Hollow Knight: Silksong

Hollow Knight: Silksong Review

Brand: Xbox
Released: September 4, 2025
Updated: 1 week ago
4.3
Consolidated expert score
263
Review insights
62
Scored features
28
Expert reviews

Bottom Line

Choose Silksong for a gorgeous, demanding Metroidvania with superb movement, bosses, music, and secrets. Skip it when long runbacks, sparse checkpoints, resource grinding, or limited accessibility options would turn challenge into frustration.

Best for

Best for players who enjoy demanding Metroidvanias built around mastery, exploration, precision movement, and repeated boss attempts. Completionists also benefit from the dense map, optional endings, and many hidden routes.

Not for

Not for players who want generous checkpoints, broad accessibility options, low-stress exploration, or frequent material rewards after every challenge. Reviewers repeatedly warn that runbacks, currency loss, and early friction can sour the experience.

Verdict

Across the supplied reviews, Silksong emerges as an exceptionally crafted sequel whose strongest traits are movement, combat, exploration, art direction, music, and world-building. Reviewers repeatedly praise Hornet’s speed, the dense map, choreographed bosses, and the sense that Pharloom rewards curiosity. The tradeoff is that the same conviction also creates friction: sparse benches, runbacks, punishing two-mask damage, resource pressure, and some opaque progression can make the game feel cruel or exhausting. It is widely treated as a top-tier Metroidvania, but not a frictionless one; its best moments depend on a willingness to learn, retreat, experiment, and endure.

Compared in Reviews

Products reviewers directly compared with this model, grouped into quick takeaways.

Elden Ring

  • Compared: difficulty assists The reviewer compares Silksong's walling difficulty with Elden Ring's imperfect boss-easing tools.
  • Similar: problem-solving through exploration The reviewer says Silksong asks players to leave walls and explore, similar to Elden Ring.
  • Compared: punishment and difficulty The reviewer frames Silksong as less willing to relent than even Elden Ring.

Dark Souls 2

  • Compared: respawn-point placement The reviewer likens Silksong's sparse, inconvenient benches to Dark Souls 2-style respawn placement.
  • Compared: runbacks The reviewer compares Silksong's runback discourse to Dark Souls 2's notorious runbacks.

Animal Well

  • Compared: genre evolution and identity The reviewer says Silksong still feels distinctive despite wondering whether Animal Well had moved the genre forward.

Feature Scorecards

Summary

62 reviewed features
  • Very positive 4.5-5.0 65% 40 features
  • Positive 3.5-4.4 15% 9 features
  • Neutral 2.5-3.4 11% 7 features
  • Negative 1.5-2.4 10% 6 features
  • Very negative below 1.5 0% 0 features

