Black & Decker dustbuster Cordless Handheld Vacuum, HHVI315JO42

3.7

(7)

Bottom Line

Choose this Dustbuster if you want a cheap, lightweight grab-and-go handheld for crumbs and quick car touch-ups; Skip if you need strong fine-dust filtration or a powered brush for embedded pet hair.

Best for

Shoppers who want an inexpensive handheld for quick daily pickups (crumbs, snack spills, light car detailing) and prefer a lightweight, straightforward design with basic attachments.

Not for

Homes that need stronger fine-dust containment, allergy-focused filtration, or frequent embedded pet-hair cleanup where a mini motorized brush and cleaner emptying would matter.

Verdict

Across multiple reviews and tests, the HHVI315JO42 stands out as a simple, affordable handheld that performs better than you would expect on everyday messes, especially larger debris, crumbs, and quick pickups on hard surfaces. It is consistently described as lightweight and easy to maneuver, with useful basic tools like a crevice and brush. The main tradeoff is that it lacks a motorized brush and can struggle with embedded dirt or heavy pet hair across larger areas, often requiring extra passes and effort. Fine dust and filtration are also a recurring limitation, with some reports of dust exhausting out the back in very dusty car-floor scenarios and messier, filter-in-hand emptying.

Pros

Price & Value 4.7 ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ 3 reviews 4.7

Value is a major reason it gets recommended. Multiple sources position it as a budget pick or best-budget option, emphasizing that it delivers solid everyday performance at a notably low price, especially compared with models that add powered brushes and better filtration.
Weight 4.7 ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ 4 reviews 4.7

Weight is consistently praised as very light, with multiple sources calling it one of the lightest-feeling handhelds they have used, which helps for quick cleanups and tight-space use.
Cordless convenience 4.6 ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ 1 review 4.6

Cordless convenience is central to the appeal: reviewers frame it as a quick-grab solution for daily messes and car touch-ups without the hassle of a full-size vacuum.
Hard Floor — Large Debris Intake 4.5 ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ 2 reviews 4.5

Large-debris intake on hard surfaces is generally described as a strong point, with a wide mouth that handles snack spills and bigger pieces without frequent snagging.
Suction & Airflow 4.4 ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ 3 reviews 4.4

Suction/power is repeatedly characterized as strong for the size and price. It is often called powerful enough for everyday debris and quick pickups, with particularly good results on larger crumbs and snack spills.
Crevice / Groove Pickup (Hard Floors) 4.4 ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ 2 reviews 4.4

Crevice performance is a recurring strength: multiple sources describe the crevice tool fitting into narrow gaps (car mats, seat cracks, grooves) and pulling debris effectively.
Hair Pickup — Hard Floors 4.3 ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ 1 review 4.3

For hair on hard surfaces and in tight areas, reviewers report decent pickup helped by suction and the crevice tool, but overall hair performance is still often characterized as only average.
Ease of use 4.3 ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ 2 reviews 4.3

Ease of use is a strong theme: lightweight handling, simple controls, and easy maneuvering in tight spaces are praised. Downsides include messier emptying and keeping track of loose attachments.
Packaging quality 4.2 ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ 1 review 4.2
Storage footprint & upright-stand stability 4.1 ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ 3 reviews 4.1

Storage is commonly described as easy due to a wall-mount/docking approach, though at least one test source notes the attachments are not stored onboard, making small tools easier to misplace.
Comparative performance 4.0 ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ 3 reviews 4.0

Comparisons repeatedly place it as a strong budget performer: it is often described as not excelling everywhere but avoiding major weaknesses at its price, and some lab-style comparisons recommend it over other similarly priced handhelds based on cleaning results.
Assembly and Setup 4.0 ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ 2 reviews 4.0

Setup is described as simple, with wall-mount hardware and straightforward attachment installation. Owners generally treat it as plug-in-and-go with minimal assembly.
Overall opinion 3.9 ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ 3 reviews 3.9

Overall sentiment trends positive for the price: reviewers frequently recommend it as a dependable, simple handheld for everyday messes, while clearly flagging tradeoffs in fine-dust filtration, embedded dirt, and pet-hair-focused performance.
Noise level 3.9 ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ 2 reviews 3.9

Noise is generally described as average for handhelds. At least one test source reports typical handheld noise levels and notes it is not piercing, while another calls it quiet relative to expectations for the category.
Carpet — Low-Pile Pickup 3.7 ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ 2 reviews 3.7

