-
4.7
based on 7 reviews
Filtration / Dust Containment: 4.7, based on 7 reviews
Filtration is consistently a standout: multiple test reviews emphasize sealed, HEPA-style filtration and strong containment, including smoke-test style demonstrations. Allergy-focused users frequently cite cleaner air and less dust blowback compared to alternatives.
-
4.7
based on 4 reviews
Versatility: 4.7, based on 4 reviews
Versatility is a major strength: reviews repeatedly emphasize moving between upright cleaning, lift-away pod use, and wand/attachment work for stairs, upholstery, ceilings, and under-furniture cleaning. The tradeoff is that full versatility sometimes requires carrying the pod and managing cord and hose together.
-
4.7
based on 10 reviews
Convertible handheld design: 4.7, based on 10 reviews
Powered Lift-Away is repeatedly cited as the core differentiator: it enables cleaning under beds and furniture while keeping the powered head active, and it improves stair cleaning compared to standard uprights. The main downside is that the detached pod can feel heavy to carry during extended above-floor sessions.
-
4.7
based on 10 reviews
Suction and Airflow: 4.7, based on 10 reviews
Across reviews and test-style videos, the NV752 is repeatedly described as very high suction with strong airflow (often measured in the low-to-mid 20 kPa range). A recurring theme is that suction can feel almost too strong on small rugs and some attachment use-cases.
-
4.6
based on 2 reviews
Assembly and Setup: 4.6, based on 2 reviews
Assembly is widely described as fast and straightforward, with parts clicking into place cleanly. Unboxing-style reviews often highlight that setup can be done in minutes without special tools.
-
4.6
based on 6 reviews
Under-Furniture Pickup: 4.6, based on 6 reviews
Under-furniture pickup is repeatedly praised as a core benefit of the Powered Lift-Away design, enabling flatter reach under beds and many couches without losing powered-head performance. A few users still report limitations under very low-clearance furniture, but overall sentiment is strongly positive.
-
4.6
based on 3 reviews
Hair Pickup — Carpets: 4.6, based on 3 reviews
Carpet hair pickup is one of the strongest consensus positives, with multiple reviews describing major hair recovery even after other vacuums were used. This is frequently highlighted by multi-pet households and deep-clean comparisons against older machines.
-
4.6
based on 5 reviews
Headlight and LED lights: 4.6, based on 5 reviews
LED lighting is one of the most consistently praised features, with reviewers highlighting bright lights on the floorhead and, in many configurations, on the wand/handle for attachment use. Lights are frequently credited with revealing dirt that would otherwise be missed.
-
4.5
based on 5 reviews
Carpet — Medium-Pile Pickup: 4.5, based on 5 reviews
Medium-pile carpet performance is consistently strong in both subjective impressions and structured pickup tests, with many reviewers describing visibly revived carpets. Some note that the unit may require multiple passes for very heavy debris loads, but overall effectiveness remains a key selling point.
-
4.5
based on 3 reviews
Stair Cleaning: 4.5, based on 3 reviews
Stair cleaning is frequently called out as easier than typical uprights because Lift-Away lets users bring suction and tools to the stairs without moving the full base. The main limitation is the weight of the pod during longer stair sessions.
-
4.5
based on 1 review
Automatic shutoff for obstructions: 4.5, based on 1 review
Several reviews describe protective shutoff behavior or clear warning indicators when the brush stops or a clog occurs, helping prevent belt damage or overheating. Users who encounter clogs often resolve them by clearing hair/string from the brush roll and obstructions from internal pathways.
-
4.5
based on 8 reviews
Accessories and Tools: 4.5, based on 8 reviews
Most reviews highlight a strong accessory bundle (crevice, upholstery tools, dusting variants, and often hard-floor and pet tools), plus the option of a caddy on some kits. Complaints focus on missing or downgraded accessories in some packages, limited included brushes, and frustration sourcing compatible add-ons.
-
4.5
based on 4 reviews
Emptying and Mess Control: 4.5, based on 4 reviews
Emptying is commonly described as quick and cleaner than many competitors, often via a bottom-drop mechanism and an additional top access point on some designs. While a few mention breakage or lid issues, the dominant theme is easy, low-mess dumping and less hair sticking inside.