Pros

  • 5.0
    based on 5 reviews
    environmental detail: 5.0, based on 5 reviews
    Environmental detail is repeatedly praised, from dense small touches to rooms and backgrounds that make Pharloom feel lived-in.
  • 5.0
    based on 4 reviews
    atmosphere: 5.0, based on 4 reviews
    Atmosphere is a major strength, described as surreal, haunting, dreadful, beautiful, and full of wonder and horror.
  • 5.0
    based on 3 reviews
    graphics quality: 5.0, based on 3 reviews
    Graphics quality is praised for a stunning hand-drawn world and a visual style that feels playful, dark, and richly realized.
  • 5.0
    based on 2 reviews
    core gameplay loop: 5.0, based on 2 reviews
    The core loop is praised as pure Metroidvania satisfaction: tough encounters, discovery, and rewarding progression through new areas.
  • 5.0
    based on 2 reviews
    sound design: 5.0, based on 2 reviews
    Sound design earns strong support from praise for surface-specific details and top-notch audio touches.
  • 5.0
    based on 2 reviews
    writing quality: 5.0, based on 2 reviews
    Writing quality receives strong praise where reviewers call it top-notch and tied to Hornet’s conversations and character insight.
  • 5.0
    based on 1 review
    animation quality: 5.0, based on 1 review
    Animation quality has limited but strong evidence, with reviewers noting gorgeous animation within the hand-drawn presentation.
  • 5.0
    based on 1 review
    endgame content: 5.0, based on 1 review
    Endgame content receives strong support from optional endings, zones, bosses, and post-credits discoveries.
  • 5.0
    based on 1 review
    frame rate stability: 5.0, based on 1 review
    Frame rate stability has limited but positive evidence from a Switch 2 review calling 120fps performance perfect.
  • 5.0
    based on 1 review
    immersion: 5.0, based on 1 review
    Immersion is strongly supported by one review’s comment about Pharloom lingering after play.
  • 5.0
    based on 1 review
    world interactivity: 5.0, based on 1 review
    World interactivity has limited but strong support from one review that praises evolving locations, reactive hubs, and organic backtracking.
  • 5.0
    based on 14 reviews
    art direction: 5.0, based on 14 reviews
    Art direction receives near-universal praise for hand-drawn beauty, color variety, style, and a distinctive visual identity.
  • 5.0
    based on 9 reviews
    soundtrack quality: 5.0, based on 9 reviews
    The soundtrack is one of the clearest strengths, repeatedly described as magnificent, excellent, world-class, and emotionally fitting.
  • 4.9
    based on 5 reviews
    world-building: 4.9, based on 5 reviews
    World-building is one of the strongest areas, with reviewers praising Pharloom as immaculate, complex, sad, and worth exploring.
  • 4.9
    based on 10 reviews
    value for money: 4.9, based on 10 reviews
    Value for money is exceptional across reviews, especially because of the low price, large content volume, and long completion potential.
  • 4.9
    based on 5 reviews
    protagonist appeal: 4.9, based on 5 reviews
    Hornet is consistently praised as an excellent, charismatic, well-rounded protagonist with stronger presence than the silent Knight.
  • 4.9
    based on 5 reviews
    level design: 4.9, based on 5 reviews
    Level design is strongly praised for seamless area flow, purposeful rooms, thoughtful platform placement, and dense Metroidvania structure.
  • 4.9
    based on 4 reviews
    lore depth: 4.9, based on 4 reviews
    Lore depth is praised for hidden mysteries, optional heritage threads, and deeper history that rewards curiosity.
  • 4.9
    based on 2 reviews
    controls responsiveness: 4.9, based on 2 reviews
    Control feel is strongly praised, with one review emphasizing complete control of Hornet and another calling the Switch 2 Pro Controller perfect.
  • 4.9
    based on 12 reviews
    movement feel: 4.9, based on 12 reviews
    Hornet’s movement is one of the clearest consensus wins, with reviewers praising her speed, agility, sprinting, and dance-like traversal.
  • 4.8
    based on 3 reviews
    performance optimization: 4.8, based on 3 reviews
    Performance is praised on lower-end hardware, Switch platforms, and 120fps contexts, with only minor visual caveats.
  • 4.8
    based on 1 review
    handheld play suitability: 4.8, based on 1 review
    Handheld suitability has positive evidence from Steam Deck performance and battery life comments.
  • 4.8
    based on 1 review
    polish: 4.8, based on 1 review
    Polish is praised through meticulous design and presentation, though only one scored review directly supports the attribute.
  • 4.7
    based on 5 reviews
    faithfulness to franchise: 4.7, based on 5 reviews
    Faithfulness to franchise is strongly supported by reviews saying it captures, continues, and improves on Hollow Knight while standing apart.
  • 4.7
    based on 3 reviews
    character development: 4.7, based on 3 reviews
    Character development is praised for Hornet softening through Pharloom and for character arcs that counterbalance the harsh world.
  • 4.7
    based on 3 reviews
    narrative quality: 4.7, based on 3 reviews
    Narrative quality is praised as more focused and engaging than the original, helped by Hornet’s voice and guided exploration.
  • 4.7
    based on 4 reviews
    emotional impact: 4.7, based on 4 reviews
    Emotional impact is strong, ranging from adrenaline and triumph to reviewers saying they shed tears or were moved by events.
  • 4.7
    based on 1 review
    originality: 4.7, based on 1 review
    Originality is praised where Silksong is seen as firmly on its own path rather than a simple copy.
  • 4.7
    based on 1 review
    side character depth: 4.7, based on 1 review
    Side character depth receives positive evidence from a review praising Pharloom’s supporting characters as charming and motivated.
  • 4.7
    based on 12 reviews
    combat system: 4.7, based on 12 reviews
    Combat is a major strength, described as fast, precise, tense, dance-like, and rewarding, though some reviews tie its highs to demanding difficulty.
  • 4.6
    based on 5 reviews
    fun factor: 4.6, based on 5 reviews
    Fun factor is high overall, with reviewers repeatedly saying they had great fun, wanted to return, or found the game compelling despite pain.
  • 4.6
    based on 3 reviews
    content variety: 4.6, based on 3 reviews
    Content variety is praised through multiple game-like challenge types, many systems, and plentiful options, while remaining tied to high difficulty.
  • 4.6
    based on 1 review
    horror tension: 4.6, based on 1 review
    Horror tension receives limited positive support from the dream/nightmare tone described in one review.
  • 4.6
    based on 1 review
    platform-specific feature support: 4.6, based on 1 review
    Platform-specific support has positive evidence from ultrawide support that improves immersion.
  • 4.5
    based on 12 reviews
    boss design: 4.5, based on 12 reviews
    Boss design is broadly praised as memorable, choreographed, varied, and exciting, though some reviews dislike spongey health pools, rewards, or runbacks.
  • 4.5
    based on 6 reviews
    replay value: 4.5, based on 6 reviews
    Replay value trends high for completionists and build experimenters, though one reviewer said they were glad to play it only once.
  • 4.5
    based on 1 review
    mission design: 4.5, based on 1 review
    Mission design earns positive evidence where missions give players reasons to revisit areas and make NPC discoveries feel more purposeful.
  • 4.5
    based on 1 review
    puzzle design: 4.5, based on 1 review
    Puzzle design receives limited but positive evidence, with one review saying Silksong makes puzzle-solving and hidden-path discovery feel effortless.
  • 4.5
    based on 1 review
    user interface design: 4.5, based on 1 review
    User interface design has limited positive evidence around attractive mission HUD illustrations and attention to detail.
  • 4.5
    based on 14 reviews
    exploration quality: 4.5, based on 14 reviews
    Exploration is a standout, with most reviewers praising dense secrets, rewarding routes, and curiosity-driven discovery, though a few disliked sparse rewards or risk pressure.
  • 4.3
    based on 1 review
    gameplay mechanics: 4.3, based on 1 review
    Review evidence frames the broader mechanics as more complex than the original, especially through Hornet’s expanded combat and movement options.
  • 4.3
    based on 6 reviews
    innovation: 4.3, based on 6 reviews
    Innovation is positive but measured: reviewers praise new directions and system changes, while one calls it evolutionary rather than revolutionary.
  • 4.3
    based on 10 reviews
    upgrade system: 4.3, based on 10 reviews
    Crests, tools, and upgrades are widely seen as flexible and creative, though a few reviews found early limitations or resource-linked tool use frustrating.
  • 4.3
    based on 2 reviews
    dialogue quality: 4.3, based on 2 reviews
    Dialogue is mixed-to-positive: one review calls it shockingly good, while another says it can feel dry at times.
  • 4.2
    based on 3 reviews
    progression system: 4.2, based on 3 reviews
    Progression is generally praised for fresh upgrades and satisfying forward motion, but one review criticizes opaque true-ending requirements.
  • 4.2
    based on 1 review
    fast travel convenience: 4.2, based on 1 review
    Fast travel is praised in one review for reducing backtracking tedium through well-marked routes.
  • 4.1
    based on 8 reviews
    map and navigation design: 4.1, based on 8 reviews
    Map and navigation design is mixed: several reviews praise map structure and direction, but others dislike incomplete map support and 100% cleanup.
  • 4.1
    based on 4 reviews
    enemy variety: 4.1, based on 4 reviews
    Enemy variety is strong in scope, but evidence is mixed because flying enemies, monster rooms, and certain mobs can feel annoying.
  • 3.8
    based on 22 reviews
    difficulty balance: 3.8, based on 22 reviews
    Difficulty is the most divisive attribute: many reviewers call it rewarding and intentional, while others find it cruel, too punishing, or unfairly frictional.

