It Takes Two

It Takes Two Review

Released: March 26, 2021
Updated: 1 hour ago
4.4
Consolidated expert score
261
Review insights
55
Scored features
21
Expert reviews

Bottom Line

Choose It Takes Two for joyful, inventive co-op with a partner, especially on couch. Skip it if divorce themes, uneven story tone, or Switch visual compromises would distract you.

Best for

Best for two players who want a communication-heavy co-op adventure with constant new mechanics, strong platforming, replayable minigames, and a couch-friendly feel.

Not for

Not for players wanting solo play, deep challenge, a universally loved story, or the best visual version on Switch.

Verdict

It Takes Two earns unusually broad praise as a co-op-first platformer because almost every review highlights its constant mechanical variety, responsive movement, generous checkpoints, and playful environments. The strongest evidence centers on how completely the game is built around two people communicating, experimenting, and solving problems together. Its tradeoff is narrative: several reviewers liked the heartfelt marriage-repair premise, but others found the tone shallow, cringy, or uncomfortable, especially around Dr. Hakim and May and Cody’s behavior. Switch coverage adds another tradeoff, praising performance and play options while noting rougher visuals. Overall, the review evidence points to a highly polished, joyful co-op game whose gameplay consensus is much stronger than its story consensus.

Compared in Reviews

Products reviewers directly compared with this model, grouped into quick takeaways.

A Way Out

  • Worse: gameplay The reviewer says It Takes Two even tops A Way Out's great gameplay.
  • Worse: gameplay depth The reviewer says A Way Out's gameplay suffered, while It Takes Two's gameplay is fleshed out.
  • Worse: overall quality The reviewer says the leap in quality from A Way Out to It Takes Two is incredible.

Diablo

  • Compared: genre-shifting gameplay style The reviewer compares one medieval section's gameplay style to Diablo.

God of War

  • Compared: recallable tool feel The reviewer compares Cody's recallable nails to the axe recall in God of War.

Feature Scorecards

Summary

55 reviewed features
  • Very positive 4.5-5.0 67% 37 features
  • Positive 3.5-4.4 18% 10 features
  • Neutral 2.5-3.4 11% 6 features
  • Negative 1.5-2.4 4% 2 features
  • Very negative below 1.5 0% 0 features

