If you want better Existing hardware reuse
Choose eufy Video Smart Lock E330. It scores 4.5 vs 2.8 for Existing hardware reuse, with a 4.4 overall score.
Tapo Smart Door Lock DL110 Review
Bottom Line
Choose the Tapo DL110 if you want fast fingerprint entry, strong app control, long battery life, and premium features under a lower price. Skip it if your door/strike alignment is imperfect or you need deeper rental-platform automation.
Best for
Best for homeowners who want fast fingerprint entry, remote app control, access logs, guest codes, and a built-in doorbell without paying premium-lock prices.
Not for
Not ideal for doors with poor strike alignment or for commercial/rental operators who need deeper property-management automation and automatic temporary-code workflows.
Verdict
The Tapo DL110 earns strong reviewer support for delivering premium smart-lock conveniences at a budget-friendly price. Across the reviews, the fingerprint reader is repeatedly described as fast and accurate, the battery as long-lasting and easy to recharge, and the app as practical for codes, logs, notifications, and remote control. Its Grade 2 security claims, weather-ready build, hidden key backup, and built-in doorbell add to the value story. The main tradeoff is fit sensitivity: one hands-on review found the lock unusually finicky when the strike plate was not perfectly aligned, causing repeated auto-lock cycles. It also lacks deeper property-management automation, so the strongest fit is a homeowner who wants reliable daily convenience rather than advanced rental integration.
Feature Scorecards
Summary
34 reviewed features-
Very positive 4.5-5.017 (50%)
-
Positive 3.5-4.414 (41%)
-
Neutral 2.5-3.43 (9%)
Pros
-
Value was one of the strongest consensus points: reviewers repeatedly called the DL110 unusually feature-rich for its price.
-
Unlocking speed was a major strength, with reviewers describing near-instant fingerprint or app response.
-
Fingerprint recognition was one of the clearest strengths, repeatedly described as fast, accurate, easy to enroll, and nearly instant.
-
Battery life was strongly praised for its large rechargeable pack and long expected runtime, with one review also noting 100% after weeks of use.
-
Build quality was consistently praised as substantial, sturdy, and durable, with reviewers calling it built to last or quality-feeling.
-
Physical security drew strong praise from reviewers citing Grade 2/BHMA positioning and stronger resistance than many lower-grade locks.
-
Access logs were repeatedly praised for showing what happened, who used the lock, and when, often in a clear or categorized format.
-
Notifications were praised as quick, instant, configurable, and useful for lock activity, doorbell presses, and suspicious activity.
-
Remote access was a practical highlight, letting reviewers unlock or lock from another location or from a vehicle when someone needed entry.
-
Industrial design was praised for its sleek matte look, hidden backup entry, and ability to blend into a door rather than looking overly techy.
-
Voice control was shown working well and was viewed positively, especially with required PIN/security steps for unlocking.
-
Weather resistance was viewed positively, with reviewers citing stronger element protection and confidence around rain, snow, and outdoor placement.
-
Security feature praise centered on scramble PINs and biometric app verification; reviewers did not evaluate encryption specifically.
-
The matte finish earned praise for resisting fingerprints and keeping the exterior cleaner after repeated touch use.
-
The motor was praised as quieter and more refined than many smart locks, reducing the clunky feel some reviewers dislike.
-
Failed-attempt lockout had limited but positive evidence, with one reviewer describing automatic lockdown plus notification after suspicious attempts.
-
A locksmith reviewer praised the SC1/Schlage-style keyway because it could be pinned to an existing house key without trouble.
-
The app was consistently praised as intuitive, useful, and easy to follow for setup, control, users, logs, and settings.
-
Guest access was a strong feature for families, cleaners, technicians, and visitors, although the PCWorld review noted limits for commercial rental automation.
-
Most reviewers found setup quick and DIY-friendly, often around 5-20 minutes, but one reviewer found the DL110 unusually finicky when strike alignment was imperfect.
-
User management was praised for configurable people, fingerprints, PINs, schedules, and control over who can enter.
-
Bluetooth was valued as a useful fallback when Wi-Fi drops or is unavailable, preserving local app control.
-
The keypad was generally well-liked for fast response, code entry convenience, visibility, and anti-shoulder-surfing features.
-
Backup key access was treated as a reassuring fallback, especially when paired with the hidden keyhole and other emergency power options.
-
Overall reliability was strong across testing, though one reviewer’s alignment-related auto-lock issue kept it short of flawless.
-
Wi-Fi received positive but narrower evidence, with reviewers praising reliable connectivity and useful power-saving scheduling.
-
Tamper-related alerts were treated as useful extra protection, with reviewers praising suspicious-activity alerts and the tamper alarm concept.
-
Auto-lock was widely praised as convenient and configurable, but the PCWorld review found it could repeatedly cycle when calibration was off.
-
The built-in doorbell was generally praised as useful, integrated, loud enough, and a reason the lock feels more like a two-in-one device.
-
Smart-home integration was mostly positive for Alexa, Google, and SmartThings setup, though one reviewer wanted deeper automation.
