Garmin Forerunner 170 Music

Garmin Forerunner 170 Music Feature Scores

Explore all 49 feature scores for Garmin Forerunner 170 Music, organized into pros and cons.

Scores by Feature

Summary

49 reviewed features
  • Very positive 4.5-5.0
    30 (61%)
  • Positive 3.5-4.4
    11 (22%)
  • Neutral 2.5-3.4
    7 (14%)
  • Negative 1.5-2.4
    1 (2%)

Pros

Sort
  • 4.8
    9 reviews strong consensus
    coaching features: 4.8, 9 reviews, strong consensus
    Garmin Coach, adaptive plans, Daily Suggested Workouts, and Quick Workout provide unusually strong structure at this price. The tools work well for beginners building consistency and experienced runners training for races.
  • 4.8
    8 reviews strong consensus
    recovery insights: 4.8, 8 reviews, strong consensus
    Training Readiness, Training Status, load, HRV, and recovery-time guidance are among the watch’s strongest features. The recommendations feel closely tied to recent sleep, stress, and training history.
  • 4.7
    8 reviews strong consensus
    workout tracking variety: 4.7, 8 reviews, strong consensus
    More than 80 sport profiles cover running, cycling, swimming, strength work, winter sports, and many niche activities. The breadth is unusually strong for an entry-to-midrange Forerunner.
  • 4.8
    6 reviews strong consensus
    button controls: 4.8, 6 reviews, strong consensus
    Five physical buttons are a major strength during runs, especially with sweaty hands or gloves. Nearly every function can be controlled without relying on touch.
  • 4.6
    8 reviews strong consensus
    display quality: 4.6, 8 reviews, strong consensus
    The 1.2-inch AMOLED touchscreen is colorful, sharp, and attractive. It trails flagship Apple, Samsung, and premium Garmin panels in fluidity and peak brightness, but remains excellent for training.
  • 4.7
    6 reviews strong consensus
    GPS accuracy: 4.7, 6 reviews, strong consensus
    GPS locks quickly and stayed reliable in real-world running, swimming, and city testing. Single-band GNSS is a technical limitation, but most testers saw little practical loss outside very difficult terrain.
  • 4.8
    5 reviews strong consensus
    outdoor visibility: 4.8, 5 reviews, strong consensus
    Workout data remains easy to read in bright sunlight. Physical buttons also preserve usability when glare, sweat, or gloves make touch less convenient.
  • 4.7
    5 reviews strong consensus
    brightness: 4.7, 5 reviews, strong consensus
    The AMOLED display is bright and vivid enough for outdoor runs. It is not Garmin’s brightest panel, but readability remained strong in sunshine.
  • 4.5
    6 reviews low consensus
    comfort: 4.5, 6 reviews, low consensus
    The compact, lightweight case is easy to forget during runs, sleep, and daily wear. One report of skin irritation from the plastic back is the main caveat.
  • 4.6
    4 reviews strong consensus
    touchscreen responsiveness: 4.6, 4 reviews, strong consensus
    Swipes and taps register quickly without feeling overly sensitive. Touch works well for menus and music, while buttons remain available for workouts.
  • 4.5
    4 reviews strong consensus
    operating system experience: 4.5, 4 reviews, strong consensus
    Garmin’s latest interface looks more polished, colorful, and modern while bringing sports and smartwatch tools into one place. It also positions the watch well for future updates.
  • 4.1
    8 reviews moderate consensus
    onboard music storage: 4.1, 8 reviews, moderate consensus
    Offline Spotify, Amazon Music, Deezer, and other supported services make phone-free running easy. Apple Music remains unsupported, and the Music edition’s premium may not suit runners who always carry a phone.
  • 4.7
    3 reviews strong consensus
    software smoothness: 4.7, 3 reviews, strong consensus
    The updated interface feels faster and smoother than older entry-level Garmins, and activity syncing is notably quick.
  • 3.9
    10 reviews moderate consensus
    value for money: 3.9, 10 reviews, moderate consensus
    The feature set is impressive for runners who want advanced coaching, music, and payments in one compact watch. Value becomes less convincing beside the cheaper Forerunner 70, discounted Forerunner 265, and running-focused rivals.
  • 4.2
    5 reviews moderate consensus
    contactless payments: 4.2, 5 reviews, moderate consensus
    Garmin Pay is convenient for phone-free coffee, water, or emergency purchases. Its value depends heavily on local bank support and whether the extra model cost feels justified.
  • 4.2
    5 reviews strong consensus
    user interface: 4.2, 5 reviews, strong consensus
    The on-watch experience is generally simple, polished, and easy to live with. Some features are buried in settings, so learning the full menu structure takes time.
  • fit
    4.8
    2 reviews limited evidence
    fit: 4.8, 2 reviews, limited evidence
    The compact case sits comfortably on smaller wrists and should suit a broad range of wrist sizes without feeling cumbersome.
  • 4.8
    2 reviews limited evidence
    fitness tracking accuracy: 4.8, 2 reviews, limited evidence