Cons

  • 3.4
    based on 6 reviews
    platforming precision: 3.4, based on 6 reviews
    Platforming precision is mixed: reviewers admire Hornet’s acrobatics, but several criticize the diagonal pogo or inconsistent bounce feel.
  • 3.3
    based on 3 reviews
    learning curve: 3.3, based on 3 reviews
    The learning curve is steep, with reviewers noting hours of mastery and occasional git-gud walls, but also rewarding skill growth.
  • 3.2
    based on 1 review
    pacing: 3.2, based on 1 review
    Pacing has a notable concern around long checkpoint placement that interrupts practice and repetition in challenging sequences.
  • 3.1
    based on 3 reviews
    quest design: 3.1, based on 3 reviews
    Quest design is split: some reviewers like wishes and missions as structure, while others criticize boring or grindy fetch quests.
  • 2.8
    based on 1 review
    onboarding experience: 2.8, based on 1 review
    Onboarding is a weak spot for some, especially in the opening hours where resources, checkpoints, and tutorial clarity are less generous.
  • 2.8
    based on 1 review
    tutorial quality: 2.8, based on 1 review
    Tutorial quality is criticized through comparison with Hollow Knight’s clearer early tutorial structure and more generous opening support.
  • 2.5
    based on 8 reviews
    economy and resource balance: 2.5, based on 8 reviews
    The rosary and shard economy is the most repeated systems complaint, often described as stingy, grindy, or slightly misbalanced.
  • 2.3
    based on 2 reviews
    camera behavior: 2.3, based on 2 reviews
    Camera and hitbox-adjacent behavior draws criticism where bosses or damage windows appear from off-screen or feel overly generous.
  • 2.2
    based on 7 reviews
    checkpoint system: 2.2, based on 7 reviews
    Checkpointing is a common concern, with long runbacks, sparse benches, paid benches, and poor placement repeatedly criticized.
  • 2.2
    based on 1 review
    crafting system: 2.2, based on 1 review
    Crafting has negative evidence where shard requirements pull the player away from action into repetitive resource hunting.
  • 2.2
    based on 1 review
    grind level: 2.2, based on 1 review
    Grind level is criticized where resource depletion and boss attempts can push players toward needless grinding.
  • 2.0
    based on 2 reviews
    accessibility options: 2.0, based on 2 reviews
    Accessibility is criticized as limited, with reviews noting the game is not trying to be accessible to everyone and lacks broader options.
  • 2.0
    based on 2 reviews
    loot system: 2.0, based on 2 reviews
    Loot and rewards are a weaker point, with reviewers complaining about bosses or difficult paths that provide little or disappointing material payoff.

