Shark Vertex Cordless Stick Vacuum

4.0
(9)

Bottom Line

Choose the Shark Vertex Cordless for strong mixed-floor pickup and pet-hair handling; Skip if you want a lightweight stick with a proper charging dock.

Best for

Homes with mixed floors (hardwood + rugs) and lots of pet hair that want strong pickup without paying Dyson-level prices, plus anyone who needs to reach under beds/sofas often.

Not for

Small-space users who prioritize a very light, nimble stick vac or want a tidy wall dock/charging holster; also not ideal if you frequently need pristine edge cleanup of fine grit on hard floors.

Verdict

Shark’s Vertex Cordless targets “upright-like” results in a stick format: strong suction, DuoClean/PowerFins agitation, and a sealed HEPA-style setup that multiple reviews found effective at containing dust. It performs best on mixed flooring, handles big debris and pet hair well, and the Multi-Flex wand plus fold-and-stand storage make quick cleanups easy. The tradeoff is feel: it’s heavier and bulkier than many stick vacs, can get loud at higher power, and several reviewers reported weaker edge or fine-grit pickup plus extra roller maintenance. Runtime varies a lot by mode and head use, so expect shorter carpet sessions than the headline hour. reviews

Pros

  • Cordless convenience 4.7 2 reviews 4.7
    Cordless use is repeatedly praised for quick, anywhere cleanup and for making whole-home spot cleaning easier than corded uprights.
  • Carpet — Medium-Pile Pickup 4.7 2 reviews 4.7
    On medium-pile carpet, reviews that measured pickup report very high removal rates, helped by the PowerFins’ agitation.
  • Under-Furniture Pickup 4.6 7 reviews 4.6
    Under-furniture reach is one of its signature wins: the Multi-Flex/bendable wand and low-angle cleaning make it easier to clean under beds and sofas without crouching.
  • Hair Pickup — Hard Floors 4.5 1 review 4.5
    Hair pickup on hard floors is typically strong and benefits from the soft roller and anti-tangle design, with most hair making it into the bin rather than wrapping heavily.
  • Filtration / Dust Containment 4.4 5 reviews 4.4
    Multiple reviewers describe a sealed system with HEPA-style filtration that helps contain fine dust/allergens better than leaky budget sticks, with testing that suggests minimal leakage.
  • Versatility 4.4 4 reviews 4.4
    Versatility is a recurring strength: it works across hard floors and carpets, supports handheld use, and includes tools for above-floor cleaning and tight spaces.
  • Floorhead Seal on Hard Floors 4.4 3 reviews 4.4
    Most reviews suggest the head seals well on hard floors, supporting strong pickup; however, a few note the rear wheels or head geometry can flick or push debris in certain situations.
  • Emptying & Mess Control 4.4 5 reviews 4.4
    Emptying is generally clean and quick via a ‘point-and-shoot’/clean-touch ejector, but some users note hair can cling inside and may need a quick pull-out.
  • Hard Floor — Large Debris Intake 4.4 5 reviews 4.4
    Large debris intake on hard floors is a highlight: several tests show it can swallow cereal/cheerios and similar messes cleanly, though a minority report occasional scatter from the back wheels.
  • Floorhead design 4.3 7 reviews 4.3
    The DuoClean floorhead (soft front roller + PowerFins/brush) is widely credited for strong multi-surface pickup, including large debris and pet hair, with a self-cleaning/anti-tangle approach.
  • Headlight & LED lights 4.3 3 reviews 4.3
    LED headlights on the floorhead are appreciated for spotting debris in dim areas and under furniture.
  • Hair‑Wrap / Tangle Resistance 4.3 7 reviews 4.3
    Hair-wrap resistance is a core strength: PowerFins plus combs reduce tangles substantially, though long strands can still collect on side wheels or require occasional cleanup.
  • Suction & Airflow 4.3 8 reviews 4.3
    Across reviews, suction is described as strong for a cordless stick, helped by the DuoClean/PowerFins head and a good floor seal; several tests show it can pick up embedded debris well without constant max mode.
  • Storage footprint & upright-stand stability 4.3 6 reviews 4.3
    A standout is its fold-and-stand storage: the wand bends/folds to reduce height and can stand on its own, though some reviewers miss a wall dock or mounting bracket.
  • Carpet — Low-Pile Pickup 4.2 5 reviews 4.2
    Low-pile carpet performance is consistently strong, especially for everyday debris and pet hair, with few complaints beyond occasional fine-debris limits.
  • Hair Pickup — Carpets 4.2 3 reviews 4.2
