Dyson Purifier Humidify+Cool Formaldehyde PH04

Dyson Purifier Humidify+Cool Formaldehyde PH04 Air Purifier Review

Brand: Dyson
Released: November 4, 2021
Updated: 2 months ago
3.4
Overall review score Expert score: 4.3 Customer score: 2.6
319
Review evidence points
45
Scored features
63
Total reviews
17 expert / 46 customer

Bottom Line

Choose the Dyson PH04 for premium purification, humidifying, formaldehyde/VOC monitoring, and smart controls. Skip it if you need low cost, compact size, quiet max airflow, or proven pump reliability.

Best for

Best for people who want one premium device for air purification, humidity control, cooling airflow, and detailed air-quality monitoring, especially in dry homes or spaces with VOC, smoke, pollen, or allergen concerns.

Not for

Not ideal for buyers who mainly need a basic humidifier, have little floor space, dislike app-centered controls, need a quiet fan at maximum speed, or want low ownership costs.

Verdict

The Dyson Purifier Humidify+Cool Formaldehyde PH04 earns strong expert praise for its 3-in-1 design, sensitive air-quality reporting, VOC and formaldehyde focus, app controls, quiet lower settings, and comfortable humidification. Many customers also report cleaner air, allergy relief, better sleep, and stylish design. The tradeoff is real: customer reviews repeatedly mention high price, bulky size, weak humidifying in some rooms, loud high-speed operation, bad arrivals, pump-column failures, difficult support, and expensive filters or repairs. It looks strongest as a premium all-in-one air-care appliance for people who will use every function, not as a simple humidifier or budget purifier.

Feature Scorecards

Summary

45 reviewed features
  • Very positive 4.5-5.0
    18 (40%)
  • Positive 3.5-4.4
    12 (27%)
  • Neutral 2.5-3.4
    8 (18%)
  • Negative 1.5-2.4
    4 (9%)
  • Very negative below 1.5
    3 (7%)

Pros

  • 4.4
    25 reviews moderate consensus
    air purification performance: 4.4, 25 reviews, moderate consensus
    Review evidence is strongly positive.
  • 4.6
    9 reviews strong consensus
    app connectivity: 4.6, 9 reviews, strong consensus
    Review evidence is strongly positive.
  • 4.4
    12 reviews strong consensus
    air circulation: 4.4, 12 reviews, strong consensus
    Review evidence is strongly positive.
  • 4.5
    9 reviews strong consensus
    design and appearance: 4.5, 9 reviews, strong consensus
    Review evidence is strongly positive.
  • 4.7
    5 reviews strong consensus
    formaldehyde removal: 4.7, 5 reviews, strong consensus
    Review evidence is strongly positive.
  • 4.6
    5 reviews strong consensus
    allergen reduction: 4.6, 5 reviews, strong consensus
    Review evidence is strongly positive.

Cons

  • 1.5
    15 reviews strong consensus
    customer support: 1.5, 15 reviews, strong consensus
    Review evidence is mostly negative.
  • 1.5
    13 reviews moderate consensus
    reliability: 1.5, 13 reviews, moderate consensus
    Review evidence is mostly negative.
  • 1.3
    8 reviews strong consensus
    condition on arrival: 1.3, 8 reviews, strong consensus
    Review evidence is mostly negative.
  • 1.9
    5 reviews low consensus
    durability: 1.9, 5 reviews, low consensus
    Review evidence is mostly negative.
  • 1.4
    2 reviews limited evidence
    replacement experience: 1.4, 2 reviews, limited evidence
    Review evidence is mostly negative.
  • 2.2
    5 reviews strong consensus
    filter replacement cost: 2.2, 5 reviews, strong consensus
    Review evidence is mostly negative.

Compared With Category Average

Compared with other Air Purifiers, this product is above average in UV-C light effectiveness, app connectivity, Wi-Fi reliability, near average in humidification performance, air purification performance, below average in documentation quality, overall satisfaction, customer support.

