-
-
Storage is repeatedly praised due to the vacuum being able to stand upright on its own, with some models also including wall-mount storage/charging options.
-
-
Price & Value
4.2
★
★
★
★
★
★
★
★
★
14 reviews
4.2
Consistently positioned as a budget standout: reviewers repeatedly frame it as hard to beat for the price, with strong carpet results and convenience features typically missing at this tier (self-standing, LEDs, swappable battery).
-
Medium-pile carpet performance is frequently cited as a strength, including deep-cleaning-style tests where embedded sand pickup is described as higher than expected for a budget cordless.
-
LED lighting is repeatedly called out as useful (often a standout feature at this price), improving visibility of dust and hair in darker areas and along edges.
-
Maneuverability is a recurring strength, including easy navigation around furniture, low-profile reach under beds, and smooth handling for quick passes in typical rooms.
-
Under-furniture access is highlighted as good thanks to a low-profile head and the ability to get under beds and furniture more easily than many budget sticks.
-
-
Default/low-power runtime is frequently described as long for the price (often cited up to ~55 minutes), but practical runtime drops in higher modes and during real cleaning sessions.
-
-
Build is generally described as solid for the price and able to take normal household use, though some note cheap-feeling plastics or a less-premium bin/parts compared with higher-end cordless models.
-
Airflow is often measured or described as strong for the price, while suction is more mixed: some reviews cite competitive wand suction, but others characterize overall suction as low for deeper or handheld-focused work.
-
Weight
3.9
★
★
★
★
★
★
★
★
★
6 reviews
3.9
Weight is generally characterized as lightweight to moderate for a cordless stick, though some mention a heavier-in-hand feel for above-floor tasks depending on configuration and variant.
-
Marketed and frequently discussed as pet-friendly, with generally solid pet-hair pickup on carpets and helpful tools on some bundles, but limited by filtration and variable anti-tangle behavior.
-
Battery convenience is a major theme: removable pack on the Extreme model enables swapping across the Black+Decker ecosystem and extending runtime with spares. Runtime claims are high on low power, while real-world high/strong settings are notably shorter; charging is often described as slow.
-
Low-pile carpet pickup is generally rated as good for the price in several reviews, with strong surface pickup; independent lab-style scoring in one source is notably lower, suggesting variability by test method and debris type.
-
Ongoing costs are generally low (washable filters), but replacement filters/batteries are discussed as practical considerations; the ability to share batteries across tools can reduce effective ownership cost for existing Black+Decker owners.
-
Hard-floor fine debris pickup is described as decent in some reviews, but performance is inconsistent and often requires extra passes, particularly near edges or when debris distribution is uneven.
-
Maintenance is recurring: washable filters are common, brush-roll hair removal is sometimes necessary, and several reviewers stress that neglected filters can cause performance issues.
-
Controls & UI
3.5
★
★
★
★
★
★
★
★
★
8 reviews
3.5
Controls are generally simple (multiple power levels and, in some variants, brush-roll control). Some versions also reference auto/adjusting suction behavior, but the core experience is basic and easy to learn.