Pros

  • 5.0
    based on 12 reviews
    content variety: 5.0, based on 12 reviews
    Content variety is one of the strongest consensus points, with reviewers praising constant new mechanics, tools, genres, settings, and minigames.
  • 5.0
    based on 5 reviews
    movement feel: 5.0, based on 5 reviews
    Movement is repeatedly described as freeing, smooth, delightful, and enjoyable across jumping, dashing, and traversal.
  • 5.0
    based on 5 reviews
    sound design: 5.0, based on 5 reviews
    Sound design is repeatedly praised as outstanding, top-notch, rich, whimsical, and technically impressive.
  • 5.0
    based on 4 reviews
    checkpoint system: 5.0, based on 4 reviews
    Checkpointing is praised as extremely generous or instant, making experimentation and deaths less punishing.
  • 5.0
    based on 4 reviews
    frame rate stability: 5.0, based on 4 reviews
    Frame rate stability is praised across PC/console/Switch coverage, with reviewers noting steady or smooth performance.
  • 5.0
    based on 4 reviews
    innovation: 5.0, based on 4 reviews
    Innovation is strongly praised for its original, constantly changing co-op mechanics and creative approach.
  • 5.0
    based on 4 reviews
    multiplayer design: 5.0, based on 4 reviews
    Multiplayer design is praised as fully built around two players, with local, online, and cooperative structure central to the experience.
  • 5.0
    based on 4 reviews
    platforming precision: 5.0, based on 4 reviews
    Platforming precision receives strong praise, with reviewers calling it responsive, precise, and effortless.
  • 5.0
    based on 3 reviews
    couch co-op quality: 5.0, based on 3 reviews
    Couch co-op is repeatedly praised as a natural or superior way to experience the game.
  • 5.0
    based on 3 reviews
    polish: 5.0, based on 3 reviews
    Polish is praised through comments about thoughtful production, virtual glitch-free execution, and masterful construction.
  • 5.0
    based on 3 reviews
    puzzle design: 5.0, based on 3 reviews
    Puzzle design is praised for making both players collaborate, with tools and level setups creating satisfying shared problem solving.
  • 5.0
    based on 2 reviews
    animation quality: 5.0, based on 2 reviews
    Animation is praised for Pixar-like presentation, squash-and-stretch style, and strong mocap-style character work.
  • 5.0
    based on 2 reviews
    atmosphere: 5.0, based on 2 reviews
    Atmosphere is praised for wonder, warmth, and imaginative environmental mood.
  • 5.0
    based on 2 reviews
    environmental detail: 5.0, based on 2 reviews
    Environmental detail is praised in both character materials and intricate level spaces.
  • 5.0
    based on 2 reviews
    exploration quality: 5.0, based on 2 reviews
    Exploration is praised where reviewers emphasize that playful, interactive spaces reward looking around and traversing levels.
  • 5.0
    based on 2 reviews
    immersion: 5.0, based on 2 reviews
    Immersion is praised through absorbing environments and gameplay that reinforces the couple/co-op premise.
  • 5.0
    based on 2 reviews
    monetization fairness: 5.0, based on 2 reviews
    Monetization fairness is praised because Friend Pass/pro-consumer ownership rules let two people play without both buying full copies.
  • 5.0
    based on 2 reviews
    originality: 5.0, based on 2 reviews
    Originality is praised through reviewers calling the game rare and among the most creative co-op experiences they have played.
  • 5.0
    based on 1 review
    core gameplay loop: 5.0, based on 1 review
    The core loop is described as a well-crafted platforming foundation that supports the game's cooperative variety.
  • 5.0
    based on 1 review
    world-building: 5.0, based on 1 review
    World-building is praised for imagination and character shining through the whole adventure.
  • 5.0
    based on 21 reviews
    co-op experience: 5.0, based on 21 reviews
    Co-op experience is the clearest strength, with every review praising how essential, joyful, collaborative, or unusually strong the cooperative play feels.
  • 4.9
    based on 7 reviews
    level design: 4.9, based on 7 reviews
    Level design is consistently praised as creative, intricate, masterfully mapped out, and varied across imaginative environments.
  • 4.9
    based on 16 reviews
    fun factor: 4.9, based on 16 reviews
    Fun factor is exceptionally strong, with most reviewers calling it joyful, blast-like, highly enjoyable, or one of their most fun recent games.
  • 4.9
    based on 8 reviews
    world interactivity: 4.9, based on 8 reviews
    Interactive spaces are a major strength, with reviewers praising playful objects, rewarded curiosity, and dense environmental interactions.
  • 4.9
    based on 7 reviews
    value for money: 4.9, based on 7 reviews
    Value for money is praised due to long runtime, Friend Pass, replay value, sale pricing, and perceived worth.
  • 4.9
    based on 13 reviews
    gameplay mechanics: 4.9, based on 13 reviews
    Reviewers overwhelmingly praise the mechanics as simple to grasp yet constantly inventive, with several genres and toolsets executed well.
  • 4.8
    based on 6 reviews
    art direction: 4.8, based on 6 reviews
    Art direction is widely praised as remarkable, gorgeous, imaginative, and strong enough to survive Switch visual compromises.
  • 4.8
    based on 6 reviews
    voice acting: 4.8, based on 6 reviews
    Voice acting is strongly praised across reviews as fantastic, phenomenal, well acted, and top-tier.
  • 4.8
    based on 3 reviews
    onboarding experience: 4.8, based on 3 reviews
    The onboarding is praised for welcoming new or non-gamer partners without heavy-handed teaching.
  • 4.8
    based on 10 reviews
    controls responsiveness: 4.8, based on 10 reviews
    Controls are widely praised as responsive, tight, natural, and accessible, with only the Switch Joy-Con feel drawing a mild caveat.
  • 4.7
    based on 8 reviews
    soundtrack quality: 4.7, based on 8 reviews
    The soundtrack is usually praised as fitting, cinematic, and emotionally effective, though one reviewer found some music generic.
  • 4.7
    based on 3 reviews
    boss design: 4.7, based on 3 reviews
    Bosses are praised as fun, challenging, cinematic, and sometimes wonderful, with checkpoints supporting the tougher encounters.
  • 4.7
    based on 3 reviews
    learning curve: 4.7, based on 3 reviews
    The learning curve is viewed positively, especially for non-gamers, with gradual skill development and inclusive design.
  • 4.6
    based on 7 reviews
    emotional impact: 4.6, based on 7 reviews
    The emotional impact is often strong, especially around relationship reflection, ending moments, and co-op connection, though divorce sensitivity is a caveat.
  • 4.5
    based on 2 reviews
    side character depth: 4.5, based on 2 reviews
    Side characters are generally praised for providing laughs and inventive background flavor.
  • 4.5
    based on 2 reviews
    split-screen quality: 4.5, based on 2 reviews
    Split-screen quality is praised for companionship and smooth two-window play, especially despite Switch limitations.
  • 4.5
    based on 1 review
    camera behavior: 4.5, based on 1 review
    Camera behavior receives a positive note for keeping up with fast, dynamic action.
  • 4.4
    based on 6 reviews
    pacing: 4.4, based on 6 reviews
    Pacing is mostly praised as breakneck, fantastic, and expertly paced, though one reviewer felt the game overstayed its welcome and another noted one section ran long.
  • 4.3
    based on 2 reviews
    platform-specific feature support: 4.3, based on 2 reviews
    Platform-specific support on Switch is praised for multiple play options, though practical compromises remain.
  • 4.2
    based on 5 reviews
    graphics quality: 4.2, based on 5 reviews
    Graphics are praised on stronger hardware but notably compromised on Switch, where reviewers describe rough visuals and graphical tradeoffs.
  • 4.0
    based on 3 reviews
    competitive balance: 4.0, based on 3 reviews
    Competitive balance is mixed: core roles are praised as equal, but some minigames or character roles are described as one-sided.
  • 4.0
    based on 2 reviews
    handheld play suitability: 4.0, based on 2 reviews
    Handheld suitability is positive overall, with similar handheld and docked performance, though controller and visual compromises remain.
  • 4.0
    based on 1 review
    bug frequency: 4.0, based on 1 review
    Bug frequency appears low in the evidence, with one review reporting only minor graphical bugs plus one checkpoint-reset issue.
  • 4.0
    based on 1 review
    performance optimization: 4.0, based on 1 review
    Performance optimization is mostly positive in the cited review, with only occasional frame-rate dips in heavier scenes.
  • 3.9
    based on 7 reviews
    replay value: 3.9, based on 7 reviews
    Replay value is generally positive due to swapped characters and replayable minigames, though one reviewer personally had no desire to replay.
  • 3.8
    based on 2 reviews
    online stability: 3.8, based on 2 reviews
    Online stability is mostly positive but not perfect, with rare rubberbanding or server drops not erasing much progress.
  • 3.5
    based on 1 review
    server reliability: 3.5, based on 1 review
    Server reliability is mixed in the Switch evidence because online play was mostly solid but had a couple of server drops.