On carpets/rugs, performance is generally described as good but not best-in-class. Embedded debris and hair often require extra passes, and the lack of a motorized brush is repeatedly cited as the main reason.
Edge & Baseboard Cleaning (Hard Floors) 3.6 ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ 1 review 3.6

Edge/baseboard cleaning is described as good to very good in at least one lab-tested comparison, though it is not consistently highlighted as a primary strength across all sources.
Hair Pickup — Carpets 3.6 ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ 1 review 3.6

Hair pickup on carpet/rugs improves notably when using the brush attachment, but embedded hair still tends to take more effort and repeated passes compared with models that include powered brushes.
Tool-change simplicity 3.6 ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ 1 review 3.6

Tool changes are generally described as straightforward: attachments push in and pull out easily. One review notes a design limitation where certain tools cannot be combined as an extension the way the reviewer expected.

Cons

Bin & Bag 3.4 ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ 4 reviews 3.4

Bin capacity is described as relatively large for a handheld in at least one test, but the bin design is often characterized as traditional/older style, contributing to a less refined emptying experience.
Controls & UI 3.3 ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ 2 reviews 3.3

Controls are repeatedly described as simple, often single-speed operation. One test source also notes limited battery/charge indication, which reduces day-to-day feedback compared with models that show charge status.
Emptying & Mess Control 3.2 ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ 3 reviews 3.2

Emptying can be messy because it commonly requires removing the filter to dump debris. Several sources mention hands getting dusty and the need to tap/clean the filter, which can release dust.
Accessories & Tools 3.2 ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ 6 reviews 3.2

Reviews consistently note a basic but useful set of tools (typically crevice and brush). Multiple sources highlight the lack of a motorized/powered brush as a key limitation for embedded dirt and heavier pet-hair tasks. Some users mention tool fit/combination limitations (for example, not being able to stack certain pieces).
Hard Floor — Fine Dust Pickup 3.1 ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ 1 review 3.1

Fine dust can be a weakness. One test source notes the finest dust may leave a faint haze on surfaces after cleaning, and another demonstrates very fine dirt/dust escaping filtration in especially dusty car-floor use.
Maintenance requirements 3.1 ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ 2 reviews 3.1

Maintenance is described as routine but somewhat hands-on: filter cleaning is commonly mentioned, and dusty environments can dirty the filter quickly, requiring more frequent cleaning.
Runtime (Measured, Default) 2.8 ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ 3 reviews 2.8

Measured/observed runtime is commonly described as modest. One detailed test reports around the mid-teens in minutes, while another roundup frames battery life for this model as lower than higher-priced alternatives.
Battery & Charging 2.7 ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ 4 reviews 2.7

Battery and charging feedback is mixed-to-average: runtime is described as average to below average depending on the comparison set, and at least one user report describes a very long charge time. Some sources also note limited charge-status feedback.
Filtration / Dust Containment 2.6 ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ 2 reviews 2.6

Filtration is a recurring limitation. Multiple sources indicate it is not ideal for very fine particles, with demonstrations of dust passing through and exhausting out the back in heavy fine-dust situations; it is better suited to larger everyday debris than allergy-sensitive fine-dust cleanup.
Airflow blowback 2.4 ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ 2 reviews 2.4

Strong exhaust/airflow blowback is specifically called out in lab testing and user-style demonstrations, where airflow can blow light debris or fine dust around and, in dirty scenarios, dust may visibly exhaust out the back.
Onboard tool storage 2.2 ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ 1 review 2.2

At least one detailed test notes there is no built-in attachment storage on the unit or dock, which can be inconvenient for keeping the crevice/brush tools together.

FAQ

Does it work well on pet hair?

It can pick up loose hair and does better in tight spaces with the crevice tool, but overall pet-hair performance is described as mediocre compared with stronger handhelds and models with powered brushes.

Is it good for fine dust in cars?

For crumbs and larger debris it does well, but very fine dust can pass through the filtration in dirtier car-floor situations and may exhaust out the back.

How is the battery and charging experience?

Runtime is described as average to below average in testing, and charging can be slow in some user reports. Some reviews also note limited charge-status feedback.

Is emptying the bin messy?

Several reviews mention a more old-school emptying method that requires removing the filter, which can get your hands dusty and may release dust when cleaning the filter.