August Smart Lock Pro with Connect
- Better: overall smart features and automatic unlocking The Ambient says August Smart Lock Pro with Connect is the main competitor and smarter by several measures.
Google Nest x Yale Smart Lock Review
Bottom Line
Choose the Google Nest x Yale if you want reliable keyless locking, strong Nest app control, and temporary codes. Skip it if you need broad Alexa/HomeKit integration, automatic unlock, or a backup key.
Best for
Best for Nest-centered homes that want reliable keyless entry, app-based remote control, scheduled guest codes, and a clean touchscreen lock. It is especially useful when visitors, dog walkers, contractors, or short-term guests need temporary access.
Not for
Not for shoppers who need broad smart-home compatibility, automatic proximity unlock, a physical backup key, or the lowest price. It is also a weaker fit for doors that already have fit or alignment issues.
Verdict
Reviewers treat the Google Nest x Yale as a polished, dependable smart lock for people already invested in Nest. Its strongest evidence is reliability: several reviewers said it locked and unlocked consistently, the app was easy, access codes were useful, and the design looked clean. The main tradeoff is ecosystem narrowness. Nest integration, remote access, and Google Assistant support can be valuable, but reviewers repeatedly criticized missing Alexa, HomeKit, SmartThings, IFTTT, GPS auto-unlock, and a physical key. Setup is usually simple on standard doors, yet alignment, door-depth, and Connect setup problems appear often enough to matter. The price makes most sense when Nest compatibility and keyless reliability are the priority.
Compared in Reviews
Products reviewers directly compared with this model, grouped into quick takeaways.
August SmartLock Pro + Connect
- Better: interoperability and voice/smart-home support PCMag says August SmartLock Pro + Connect offers a stronger level of interoperability than Nest x Yale.
August WiFi Smart
- Better: hub integration, ease of use, and affordability TechGearLab preferred August WiFi Smart because it integrates with more hubs, is easier to use, and costs less.
Feature Scorecards
Summary
30 reviewed features- Very positive 4.5-5.0 23% 7 features
- Positive 3.5-4.4 50% 15 features
- Neutral 2.5-3.4 13% 4 features
- Negative 1.5-2.4 13% 4 features
- Very negative below 1.5 0% 0 features
Pros
-
Weather resistance received limited but positive evidence, mainly around extreme-temperature operation and confidence in hot conditions.
-
Notifications were praised for speed and specificity, including lock/unlock events, user-specific alerts, and battery or power-related warnings.
-
Remote access was one of the most valued strengths, letting reviewers lock, unlock, and grant access from afar through the app.
-
Build quality was one of the stronger themes, with reviewers repeatedly calling the hardware high quality, sturdy, solid, and reliable.
-
The locking motor was praised in the few reviews that evaluated it, especially for smooth operation and unusually quiet performance.
-
Feature additions via updates had limited but positive evidence, with one reviewer highlighting newer Google Assistant routine value added after release.
-
Physical attack resistance had limited evidence, but one installer praised the longer strike screws for making the deadbolt more secure against break-in attempts.
-
Auto-lock was usually reliable and useful, especially with Home/Away behavior, but reviewers noted it does not provide automatic unlocking and one found the options limited.
-
Access logs were consistently useful where evaluated, with reviewers praising the history or timeline for showing who locked or unlocked the door and when.
-
Battery evidence was mostly positive, including long life, alerts, and emergency access, although the no-key design makes dead batteries feel higher stakes.
-
Locking reliability was generally strong, with multiple reviewers reporting that locking and unlocking worked consistently, though one review noted broader glitches and door-fit caveats.
-
The Nest app was widely praised as easy, intuitive, or reliable, with one notable exception where early crashes and hangs made setup and use frustrating.
-
Industrial design was mostly praised as chic, sleek, stylish, and attractive, though one reviewer disliked the inside appearance.
-
Security features were discussed mainly through privacy mode and keypad disabling, which reviewers valued as an extra safety layer; no encryption-specific evaluation appeared.
-
Guest codes were broadly useful for family, visitors, dog walkers, Airbnb, and contractors, though one reviewer reported frequent keycode creation errors and another called the feature average.
-
User access management was usually strong thanks to scheduled, revocable, and user-specific codes, but one review found app/account requirements and code-sharing glitches frustrating.
-
Most reviewers found installation straightforward on standard doors, but several hit alignment, door-depth, or Nest Connect setup snags that lowered confidence for less typical doors.
-
Wi-Fi evidence was mixed: setup could be seamless through Nest Connect, but weak signal or Connect problems could disable remote app access.
-
The hub requirement is a tradeoff: Nest Connect or Guard enables remote access and reliability, but it adds cost and sometimes setup/connectivity headaches.
-
Value was mixed: reviewers liked the reliability, Nest app, and quality, but the lock was often described as expensive or best justified for Nest users.
-
Touchscreen evidence was mixed: reviewers liked the clean lit keypad, glove use, and fingerprint resistance, while others found it finicky or lacking feedback.
-
The keypad was easy enough for many reviewers, but repeated criticisms focused on the extra checkmark step, fiddly touch behavior, and limited tactile feedback.
Cons
-
Deadbolt fit was mixed: it worked well on compatible doors, yet shallow frames, oversized holes, and older settled doors sometimes required trimming or adjustment.