-
4.5
based on 4 reviews
Price and Value: 4.5, based on 4 reviews
Value is commonly rated high: many compare it favorably to more expensive Dysons, citing similar cleaning results at a lower price. Detractors argue that missing accessories, short hose/cord, and hair-wrap maintenance reduce the value proposition for their specific homes.
-
4.5
based on 3 reviews
Carpet — Low-Pile Pickup: 4.5, based on 3 reviews
Low-pile carpet pickup is consistently strong, with many reviewers describing one-pass improvement and deep debris recovery compared to prior vacuums. The main drawback in low-pile settings is that strong suction can make backward pulls feel like a workout for some users.
-
4.5
based on 3 reviews
Comparative performance: 4.5, based on 3 reviews
Comparisons commonly position the NV752 as competitive with pricier Dyson uprights on carpet while offering more configuration flexibility. In head-to-head pet-hair testing, some competitors outperform it on anti-tangle and certain upholstery tool behavior, while the Shark often wins on filtration and hard-floor behavior versus kickback-prone designs.
-
4.4
based on 2 reviews
Self-propel feature: 4.4, based on 2 reviews
The self-propelled or drive-assist feel is widely mentioned as making carpet cleaning faster and easier. Some users love it, while others find it overly aggressive, describing the vacuum as pulling forward or being difficult to control in tight spaces.
-
4.4
based on 1 review
Crevice / Groove Pickup (Hard Floors): 4.4, based on 1 review
The crevice tool and wand setup are repeatedly cited as effective for corners, baseboard gaps, vents, and furniture seams. Lighted wand configurations (when included) are viewed as especially helpful for seeing debris in tight crevices.
-
4.4
based on 1 review
Suitability for heavy-duty use: 4.4, based on 1 review
Multiple reviews (including professional cleaners and heavy pet households) describe it as a capable workhorse for deep cleaning and high hair load. The main heavy-duty downsides are frequent bin emptying in extreme pet homes and brush-roll hair maintenance.
-
4.4
based on 5 reviews
Controls and UI: 4.4, based on 5 reviews
Controls on the handle and a three-surface selector are frequently praised as convenient and intuitive. The most common control-related complaints are the lack of fine-grained suction/height adjustment and, in a few cases, a power button that feels finicky or hard to press.
-
4.3
based on 8 reviews
Pet-Ready Features: 4.3, based on 8 reviews
Most reviewers frame the NV752 as a strong pet-home upright thanks to deep carpet cleaning, a pet-focused tool set, and sealed filtration. The main drawbacks for pet owners are brush-roll hair wrap on long hair and mixed performance from some air-powered pet tools depending on the included version.
-
4.3
based on 3 reviews
Carpet — High-Pile Pickup: 4.3, based on 3 reviews
High-pile carpet performance is generally rated strong when using the high-pile/area-rug setting, and many reviewers highlight effective pet hair removal. Some also report the lack of height adjustment and strong suction can cause rug grabbing, carpet seam lift, or long-term wear on certain rugs.
-
4.3
based on 2 reviews
Tool-change simplicity: 4.3, based on 2 reviews
Tool swaps and mode changes are generally described as button-driven and quick, with the wand and pod detaching cleanly. A minority of users find handling awkward when they must carry the pod while using attachments, which can reduce the perceived simplicity.
-
4.3
based on 2 reviews
Aesthetic design and finish: 4.3, based on 2 reviews
Design feedback is generally positive, with some reviewers calling the finish modern and attractive. A few owners describe the look as dated or purely utilitarian, but aesthetics rarely impact overall satisfaction compared to performance factors.
-
4.2
based on 5 reviews
Dried-On Stain Removal: 4.2, based on 5 reviews
Swivel steering and cornering are frequently praised, especially on carpet, and many users describe a smooth glide. The most common handling negatives are top-heaviness, wrist/back strain for some users, and a tendency to tip when pulling on the hose during above-floor cleaning.
-
4.2
based on 4 reviews
Ease of use: 4.2, based on 4 reviews
Ease of use is generally rated high for standard upright floor cleaning due to swivel steering, strong pickup, and quick controls. Usability drops for some in lift-away and wand modes because of pod weight, tipping risk, and managing cord plus hose together.