Cons

  • 3.4
    based on 12 reviews
    narrative quality: 3.4, based on 12 reviews
    Narrative quality is divisive: some reviewers found the relationship story moving or healthy, while others called it shallow, predictable, or poorly told.
  • 3.4
    based on 5 reviews
    writing quality: 3.4, based on 5 reviews
    Writing quality is split between praise for snappy, excellent writing and criticism that the tone is uneven or disappointing beside the gameplay.
  • 3.2
    based on 6 reviews
    difficulty balance: 3.2, based on 6 reviews
    Difficulty is mixed: several reviewers found it forgiving or not very challenging, while others noted frustration or a gradual, approachable curve.
  • 3.0
    based on 3 reviews
    age appropriateness: 3.0, based on 3 reviews
    Age appropriateness is mixed-to-cautious: reviewers note mature themes, marriage metaphors, and challenge that may not fit younger children.
  • 3.0
    based on 1 review
    family friendliness: 3.0, based on 1 review
    Family friendliness is limited by language and teen-rated content despite the otherwise loved cooperative experience.
  • 2.6
    based on 5 reviews
    protagonist appeal: 2.6, based on 5 reviews
    Protagonist appeal is polarized: some reviewers found Cody and May real or excellent, while others found them irritating, bitter, or unlikeable.
  • 2.4
    based on 7 reviews
    dialogue quality: 2.4, based on 7 reviews
    Dialogue quality is mixed, with some humorous or realistic dialogue but repeated criticism of Dr. Hakim as cringy or uncomfortable.
  • 2.0
    based on 2 reviews
    character development: 2.0, based on 2 reviews
    Character development draws criticism from two reviews that felt May and Cody's marital issues were not explored deeply enough.