    On carpets, pet and human hair pickup is widely praised, including in comparative tests where most hair made it into the bin in a pass or two.
  • Runtime (Measured, Default) 4.2 6 reviews 4.2
    Measured runtime varies by mode and head use: reviewers cite roughly ~35–40 minutes on hard floors and ~20–25 minutes on carpet with the main head, while non-powered tools can approach or exceed an hour.
  • Carpet — High-Pile Pickup 4.2 5 reviews 4.2
    High-pile and deeper carpet cleaning is generally good for a stick vacuum, aided by agitation, but some reviews note fine grit or deep-fiber dust can still lag behind top premium models.
  • Self-propel feature 4.2 1 review 4.2
    Several reviews describe a noticeable self-propel/drive-forward feel that reduces push effort on hard floors and low-pile carpet.
  • Convertible handheld design 4.2 4 reviews 4.2
    It converts to handheld mode quickly for cars, stairs, and spot jobs, but some reviewers find the handheld form longer/heavier than the most compact competitors.
  • Hard Floor — Fine Dust Pickup 4.1 6 reviews 4.1
    Fine dust pickup on hard floors is reported as good in controlled tests (coffee grounds/flour), but a few real-home users experienced ‘pushing’ gritty dust, especially near edges, so technique and surface matter.
  • Ease of use 4.1 5 reviews 4.1
    Ease of use is generally rated high for everyday cleaning thanks to simple mode switching, quick conversions, and easy emptying—offset by bulk, corded charging (no dock), and a few fiddly fit/finish quirks.
  • Onboard tool storage 4.1 1 review 4.1
    Some versions include clips or onboard storage solutions for small tools, but many users still end up storing accessories separately due to the lack of a full dock.
  • Tool-change simplicity 4.1 1 review 4.1
    Attachments and the handheld conversion generally click on/off easily with simple release buttons, making swaps quick during a clean.
  • Overall opinion 4.0 4 reviews 4.0
    Overall impressions range from ‘best for most people’ and strong test scores to more lukewarm takes that it isn’t a ‘Dyson killer,’ landing as a capable but compromise-filled stick vac.
  • Accessories & Tools 4.0 7 reviews 4.0
    Most packages include core tools like a crevice tool, dusting/combination brush, and a pet tool; some versions add an under‑appliance wand or storage clip, but the exact bundle varies by model.
  • Price & Value 4.0 7 reviews 4.0
    Value is commonly framed as a strong-performance alternative to pricier Dyson models, though at typical sale prices it competes with older Dysons and higher-tier Shark variants.
  • Battery & Charging 4.0 6 reviews 4.0
    Charging is via a plug-in charger (often into the vacuum/battery) rather than an auto-docking holster; the battery is removable and spares can extend runtime, but full recharges are often cited around ~4 hours.
  • Bin & Bag 4.0 4 reviews 4.0
    It’s bagless with a removable bin; reviewers disagree on exact capacity by variant, but it’s generally noted as larger than many sticks yet smaller than full uprights.
  • Maintenance requirements 3.9 4 reviews 3.9
    Maintenance is typical for a DuoClean head: washable filters and easy-access rollers, but the soft roller and bin can collect hair/dust that needs periodic manual cleanup.
  • Upholstery / Above-Floor Pickup 3.9 2 reviews 3.9
    With the right tools, above-floor pickup for upholstery and cars is generally effective, though some users note the unit’s size/weight makes long handheld sessions tiring.
  • Comparative performance 3.9 3 reviews 3.9
    Comparisons generally position it as strong on pickup and runtime versus older/entry Dyson sticks and many midrange rivals, but with tradeoffs in weight, refinement, and edge/fine-grit performance.
  • Crevice / Groove Pickup (Hard Floors) 3.9 2 reviews 3.9
    Crevice/groove pickup (like floor cracks) is decent but not class-leading; testing suggests it often needs repeated passes compared with the very best hard-floor specialist heads.
  • Support & Reliability 3.8 3 reviews 3.8
    Reliability sentiment is mixed-positive: some call it dependable and highlight a longer warranty, while others caution that service/parts availability and repairs may be less convenient than premium brands.
  • Maneuverability & Handling 3.7 5 reviews 3.7
    Handling is a mix of ‘maneuverable’ and ‘bulky’: the head and drive feel help on open floors, but the ~9 lb weight and wider head can feel clumsy in tight rooms.
  • Clogging & debris prevention 3.5 1 review 3.5
    Clogs aren’t a constant theme, but fibrous or bulky debris can lodge in the wand/head; reviews emphasize it’s easy to open up and clear when it happens.

