Compare Kwikset Halo Touch Fingerprint Smart Lock vs Lockly Secure Plus Smart Lock

History logs show lock events and how the lock was operated (fingerprint, app, voice, auto-lock). However, more than one reviewer reports failed fingerprint attempts may not appear in the history.

Reviews highlight detailed event history in the app, with lock/unlock entries tied to user and method; one reviewer notes being able to review long windows of history for shared spaces.

The app is easy to understand and includes lock control, people management, and history. Multiple reviews criticize lag or limited polish, while others report quick response and straightforward setup including firmware updates.

The Lockly app is generally described as clean and responsive for basic lock/unlock, logs, and settings, but some reviewers found PIN and guest workflows overly complicated compared with rivals.

Auto-lock is configurable and often works as intended, but several reviewers warn it can be risky without door sensing because the bolt may extend while the door is still open. No true proximity auto-unlock is described in the review set; entry is manual via fingerprint, app, voice assistant, or key.

Auto-locking is widely praised and configurable (often cited in the 5–300 second range), helping the door re-secure itself without relying on habits.

Reviews that tested repeated failed fingerprints did not observe a meaningful lockout by default, and failed attempts were not consistently logged or surfaced as alerts.

A lockout style safeguard is described that disables keypad input after too many failed attempts, reducing brute-force code guessing.

Installer walkthroughs describe an adjustable latch that supports common backsets (residential and some commercial), helping fit a wider range of doors.

Runs on four AA batteries, with reviewers reporting modest drain over weeks and appreciating visible battery status plus easy battery replacement.

Battery life is described as strong on four AA cells, and the external 9V jump option reduces the risk of lockouts when batteries die.

Bluetooth is commonly required for initial setup and for enrolling users at the door, while day-to-day remote control is handled over Wi-Fi.

Bluetooth performance is usually fast and stable for in-range control, though at least one review reports occasional trouble discovering the lock on some phones during setup.

Overall build is described as sturdy, sleek, and quiet in operation. A minority of comments mention cosmetic concerns on interior plastics or size bulk on the inside module.

Multiple reviews describe the hardware as sturdy and premium, but also noticeably large and heavy compared with sleeker competitors.

Multiple reviews emphasize the lack of a door-open sensor. The lock can report locked or unlocked status, but it cannot confirm whether the door is actually shut.

A door sensor is mentioned as an optional add-on to report open/closed state, but it is not consistently tested across reviews.

Compatibility is mostly standard for deadbolt doors, but reviews disagree at the thin end: one installer struggled on a 1-3/8 inch door, while another warns against doors under 1-3/4 inches.

Most reviewers report compatibility with standard doors, but at least one install required extra door prep (strike/side bracket work) and the weight can make alignment more sensitive.

It is generally treated as a full deadbolt replacement rather than a retrofit that reuses existing exterior hardware, which some reviewers consider a downside versus modular designs.

Several reviews mention firmware updates through the app and suggest future updates could improve app polish, notification behavior, and integration depth.

Across reviews, fingerprint unlock is consistently fast and accurate. Limitations show up with wet or dirty fingers and sensor ergonomics for some hands, and several sources describe a two-fingerprint-per-user limit (with workarounds).

The 3D fingerprint reader is repeatedly called fast and accurate; enrollment takes multiple scans but day-to-day unlocking is a standout convenience.

Reviewers generally report a solid finish and reference high grade ratings, though at least one source notes cosmetic scratching on plastic components and others mention limited finish choices.

One review cites strong finish coverage, including a lifetime warranty on exterior finishes, supporting long-term cosmetic durability expectations.

Geofencing is not offered, and reviewers explicitly recommend other locks if proximity-based unlocking is a priority.

There are no guest PIN codes or keypad codes; guest access is primarily fingerprint enrollment. Reviewers note this can be inconvenient for short-term visitors or rentals if guests cannot enroll in person.

Access sharing is a strength: reviews mention temporary, scheduled, one-time, offline codes, and app-based sharing options; however, some find the onboarding and messaging flow confusing for casual guests.

No hub is required; the lock connects directly to Wi-Fi for remote features.

Out of the box the lock is Bluetooth-first, and multiple reviews note that a separate Wi-Fi hub is needed for remote control and voice assistants.

Installation is typically described as straightforward with clear instructions and app guidance. Some installers note cable management can be fiddly and door thickness edge cases may require extra care.

Installation experiences vary from quick (around 15 minutes) to frustrating; the app guidance helps, but the heavy hardware and documentation can make assembly and alignment harder than average.

Most reviews praise the physical key backup as a dependable fail-safe for dead batteries or edge cases, and note that key operation is smooth.

