Low-pile carpet performance is reported as either excellent in structured pickup tests with the right floor tool or limited to surface-level cleaning in other hands-on use, suggesting variability by nozzle/technique.
Low-pile carpet pickup is repeatedly reported as excellent, including strong results on mixed debris and good deep-clean outcomes when Auto or higher power is used.
Low-pile carpet tests and hands-on reviews show very high pickup, including ground-in debris, making it one of the V8’s standout surfaces. Performance is commonly described as close to corded-level for typical home messes.
Low-pile carpet pickup is excellent in both testing and real-world use, with strong embedded-dirt results. Reviewers often describe the cleaning as smooth and effective.
In low-pile carpet tests, pickup rates were very high overall, with only minor dips tied to bulky debris that could clog the intake near the end of a run.
On low-pile carpet, test results and reviewer feedback indicate strong pickup and good deep-cleaning ability for a cordless stick vacuum. Performance is generally framed as premium-tier, though some comparisons suggest the standard-width Gen5 Detect can be slightly more effective per pass.
Low-pile carpet pickup is consistently reported as excellent (often mid-to-high 90% removal in objective tests), with the main caveat being that very light debris can be pushed or blown aside in certain situations until you make an extra pass or adjust head airflow/gates.
Low-pile carpet pickup is repeatedly rated excellent, with testing and comparisons showing strong debris removal without needing a corded vacuum for everyday messes.
Low-pile carpet pickup is consistently strong, including embedded debris and hair, with some tests nearing ‘perfect’ results. It’s widely considered a dependable performer on common low/short carpet.
On low-pile carpet, most reviews report excellent pickup, including strong results on fine and medium debris. A few tests note small particles like sugar can remain without extra attention, but overall low-pile performance is a key strength.
Low-pile carpet performance is consistently a strength, with lab testing and demos describing very strong pickup and effective use of the motorized head.
Low-pile carpet tests are consistently excellent, with reviewers reporting near-complete pickup in a single pass. Auto mode and strong agitation help it pull embedded grit without needing repeated passes.
Low-pile carpet pickup is repeatedly reported as very strong with the powered head, including lab-style and real-home comments about faster cleaning and lifted pile.
Low-pile carpet cleaning is often described as strong, including flour pickup tests that leave little to no visible residue. Still, a few reviewers caution that real-world carpet performance doesn’t always match the impressive suction specification.
Low‑pile carpet performance is generally strong, but at least one review notes fine powder can be harder to fully remove from tightly bound carpet. Overall it ranks as a high performer with occasional edge cases.
Low-pile carpet pickup is excellent in structured tests, often nearing perfect collection across multiple debris types. This is one of the areas where it most clearly earns its reputation for strong performance.
Low-pile carpet pickup is consistently strong, with many reviewers describing one-pass improvement and deep debris recovery compared to prior vacuums. The main drawback in low-pile settings is that strong suction can make backward pulls feel like a workout for some users.
Low-pile carpet pickup is often reported as above-average to excellent in standardized testing and daily use, though not always class-leading in deep-clean style tests.
Low-pile rugs and flatter carpets generally clean well with turbo or combo heads, and reviewers cite strong suction as a helpful baseline. Performance still improves with the correct head compared with a one-size-fits-all floor tool.
Low-pile carpet performance is a relative strength, with a lab review reporting strong capture rates and another source reporting strong debris pickup on carpets in general. It is typically positioned as very good for routine, surface-level carpet cleaning at this price.
Low-pile carpets and flatter rugs are cleaned very effectively, often in one pass for dust and hair, with boost rarely required. Larger pieces may take additional passes depending on how easily they scatter.
Low-pile carpet cleaning is widely described as excellent, with testing-focused sources reporting near-top collection results and strong single-pass pickup on typical debris.
Low-pile carpet and rugs are a strength, with good pickup and strong pet hair results reported across reviews. A few notes mention needing extra passes or higher power when pulling backward.
A low-pile/outdoor carpet test demonstrates strong pickup of mixed debris, and reviewers broadly report effective carpet cleaning with the motorized head.
On low-pile carpets and rugs, most reviews report strong pickup and good transitions from hard floors. A few mention occasional drag or the need to select a specific mode for best feel.
Low-pile carpet pickup is generally strong in objective tests and everyday use, with high debris removal percentages reported. Some reviewers still note that carpet hair or deep debris can be harder than surface crumbs on this product line.
Low-pile carpet pickup is generally strong, clearing powders and everyday debris well; performance can depend on mode and may be less impressive than the very best competitors.
Low-pile carpet pickup is generally very good, handling daily hair and debris well. Some users still notice occasional leftover strands on rugs and may choose extra passes for a more thorough finish.
Low‑pile carpet performance is consistently excellent in most standardized tests, even with cereal and fine debris. One technician review reports the opposite on carpet fine sand, suggesting results can vary with debris type and floorhead behavior.
Carpet cleaning is generally described as above-average for the price, with strong deep-clean and pet-hair results in some tests. One review noted weaker default results on short-pile carpet that improved substantially with strong/max suction and two passes, so settings and pass count matter.
Low-pile carpet results are generally good, with most debris removed in tests; occasional misses on fine dust or sugary or kitty-litter style particles were noted.
Low-pile carpet performance is frequently rated strong for a Roomba-class robot, with good debris pickup and solid deep-clean results in testing. Some reviewers still recommend multiple passes for heavier soil.