Shark Detect Pro Cordless Stick Vacuum

3.9

(12)

Bottom Line

Choose it for an ultralight, sensor-driven cordless that excels at quick hard-floor messes; Skip it if your home is mostly plush carpet or you need long sessions, since the small bin and short Boost runtime can frustrate.

Best for

Small to mid-size homes with mostly hard floors and frequent quick cleanups, especially if you value light handling and automatic suction and edge adjustments.

Not for

Homes with lots of high-pile carpet or heavy shedding pets who want consistent deep-clean performance and longer run time without frequent emptying.

Verdict

The Detect Pro’s strongest theme across reviews is effort-saving everyday cleaning: it’s notably light in hand, glides well on hard floors, and the Detect features meaningfully adjust suction and edge behavior so you do less mode switching. If you buy the Auto-Empty System, it further reduces dust exposure and day-to-day mess, which several testers loved. The tradeoff is that compact design limits capacity and endurance: the bin is small, Boost runs are brief, and deep carpet results vary more than on heavier, higher-suction sticks. For mixed-floor homes that prioritize convenience over maximum carpet muscle, it’s a smart pick.

Pros

Stair Cleaning 4.8 ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ 1 review 4.8

Stair cleaning is a standout when used in handheld mode with tools; at least one long-form test calls it one of the better stair experiences they have had.
Cordless convenience 4.7 ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ 1 review 4.7

Cordless convenience is a highlight: light, quick grab-and-go sessions are repeatedly emphasized, especially with a dock that keeps it charged.
Hard Floor — Fine Dust Pickup 4.7 ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ 3 reviews 4.7

Hard-floor fine dust pickup is repeatedly strong in both lab and anecdotal tests, with some reviewers saying floors look notably cleaner/polished afterward.
Hair Pickup — Carpets 4.6 ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ 2 reviews 4.6

Carpet hair pickup is often strong for typical pet hair, but some tests report clumping in the head and performance varies with hair length/thickness and carpet type.
Hard Floor — Large Debris Intake 4.6 ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ 2 reviews 4.6

Large debris handling on hard floors is a highlight; the floorhead gate and design are credited with swallowing cereal/dry food effectively, though bulky wrappers can be finicky.
Weight 4.5 ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ 5 reviews 4.5

Weight is a top strength; many reviewers emphasize how light it feels in hand, making it easier for stairs, quick cleans, and users who dislike heavy sticks.
Assembly and Setup 4.5 ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ 4 reviews 4.5

Setup is usually quick with a few main components clicking together; most reviewers describe it as straightforward and beginner-friendly.
Packaging quality 4.5 ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ 1 review 4.5

Packaging is praised in at least one review for recyclable materials and reduced plastic use.
Maneuverability & Handling 4.5 ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ 10 reviews 4.5
Pet-Ready Features 4.5 ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ 2 reviews 4.5

Pet-focused feedback is mixed: many find it effective for routine pet hair and upholstery with the pet tool, but lab tests flag hair clumping/wrap on carpets for some hair types.
AI, Smart & App / Automation 4.4 ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ 9 reviews 4.4

Auto-detect features (dirt/floor/edge/light detection) are a core differentiator and generally work as advertised, reducing manual mode switching; some reviewers note minor delays or occasional inaccuracies.
Floorhead design 4.4 ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ 1 review 4.4

The QuadClean floorhead design is often praised for balancing hard-floor pickup with carpet agitation, plus responsive swivel; a few note quirks like debris pooling when pulled backward.
Filtration / Dust Containment 4.3 ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ 7 reviews 4.3

Filtration is a major selling point in several reviews (sealed system/HEPA claims), but at least one reviewer questions whole-machine HEPA/long-term seal integrity; overall best for allergy-conscious users if you confirm your exact model spec.
Onboard tool storage 4.3 ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ 1 review 4.3

Some docks/stations include convenient attachment storage hooks, reducing the chance of losing the crevice/pet tool.
Price & Value 4.3 ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ 4 reviews 4.3

Value is commonly rated strong, especially on sale; pricing looks competitive versus premium cordless rivals, with the caveat that you may pay more for the auto-empty package.
Odor control 4.2 ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ 5 reviews 4.2

Odor neutralizer features (when included with a base) are widely liked for keeping stored dust from smelling and for leaving a light fresh scent.
Edge & Baseboard Cleaning (Hard Floors) 4.2 ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ 5 reviews 4.2

Edge performance is generally strong; sensor-based edge boost is praised and lab tests show good wall-line pickup, though technique matters and some heads leave a small center gap on the first pass.
Crevice / Groove Pickup (Hard Floors) 4.2 ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ 2 reviews 4.2

Crevice and groove pickup is generally good on hard floors; deeper crevices can still leave some fine debris depending on setup and pass count.
Debris illumination 4.1 ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ 1 review 4.1

Illumination and indicator feedback help make hidden dust more visible; some models also provide dirt-level color cues that guide where to focus.
Headlight & LED lights 4.0 ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ 5 reviews 4.0

Headlights are generally helpful for spotting debris, though effectiveness varies by placement/brightness and is typically less dramatic than laser-style illumination on some competitors.
Emptying & Mess Control 4.0 ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ 7 reviews 4.0

