Tapo Smart Door Lock DL110

Tapo Smart Door Lock DL110 Review

Brand: Tapo
Released: September 12, 2024
Updated: 3 weeks ago
4.4
Consolidated expert score
158
Review insights
34
Scored features
12
Expert reviews

Bottom Line

Choose the Tapo DL110 if you want fast fingerprint entry, strong app control, long battery life, and premium features under a lower price. Skip it if your door/strike alignment is imperfect or you need deeper rental-platform automation.

Best for

Best for homeowners who want fast fingerprint entry, remote app control, access logs, guest codes, and a built-in doorbell without paying premium-lock prices.

Not for

Not ideal for doors with poor strike alignment or for commercial/rental operators who need deeper property-management automation and automatic temporary-code workflows.

Verdict

The Tapo DL110 earns strong reviewer support for delivering premium smart-lock conveniences at a budget-friendly price. Across the reviews, the fingerprint reader is repeatedly described as fast and accurate, the battery as long-lasting and easy to recharge, and the app as practical for codes, logs, notifications, and remote control. Its Grade 2 security claims, weather-ready build, hidden key backup, and built-in doorbell add to the value story. The main tradeoff is fit sensitivity: one hands-on review found the lock unusually finicky when the strike plate was not perfectly aligned, causing repeated auto-lock cycles. It also lacks deeper property-management automation, so the strongest fit is a homeowner who wants reliable daily convenience rather than advanced rental integration.

Compared in Reviews

Products reviewers directly compared with this model, grouped into quick takeaways.

DL100

  • Worse: locking motor refinement The DL110's motor was described as lower-toned and more refined than the DL100's.
  • Worse: battery capacity and rechargeability The DL110's rechargeable battery was described as a big improvement over the DL100's smaller internal pack.

TCL D2 Pro

  • Better: touchless biometric unlocking The DL110's fingerprint reader was praised, but the TCL D2 Pro's palm-vein technology was described as more impressive.

Feature Scorecards

Summary

34 reviewed features
  • Very positive 4.5-5.0 50% 17 features
  • Positive 3.5-4.4 41% 14 features
  • Neutral 2.5-3.4 9% 3 features
  • Negative 1.5-2.4 0% 0 features
  • Very negative below 1.5 0% 0 features