Backup entry options are well covered, with a traditional key cylinder and an exterior 9V jump-power method noted for dead batteries.

No keypad is included, and reviewers explicitly note it is not the right model if you want PIN code entry.

The PIN Genie keypad that shuffles digit positions is consistently praised for improving code privacy, though a reviewer notes it can feel disorienting for people who remember codes by shape.

SmartKey rekeying is frequently mentioned as a practical advantage, letting owners rekey quickly without a locksmith. Security opinions vary by reviewer preference, but usability is consistently praised.

Fingerprint entry and physical interactions are generally fast, and some tests report near-instant app response. Other reviews report noticeable app lag, making speed perception mixed.

Lock/unlock actions are commonly described as quick, including near-instant app commands within Bluetooth range and a few-second mechanical cycle.

Motor operation is repeatedly described as smooth and quiet, with several sources emphasizing low noise during locking and unlocking.

Motor operation is described as relatively quiet compared with typical smart deadbolts.

Core locking and unlocking is generally dependable across reviews, with most reliability concerns centered on auto-lock behavior without door sensing rather than the motor itself.

Most reviews describe solid day-to-day operation, but one outlet reports calibration/status mismatches that made locked vs unlocked reporting unreliable in their testing.

Some reviews report reliable push alerts for lock events, but others describe missed or inconsistent notifications and limited insight into unsuccessful attempts (especially with many users on one account).

Push notifications are specifically called out as missing versus competing smart locks.

Multiple reviews cite high ANSI or BHMA grading and describe a beefy deadbolt and strong strike hardware, framing it as robust against forced entry.

Several sources describe the cylinder as bump-resistant and pick-resistant due to SmartKey, and cite high residential grades. Few provide detailed drill-test specifics in these reviews.

Remote access is a key strength: reviewers describe being able to lock and unlock from anywhere and manage users remotely once the lock is on Wi-Fi.

Remote locking/unlocking is not available without the optional Wi-Fi hub; with the hub, reviews describe convenient anywhere access through the app.

Security is a core theme: reviewers cite AES256/BLE security claims, the PIN-shuffling keypad, biometric anti-spoofing, lockout behavior, and privacy mode style controls.

Works with Alexa and Google Assistant and can be used in routines, but reviewers repeatedly call out limited ecosystem depth (no HomeKit, no IFTTT) and fewer third-party integrations than some rivals.

Smart-home integration is limited without accessories; Alexa and Google support is tied to the Wi-Fi hub, while HomeKit, Matter, Thread, and IFTTT-style automation are repeatedly noted as absent or limited.

No touchscreen is included; the exterior interaction is via the fingerprint sensor plus the physical keyway.

The touchscreen is generally responsive and easy to read, but its glossy surface can show fingerprints; its main value is supporting the dynamic PIN layout.

Several reviews describe a PIN requirement for voice unlocking, adding an extra layer of protection. Some also raise usability or privacy concerns about speaking a code aloud.

At least one review describes multi-step account or device activation verification (codes via SMS and email), indicating stronger account protection than many simple Bluetooth locks.

Supports up to 50 users with schedules by date and time, and reviewers highlight the ability to remove users remotely. Enrollment requires the person to be physically present at the lock because access is fingerprint-based.

User and guest management is feature-rich, offering multiple access types and schedules, but the depth can feel like overkill and harder to administer for short-term visitors.

Pricing is typically described around the mid-$200 range. Some reviewers call it fair for hub-free Wi-Fi plus fingerprint, while others say it is expensive compared with better-integrated competitors.

Value is the most common knock: reviewers call it expensive for a Bluetooth-first lock, especially once the Wi-Fi hub accessory is added.

Voice control for locking is generally reported as reliable. Unlocking typically requires a spoken PIN for security, and some reviews note platform limitations depending on the assistant.

Voice control is not native; Alexa and Google voice commands are described as available only when paired with the Wi-Fi hub.

Warranty coverage is described as strong (including finish and electronics coverage), but reviewers also flag usability and setup complexity as an area needing improvement.

At least one review expects it to withstand outdoor elements well based on fit and construction, but the review set offers limited long-term exposure data.

One review explicitly praises weather toughness across extreme temperatures, suggesting good outdoor suitability when installed correctly.

Built-in Wi-Fi enables remote control without extra hardware and is generally stable once connected. Several reviews note it prefers a 2.4GHz network and changing Wi-Fi can require a reset and re-enrolling users.

There is no built-in Wi-Fi in the base lock; Wi-Fi connectivity is achieved through an add-on hub or bundled variant, which affects total cost and complexity.