Compare Kwikset Halo Touch Fingerprint Smart Lock vs Desloc D110 Plus Smart Lock

History logs show lock events and how the lock was operated (fingerprint, app, voice, auto-lock). However, more than one reviewer reports failed fingerprint attempts may not appear in the history.

Activity history is commonly available via an events or logs view showing locks and unlocks, though at least one review noted failed attempts may not always be logged unless a lockout triggers.

The app is easy to understand and includes lock control, people management, and history. Multiple reviews criticize lag or limited polish, while others report quick response and straightforward setup including firmware updates.

The app generally earns good marks for straightforward control, logs, user setup, and modes, but some reviewers wanted clearer or more adjustable advanced settings (notably around lockout behavior and alerts).

Auto-lock is configurable and often works as intended, but several reviewers warn it can be risky without door sensing because the bolt may extend while the door is still open. No true proximity auto-unlock is described in the review set; entry is manual via fingerprint, app, voice assistant, or key.

Auto-lock is available with a short delay range (often cited as 5 to 120 seconds) and works as intended for many users, but its time-based nature and limited delay range drew criticism in a few reviews.

Reviews that tested repeated failed fingerprints did not observe a meaningful lockout by default, and failed attempts were not consistently logged or surfaced as alerts.

Failed-attempt protection can trigger a temporary lockout after repeated wrong codes, and at least one review described adjustable thresholds, though another noted limited transparency or controls.

Installer walkthroughs describe an adjustable latch that supports common backsets (residential and some commercial), helping fit a wider range of doors.

Supports common backsets (2-3/8 and 2-3/4), matching typical residential door prep.

Runs on four AA batteries, with reviewers reporting modest drain over weeks and appreciating visible battery status plus easy battery replacement.

Battery life is commonly quoted around six months on four AA cells (often not included), with Wi-Fi potentially increasing drain; multiple reviews highlighted USB-C emergency power, and one follow-up credited firmware updates and a Wi-Fi toggle with improving battery impact.

Bluetooth is commonly required for initial setup and for enrolling users at the door, while day-to-day remote control is handled over Wi-Fi.

Bluetooth appears mainly in setup and onboarding flows for pairing and Wi-Fi bridging, rather than as the primary day-to-day control method.

Overall build is described as sturdy, sleek, and quiet in operation. A minority of comments mention cosmetic concerns on interior plastics or size bulk on the inside module.

Build is generally described as solid for the price, with BHMA Grade 3 positioning and a mix of metal and plastic; one review questioned overall construction quality and budget compromises.

Multiple reviews emphasize the lack of a door-open sensor. The lock can report locked or unlocked status, but it cannot confirm whether the door is actually shut.

Reviews repeatedly note the lack of a true door sensor, meaning auto-lock can extend the bolt even if the door is open, which can be inconvenient and potentially hard on door trim.

Compatibility is mostly standard for deadbolt doors, but reviews disagree at the thin end: one installer struggled on a 1-3/8 inch door, while another warns against doors under 1-3/4 inches.

Fits standard US deadbolt prep in most cases, including common door thickness ranges, but one reviewer noted it is less ideal for very thick doors without modification.

It is generally treated as a full deadbolt replacement rather than a retrofit that reuses existing exterior hardware, which some reviewers consider a downside versus modular designs.

This is a full deadbolt replacement, so you generally swap existing hardware; one reviewer chose to reuse a preferred deadbolt piece, but reuse options are limited versus retrofit-style locks.

Several reviews mention firmware updates through the app and suggest future updates could improve app polish, notification behavior, and integration depth.

Firmware updates are a recurring theme in longer-term coverage, including improvements like a Wi-Fi toggle, better Wi-Fi stability, reduced power usage, and privacy tweaks like masking passcode entry.

Across reviews, fingerprint unlock is consistently fast and accurate. Limitations show up with wet or dirty fingers and sensor ergonomics for some hands, and several sources describe a two-fingerprint-per-user limit (with workarounds).

Fingerprint access is a headline feature and is often described as quick and accurate for the price, with support for up to about 50 fingerprints; one review found it hit-or-miss and requiring multiple scans.

Reviewers generally report a solid finish and reference high grade ratings, though at least one source notes cosmetic scratching on plastic components and others mention limited finish choices.

A 90-day outdoor follow-up and several user impressions suggest the exterior holds up reasonably well, but long-term finish wear is still lightly documented.

Geofencing is not offered, and reviewers explicitly recommend other locks if proximity-based unlocking is a priority.

There are no guest PIN codes or keypad codes; guest access is primarily fingerprint enrollment. Reviewers note this can be inconvenient for short-term visitors or rentals if guests cannot enroll in person.

Guest access options commonly include always-on users, scheduled access windows, and one-time or one-pass codes, making it suitable for cleaners, visitors, and rentals.

No hub is required; the lock connects directly to Wi-Fi for remote features.

No hub or separate gateway is required for remote features because Wi-Fi is integrated.

Installation is typically described as straightforward with clear instructions and app guidance. Some installers note cable management can be fiddly and door thickness edge cases may require extra care.

Most reviewers found installation straightforward and comparable to swapping a standard deadbolt, but one hands-on test reported overly tight/stiff hardware that made mounting difficult and another noted a short internal cable that can complicate assembly.

