Alen BreatheSmart 75i

Alen BreatheSmart 75i Air Purifier Review

Brand: Alen
Released: April 18, 2021
Updated: 2 months ago
3.8
Overall review score Expert score: 4.0 Customer score: 3.6
370
Review evidence points
44
Scored features
96
Total reviews
12 expert / 84 customer

Bottom Line

Choose the Alen BreatheSmart 75i for quiet, powerful cleaning in large rooms. Skip it if price, replacement filters, bulky size, or app polish matter most.

Best for

Best for people who need serious air cleaning in large bedrooms, open living areas, offices, basements, or smoke/allergy-prone homes and want quiet low-speed operation.

Not for

Not ideal for small rooms, tight budgets, buyers who dislike bulky appliances, or anyone who wants the cheapest CADR per dollar or a flawless app experience.

Verdict

The Alen BreatheSmart 75i earns broad support for large-room purification, low-speed quietness, easy setup, and visible air-quality feedback. Expert tests and many customers describe meaningful reductions in dust, smoke, odors, allergens, and stale air, with auto mode and long filter life adding convenience. The tradeoff is cost and scale: it is expensive to buy, replacement filters can be costly, and the cabinet is too large for small rooms. App feedback is useful but uneven, and customer reports show occasional defects, bad odors, poor arrivals, or support frustrations. Overall, the evidence favors it for serious air cleaning when budget and space allow.

Feature Scorecards

Summary

44 reviewed features
  • Very positive 4.5-5.0
    6 (14%)
  • Positive 3.5-4.4
    23 (52%)
  • Neutral 2.5-3.4
    10 (23%)
  • Negative 1.5-2.4
    5 (11%)

Pros

  • 4.4
    15 reviews strong consensus
    design and appearance: 4.4, 15 reviews, strong consensus
    Design is generally praised for sleek looks and color/panel options despite the unit’s bulk.
  • 4.3
    20 reviews strong consensus
    ease of use: 4.3, 20 reviews, strong consensus
    Setup and everyday operation are usually described as easy or simple, with limited exceptions.
  • 3.9
    47 reviews low consensus
    air purification performance: 3.9, 47 reviews, low consensus
    Most reviews report strong air-cleaning performance, though a minority of customers saw little benefit or defects.
  • 4.0
    19 reviews moderate consensus
    build quality: 4.0, 19 reviews, moderate consensus
    Build quality is mostly positive in expert coverage and customer impressions.
  • 4.0
    21 reviews moderate consensus
    app connectivity: 4.0, 21 reviews, moderate consensus
    App control is useful for remote access and data, but feedback is mixed on discoverability, intuitiveness, and connection reliability.
  • 4.1
    9 reviews moderate consensus
    CADR rating: 4.1, 9 reviews, moderate consensus
    Expert reviews cite strong CADR/CFM numbers that support the large-room use case.

Cons

  • 1.8
    4 reviews strong consensus
    filter replacement cost: 1.8, 4 reviews, strong consensus
    Filter replacement cost/subscription requirements are one of the recurring negatives.
  • 1.8
    2 reviews limited evidence
    listing accuracy: 1.8, 2 reviews, limited evidence
    Listing accuracy is mixed, with “as advertised” praise and a mold-removal complaint.
  • 2.5
    4 reviews low consensus
    reliability: 2.5, 4 reviews, low consensus
    Reliability is mixed: some units ran for years, while others shut off, failed, or would not turn off.
  • 1.8
    1 review
    handle design: 1.8, 1 review
    Handle and wheels help move the large unit, but wheel placement is not universally liked.
  • 1.8
    1 review
    indicator lights: 1.8, 1 review
    Indicator lights are valued for quick air-quality feedback and night-light control, with some false-reading complaints.
  • 1.8
    1 review
    real-time air quality monitoring: 1.8, 1 review
    Real-time monitoring is a useful feature through lights, sensors, app readings, and graphs, though not always trusted.

Compared With Category Average

Compared with other Air Purifiers, this product is above average in app connectivity, control placement, room temperature mixing, near average in ease of use, display readability, below average in real-time air quality monitoring, indicator lights, pet dander removal.

