Compare Tapo Smart Door Lock DL110 vs Lockly Secure Plus Smart Lock

Activity/event logs are a consistent strength: reviewers show time-stamped records for lock/unlock events (often tied to a specific user/fingerprint or PIN) and even doorbell presses, making it easy to confirm who accessed the door and when.

Reviews highlight detailed event history in the app, with lock/unlock entries tied to user and method; one reviewer notes being able to review long windows of history for shared spaces.

Audio output is described mainly through the built-in doorbell and alarms: volume is adjustable in-app and generally reported as loud enough, but there is little objective measurement of siren output.

The Tapo app is widely praised for guided setup, a clean layout, and quick access to codes, schedules, logs, and settings like scramble PIN, lockout, notifications, and auto-lock scheduling.

The Lockly app is generally described as clean and responsive for basic lock/unlock, logs, and settings, but some reviewers found PIN and guest workflows overly complicated compared with rivals.

Auto-lock is highly configurable (often described from ~15 seconds to 15 minutes) and can be scheduled on some setups; however, one expert review warns that misalignment can cause auto-lock to retry repeatedly or behave erratically until strike alignment is corrected. Auto-unlock is mentioned as an optional proximity-style unlock via Bluetooth in at least one review, with reviewers flagging it as convenient but something to weigh against personal security comfort.

Auto-locking is widely praised and configurable (often cited in the 5–300 second range), helping the door re-secure itself without relying on habits.

Wrong-try protection is repeatedly demonstrated via an unlock attempt limiter/lockout with adjustable lockout duration, helping deter PIN guessing attempts.

A lockout style safeguard is described that disables keypad input after too many failed attempts, reducing brute-force code guessing.

Battery performance is a standout: the removable ~10,000mAh rechargeable pack is frequently described as capable of around a year of use, and several reviewers report very slow drain early on. A noted tradeoff is that the lock can be offline while the pack is removed for charging unless temporarily powered.

Battery life is described as strong on four AA cells, and the external 9V jump option reduces the risk of lockouts when batteries die.

Bluetooth is described as both a local control method and a fallback when Wi-Fi drops, with multiple reviews calling the connection quick and practical for local use.

Bluetooth performance is usually fast and stable for in-range control, though at least one review reports occasional trouble discovering the lock on some phones during setup.

Build quality is repeatedly described as sturdy and premium-feeling for the price, including mentions of metal construction and overall solidity in daily handling.

Multiple reviews describe the hardware as sturdy and premium, but also noticeably large and heavy compared with sleeker competitors.

A door sensor is mentioned as an optional add-on to report open/closed state, but it is not consistently tested across reviews.

Door fit is generally described as a standard deadbolt swap with included templates/hardware and support for common door thicknesses (with some mention of thicker-door hardware), but multiple reviewers recommend checking door measurements/compatibility before buying.

Most reviewers report compatibility with standard doors, but at least one install required extra door prep (strike/side bracket work) and the weight can make alignment more sensitive.

Fingerprint performance is consistently framed as one of the best at the price: near-instant unlock (often around 0.42 seconds), high accuracy, and strong day-to-day reliability, with occasional second-try success when a read fails.

The 3D fingerprint reader is repeatedly called fast and accurate; enrollment takes multiple scans but day-to-day unlocking is a standout convenience.

Finish impressions are generally positive (matte look that resists visible fingerprints/smudges). Long-term scratch/wear durability is not deeply tested in these reviews.

One review cites strong finish coverage, including a lifetime warranty on exterior finishes, supporting long-term cosmetic durability expectations.

True location-based geofencing is not clearly established for the DL110 in these reviews; one related Tapo lock review explicitly notes a lack of geofencing, while DL110 coverage focuses more on Bluetooth proximity behaviors than map-based geofences.

Guest access is a strong point: reviewers demonstrate one-time codes, scheduled/time-window codes, and the ability to create multiple PINs for different people and scenarios.

Access sharing is a strength: reviews mention temporary, scheduled, one-time, offline codes, and app-based sharing options; however, some find the onboarding and messaging flow confusing for casual guests.

No mandatory hub is emphasized across reviews; optional accessories (like chimes or hubs) are discussed for convenience rather than basic functionality.

Out of the box the lock is Bluetooth-first, and multiple reviews note that a separate Wi-Fi hub is needed for remote control and voice assistants.

Installation is usually described as a fast DIY swap (often 5–20 minutes) with strong app/manual guidance. A key caveat appears in one expert review: the DL110 can be more sensitive to strike plate alignment than many locks, requiring adjustment for best performance.

Installation experiences vary from quick (around 15 minutes) to frustrating; the app guidance helps, but the heavy hardware and documentation can make assembly and alignment harder than average.

Door jam detection/alarming is referenced in app settings and demos, and reviewers show notifications/alarms when jamming is detected. Real-world behavior under misalignment can include repeated retry cycles.