Comparison summary

45 compared features
  • Above average 0.4+ pts higher
    17 (38%)
  • Same as average within 0.3 pts
    12 (27%)
  • Below average 0.4+ pts lower
    16 (36%)

Largest category differences

Attribute This product Category average Difference
documentation quality 1.2 3.4 -2.2
overall satisfaction 2.8 4.3 -1.5
customer support 1.5 3.0 -1.6
reliability 1.5 3.0 -1.6
UV-C light effectiveness 4.7 2.9 +1.8
app connectivity 4.6 3.2 +1.4
replacement experience 1.4 3.0 -1.6
size and footprint 2.5 4.0 -1.5

Consider This Instead

If you want better condition on arrival

Choose Nuwave Forever, 47265. It scores 4.7 vs 1.3 for condition on arrival, with a 4.6 overall score.

Compare

Compared in Reviews

Products reviewers directly compared with this model, grouped into quick takeaways.

Honeywell HCM350W

  • Worse: humidifier cleanliness and convenience The Dyson is framed as more expensive but cleaner and easier to use than the Honeywell.
  • Compared: humidifier alternative The Honeywell is described as cheaper and smaller, while Dyson is positioned as the quality choice.

HP09

  • Similar: air quality detection and purification The customer says its detection, reporting, and purification are comparable to their excellent HP09.
  • Better: PM2.5 clearing time The PH2 was close to the HP09 but took slightly longer to return to the initial PM2.5 reading.

Alen air purifier

  • Worse: air purification performance The customer says the Dyson surpasses their Alen air purifier.

FAQ

Does the Dyson PH04 clean air well?

Most expert and positive customer reviews say it improves air quality, detects pollutants, and responds automatically. A few tests and customers found particle removal or purifier strength less impressive than dedicated purifiers.

Is the humidifier effective?

Evidence is split. Experts and some customers praised comfortable, hygienic humidification, while many negative customers said it barely raised humidity or stopped humidifying.

Is it quiet enough for bedrooms?

It is often praised as quiet on lower settings and night mode. High fan speeds, long runs, buzzing, or failure-related noises drew complaints.

Is the app useful?

Yes for most reviewers. The app is praised for real-time air-quality data, scheduling, remote control, humidity settings, and filter or cleaning reminders.

What are the main reliability complaints?

Customer complaints cluster around humidifier failure, pump-column replacement, oscillation failure, defective arrivals, and poor support or warranty experiences.

Is it worth the price?

It is worth it for reviewers who use purification, humidification, cooling, sensors, and smart controls together. It looks overpriced if used mainly as a humidifier or if reliability problems occur.

Sample Expert Reviews We Analyzed

These are a few of the reviews included in our analysis.

Video Reviews

Article Reviews

Top Air Purifiers to Consider

#1 GoveeLife H7124
4.6

Choose the H7124 if you want a quiet smart purifier for odors, dust, pets, and app control. Skip it if you need foolproof Wi-Fi, wall-facing intake, UV light, or strong...

Pros: particle removal effectiveness, pollen removal

Cons: UV-C light effectiveness, air dryness

#2 PuroAir 240
4.6

Best for quiet, simple cleaning in bedrooms or apartments. Skip it if you need verified large-room CADR value, app control, or guaranteed neighbor-smoke removal.

Pros: particle removal effectiveness, dust removal

Cons: CADR rating, air changes per hour

#3 AirDoctor AD3500
4.6

Best for strong room cleaning, allergy relief, odor control, and simple operation. Skip it if high filter costs, a larger footprint, or possible nighttime fan noise would bother you.

Pros: particle removal effectiveness, HEPA filtration

Cons: customer support, warranty coverage

#4 Nuwave Forever, 47265
4.6

Choose this if you want strong odor, dust, smoke, and pet-air cleanup with washable filters. Skip it if turbo noise, Wi-Fi setup, or a high upfront price will bother you.

Pros: filter replacement cost, allergen reduction

Cons: Wi-Fi reliability