Compare Google Nest x Yale Smart Lock vs Desloc D110 Plus Smart Lock

Reviewers consistently liked the event history and activity timeline, which showed lock use, code use, and who came or went.

Event history and logs are repeatedly mentioned for locks, unlocks, activity, users, and alarm events.

The Nest app was usually praised as simple and capable, though one review reported early crashes and hangs during setup and control.

The app is generally considered straightforward for status, access, settings, and control, with one reviewer only calling the overall feature set adequate.

Auto-lock was a reliable strength, especially with Home/Away Assist or configurable delay options, but it does not auto-unlock.

Auto-lock is widely supported and usually convenient, but missing door sensing makes it risky when the door is open.

Failed-attempt protection is supported through wrong-try/security lockout evidence, and later firmware reportedly added repeated-unlock protection.

Door backset and latch fit matter: the lock can fit standard setups, but reviewers stress checking measurements and alignment first.

GearBrain specifically listed support for 2-3/8-inch or 2-3/4-inch backsets.

Battery coverage was strong, with AA batteries lasting around a year or longer and 9V emergency power available when depleted.

Battery life is commonly described around four AA batteries and six months, with some concern about Wi-Fi drain before updates.

Bluetooth-style proximity unlocking was a weakness because reviewers noted the lock lacks approach-based or Bluetooth auto-unlock behavior.

Bluetooth appears as setup or local connectivity support rather than a headline feature.

Build quality was generally strong, with reviewers calling the hardware sturdy, sleek, solid, stylish, and high quality.

Most reviews describe solid build, BHMA/IP-rated durability, or good build for the price; PCWorld was the main outlier on questionable construction.

Nest camera and doorbell ties were useful inside the Nest app, but reviewers wanted tighter Hello/video-feed integration.

Door-sense evidence was negative: reviewers wanted a door sensor and noted auto-lock could throw the bolt while the door was open.

Reviewers agree it lacks a door sensor, so time-based auto-lock can throw the bolt even if the door is open.

Deadbolt fit was mostly standard-door friendly, but several reviewers had to adjust frames, holes, or strike plates for smooth operation.

Evidence supports standard U.S. deadbolt sizing and auto left/right door detection, while one reviewer cautioned against very thick doors.

The lock reuses the door conceptually as a deadbolt replacement and can preserve the doorknob, but it replaces the existing deadbolt hardware.

Existing-hardware reuse is mixed: one reviewer reused an existing deadlock, while another said the lock replaces the entire deadbolt.

Feature-update evidence was mixed but promising, with Google Assistant and Nest integrations described as arriving or promised through software.

Firmware updates improved Wi-Fi stability, power usage, passcode masking, auto-lock behavior, and feature availability.

Most reviewers found fingerprint access fast or accurate; PCWorld was the main negative outlier with hit-and-miss scans.

Finish evidence was limited but positive, supported by finish options and a lifetime limited warranty for finish and mechanical issues.

Geofencing worked for Home/Away auto-lock, but reviewers criticized the absence of GPS or proximity auto-unlock.

Guest codes were a major strength, with expiring, scheduled, or temporary codes praised, though one test saw frequent keycode-generation errors.

Temporary, one-pass, scheduled, and Airbnb-style access are well-supported across reviews.

A Nest Connect or Nest Guard is central to the experience; reviewers accepted it but consistently flagged it as a required extra hub.

Reviewers repeatedly emphasize direct Wi-Fi operation without a separate hub or gateway.

Installation was usually straightforward with app or voice guidance, but several reviewers needed alignment, frame, or setup troubleshooting.

Most reviewers found setup simple, with app-guided onboarding and auto door-hand detection, but PCWorld and GearBrain reported hardware, cord, or overtightening problems.

Jam or installation detection appeared useful when the bolt got stuck, though evidence was mostly tied to setup and alignment issues.

Key override reliability was weak because the lock has no physical key; reviewers relied instead on keypad access or 9V emergency power.

