It Takes Two

It Takes Two Review

Released: March 26, 2021
Updated: 2 months ago
4.5
Overall review score
261
Review evidence points
55
Scored features
21
Expert reviews

Bottom Line

Choose It Takes Two for joyful, inventive co-op with a partner, especially on couch. Skip it if divorce themes, uneven story tone, or Switch visual compromises would distract you.

Best for

Best for two players who want a communication-heavy co-op adventure with constant new mechanics, strong platforming, replayable minigames, and a couch-friendly feel.

Not for

Not for players wanting solo play, deep challenge, a universally loved story, or the best visual version on Switch.

Verdict

It Takes Two earns unusually broad praise as a co-op-first platformer because almost every review highlights its constant mechanical variety, responsive movement, generous checkpoints, and playful environments. The strongest evidence centers on how completely the game is built around two people communicating, experimenting, and solving problems together. Its tradeoff is narrative: several reviewers liked the heartfelt marriage-repair premise, but others found the tone shallow, cringy, or uncomfortable, especially around Dr. Hakim and May and Cody’s behavior. Switch coverage adds another tradeoff, praising performance and play options while noting rougher visuals. Overall, the review evidence points to a highly polished, joyful co-op game whose gameplay consensus is much stronger than its story consensus.

Feature Scorecards

Summary

55 reviewed features
  • Very positive 4.5-5.0
    37 (67%)
  • Positive 3.5-4.4
    10 (18%)
  • Neutral 2.5-3.4
    6 (11%)
  • Negative 1.5-2.4
    2 (4%)

Pros

  • 5.0
    21 reviews strong consensus
    co-op experience: 5.0, 21 reviews, strong consensus
    Co-op experience is the clearest strength, with every review praising how essential, joyful, collaborative, or unusually strong the cooperative play feels.
  • 4.9
    16 reviews strong consensus
    fun factor: 4.9, 16 reviews, strong consensus
    Fun factor is exceptionally strong, with most reviewers calling it joyful, blast-like, highly enjoyable, or one of their most fun recent games.
  • 5.0
    12 reviews strong consensus
    content variety: 5.0, 12 reviews, strong consensus
    Content variety is one of the strongest consensus points, with reviewers praising constant new mechanics, tools, genres, settings, and minigames.
  • 4.8
    13 reviews strong consensus
    gameplay mechanics: 4.8, 13 reviews, strong consensus
    Reviewers overwhelmingly praise the mechanics as simple to grasp yet constantly inventive, with several genres and toolsets executed well.
  • 4.8
    10 reviews strong consensus
    controls responsiveness: 4.8, 10 reviews, strong consensus
    Controls are widely praised as responsive, tight, natural, and accessible, with only the Switch Joy-Con feel drawing a mild caveat.
  • 4.9
    8 reviews strong consensus
    world interactivity: 4.9, 8 reviews, strong consensus
    Interactive spaces are a major strength, with reviewers praising playful objects, rewarded curiosity, and dense environmental interactions.

Cons

  • 2.4
    7 reviews moderate consensus
    dialogue quality: 2.4, 7 reviews, moderate consensus
    Dialogue quality is mixed, with some humorous or realistic dialogue but repeated criticism of Dr. Hakim as cringy or uncomfortable.
  • 2.0
    2 reviews limited evidence
    character development: 2.0, 2 reviews, limited evidence
    Character development draws criticism from two reviews that felt May and Cody's marital issues were not explored deeply enough.
  • 2.6
    5 reviews low consensus
    protagonist appeal: 2.6, 5 reviews, low consensus
    Protagonist appeal is polarized: some reviewers found Cody and May real or excellent, while others found them irritating, bitter, or unlikeable.
  • 3.0
    3 reviews strong consensus
    age appropriateness: 3.0, 3 reviews, strong consensus
    Age appropriateness is mixed-to-cautious: reviewers note mature themes, marriage metaphors, and challenge that may not fit younger children.
  • 3.0
    1 review
    family friendliness: 3.0, 1 review
    Family friendliness is limited by language and teen-rated content despite the otherwise loved cooperative experience.
  • 3.2
    6 reviews strong consensus
    difficulty balance: 3.2, 6 reviews, strong consensus
    Difficulty is mixed: several reviewers found it forgiving or not very challenging, while others noted frustration or a gradual, approachable curve.

