Compare Lockly Secure Plus Smart Lock vs eufy Video Smart Lock S330

Reviewers who discussed logs liked the recordkeeping, citing accurate history entries and even a year of usable activity history.

Access logs were useful for seeing who came and went and which credential unlocked the door.

The app was generally considered easy, clear, and responsive, though one review separated that from a difficult guest-code workflow.

The app was usually described as smooth, easy, useful, or user-friendly across reviews.

Auto-lock has limited but strong evidence, with PCMag reporting that the feature worked very well in testing.

Auto-lock was valued for peace of mind, though one reviewer cautioned against using timed auto-lock without reliable door-position awareness.

Battery evidence is limited to one long-term review, but that reviewer called performance stellar after about a year of use.

Battery life was generally praised as long-lasting, though full charging can take several hours.

Bluetooth evidence is positive, with stable connectivity and unusually quick app response over Bluetooth range.

Build quality was repeatedly praised as sturdy, well-built, strong, and rock solid.

Reviewers consistently praised the heavy, metal-feeling construction and durable build.

Camera and doorbell performance was generally strong, especially video clarity, but motion timing, distance, and visitor button clarity were recurring caveats.

Door-sense evidence was mixed: departure detection was useful, but one reviewer criticized the lock for not knowing whether the door was open.

Compatibility evidence is positive but limited, with reviewers noting standard-door fit and successful single-doorknob replacement.

Door fit was context-dependent: some installations worked smoothly, while shallow strike plates, alignment, and size constraints caused problems.

A post-review feature addition impressed one long-term reviewer by making live-view unlocking more convenient.

Fingerprint access is the strongest feature across reviews, described as fast, accurate, responsive, effective, and unusually good.

Fingerprint performance was strongly positive in most reviews, but one reviewer had repeated failed reads.

Guest access is mixed: several reviewers liked the flexible access options, while one found temporary-code delivery convoluted and buggy.

Guest access was a standout use case, with reviewers liking temporary access, contractor use, and removable access.

The hub requirement is a drawback because remote and voice features require added hardware and cost.

The required bridge/chime was viewed positively when it improved chime, storage, or camera-feed experience.

Design opinions are mixed: reviewers liked the attractive, premium look, but several also called the lock large, bulky, or obvious.

Design was generally liked for its sleek or elegant look, though its large size stood out as a drawback.

Installation is sharply mixed, ranging from simple, app-guided, and quick to unusually complicated and frustrating.

Installation was often described as easy or manageable, but door fit and alignment created trouble for some reviewers.

One reviewer found jam reporting annoying because a calibration issue made the app keep showing the lock as jammed.

Key backup evidence is positive, with reviewers valuing physical-key and backup access as a practical fallback.

The keypad and PIN Genie concept were widely praised for security and usability, although one reviewer found the shifting layout disorienting.

Keypad and touchpad feedback was mostly positive, though one reviewer had wake-up/tap responsiveness issues.

Lock and unlock speed was consistently positive, with instant app response or unlocks taking only a couple of seconds.

When working well, unlocking was described as instant or very fast, especially through fingerprint recognition.

Motor evidence is limited, but PCMag praised the lock for relatively quiet operation.

Motor feedback was split: one long-term reviewer found it solid, while another warned that small alignment resistance could stop locking.

Locking reliability is mixed: some testing found smooth, great performance, while Digital Trends encountered unresolved calibration errors.

Reliability was mixed, ranging from flawless and better-than-prior locks to failures when alignment or one-touch locking was imperfect.

Notifications are a weakness in the limited evidence, with PCMag specifically missing push notification support.

Notifications were mostly praised as quick and useful, but some reviewers reported missed or delayed motion events.

Physical security impressions were positive, centered on wanting a sturdier alternative to flimsy plastic doorbells.

Remote access is a repeated limitation because the lock lacks built-in internet control and needs extra Wi-Fi hardware.

Remote access was a clear strength, with reviewers valuing lock control from the app while away.

Security evidence is positive, with praise for hack resistance and unusually comprehensive account-security setup.

Security/encryption evidence was limited but noted an encryption message before streaming, alongside privacy caution.

Smart-home integration is one of the clearest weaknesses, with repeated criticism of missing or limited platform support.

Smart-home integration was mixed because Alexa/Google support was useful, but reviewers noted the lack of Apple HomeKit, IFTTT, or Matter.

The touchscreen evidence is positive, with reviewers praising seamless operation and responsive keypad behavior.

Touchscreen feedback was split between responsive operation and needing repeated taps to wake it.

User access management is mixed, combining flexible access options with one strong complaint about difficult PIN assignment.

User management evidence was positive, especially around quickly adding additional users.

Value is a common concern because reviewers repeatedly describe the lock, hub path, or overall package as expensive.

Most reviewers considered the price fair for the combined lock, camera, doorbell, fingerprint, and no-extra-fee package.

Voice control is limited because it is not built in and depends on extra Wi-Fi hardware that reviewers criticized.

Voice control performed well in the one review that tested it directly.

Warranty evidence is strongly positive, with Digital Trends calling it one of the best in the smart-lock market.

Weather resistance evidence is positive but limited to one review that judged the casing able to handle harsh conditions.

Wi-Fi is mixed: the lack of built-in Wi-Fi is criticized, but one review found hub-connected Wi-Fi response very fast.

Wi-Fi performance had limited but strong evidence, with one reviewer reporting no live-view latency.