    Distance, pace, swimming, and indoor workout tracking were consistently reliable across testing. The watch performs close to more expensive sports watches for most common activities.
  • 4.3
    3 reviews strong consensus
    style and design: 4.3, 3 reviews, strong consensus
    Fresh colors, a polished band treatment, and a compact sporty shape make the watch more appealing than older budget Forerunners. It still looks clearly fitness-focused rather than dressy.
  • 4.3
    3 reviews strong consensus
    water resistance: 4.3, 3 reviews, strong consensus
    The 5ATM rating handles showers, pool swims, and open-water sessions confidently. Swim tracking also performed well in testing.
  • 4.0
    4 reviews strong consensus
    heart rate accuracy: 4.0, 4 reviews, strong consensus
    Heart-rate tracking is strong for running and indoor cycling, but weight training and some outdoor cycling can expose the limits of the older Gen 4 sensor. An external strap remains best for precision.
  • 4.2
    3 reviews strong consensus
    safety features: 4.2, 3 reviews, strong consensus
    LiveTrack is useful for solo runners because contacts can follow an activity in progress. It is not independent safety coverage, since the feature relies on a connected phone.
  • 4.5
    2 reviews limited evidence
    reliability: 4.5, 2 reviews, limited evidence
    Core tracking and everyday functions proved dependable across running, swimming, and gym use, even though the hardware is not Garmin’s newest.
  • 4.5
    2 reviews limited evidence
    smartwatch features: 4.5, 2 reviews, limited evidence
    Garmin Pay, notifications, apps, and offline music make the watch useful beyond training. It still prioritizes sports over the richer app and communication features of mainstream smartwatches.
  • 4.3
    2 reviews limited evidence
    build quality: 4.3, 2 reviews, limited evidence
    The lightweight polymer construction feels better finished than older entry-level Forerunners. The screwed-on back and small metal details help it feel less cheap.
  • 5.0
    1 review
    cross-platform compatibility: 5.0, 1 review
    Garmin Connect provides nearly the same experience on iPhone and Android, making the watch a strong option for users who may switch phone platforms.
  • 5.0
    1 review
    customization options: 5.0, 1 review
    Data screens can be tailored to show exactly what matters during a run, and watch faces offer additional visual personalization.
  • 5.0
    1 review
    menu navigation: 5.0, 1 review
    The updated menus move quickly and physical-button navigation is easy during workouts. A few controls, including the start action, can still feel ambiguous.
  • 5.0
    1 review
    music controls: 5.0, 1 review
    The responsive touchscreen makes browsing and controlling music much easier than button-only operation.
  • 5.0
    1 review
    pairing reliability: 5.0, 1 review
    GPS acquisition and Strava syncing are fast, with run uploads happening almost instantly compared with older Forerunners.
  • 4.0
    2 reviews limited evidence
    app ecosystem: 4.0, 2 reviews, limited evidence
    Garmin’s polished software and Connect IQ support add useful widgets and apps, but the music ecosystem still excludes Apple Music.
  • 4.0
    2 reviews limited evidence
    size options: 4.0, 2 reviews, limited evidence
    The compact 42–43mm design works for many wrists, but there is no larger case option for buyers who prefer a bigger display or more substantial watch.
  • 4.5
    1 review
    band quality: 4.5, 1 review
    The silicone band feels soft and stretchy, with the 170 models adding nicer metal hardware and subtle two-tone styling.
  • 4.5
    1 review
    blood oxygen tracking: 4.5, 1 review
    Pulse Ox support is a meaningful upgrade over the previous entry-level generation and broadens overnight and wellness monitoring.
  • 4.5
    1 review
    charging speed: 4.5, 1 review
    A full recharge takes just over an hour, which helps offset the need to charge more often than the headline estimate suggests.
  • 4.5
    1 review
    running power support: 4.5, 1 review
    Wrist-based running power and dynamics bring advanced training data to a lower-priced watch without requiring an external sensor.
  • 4.5
    1 review
    sleep tracking accuracy: 4.5, 1 review
    Sleep duration, bedtime, and major sleep stages generally aligned with the Oura Ring in side-by-side use, showing meaningful improvement over older Garmin sleep tracking.
  • 4.5
    1 review
    stress tracking: 4.5, 1 review
    Stress data feeds into readiness and recovery guidance, helping the watch suggest when to push harder or back off.
  • 4.5
    1 review
    third-party app support: 4.5, 1 review
    Connect IQ adds downloadable apps and watch faces, while services such as WhatsApp, Spotify, and Deezer broaden everyday usefulness.
  • 4.5
    1 review
    watch face quality: 4.5, 1 review
    Customizable watch faces and clean data layouts make the screen attractive while keeping essential running information easy to scan.
  • 4.5
    1 review
    wellness insights: 4.5, 1 review
    Sleep, HRV, Body Battery, stress, and daily reports create a broad picture of recovery and energy rather than focusing only on workouts.

