If you want better ECG functionality
Choose Apple Watch Series 11. It scores 4.8 vs 2.5 for ECG functionality, with a 4.2 overall score.
Garmin Forerunner 170 Music Review
Bottom Line
Choose it for accurate training, excellent coaching, easy controls, and phone-free Spotify runs. Skip it if you need Apple Music, offline maps, maximum battery life, or the best pure-running value.
Best for
Best for regular runners training toward a 5K, half marathon, or marathon who want structured Garmin coaching, reliable tracking, and phone-free Spotify or Amazon Music.
Not for
Skip it if you depend on Apple Music, need full offline maps or multi-day endurance, prefer a larger case, or mainly want the lowest-cost route to Garmin’s training metrics.
Verdict
The Forerunner 170 Music brings Garmin’s strongest training software into a compact, comfortable watch with accurate GPS, responsive AMOLED controls, Garmin Pay, and useful offline audio. Its coaching, readiness, recovery, and activity tools make it a genuine step up for runners moving beyond basic pace and distance. The compromises are meaningful: real battery life can fall below the 10-day claim, Apple Music remains unsupported, full offline maps are absent, and the cheaper Forerunner 70 delivers nearly the same training experience with longer endurance. It is a compelling all-round running smartwatch, but the Music edition makes the most sense only when phone-free audio and payments are features you will regularly use.
Feature Scorecards
Summary
49 reviewed features-
Very positive 4.5-5.030 (61%)
-
Positive 3.5-4.411 (22%)
-
Neutral 2.5-3.47 (14%)
-
Negative 1.5-2.41 (2%)
Pros
-
Garmin Coach, adaptive plans, Daily Suggested Workouts, and Quick Workout provide unusually strong structure at this price. The tools work well for beginners building consistency and experienced runners training for races.
-
Training Readiness, Training Status, load, HRV, and recovery-time guidance are among the watch’s strongest features. The recommendations feel closely tied to recent sleep, stress, and training history.
-
More than 80 sport profiles cover running, cycling, swimming, strength work, winter sports, and many niche activities. The breadth is unusually strong for an entry-to-midrange Forerunner.
-
Five physical buttons are a major strength during runs, especially with sweaty hands or gloves. Nearly every function can be controlled without relying on touch.
-
The 1.2-inch AMOLED touchscreen is colorful, sharp, and attractive. It trails flagship Apple, Samsung, and premium Garmin panels in fluidity and peak brightness, but remains excellent for training.
-
GPS locks quickly and stayed reliable in real-world running, swimming, and city testing. Single-band GNSS is a technical limitation, but most testers saw little practical loss outside very difficult terrain.
-
Workout data remains easy to read in bright sunlight. Physical buttons also preserve usability when glare, sweat, or gloves make touch less convenient.
-
The AMOLED display is bright and vivid enough for outdoor runs. It is not Garmin’s brightest panel, but readability remained strong in sunshine.
-
The compact, lightweight case is easy to forget during runs, sleep, and daily wear. One report of skin irritation from the plastic back is the main caveat.
-
Swipes and taps register quickly without feeling overly sensitive. Touch works well for menus and music, while buttons remain available for workouts.
-
Garmin’s latest interface looks more polished, colorful, and modern while bringing sports and smartwatch tools into one place. It also positions the watch well for future updates.
-
Offline Spotify, Amazon Music, Deezer, and other supported services make phone-free running easy. Apple Music remains unsupported, and the Music edition’s premium may not suit runners who always carry a phone.
Cons
-
There is no built-in cellular connection. LiveTrack and location sharing therefore require carrying a paired phone.
-
Skin-temperature tracking is missing because the watch does not use Garmin’s newer Gen 5 sensor. That feature remains reserved for pricier models.
-
ECG is not available on this model because it uses Garmin’s older Gen 4 sensor. Buyers who want on-demand ECG readings need a higher-end Garmin.
-
Garmin’s proprietary cable is less convenient than magnetic or wireless alternatives and can shift out of place on the watch.
-
Garmin Connect syncs quickly and works well for logging and data review, but its design can feel cluttered and overdue for a redesign.
-
The polymer body keeps weight low and generally feels well assembled. The plastic back may irritate sensitive skin during continuous wear.
Compared With Category Average
Compared with other Smartwatches, this product is above average in contactless payments, music controls, cross-platform compatibility, near average in user interface, display quality, below average in battery life, charging convenience, materials quality.