-
Existing hardware reuse was inconsistent: one install kept the doorknob, while others noted the lock replaces more hardware or required a new handle/backplate changes.
-
Geofencing was a split attribute: away-based auto-lock was useful, but reviewers repeatedly wanted GPS/proximity auto-unlock that the lock lacks.
-
Smart-home integration was the biggest tradeoff: Nest ecosystem integration helped, but limited Alexa, HomeKit, SmartThings, IFTTT, and non-Nest support hurt flexibility.
-
Voice control evidence was split by review timing and ecosystem: newer Google Assistant locking/status support added value, while many reviews criticized missing Alexa or assistant support.
-
Key override reliability scored low because several reviewers disliked the absence of a physical key, even though emergency 9V power can help after battery failure.
-
Bluetooth scored poorly because reviewers specifically missed proximity/Bluetooth-style unlocking and said it could not unlock automatically when approaching.
-
Door-sense was a clear weakness where discussed: reviewers wanted an open-door sensor, and one reported the lock throwing the bolt while the door was open.
Compared With Category Average
Compared with other Smart Locks, this product is above average in Remote access, Battery, below average in Key override reliability, Voice control, Bluetooth.
Summary
8 compared features- Above average 0.4+ pts higher 25% 2 features
- Same as average within 0.3 pts 0% 0 features
- Below average 0.4+ pts lower 75% 6 features
| Attribute | This product | Category average | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Key override reliability | 2.0 | 4.2 | -2.2 |
| Voice control | 2.1 | 4.2 | -2.1 |
| Bluetooth | 1.8 | 3.5 | -1.8 |
| Door-sense | 1.8 | 3.1 | -1.3 |
| Smart-home integration (Alexa, Google, Siri, HomeKit, Matter, Thread) | 2.7 | 3.7 | -1.0 |
| Remote access | 4.6 | 4.0 | +0.6 |
| Battery | 4.4 | 3.7 | +0.7 |
| Existing hardware reuse | 3.1 | 3.8 | -0.7 |
FAQ
Is the Google Nest x Yale lock reliable?
Most reviewers found it reliable, with several saying it never failed to lock or unlock. A few issues were tied more to app glitches, Wi-Fi/Connect problems, or door alignment than the lock mechanism itself.
Does it work well with the Nest app?
Yes, the Nest app was one of the strongest points in the reviews. Reviewers liked remote lock/unlock, user access controls, history, notifications, and the familiar Nest interface, though one review reported early crashes during setup/use.
Can I give temporary codes to guests?
Yes. Reviews praised temporary, scheduled, and user-specific passcodes for family, guests, dog walkers, contractors, and Airbnb-style access, but one reviewer reported frequent errors when generating shared access codes.
Does it support Alexa, HomeKit, or SmartThings?
Reviewer evidence points to limited non-Nest integration. Several reviews criticized missing Alexa, HomeKit, SmartThings, Z-Wave, IFTTT, or broader hub support, although some later evidence praised Google Assistant locking/status support.
Is installation easy?
Usually, on standard deadbolt doors. Reviewers often described installation as easy or straightforward, but some needed chiseling, shaving, hole enlargement, strike-plate tuning, or had Nest Connect setup trouble.
What happens if the battery dies?
The lock has battery warnings and emergency 9V power terminals, and one reviewer reported very long battery life. Still, several reviewers disliked having no physical key backup if the lock loses power.
Is it worth the price?
Reviewers generally saw the value as strongest for Nest users who prioritize reliability, app control, and design. Price was a frequent caveat for users who want broader integrations or budget-friendly smart locks.
Consider This Instead
If you want better Bluetooth
Choose Schlage Encode Smart Lock. It scores 5.0 vs 1.8 for Bluetooth, with a 4.1 overall score.
If you want better Voice control
Choose Desloc D110 Plus Smart Lock. It scores 4.6 vs 2.1 for Voice control, with a 4.0 overall score.
If you want better Door-sense
Choose ULTRALOQ U-Bolt Pro Smart Lock. It scores 4.4 vs 1.8 for Door-sense, with a 4.1 overall score.
If you want better Key override reliability
Choose Yale Approach Smart lock. It scores 4.5 vs 2.0 for Key override reliability, with a 3.4 overall score.
Overall Top Smart Locks Alternatives
Choose the Tapo DL110 if you want fast fingerprint entry, strong app control, long battery life, and premium features under a lower price. Skip it if your door/strike alignment is...
Pros: Value and Price, Lock/unlock speed
Cons: Existing hardware reuse, Door compatibility (deadbolt fit)
Choose the Lockin Veno Pro if you want touchless palm unlocking, local video storage, and one device for lock plus doorbell. Skip it if you need polished Matter features, discreet...
Pros: Lock/unlock speed, Wi-Fi
Cons: Feature additions via updates, Warranty and support
Choose the Wyze Lock Bolt v2 for low-cost Wi-Fi, fast fingerprint entry, and flexible codes. Skip it if you need Matter/HomeKit support, rechargeable batteries, or stronger door-sense behavior.
Pros: Lock/unlock speed, Keypad
Cons: Door-sense, Battery
Choose it if you want a fast, camera-equipped smart lock with strong biometric options and myQ ecosystem control. Skip it if open smart-home integrations, subscription-free advanced alerts, or a basic...
Pros: Lock/unlock speed, Locking motor
Cons: Smart-home integration (Alexa, Google