Compared With Category Average

Compared with other Video Games, this product is above average in platforming precision, monetization fairness, camera behavior, near average in narrative quality, emotional impact, below average in character development, protagonist appeal, dialogue quality.

Comparison summary

55 compared features
  • Above average 0.4+ pts higher
    40 (73%)
  • Same as average within 0.3 pts
    10 (18%)
  • Below average 0.4+ pts lower
    5 (9%)

Largest category differences

Attribute This product Category average Difference
platforming precision 5.0 3.1 +1.9
character development 2.0 3.9 -1.9
monetization fairness 5.0 3.2 +1.8
camera behavior 4.5 2.9 +1.6
puzzle design 5.0 3.6 +1.4
protagonist appeal 2.6 3.9 -1.3
co-op experience 5.0 4.1 +0.9
content variety 5.0 4.0 +1.0

Consider This Instead

If you want better graphics quality

Choose Split Fiction. It scores 4.6 vs 4.2 for graphics quality, with a 4.2 overall score.

Compare

If you want better protagonist appeal

Choose Goodnight Universe. It scores 4.9 vs 2.6 for protagonist appeal, with a 4.2 overall score.

Compare

If you want better character development

Choose Donkey Kong Bananza. It scores 4.9 vs 2.0 for character development, with a 4.5 overall score.

Compare

Compared in Reviews

Products reviewers directly compared with this model, grouped into quick takeaways.

A Way Out

  • Worse: gameplay The reviewer says It Takes Two even tops A Way Out's great gameplay.
  • Worse: gameplay depth The reviewer says A Way Out's gameplay suffered, while It Takes Two's gameplay is fleshed out.
  • Worse: overall quality The reviewer says the leap in quality from A Way Out to It Takes Two is incredible.

Diablo

  • Compared: genre-shifting gameplay style The reviewer compares one medieval section's gameplay style to Diablo.

God of War

  • Compared: recallable tool feel The reviewer compares Cody's recallable nails to the axe recall in God of War.

FAQ

Can It Takes Two be played solo?

No. The review evidence consistently describes it as co-op-only and built around two human players working together.

Is it good for non-gamers?

Several reviewers say it works well for new or non-gamer partners because the controls are approachable, the learning curve is gradual, and the game teaches through play.

Is couch co-op better than online play?

Reviewers praise both, but couch co-op receives especially strong support as the more natural and enjoyable setup. Online play is still workable, with only rare stability caveats in the Switch evidence.

How strong is the story?

The story is the most divisive part. Some reviewers found it heartfelt and moving, while others criticized the tone, Dr. Hakim, and May and Cody’s characterization.

Is it appropriate for kids?

Not always. Reviewers note teen-rated language, mature divorce themes, and moments that may be too mature or challenging for younger children.

Does it have good replay value?

Yes for many players, thanks to character-swapping, replayable minigames, and Friend Pass value, though one reviewer personally found the co-op pressure too exhausting for a replay.

Sample Expert Reviews We Analyzed

These are a few of the reviews included in our analysis.

Video Reviews

Article Reviews

Top Video Games to Consider

#1 Hades II
4.6

Good if you want fast, tactical roguelite combat with huge progression depth, striking art, and standout music. Skip it if repetition, resource micromanagement, or a less emotionally satisfying sequel story...

Pros: skill tree depth, dialogue quality

Cons: emotional impact, economy and resource balance

#2 Donkey Kong Bananza
4.5

Best for joyful destruction, dense exploration, and a charming DK-Pauline adventure. Skip it if camera quirks, frame-rate dips, easy bosses, or premium Switch 2 pricing are dealbreakers.

Pros: gameplay mechanics, world interactivity

Cons: economy and resource balance, enemy variety

#3 Clair Obscur: Expedition 33
4.5

Choose Clair Obscur if you want a story-rich RPG with thrilling timed combat, gorgeous art, and standout music. Skip it if poor maps, tight parry timing, or occasional bugs and...

Pros: monetization fairness, microtransaction impact

Cons: platforming precision, menu usability

#4 Trails in the Sky 1st Chapter
4.4

Best for a faithful, modern JRPG remake with rich world-building and strong combat. Skip it if slow-burn pacing, heavy dialogue, or localization rough edges will frustrate you.

Pros: protagonist appeal, art direction

Cons: camera behavior, tutorial quality