Best Smartwatches for body temperature tracking

#1

Body-temperature tracking received positive comparative feedback when one reviewer said it matched Oura Ring results.

#2

Body temperature tracking had limited positive evidence, with reviewers saying skin/body temperature readings were in line or accurate.

#3

Reviewers treated temperature tracking as a distinctive upgrade, useful for illness warnings, workout heat awareness, and recovery context, though some found its alerts or presentation limited.

#4

Body temperature tracking was viewed as useful enough for trends, with some reviewers finding the results accurate or aligned with comparison devices.

#5

Temperature tracking was viewed as medically useful by several reviewers, though one reviewer questioned its wrist accuracy and another found it irrelevant day to day.

#6

Body temperature tracking was treated as a nice-to-have rather than a major deciding feature.

#7

Temperature-related capability is valued for cycle tracking, but reviewers also note that Garmin reserves some skin-temperature features for more expensive models.

#8

Temperature tracking split reviewers: one praised working skin-temperature readings, another found object temperature checks wrong, and one noted cycle prediction limits.

#9

Skin-temperature tracking is missing because the watch does not use Garmin’s newer Gen 5 sensor. That feature remains reserved for pricier models.

#10

The missing temperature sensor limits advanced women’s health and overnight temperature insights. Buyers who need those features should consider the Forerunner 170 or a higher model.

#11

Body temperature tracking is effectively absent; the reviewer grouped the missing temperature sensor with features that would have been nice to have.

#12

Body temperature tracking was a missing feature and was called a consideration for users who specifically want it.

#13

Multiple reviewers treated the missing temperature sensor as a meaningful weakness for a female-focused wearable and period prediction.

#14

Body temperature tracking was treated as an absent advanced health metric rather than a supported feature.

#15

Body temperature tracking was criticized as missing, with one reviewer saying it would have been useful.