-
Jam detection had limited but positive evidence, with one reviewer confirming the app produced a notification for a door-jam event.
Cons
-
Touch/wake behavior was the one weak touchscreen-related point: one reviewer wished the lock lit up automatically instead of needing an initial touch.
-
Door fit drew mixed evidence: the lock uses common deadbolt hardware, yet reviewers warned that door restrictions and strike/frame tolerances can matter.
-
Existing strike reuse was a weakness in one hands-on review because the tester had to adjust the strike plate before the lock behaved correctly.
Compared With Category Average
Compared with other Smart Locks, this product is above average in Keyway quality, Battery, Bluetooth, near average in Camera and doorbell performance, Physical attack resistance, below average in Existing hardware reuse, Touchscreen, Door compatibility (deadbolt fit).
Summary
33 compared features-
Above average 0.4+ pts higher16 (48%)
-
Same as average within 0.3 pts14 (42%)
-
Below average 0.4+ pts lower3 (9%)
Largest category differences
| Attribute | This product | Category average | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Keyway quality | 4.5 | 3.1 | +1.4 |
| Battery | 4.6 | 3.7 | +0.9 |
| Bluetooth | 4.4 | 3.4 | +1.0 |
| Value and Price | 4.8 | 3.8 | +0.9 |
| Fingerprint | 4.7 | 3.8 | +0.9 |
| Existing hardware reuse | 2.8 | 3.8 | -1.0 |
| Auto-relock after failed attempts | 4.5 | 3.6 | +0.9 |
| Smart-home integration (Alexa, Google, Siri, HomeKit, Matter, Thread) | 4.3 | 3.6 | +0.7 |
Consider This Instead
If you want better Door compatibility (deadbolt fit)
Choose Aqara UWB Smart Lock U400. It scores 4.3 vs 3.2 for Door compatibility (deadbolt fit), with a 4.4 overall score.
If you want better Touchscreen
Choose Wyze Auto-Lock Bolt v2 Smart Lock. It scores 4.3 vs 3.4 for Touchscreen, with a 4.4 overall score.
If you want better User access management
Choose ULTRALOQ Bolt Fingerprint Smart Lock. It scores 4.8 vs 4.4 for User access management, with a 4.2 overall score.
Compared in Reviews
Products reviewers directly compared with this model, grouped into quick takeaways.
DL100
- Worse: locking motor refinement The DL110's motor was described as lower-toned and more refined than the DL100's.
- Worse: battery capacity and rechargeability The DL110's rechargeable battery was described as a big improvement over the DL100's smaller internal pack.
TCL D2 Pro
- Better: touchless biometric unlocking The DL110's fingerprint reader was praised, but the TCL D2 Pro's palm-vein technology was described as more impressive.
FAQ
Is the fingerprint reader reliable?
Reviewers repeatedly praised it as fast and accurate, with one reporting no misreads and another saying a second attempt almost always worked when the first failed.
How good is the battery life?
Battery feedback was strongly positive. Reviewers highlighted the large rechargeable pack, expected year-long use, USB-C charging, and one tester still saw 100% after weeks of use.
Is installation easy?
Most reviewers found installation quick and straightforward. The main caution is that one professional review found the lock unusually sensitive to strike-plate and door-frame alignment.
Can it be controlled remotely?
Yes. Reviewers used app-based remote locking and unlocking, and several praised the convenience of letting someone in without walking to the door.
Does it support guest access?
Yes. Reviewers praised one-time codes, scheduled codes, user profiles, and family access controls, but one review said it lacks deeper third-party rental-management automation.
How useful is the built-in doorbell?
Reviewers generally liked the integrated doorbell, calling it cool or useful, and one noted that at full volume it gets pretty loud.
Sample Expert Reviews We Analyzed
These are a few of the reviews included in our analysis.
Video Reviews
YouTube - Youtube
- Review score
- 4.3
YouTube - Youtube
- Review score
- 4.5
YouTube - Youtube
- Review score
- 4.6
Article Reviews
Top Smart Locks to Consider
Choose the Aqara U400 if you want hands-free UWB unlocking, strong Apple Home integration, and many backup entry methods. Skip it if you dislike bulky smart-lock hardware or need a...
Pros: Locking reliability, Lock/unlock speed
Cons: Bluetooth, Physical attack resistance
Choose the Wyze Lock Bolt v2 for low-cost Wi-Fi, fast fingerprint entry, and flexible codes. Skip it if you need Matter/HomeKit support, rechargeable batteries, or stronger door-sense behavior.
Pros: Lock/unlock speed, Keypad
Cons: Door-sense, Battery
Good if you want one polished lock, camera, and doorbell with excellent fingerprint access. Skip it if short battery life, screen/storm doors, or a narrow camera view would frustrate you.
Pros: Lock/unlock speed, Security features (encryption)
Cons: Door-sense, Keyway quality
Choose the Schlage Encode if you want a sturdy, hub-free Wi-Fi deadbolt with strong codes, logs, and remote access. Skip it if you need geofencing, HomeKit/IFTTT, quiet motor noise, or...
Pros: Bluetooth, Hub requirement
Cons: Door-sense, Fingerprint