Cons

Sort
  • 2.0
    1 review
    LTE connectivity: 2.0, 1 review
    There is no built-in cellular connection. LiveTrack and location sharing therefore require carrying a paired phone.
  • 2.5
    2 reviews limited evidence
    body temperature tracking: 2.5, 2 reviews, limited evidence
    Skin-temperature tracking is missing because the watch does not use Garmin’s newer Gen 5 sensor. That feature remains reserved for pricier models.
  • 2.5
    2 reviews limited evidence
    ECG functionality: 2.5, 2 reviews, limited evidence
    ECG is not available on this model because it uses Garmin’s older Gen 4 sensor. Buyers who want on-demand ECG readings need a higher-end Garmin.
  • 2.5
    1 review
    charging convenience: 2.5, 1 review
    Garmin’s proprietary cable is less convenient than magnetic or wireless alternatives and can shift out of place on the watch.
  • 3.3
    2 reviews limited evidence
    companion app quality: 3.3, 2 reviews, limited evidence
    Garmin Connect syncs quickly and works well for logging and data review, but its design can feel cluttered and overdue for a redesign.
  • 3.3
    2 reviews limited evidence
    materials quality: 3.3, 2 reviews, limited evidence
    The polymer body keeps weight low and generally feels well assembled. The plastic back may irritate sensitive skin during continuous wear.
  • 3.4
    5 reviews low consensus
    mapping and navigation: 3.4, 5 reviews, low consensus
    Breadcrumb routes and synced courses are useful for planned runs, but full offline maps are missing. Trail, mountain, and ultra users may find this limitation significant.
  • 3.4
    7 reviews strong consensus
    battery life: 3.4, 7 reviews, strong consensus
    Battery life is adequate for several days of training, but real-world results often fall below Garmin’s 10-day claim. Always-on display, GPS, and music can cut endurance sharply, and the cheaper Forerunner 70 lasts longer.