Pros

  • 4.8
    based on 8 reviews
    Value and Price: 4.8, based on 8 reviews
    Value was one of the strongest consensus points: reviewers repeatedly called the DL110 unusually feature-rich for its price.
  • 4.8
    based on 2 reviews
    Lock/unlock speed: 4.8, based on 2 reviews
    Unlocking speed was a major strength, with reviewers describing near-instant fingerprint or app response.
  • 4.7
    based on 8 reviews
    Fingerprint: 4.7, based on 8 reviews
    Fingerprint recognition was one of the clearest strengths, repeatedly described as fast, accurate, easy to enroll, and nearly instant.
  • 4.6
    based on 9 reviews
    Battery: 4.6, based on 9 reviews
    Battery life was strongly praised for its large rechargeable pack and long expected runtime, with one review also noting 100% after weeks of use.
  • 4.6
    based on 5 reviews
    Build quality and durability: 4.6, based on 5 reviews
    Build quality was consistently praised as substantial, sturdy, and durable, with reviewers calling it built to last or quality-feeling.
  • 4.6
    based on 4 reviews
    Physical attack resistance: 4.6, based on 4 reviews
    Physical security drew strong praise from reviewers citing Grade 2/BHMA positioning and stronger resistance than many lower-grade locks.
  • 4.5
    based on 5 reviews
    Remote access: 4.5, based on 5 reviews
    Remote access was a practical highlight, letting reviewers unlock or lock from another location or from a vehicle when someone needed entry.
  • 4.5
    based on 3 reviews
    Security features (encryption): 4.5, based on 3 reviews
    Security feature praise centered on scramble PINs and biometric app verification; reviewers did not evaluate encryption specifically.
  • 4.5
    based on 2 reviews
    Finish durability: 4.5, based on 2 reviews
    The matte finish earned praise for resisting fingerprints and keeping the exterior cleaner after repeated touch use.
  • 4.5
    based on 2 reviews
    Locking motor: 4.5, based on 2 reviews
    The motor was praised as quieter and more refined than many smart locks, reducing the clunky feel some reviewers dislike.
  • 4.5
    based on 1 review
    Auto-relock after failed attempts: 4.5, based on 1 review
    Failed-attempt lockout had limited but positive evidence, with one reviewer describing automatic lockdown plus notification after suspicious attempts.
  • 4.5
    based on 1 review
    Keyway quality: 4.5, based on 1 review
    A locksmith reviewer praised the SC1/Schlage-style keyway because it could be pinned to an existing house key without trouble.
  • 4.5
    based on 7 reviews
    Notifications: 4.5, based on 7 reviews
    Notifications were praised as quick, instant, configurable, and useful for lock activity, doorbell presses, and suspicious activity.
  • 4.5
    based on 7 reviews
    Access logs: 4.5, based on 7 reviews
    Access logs were repeatedly praised for showing what happened, who used the lock, and when, often in a clear or categorized format.
  • 4.5
    based on 4 reviews
    Industrial design: 4.5, based on 4 reviews
    Industrial design was praised for its sleek matte look, hidden backup entry, and ability to blend into a door rather than looking overly techy.
  • 4.5
    based on 4 reviews
    Voice control: 4.5, based on 4 reviews
    Voice control was shown working well and was viewed positively, especially with required PIN/security steps for unlocking.
  • 4.5
    based on 4 reviews
    Weather resistance: 4.5, based on 4 reviews
    Weather resistance was viewed positively, with reviewers citing stronger element protection and confidence around rain, snow, and outdoor placement.
  • App
    4.4
    based on 10 reviews
    App: 4.4, based on 10 reviews
    The app was consistently praised as intuitive, useful, and easy to follow for setup, control, users, logs, and settings.
  • 4.4
    based on 10 reviews
    Guest Codes and Access: 4.4, based on 10 reviews
    Guest access was a strong feature for families, cleaners, technicians, and visitors, although the PCWorld review noted limits for commercial rental automation.
  • 4.4
    based on 6 reviews
    User access management: 4.4, based on 6 reviews
    User management was praised for configurable people, fingerprints, PINs, schedules, and control over who can enter.
  • 4.4
    based on 4 reviews
    Bluetooth: 4.4, based on 4 reviews
    Bluetooth was valued as a useful fallback when Wi-Fi drops or is unavailable, preserving local app control.
  • 4.4
    based on 3 reviews
    Locking reliability: 4.4, based on 3 reviews
    Overall reliability was strong across testing, though one reviewer’s alignment-related auto-lock issue kept it short of flawless.
  • 4.4
    based on 4 reviews
    Keypad: 4.4, based on 4 reviews
    The keypad was generally well-liked for fast response, code entry convenience, visibility, and anti-shoulder-surfing features.
  • 4.4
    based on 10 reviews
    Installation and Setup: 4.4, based on 10 reviews
    Most reviewers found setup quick and DIY-friendly, often around 5-20 minutes, but one reviewer found the DL110 unusually finicky when strike alignment was imperfect.
  • 4.4
    based on 3 reviews
    Key override reliability: 4.4, based on 3 reviews
    Backup key access was treated as a reassuring fallback, especially when paired with the hidden keyhole and other emergency power options.
  • 4.4
    based on 3 reviews
    Wi-Fi: 4.4, based on 3 reviews
    Wi-Fi received positive but narrower evidence, with reviewers praising reliable connectivity and useful power-saving scheduling.
  • 4.4
    based on 2 reviews
    Tamper detection sensitivity: 4.4, based on 2 reviews
    Tamper-related alerts were treated as useful extra protection, with reviewers praising suspicious-activity alerts and the tamper alarm concept.
  • 4.3
    based on 6 reviews
    Smart-home integration (Alexa, Google, Siri, HomeKit, Matter, Thread): 4.3, based on 6 reviews
    Smart-home integration was mostly positive for Alexa, Google, and SmartThings setup, though one reviewer wanted deeper automation.
  • 4.3
    based on 8 reviews
    Camera and doorbell performance: 4.3, based on 8 reviews
    The built-in doorbell was generally praised as useful, integrated, loud enough, and a reason the lock feels more like a two-in-one device.
  • 4.3
    based on 8 reviews
    Auto-lock: 4.3, based on 8 reviews
    Auto-lock was widely praised as convenient and configurable, but the PCWorld review found it could repeatedly cycle when calibration was off.
  • 4.2
    based on 1 review
    Jam detection: 4.2, based on 1 review
    Jam detection had limited but positive evidence, with one reviewer confirming the app produced a notification for a door-jam event.