Auto-emptying (when included) is widely considered a major convenience and helps keep hands clean; manual bin-emptying can be messy on some versions, and very heavy debris loads may require a manual dump first.
Controls & UI 4.0 ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ 3 reviews 4.0

Controls are straightforward with simple mode buttons and basic battery indicators; some like the no-trigger design, others find two-handed on/off less convenient.
Under-Furniture Pickup 4.0 ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ 5 reviews 4.0

Under-furniture reach is decent because the head can get low and the unit is light; however, the grip/wand geometry and lack of a bending wand can limit the flattest reach versus rivals.
Storage footprint & upright-stand stability 3.9 ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ 3 reviews 3.9

The dock/base can be space-friendly compared to some self-emptying systems, but it still needs a dedicated spot and some versions cannot stand upright on their own.
Hair‑Wrap / Tangle Resistance 3.8 ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ 7 reviews 3.8

Anti-hair-wrap performance is inconsistent across sources: several tests praise near hair-free rollers, while others report long-hair wrap or pet-hair clumps that require manual removal.
Carpet — Low-Pile Pickup 3.7 ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ 3 reviews 3.7

Low-pile carpet performance ranges from good to below-average depending on tester; forward passes tend to be better than backward strokes.
Suction & Airflow 3.7 ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ 1 review 3.7

Most reviewers describe suction as strong for a lightweight stick, with auto-adjust helping efficiency; several note it is not the most powerful option for deep carpet work.
Maintenance requirements 3.7 ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ 2 reviews 3.7

Upkeep is mostly routine (filter cleaning/replacement and occasional brush/roller checks); some note fiddly hair removal or parts that may wear over time.

Cons

Battery & Charging 3.4 ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ 9 reviews 3.4

Battery life is described as fine for smaller homes and quick cleans, but shorter than top competitors in real use; charging can be slow and runtime drops sharply in Detect/Boost modes.
Accessories & Tools 3.3 ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ 6 reviews 3.3

Attachment bundles vary by retailer/region; some packages are sparse (often just a crevice tool), while others include a pet tool and additional accessories.
Tool-change simplicity 3.3 ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ 1 review 3.3

Tool and wand changes are generally simple, but a few reviewers found the wand connection a bit fiddly or alignment-sensitive when converting to handheld.
Runtime (Measured, Default) 3.3 ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ 4 reviews 3.3

Measured runtimes commonly land around 40 minutes on low/Eco (varies by region) and can be closer to ~20 minutes in Detect-style auto modes.
Build quality & durability 3.3 ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ 2 reviews 3.3

Build quality impressions vary: many call it solid for a lightweight plastic stick, but multiple reviews note cheap-feeling fastenings or flex at connection points.
Carpet — High-Pile Pickup 3.2 ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ 2 reviews 3.2

High-pile carpet pickup is the most contested area: some users report good results with the right mode, while lab tests show weaker deep-cleaning and performance drop as the bin fills.
Stuck resistance 3.2 ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ 1 review 3.2

A few users mention occasional head/shaft locking or stiffness in certain positions; not a dealbreaker, but it can interrupt flow until you adjust technique.
Noise level 3.1 ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ 5 reviews 3.1

Noise is frequently called out: the vacuum can get loud in Boost and when auto-ramping up; the auto-empty base can be startling but some docks offer a quiet/snooze option.
Bin & Bag 3.0 ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ 6 reviews 3.0

The dust cup is consistently described as small; that keeps weight down but can reduce performance on carpet when it fills and requires more frequent emptying unless paired with an auto-empty base.
Upholstery / Above-Floor Pickup 2.9 ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ 1 review 2.9

Above-floor results are acceptable for quick jobs, but limited tool selection in some bundles can make upholstery/detail cleaning feel constrained.
Airflow blowback 2.8 ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ 2 reviews 2.8

Several reviewers observed debris plowing/pooling or less-effective reverse strokes; technique (favoring forward passes) helps minimize scatter.
Runtime (Measured, Boost/Turbo) 2.7 ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ 4 reviews 2.7

Boost/Turbo runtime is short (often around 10–15 minutes), so it is best used in bursts for problem areas rather than full-house cleans.

FAQ

Is it good on carpet?

It can handle low-pile and some medium-pile carpets, but multiple tests and reviewers note weaker deep-cleaning on high-pile and less-effective backward strokes. If carpet is most of your home, consider a more powerful model.

Does it have HEPA filtration?

Several reviews describe sealed HEPA-style filtration, but at least one reviewer disputes whole-machine HEPA depending on region or model. If filtration is critical, confirm the exact model code and filtration spec before buying.

How long does the battery last in real use?

Many reports cluster around ~40 minutes on low/Eco, with significantly less in Detect/Auto and very short Boost runs. It works best as a quick-clean vacuum rather than a one-battery whole-house deep clean.

Is the auto-empty base worth it?

If you dislike emptying a small dust cup or have allergies, the dock is a major reason to choose this system. It reduces hands-on mess, but you will need space for the base.

How does it handle pet hair?

Results vary: some testers report excellent pickup with minimal wrap, while others saw clumping and long-hair wrap in the head, especially on carpet. Performance depends on hair type and carpet, so test early and keep the head clear if needed.