Low-pile and general carpet pickup was very strong, with awards, rice-on-carpet results, and welcome-mat success.
Pros: Carpet — Medium-Pile Pickup, Heating element
Cons: Clogging and debris prevention, Hair-removal channel issues
Showing Robotic Vacuums only. Switch back to all Vacuums anytime.
Low-pile and general carpet pickup was very strong, with awards, rice-on-carpet results, and welcome-mat success.
Pros: Carpet — Medium-Pile Pickup, Heating element
Cons: Clogging and debris prevention, Hair-removal channel issues
Low-pile or standard carpet pickup was praised in wall-to-wall carpet testing, with strong daily pickup and grooming.
Pros: Pet-Ready Features, Suitability for heavy-duty use
Cons: Value-for-money, Area Rug Handling
One family-home review was very pleased with carpet performance in robot mode, covering low-pile-style household carpet evidence.
Pros: Assembly and Setup, Price and Value
Cons: Mopping performance, Software-update support / feature longevity
Low-pile/general carpet pickup was praised in one carpet debris test, though evidence was not as broad as for mopping or pet hair.
Pros: Hair Pickup — Hard Floors, Corner Cleaning (Robot)
Cons: Carpet — High-Pile Pickup, Support and Reliability
Low-pile carpet and rug pickup is generally strong, with reviewers saying rugs and low-profile surfaces came up clean.
Pros: Wool carpet compatibility, Hair‑Wrap / Tangle Resistance
Cons: Suitability for heavy-duty use, Edge‑Following Accuracy (Robot)
Surface carpet pickup was rated strong in testing on debris sitting on carpets.
Pros: Innovation compared to competitors, Under-Furniture Pickup
Cons: Tool-change simplicity, Build quality and durability
Reviewers leaned positive on Carpet — Low-Pile Pickup, but some lower-scoring evidence flagged situational limits or inconsistency.
Pros: Hair‑Wrap / Tangle Resistance, Versatility
Cons: Stair Cleaning, Clogging and debris prevention
Low-pile or regular carpet pickup was generally strong across rugs and carpet rice tests.
Pros: Overall cleaning convenience, Streaking / Residue
Cons: Suitability for small spaces, Dock noise
Low-pile carpet evidence is limited but positive where performance across hard floors and carpets was called beefy.
Pros: Hair‑Wrap / Tangle Resistance, Versatility
Cons: Hair-removal channel issues, Clogging and debris prevention
Low-pile carpet evidence is positive, with reviewers reporting respectable measured pickup and performance comparable to named competitors.
Pros: Noise level, Maneuverability and Handling
Cons: Clogging and debris prevention, Bin and Bag
Low-pile carpet pickup is mixed: some reviewers praised low-pile debris and pet-hair pickup, while another said carpet pickup lagged competitors.
Pros: Innovation compared to competitors, Hard Floor — Large Debris Intake
Cons: Emptying and Mess Control, Cord management
Low-pile carpet pickup is positive in the available carpet food-debris test, especially after a second pass.
Pros: Assembly and Setup, Self-cleaning cycle
Cons: Odor control, Fresh Liquid Pickup Speed
Low-pile carpet pickup was acceptable to good, with reviewers calling short-pile results satisfactory or visibly good in use.
Pros: Overall cleaning convenience, Storage footprint and upright-stand stability
Cons: Kid-friendliness, Obstacle Avoidance (Robot)
Low-pile carpet evidence was mixed, with decent overall pickup but some powder and fine-debris residue left behind.
Pros: Hair Pickup — Carpets, Noise level
Cons: Crevice / Groove Pickup (Hard Floors), Edge‑Following Accuracy (Robot)
Low-pile carpet pickup was the clearest cleaning weakness, with two reviewers reporting weaker flour or pet-hair pickup than expected.
Pros: Tool-change simplicity, Battery and Charging
Cons: Cord management, Support and Reliability
Low-pile carpet cleaning is weaker because one review found it did not clean rugs thoroughly without extra passes.
Pros: Mopping performance, Controls and UI
Cons: Area Rug Handling, Accessories and Tools