Cons

  • Noise level 3.4 5 reviews 3.4
    Noise is frequently called out: acceptable on lower settings but noticeably loud on carpet or max power, making it less ideal for late-night apartment use.
  • Ongoing ownership costs (bags, filters, batteries) 3.4 1 review 3.4
    Ongoing costs are moderate: filters are washable but replacement parts (especially spare batteries) may be easier to source directly from Shark than through broad third-party listings.
  • Controls & UI 3.3 5 reviews 3.3
    Controls are mostly straightforward (floor/carpet modes and battery indicator), but several reviews note the lack of a detailed display and that max boost may require holding a lever/trigger.
  • Edge & Baseboard Cleaning (Hard Floors) 3.2 2 reviews 3.2
    Edge and baseboard cleaning is one of the more debated areas: some tests show good results with multiple passes, while others report it pushes fine grit along edges and needs follow-up.
  • Runtime (Measured, Boost/Turbo) 3.1 2 reviews 3.1
    Boost/max power is available but often requires holding a lever/trigger; in max, some tests show runtimes dropping into the ~10–16 minute range.
  • Aesthetic design & finish 2.8 1 review 2.8
    Design and finish are often described as more utilitarian and less premium-looking than Dyson, prioritizing function over aesthetics.
  • Weight 2.7 4 reviews 2.7
    Weight is frequently mentioned as a downside at roughly ~9 lb in stick form (with noticeable handle weight), though handheld mode is much lighter.

FAQ

How long does the battery really last?

Reviews report big swings by mode: around an hour with non-powered tools, but closer to ~35–37 minutes on hard floors and ~20–25 minutes on carpet with the main head, with much shorter runtimes at max power.

Is it good for pet hair and long hair?

Most reviews say the DuoClean PowerFins and anti-hair-wrap combs do a strong job resisting tangles and picking up pet hair, though some hair can still collect in corners/side wheels and needs occasional cleanup.

Does it work well on hard floors and fine dust?

It’s generally strong on hard floors and larger debris, but a few reviewers found very fine, gritty messes and edge lines can be inconsistent, sometimes requiring extra passes or follow-up.

Does it come with a dock or wall mount?

Several reviews note it charges via a plug-in cord rather than a docking station, and some packages don’t include a wall-mounting bracket—so storage is often handled by its fold-and-stand mode or by using shelf/closet space.

Is it heavy?

Many reviewers describe it as heavier than some competing stick vacuums (around 9 lb as a full stick), though it’s much lighter when used as a handheld unit.

Reviews we analyzed

Video Reviews

Article Reviews