Comparison summary
49 compared features-
Above average 0.4+ pts higher32 (65%)
-
Same as average within 0.3 pts12 (24%)
-
Below average 0.4+ pts lower5 (10%)
Largest category differences
| Attribute | This product | Category average | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| contactless payments | 4.2 | 2.7 | +1.5 |
| music controls | 5.0 | 3.5 | +1.5 |
| cross-platform compatibility | 5.0 | 3.6 | +1.4 |
| onboard music storage | 4.1 | 2.8 | +1.2 |
| third-party app support | 4.5 | 3.2 | +1.3 |
| menu navigation | 5.0 | 3.8 | +1.2 |
| blood oxygen tracking | 4.5 | 3.4 | +1.1 |
| recovery insights | 4.8 | 3.9 | +0.9 |
Consider This Instead
If you want better user interface
Choose Garmin Forerunner 70. It scores 4.8 vs 4.2 for user interface, with a 4.3 overall score.
If you want better contactless payments
Choose Apple Watch Ultra 2. It scores 5.0 vs 4.2 for contactless payments, with a 3.9 overall score.
If you want better battery life
Choose Garmin Forerunner 955. It scores 4.7 vs 3.4 for battery life, with a 4.1 overall score.
Compared in Reviews
Products reviewers directly compared with this model, grouped into quick takeaways.
- Older model: software features The 170 adds a more polished software experience and additional training features over the 165.
- Older model: training and recovery features The 170 adds several training, recovery, payment, and music features missing from the 165.
- More expensive: price and software feature parity The 170 Music originally undercuts the Forerunner 265 while matching most software features.
- Similar: urban GPS accuracy City and bridge testing found no meaningful GPS difference from the dual-band Forerunner 265.
- Compared: overall value The cheaper 70 is also considered a superb option and offers nearly the same core experience.
- Better: battery life The cheaper Forerunner 70 offers three additional days of rated battery life.
FAQ
Is the Forerunner 170 Music worth the extra cost?
It is most worthwhile for runners who will regularly use offline music and Garmin Pay. The cheaper Forerunner 70 offers nearly the same training tools and longer rated battery life.
Does it support Apple Music?
No. Offline playback supports services such as Spotify, Amazon Music, and Deezer, but Apple Music remains unavailable.
How accurate are the GPS and heart-rate sensors?
GPS was consistently quick and reliable, often comparing well with pricier dual-band watches. Heart rate is strong for running and indoor cycling, though an external strap is preferable for weight training or maximum precision.
Does it have offline maps?
No full offline maps are included. It supports synced courses and breadcrumb navigation, which is useful for planned routes but less capable for mountain, trail, and ultra use.
How long does the battery last in real use?
Garmin rates it for up to 10 days, but several testers saw less than a week or roughly three to four days with always-on display and frequent training. Music and GPS reduce endurance further.
Sample Expert Reviews We Analyzed
These are a few of the reviews included in our analysis.
Video Reviews
YouTube - SMARTWATCH SERIES
- Review score
- 3.9
YouTube - Chase the Summit
- Review score
- 4.4
Article Reviews
roadtrailrun.com
Article by Michael Ellenberger Garmin Forerunner 170 Music (Forerunner 170: $300, Forerunner 170 Music: $350) Pros Excellent AMOLED display...
mensfitness.co.uk
The Garmin Forerunner 170 Music can analyse your readiness, adapt training plans, help you recover, and soundtrack your fitness sessions.
- Review score
- 4.4
manofmany.com
The Garmin Forerunner 170 Music tested through a 14-week HYROX build and a 1:18 race in Sydney. Spotify offline, pacing tools and the honest...
runningmagazine.ca
These two watches reintroduce budget-friendly, high-quality options to the Garmin lineup
- Review score
- 4.7
womensrunning.co.uk
The Garmin Forerunner 170 Music combines advanced training features with everyday usability in a colourful, runner-friendly package.
- Review score
- 4.7
Top Smartwatches to Consider
Good if you want premium running features, long battery life, and maps for under $200. Skip it if you need flawless heart-rate data, multiband GPS, LTE, or richer app support.
Pros: pairing reliability, brightness
Cons: Wi-Fi connectivity, Bluetooth connectivity
Best for accurate running metrics, excellent coaching tools, a bright AMOLED display, and dependable battery life. Skip it if you need offline maps, music storage, contactless payments, multi-band GPS, or...
Pros: step counting accuracy, app ecosystem
Cons: Bluetooth connectivity, pairing reliability
Good if you want a compact, stylish Garmin with strong GPS, comfort, and week-plus battery life. Skip it if you need richer smartwatch apps, onboard music, bright always-on display, or...
Pros: health tracking accuracy, blood oxygen tracking
Cons: ECG functionality, onboard music storage
Best for luxury-watch styling, vivid TAG faces, solid build, and casual smartwatch use. Skip it if you need top fitness accuracy, call handling, LTE, or strong value.
Pros: contactless payments, pairing reliability
Cons: LTE connectivity, call handling