-
4.2
based on 5 reviews
Bin and Bag: 4.2, based on 5 reviews
The bagless dust cup is described as convenient, but capacity is debated: some call it large for longer sessions, while others say usable volume feels smaller than expected (especially in heavy pet homes). Many agree the shape helps collect a lot quickly, which can mean frequent emptying when tackling deep-clean jobs.
-
4.1
based on 5 reviews
Maintenance requirements: 4.1, based on 5 reviews
Routine maintenance is generally considered manageable, with washable filters and accessible components emphasized in multiple reviews. The biggest maintenance pain point is brush-roll hair removal, which can range from occasional to frequent depending on hair length and pet load.
-
4.1
based on 8 reviews
Hard Floor — Fine Dust Pickup: 4.1, based on 8 reviews
Fine dust pickup on hard floors is often reported as good, with sand and powder-like debris generally handled well in tests. Some owners with grouted tile or tricky surfaces report needing multiple passes, indicating results can depend on floor texture and the chosen mode/tool.
-
4.1
based on 2 reviews
Floorhead design: 4.1, based on 2 reviews
The floorhead is widely viewed as strong on carpets and supported by helpful indicators and lighting in some reviews, but its low front lip and aggressive suction can create issues on hard floors and with large debris. A recurring complaint is the lack of true height adjustment, which can contribute to rug grabbing and, in some homes, wear on certain area rugs.
-
4.0
based on 2 reviews
Edge and Baseboard Cleaning (Hard Floors): 4.0, based on 2 reviews
Edge and baseboard cleaning is generally rated positively, with several reviewers noting it can run tight to baseboards. A few mention side-to-side asymmetry where one side cleans edges more effectively than the other, sometimes requiring extra passes.
-
4.0
based on 2 reviews
Noise level: 4.0, based on 2 reviews
Noise impressions skew positive for an upright: several reviews call it quieter than some competing uprights and certain Dyson models. It is still commonly acknowledged as not truly quiet, especially under high-suction carpet modes.
-
3.9
based on 5 reviews
Build quality and durability: 3.9, based on 5 reviews
Build quality sentiment is mixed: many describe solid plastics and secure connections (sometimes noting a metal wand), while others cite flimsy-feeling latches, hose cracking over time, or dust-cup component breakage. Overall impressions range from sturdy workhorse to cost-optimized in specific parts.
-
3.9
based on 2 reviews
Support and Reliability: 3.9, based on 2 reviews
Support experiences vary widely. Some reviewers report helpful troubleshooting and reasonable parts discounts, while others describe warranty gaps (especially around brush-head components) and a frustrating parts/coverage process.
-
3.9
based on 3 reviews
Cord length: 3.9, based on 3 reviews
Cord length is commonly described as usable but not class-leading, with some citing 30 ft and others noting newer units closer to 25 ft. Many owners explicitly wish for an extra 2 to 5 ft to reduce outlet switching.
-
3.9
based on 7 reviews
Hard Floor — Large Debris Intake: 3.9, based on 7 reviews
Large debris intake on hard floors is the most polarized performance area: some reviewers report no snowplowing and easy pickup of cereal and crumbs, while others (including a pro review) say it can push larger particles unless the dedicated hard-floor tool is used. Expect best results when using the correct attachment and surface setting.
-
3.8
based on 3 reviews
Upholstery / Above-Floor Pickup: 3.8, based on 3 reviews
Above-floor cleaning is often praised when using the wand and upholstery tools, especially for couches, pet beds, and car interiors. Performance varies by included pet tool version: motorized tools are usually applauded, while air-powered tools sometimes stall or collect hair on their rollers.
-
3.8
based on 1 review
Overall durability/longevity: 3.8, based on 1 review
Longevity reports are mixed: many owners claim multi-year service (often 5 to 10+ years) and repeat purchases, while others report earlier failures such as hose splitting, dust cup/lid breakage, or brush-motor issues. Overall durability seems highly dependent on usage intensity and hair load.
-
3.6
based on 1 review
Packaging quality: 3.6, based on 1 review
Packaging is usually described as adequate to good, especially when double-boxed, but there are notable complaints about missing parts in used or open-box purchases. When fully complete, kits often include bags or caddies that help keep accessories organized.