Backup entry is a recurring highlight: a concealed keyway behind the doorbell button plus an external USB-C emergency power option reduces lockout risk if the battery is depleted.

Backup entry options are well covered, with a traditional key cylinder and an exterior 9V jump-power method noted for dead batteries.

Keypad entry is described as responsive and feature-rich, including scramble/decoy digits and other anti-observation options. Some users note an extra step to wake the keypad before entry depending on settings/model behavior.

The PIN Genie keypad that shuffles digit positions is consistently praised for improving code privacy, though a reviewer notes it can feel disorienting for people who remember codes by shape.

One locksmith-focused review notes a Schlage-style SC1 keyway, with the practical upside that it can be pinned/rekeyed to match existing keys if desired.

Unlock speed is frequently called out as excellent, especially via fingerprint, with multiple reviewers describing it as nearly instantaneous in real use.

Lock/unlock actions are commonly described as quick, including near-instant app commands within Bluetooth range and a few-second mechanical cycle.

Motor behavior is often described as quieter and more refined than many budget locks. One expert review notes the motor may retry repeatedly when the bolt meets resistance (often tied to alignment/calibration).

Motor operation is described as relatively quiet compared with typical smart deadbolts.

Overall locking reliability is reported as strong across weeks of use, but several reviews stress that proper strike/bolt alignment matters; misalignment can cause retries or auto-lock quirks until adjusted.

Most reviews describe solid day-to-day operation, but one outlet reports calibration/status mismatches that made locked vs unlocked reporting unreliable in their testing.

Notifications are repeatedly described as fast and dependable for lock/unlock events, alarms, and doorbell presses, with settings to tune what you receive.

Push notifications are specifically called out as missing versus competing smart locks.

Physical attack resistance is supported in reviews by BHMA/ANSI Grade 2 references and repeated claims of stronger resistance to force/wear than typical budget Grade 3 locks.

Remote access is a core capability (lock/unlock from the app over Wi-Fi) and is generally shown working quickly; one related model review mentions occasional multi-second delay, but DL110-focused demos typically show responsive remote control.

Remote locking/unlocking is not available without the optional Wi-Fi hub; with the hub, reviews describe convenient anywhere access through the app.

Security is a core theme: reviewers cite AES256/BLE security claims, the PIN-shuffling keypad, biometric anti-spoofing, lockout behavior, and privacy mode style controls.

Smart-home integration coverage centers on Alexa, Google Assistant/Google Home, and SmartThings/SmartThings-style ecosystems. Reviews do not clearly confirm HomeKit, Thread, or Matter support, so buyers wanting those should verify before purchase.

Smart-home integration is limited without accessories; Alexa and Google support is tied to the Wi-Fi hub, while HomeKit, Matter, Thread, and IFTTT-style automation are repeatedly noted as absent or limited.

Tamper detection is described as present with alarms and instant alerts for suspicious activity. Sensitivity is not quantified, but reviewers present it as a meaningful extra security layer.

The front interface is generally a touch-to-wake experience; at least one reviewer wishes it had a motion/wake sensor so it would light up automatically without needing an initial touch.

The touchscreen is generally responsive and easy to read, but its glossy surface can show fingerprints; its main value is supporting the dynamic PIN layout.

At least one review describes multi-step account or device activation verification (codes via SMS and email), indicating stronger account protection than many simple Bluetooth locks.

User access management is robust in reviews, including named users/profiles, per-user fingerprints/PINs, scheduling rules, and straightforward removal or modification in the app.

User and guest management is feature-rich, offering multiple access types and schedules, but the depth can feel like overkill and harder to administer for short-term visitors.

Value is a dominant theme: reviewers repeatedly frame the DL110 as delivering premium-feeling features (fast fingerprint, Wi-Fi remote access, logs, alerts, doorbell) at a far lower price than many competing locks.

Value is the most common knock: reviewers call it expensive for a Bluetooth-first lock, especially once the Wi-Fi hub accessory is added.

Voice control is commonly shown with Alexa/Google (and sometimes SmartThings), typically requiring a voice PIN/code for unlocking, which improves security but adds a step. Some users note occasional need to repeat a command depending on the assistant.

Voice control is not native; Alexa and Google voice commands are described as available only when paired with the Wi-Fi hub.

Warranty coverage is described as strong (including finish and electronics coverage), but reviewers also flag usability and setup complexity as an area needing improvement.

Weather resistance is highlighted often, including IP65 references and weatherproofing elements (like gaskets/rubber backing), with reviewers expressing confidence for typical exterior exposure.

One review explicitly praises weather toughness across extreme temperatures, suggesting good outdoor suitability when installed correctly.

Wi-Fi remote control is consistently supported in demos and written reviews; some reviewers highlight power-saving options (such as scheduling Wi-Fi off at night) to reduce battery impact while keeping core remote features available when needed.

There is no built-in Wi-Fi in the base lock; Wi-Fi connectivity is achieved through an add-on hub or bundled variant, which affects total cost and complexity.