Multiple reviewers confirm a mechanical key or keyway backup, and several frame it as a reliable fallback if power or electronics fail.

The keypad was convenient and glove-friendly, but some reviewers disliked the required checkmark step or found touch feedback inconsistent.

Keypad evidence is mixed: one review praised responsiveness and lighting, another said it was slow to wake, and others noted backlit or passcode features.

Keyway quality scored poorly because there is no traditional keyway or physical key path to evaluate.

Fingerprint and voice/app responses are often described as quick, snappy, or instant, though one reviewer found it slower than other locks.

The locking motor was smooth and quiet, with chimes or audible confirmation and one review calling it among the quietest locks tested.

Motor evidence is mixed: PCWorld found operation smooth and quiet, while GearBrain warned overtightening could make the bolt struggle.

Locking reliability was one of the strongest themes, with multiple reviewers reporting dependable locking and unlocking once installed correctly.

Most hands-on reviewers reported reliable operation, including no jamming, stable 90-day use, and successful remote or app use.

Notifications were strong, with reviewers receiving alerts for lock events, battery status, offline status, and failed lock behavior.

Reviewers saw lock status, user, and alarm notifications, though one noted emergency emails went to spam.

Physical resistance evidence was positive, from ANSI Grade 2 mentions, sturdy construction, and stronger strike-plate screw installation.

BHMA Grade 3, cycle, salt-spray, impact, and residential-security claims support basic physical durability, not premium security.

Pick resistance was supported by the keyless design and fingerprint-resistant touchscreen, but drill resistance was not directly evaluated.

Remote access was a core advantage through the app once Nest Connect or Nest Guard enabled internet connectivity.

Remote locking, unlocking, monitoring, and code management are consistently supported when Wi-Fi is enabled.

Security features centered on privacy mode, keypad disabling, passcode limits, tamper or wrong-code alerts, and Grade 2 hardware rather than encryption details.

Evidence supports anti-peep PINs, failed-attempt lockout, anti-hijack alerts, and encrypted biometric storage.

Smart-home integration was the main tradeoff: it works best in Nest, but Alexa, HomeKit, SmartThings, IFTTT, and Z-Wave support were limited or absent.

Alexa and Google support is consistent, but reviewers repeatedly flag missing HomeKit, Matter, IFTTT, or deeper security-platform integration.

Tamper detection had direct evidence from CNET, which noted alerts for tampering and repeated incorrect password attempts.

Only one review clearly mentions a tamper-triggered anti-hijack alarm, so evidence is limited.

The touchscreen looked premium and lit up clearly, but some reviewers found it resistive, fiddly, or lacking button feedback.

The touch/display experience is generally useful for keypad entry, status, battery, and visual feedback, but it remains basic.

User access management was generally strong with scheduled, expiring, and revocable codes, though one review hit app errors during sharing.

User management is one of the strongest areas, with reviewers repeatedly citing user profiles, fingerprints, PINs, schedules, and permissions.

Value depended heavily on the Nest ecosystem: reviewers saw the lock as pricey but worthwhile for Nest users who prize reliability.

Most reviewers saw strong value or sub-$100 appeal; PCWorld was the clearest dissent, saying compromises undercut the value.

Voice control was mixed across review timing: some reviews found no assistant support, while later evidence described Google Assistant lock-only support.

Voice control through Alexa and Google is directly supported, with several reviewers describing successful or seamless use.

Warranty and support evidence was positive but sparse, with warranty coverage and Nest Pro installation support mentioned.

Formal warranty was not reviewed, but support evidence is positive through repeated firmware updates and customer-responsive enhancements.

Weather resistance was supported by wide temperature ratings, glove use, and reviewers contrasting it with conventional locks freezing.

Reviewers repeatedly cite IP-rated dust and water resistance or durability testing, though one review called the IP54 rating tame.

Wi-Fi was indirect through Nest Connect or Nest Guard, and reviewers sometimes reported distance or connection caveats.

Built-in Wi-Fi is a central strength, supporting remote status/control and later firmware improvements.