and practical grips/finishes. This attribute rarely drives the decision, but it does not appear to be a widespread negative.
-
-
Several reviewers like the compact feel and easy storage. Counterpoints include reports of a top-heavy/tippy feel, awkward upright behavior, or needing attention when standing it up after use.
-
-
Weight
4.0
★
★
★
★
★
★
★
★
★
5 reviews
4.0
Weight perception is polarized: multiple reviewers call it light and easy to carry upstairs, while others describe it as heavy, top-heavy, or tiring on carpet. Handling and balance seem to drive these differences more than absolute weight alone.
-
Cord length
3.9
★
★
★
★
★
★
★
★
★
2 reviews
3.9
Cord length feedback is mixed: some can clean large areas from one outlet, while others find it shorter than previous vacuums and must move plugs more often. Expectations appear to depend on prior models and home layout.
-
Comparisons frequently position it as better than certain older Dyson/Shark/Hoover units for carpet pet hair, sometimes dramatically. Negative comparisons often favor Shark models for maneuverability or find this model weaker on hard floors.
-
Some owners report no clogging even with heavy shedding, and the hair-channel concept is meant to keep airflow moving. Others describe recurring clogs in hoses or head pathways after months of use, especially in long-hair/high-fur homes.
-
The floorhead is praised for swivel and the usefulness of its lights, and some appreciate a smaller head for tight spaces. Critiques focus on head height for under-furniture reach and roller/channel design that can jam or wear.
-
Filter cleaning is expected and usually manageable, but overall maintenance varies widely based on whether the head or channels jam. Some call it easy to disassemble and repair, while others report repeated, time-consuming screw-based cleanouts.
-
Hard-floor hair pickup is repeatedly described as weaker than carpet performance, often requiring extra passes or wand cleanup. Some owners are satisfied on tile/wood, but the broader theme is uneven results on bare floors.
-
Build quality impressions vary: some describe it as solid for the price, while others report cracked plastic, worn rollers, or components breaking with normal mishaps. The overall takeaway is that materials feel acceptable until a weak point fails.
-
Price & Value
3.5
★
★
★
★
★
★
★
★
★
2 reviews
3.5
Value perceptions split: many feel it is worth the price because of carpet pet-hair results and features like headlights and lift-off, sometimes comparing favorably to pricier brands. Negative reviewers cite hard-floor performance, hose/cable annoyances, or durability issues as reasons it is not worth the cost.
-
Noise level
3.5
★
★
★
★
★
★
★
★
★
1 review
3.5
Noise is typically considered acceptable for an upright, though turbo/pet attachments and higher power settings can be loud. A few users explicitly call it noisy, but it is not the dominant complaint.