Compared With Category Average

Compared with other Video Games, this product is above average in platforming precision, monetization fairness, camera behavior, below average in character development, protagonist appeal.

Summary

8 compared features
  • Above average 0.4+ pts higher 75% 6 features
  • Same as average within 0.3 pts 0% 0 features
  • Below average 0.4+ pts lower 25% 2 features
Attribute This product Category average Difference
character development 2.0 4.0 -2.0
platforming precision 5.0 3.1 +1.9
monetization fairness 5.0 3.2 +1.8
camera behavior 4.5 3.1 +1.4
checkpoint system 5.0 3.6 +1.4
protagonist appeal 2.6 3.9 -1.3
puzzle design 5.0 3.6 +1.4
learning curve 4.7 3.5 +1.2

FAQ

Can It Takes Two be played solo?

No. The review evidence consistently describes it as co-op-only and built around two human players working together.

Is it good for non-gamers?

Several reviewers say it works well for new or non-gamer partners because the controls are approachable, the learning curve is gradual, and the game teaches through play.

Is couch co-op better than online play?

Reviewers praise both, but couch co-op receives especially strong support as the more natural and enjoyable setup. Online play is still workable, with only rare stability caveats in the Switch evidence.

How strong is the story?

The story is the most divisive part. Some reviewers found it heartfelt and moving, while others criticized the tone, Dr. Hakim, and May and Cody’s characterization.

Is it appropriate for kids?

Not always. Reviewers note teen-rated language, mature divorce themes, and moments that may be too mature or challenging for younger children.

Does it have good replay value?

Yes for many players, thanks to character-swapping, replayable minigames, and Friend Pass value, though one reviewer personally found the co-op pressure too exhausting for a replay.

Sample Expert Reviews We Analyzed

These are a few of the reviews included in our analysis.

Video Reviews

Article Reviews

Consider This Instead

If you want better dialogue quality

Choose Hades II. It scores 5.0 vs 2.4 for dialogue quality, with a 4.5 overall score.

Compare

If you want better protagonist appeal

Choose Resident Evil Requiem. It scores 5.0 vs 2.6 for protagonist appeal, with a 4.4 overall score.

Compare

Overall Top Video Games Alternatives

#1 Hades II
4.5

Good if you want fast, tactical roguelite combat with huge progression depth, striking art, and standout music. Skip it if repetition, resource micromanagement, or a less emotionally satisfying sequel story...

Pros: skill tree depth, dialogue quality

Cons: emotional impact, economy and resource balance

#2 Donkey Kong Bananza
4.4

Best for joyful destruction, dense exploration, and a charming DK-Pauline adventure. Skip it if camera quirks, frame-rate dips, easy bosses, or premium Switch 2 pricing are dealbreakers.

Pros: gameplay mechanics, world interactivity

Cons: economy and resource balance, enemy variety

#3 Current product It Takes Two
It Takes Two
4.4

Best for joyful, inventive co-op with a partner, especially on couch. Skip it if divorce themes, uneven story tone, or Switch visual compromises would distract you.

Pros: core gameplay loop, movement feel

Cons: character development, dialogue quality

#4 Resident Evil Requiem
4.4

Best for tense Grace-led horror, slick Leon action, and lavish franchise callbacks. Skip it if you want a bolder reinvention, evenly mixed pacing, or substantial post-game modes.

Pros: driving mechanics, protagonist appeal

Cons: platform-specific feature support, checkpoint system