Most reviews praise the physical key backup as a dependable fail-safe for dead batteries or edge cases, and note that key operation is smooth.

Backup entry is well covered via a traditional keyway, and several reviews also liked the USB-C emergency power option as an extra failsafe when batteries die.

No keypad is included, and reviewers explicitly note it is not the right model if you want PIN code entry.

The backlit touchscreen keypad is usually described as clear and usable, and privacy features like anti-peeping or masked digits are appreciated; one review reported slow wake-up behavior requiring extra taps.

SmartKey rekeying is frequently mentioned as a practical advantage, letting owners rekey quickly without a locksmith. Security opinions vary by reviewer preference, but usability is consistently praised.

Fingerprint entry and physical interactions are generally fast, and some tests report near-instant app response. Other reviews report noticeable app lag, making speed perception mixed.

Speed is often praised, especially for fingerprint unlock and remote commands, but one critical review found the keypad slow to wake and fingerprint reads inconsistent, and another noted it is not the fastest compared with pricier locks.

Motor operation is repeatedly described as smooth and quiet, with several sources emphasizing low noise during locking and unlocking.

The motor is generally described as smooth and reasonably quiet, but over-tightening during install can cause the bolt to struggle to slide smoothly.

Core locking and unlocking is generally dependable across reviews, with most reliability concerns centered on auto-lock behavior without door sensing rather than the motor itself.

Day-to-day locking/unlocking is generally reliable across reviews, including schedules and routines, though one reviewer characterized overall operation as only just OK despite not seeing jamming in testing.

Some reviews report reliable push alerts for lock events, but others describe missed or inconsistent notifications and limited insight into unsuccessful attempts (especially with many users on one account).

Notifications are available for lock activity and some alarm states, but experiences vary: some reviewers wanted push alerts over email or found certain emergency emails unreliable.

Multiple reviews cite high ANSI or BHMA grading and describe a beefy deadbolt and strong strike hardware, framing it as robust against forced entry.

Physical robustness is most often framed around BHMA Grade 3, which is a baseline residential-grade rating; it is not positioned as a high-security, hardened deadbolt.

Several sources describe the cylinder as bump-resistant and pick-resistant due to SmartKey, and cite high residential grades. Few provide detailed drill-test specifics in these reviews.

Remote access is a key strength: reviewers describe being able to lock and unlock from anywhere and manage users remotely once the lock is on Wi-Fi.

Remote locking/unlocking, status checks, and managing users from anywhere are consistently highlighted as strong points when the lock has a stable Wi-Fi connection.

Security features mentioned include anti-peeping PIN entry, vacation-style restriction modes, failed-attempt lockouts, and anti-hijacking or SOS-style alerts; some sources also mention encrypted fingerprint storage, but overall physical security is positioned as budget-grade.

Works with Alexa and Google Assistant and can be used in routines, but reviewers repeatedly call out limited ecosystem depth (no HomeKit, no IFTTT) and fewer third-party integrations than some rivals.

Smart-home support is consistently limited to Alexa and Google ecosystems, with repeated callouts that Apple HomeKit and Matter support are not available.

Anti-hijacking or alarm-style features are described as a way to signal distress or tampering, but detailed sensitivity or false-alarm behavior is not well documented in the reviews.

No touchscreen is included; the exterior interaction is via the fingerprint sensor plus the physical keyway.

Touch controls and illumination are generally well liked, but responsiveness can vary, with one hands-on review calling the interface sluggish to wake.

Several reviews describe a PIN requirement for voice unlocking, adding an extra layer of protection. Some also raise usability or privacy concerns about speaking a code aloud.

Supports up to 50 users with schedules by date and time, and reviewers highlight the ability to remove users remotely. Enrollment requires the person to be physically present at the lock because access is fingerprint-based.

User management is a strength, with support for multiple users, role-based sharing, and assigning different credentials per person.

Pricing is typically described around the mid-$200 range. Some reviewers call it fair for hub-free Wi-Fi plus fingerprint, while others say it is expensive compared with better-integrated competitors.

Many reviews frame the lock as strong value, especially when discounted under $100, due to built-in Wi-Fi and multiple entry methods, but one outlet argued the compromises (install quirks and scanner quality) reduce the perceived bargain.

Voice control for locking is generally reported as reliable. Unlocking typically requires a spoken PIN for security, and some reviews note platform limitations depending on the assistant.

Voice control via Alexa and Google is generally reliable for locking and, with a voice code, unlocking, but it does not provide the broader cross-platform benefits of Matter ecosystems.

At least one review expects it to withstand outdoor elements well based on fit and construction, but the review set offers limited long-term exposure data.

Multiple reviews cite an IP54-style dust/splash rating and reported normal rain exposure without issue, though a few creator claims vary; overall it is best treated as weather resistant rather than fully waterproof.

Built-in Wi-Fi enables remote control without extra hardware and is generally stable once connected. Several reviews note it prefers a 2.4GHz network and changing Wi-Fi can require a reset and re-enrolling users.

Built-in 2.4GHz Wi-Fi is a major advantage for remote access without extra hardware, but connection quality can affect responsiveness and battery use; updates and a Wi-Fi on/off toggle were noted as improvements in longer-term use.