Compared With Category Average

Compared with other Video Games, this product is above average in writing quality, endgame content, movement feel, below average in accessibility options, loot system, crafting system.

Summary

8 compared features
  • Above average 0.4+ pts higher 38% 3 features
  • Same as average within 0.3 pts 0% 0 features
  • Below average 0.4+ pts lower 63% 5 features
Attribute This product Category average Difference
accessibility options 2.0 4.1 -2.1
loot system 2.0 3.8 -1.8
crafting system 2.2 4.0 -1.8
checkpoint system 2.2 3.6 -1.4
writing quality 5.0 3.5 +1.5
endgame content 5.0 3.5 +1.5
movement feel 4.9 3.8 +1.0
onboarding experience 2.8 4.0 -1.2

FAQ

Is Hollow Knight: Silksong harder than Hollow Knight?

Most reviewers say it is harder or more punishing, especially early on. Several still argue the challenge is intentional and rewarding once players explore, learn patterns, and experiment with tools.

What do reviewers praise most?

The strongest praise goes to Hornet’s movement, combat, exploration, boss design, art direction, soundtrack, and world-building. Reviewers repeatedly describe Pharloom as beautiful, dense, and rewarding to uncover.

What are the most common complaints?

The recurring complaints are long runbacks, sparse or paid benches, heavy two-mask damage, stingy currency and shard balance, occasional grind, and limited accessibility options.

Does the sequel stand on its own?

Yes. Reviews say prior Hollow Knight knowledge enhances callbacks and context, but Hornet’s story and Pharloom’s world can be understood as their own adventure.

How is Hornet as a protagonist?

Reviewers are very positive on Hornet. They praise her speed, charisma, dialogue, and stronger narrative presence compared with the silent Knight.

Is there enough content after the first ending?

Yes. Reviewers mention optional endings, additional zones, bosses, secrets, and completion goals, though some criticize how opaque certain requirements can be.

Consider This Instead

If you want better accessibility options

Choose Cabernet. It scores 5.0 vs 2.0 for accessibility options, with a 3.9 overall score.

Compare

If you want better checkpoint system

Choose Saros. It scores 4.6 vs 2.2 for checkpoint system, with a 4.2 overall score.

Compare

Overall Top Video Games Alternatives

#1 Hades II
4.5
25 reviews

Good if you want fast, tactical roguelite combat with huge progression depth, striking art, and standout music. Skip it if repetition, resource micromanagement, or a less emotionally satisfying sequel story...

Pros: skill tree depth, dialogue quality

Cons: emotional impact, economy and resource balance

#2 Donkey Kong Bananza
4.4
30 reviews

Best for joyful destruction, dense exploration, and a charming DK-Pauline adventure. Skip it if camera quirks, frame-rate dips, easy bosses, or premium Switch 2 pricing are dealbreakers.

Pros: gameplay mechanics, world interactivity

Cons: economy and resource balance, enemy variety

#3 Death Stranding 2: On the Beach
4.3
30 reviews

Choose Death Stranding 2 if you want a gorgeous, stranger, more action-friendly delivery epic with powerful performances. Skip it if fetch quests, Kojima exposition, reduced tension, or easier traversal undercut...

Pros: animation quality, facial animations

Cons: quest design, AI behavior

#4 Dragon Quest I & II HD-2D Remake
4.3
30 reviews

Choose it if you want classic turn-based Dragon Quest modernized with richer stories, gorgeous HD-2D visuals, and helpful quality-of-life options. Skip it if random encounters, grinding, or occasional difficulty spikes...

Pros: visual effects quality, environmental detail

Cons: AI behavior, level design