Comparison summary

43 compared features
  • Above average 0.4+ pts higher
    5 (12%)
  • Same as average within 0.3 pts
    21 (49%)
  • Below average 0.4+ pts lower
    17 (40%)

Largest category differences

Attribute This product Category average Difference
real-time air quality monitoring 1.8 3.9 -2.1
indicator lights 1.8 3.9 -2.1
pet dander removal 3.0 4.5 -1.5
handle design 1.8 3.4 -1.6
filter replacement cost 1.8 3.3 -1.5
app connectivity 4.0 3.2 +0.8
allergen reduction 3.8 4.6 -0.8
dust removal 3.4 4.3 -0.9

Consider This Instead

If you want better ease of use

Choose Coway Airmega 50. It scores 4.8 vs 4.3 for ease of use, with a 3.6 overall score.

Compare

If you want better handle design

Choose AirDoctor AD3000. It scores 5.0 vs 1.8 for handle design, with a 4.0 overall score.

Compare

If you want better real-time air quality monitoring

Choose Shark MAX HP202. It scores 5.0 vs 1.8 for real-time air quality monitoring, with a 4.2 overall score.

Compare

If you want better value for money

Choose HEAPETS P358. It scores 4.8 vs 3.2 for value for money, with a 4.1 overall score.

Compare

Compared in Reviews

Products reviewers directly compared with this model, grouped into quick takeaways.

  • Cheaper: price and CADR value The review says the 75i is significantly more expensive than Coway Airmega equivalents.
  • Cheaper: price and CADR value The review says the 75i is significantly more expensive than the Levoit Core 600S.

FAQ

Is the Alen BreatheSmart 75i good for large rooms?

Yes. Expert and customer evidence repeatedly supports large-room use, including open living areas, basements, offices, and large bedrooms.

Is it quiet enough for bedrooms?

Most reviews say it is very quiet or nearly inaudible on low settings, and the lights can be turned off for sleep. Higher speeds can be more noticeable.

Does it help with allergies and asthma symptoms?

Many customers report easier breathing, fewer allergy symptoms, less congestion, and better sleep, though a few users did not feel symptom relief.

Are replacement filters expensive?

Yes, filter cost is a recurring caveat. Several reviews note carbon or specialty filters cost more, and warranty benefits may require a filter subscription.

How useful is the app?

The app can provide remote control, sensor data, graphs, and scheduling in some versions, but reviewers also describe it as hidden, simple, or not intuitive.

Does it remove odors and smoke?

Evidence is generally positive for cooking odors, stale smoke, wildfire smoke, and freshness, especially with carbon-focused filters. Some customers complained of plastic or filter smells.

Sample Expert Reviews We Analyzed

These are a few of the reviews included in our analysis.

Video Reviews

Article Reviews

Top Air Purifiers to Consider

#1 GoveeLife H7124
4.6

Choose the H7124 if you want a quiet smart purifier for odors, dust, pets, and app control. Skip it if you need foolproof Wi-Fi, wall-facing intake, UV light, or strong...

Pros: particle removal effectiveness, pollen removal

Cons: UV-C light effectiveness, air dryness

#2 PuroAir 240
4.6

Best for quiet, simple cleaning in bedrooms or apartments. Skip it if you need verified large-room CADR value, app control, or guaranteed neighbor-smoke removal.

Pros: particle removal effectiveness, dust removal

Cons: CADR rating, air changes per hour

#3 AirDoctor AD3500
4.6

Best for strong room cleaning, allergy relief, odor control, and simple operation. Skip it if high filter costs, a larger footprint, or possible nighttime fan noise would bother you.

Pros: particle removal effectiveness, HEPA filtration

Cons: customer support, warranty coverage

#4 Nuwave Forever, 47265
4.6

Choose this if you want strong odor, dust, smoke, and pet-air cleanup with washable filters. Skip it if turbo noise, Wi-Fi setup, or a high upfront price will bother you.

Pros: filter replacement cost, allergen reduction

Cons: Wi-Fi reliability