Cons

  • 3.4
    based on 1 review
    Touchscreen: 3.4, based on 1 review
    Touch/wake behavior was the one weak touchscreen-related point: one reviewer wished the lock lit up automatically instead of needing an initial touch.
  • 3.2
    based on 2 reviews
    Door compatibility (deadbolt fit): 3.2, based on 2 reviews
    Door fit drew mixed evidence: the lock uses common deadbolt hardware, yet reviewers warned that door restrictions and strike/frame tolerances can matter.
  • 2.8
    based on 1 review
    Existing hardware reuse: 2.8, based on 1 review
    Existing strike reuse was a weakness in one hands-on review because the tester had to adjust the strike plate before the lock behaved correctly.

Compared With Category Average

Compared with other Smart Locks, this product is above average in Keyway quality, Battery, Bluetooth, below average in Existing hardware reuse.

Summary

8 compared features
  • Above average 0.4+ pts higher 88% 7 features
  • Same as average within 0.3 pts 0% 0 features
  • Below average 0.4+ pts lower 13% 1 feature
Attribute This product Category average Difference
Keyway quality 4.5 3.1 +1.4
Battery 4.6 3.7 +1.0
Bluetooth 4.4 3.4 +1.0
Value and Price 4.8 3.9 +0.9
Existing hardware reuse 2.8 3.8 -1.0
Fingerprint 4.7 3.9 +0.8
Jam detection 4.2 3.3 +1.0
Auto-relock after failed attempts 4.5 3.6 +0.9

FAQ

Is the fingerprint reader reliable?

Reviewers repeatedly praised it as fast and accurate, with one reporting no misreads and another saying a second attempt almost always worked when the first failed.

How good is the battery life?

Battery feedback was strongly positive. Reviewers highlighted the large rechargeable pack, expected year-long use, USB-C charging, and one tester still saw 100% after weeks of use.

Is installation easy?

Most reviewers found installation quick and straightforward. The main caution is that one professional review found the lock unusually sensitive to strike-plate and door-frame alignment.

Can it be controlled remotely?

Yes. Reviewers used app-based remote locking and unlocking, and several praised the convenience of letting someone in without walking to the door.

Does it support guest access?

Yes. Reviewers praised one-time codes, scheduled codes, user profiles, and family access controls, but one review said it lacks deeper third-party rental-management automation.

How useful is the built-in doorbell?

Reviewers generally liked the integrated doorbell, calling it cool or useful, and one noted that at full volume it gets pretty loud.

Sample Expert Reviews We Analyzed

These are a few of the reviews included in our analysis.

Video Reviews

Article Reviews

Consider This Instead

If you want better Existing hardware reuse

Choose SwitchBot Lock Ultra. It scores 4.5 vs 2.8 for Existing hardware reuse, with a 4.0 overall score.

Compare

Overall Top Smart Locks Alternatives

#1 Current product Tapo Smart Door Lock DL110
Tapo Smart Door Lock DL110
4.4

Choose the Tapo DL110 if you want fast fingerprint entry, strong app control, long battery life, and premium features under a lower price. Skip it if your door/strike alignment is...

Pros: Value and Price, Lock/unlock speed

Cons: Existing hardware reuse, Door compatibility (deadbolt fit)

#2 Lockin Veno Pro Smart Deadbolt Lock
4.3

Choose the Lockin Veno Pro if you want touchless palm unlocking, local video storage, and one device for lock plus doorbell. Skip it if you need polished Matter features, discreet...

Pros: Lock/unlock speed, Wi-Fi

Cons: Feature additions via updates, Warranty and support

#3 Wyze Auto-Lock Bolt v2 Smart Lock
4.3

Choose the Wyze Lock Bolt v2 for low-cost Wi-Fi, fast fingerprint entry, and flexible codes. Skip it if you need Matter/HomeKit support, rechargeable batteries, or stronger door-sense behavior.

Pros: Lock/unlock speed, Keypad

Cons: Door-sense, Battery

#4 myQ Secure View 3-in-1 Smart Lock
4.3

Choose it if you want a fast, camera-equipped smart lock with strong biometric options and myQ ecosystem control. Skip it if open smart-home integrations, subscription-free advanced alerts, or a basic...

Pros: Lock/unlock speed, Locking motor

Cons: Smart-home integration (Alexa, Google