-
High-pile carpet pickup was rated very strong in one lab-style test set, but other reviewers emphasize that soft flooring is not this vacuum’s strength overall.
-
Low-pile carpet performance is reported as either excellent in structured pickup tests with the right floor tool or limited to surface-level cleaning in other hands-on use, suggesting variability by nozzle/technique.
-
Design styling was praised in one review for a sleek, modern color scheme, while others focused more on function than appearance.
-
Cord management is a standout: multiple reviews highlight the self-rewinding cord as a major convenience improvement over manual wrapping.
-
-
Hair pickup on hard floors is consistently good, with reviewers noting easy capture of pet hair and limited wrap buildup over time.
-
Price & Value
4.6
★
★
★
★
★
★
★
★
★
★
2 reviews
4.6
Value is a major positive theme: reviewers frequently frame it as a strong performer for its price, especially for hard-floor-heavy homes.
-
Crevice and groove pickup on hard floors is rated strong in testing where fine debris was pulled from between floor cracks effectively.
-
Bin & Bag
4.6
★
★
★
★
★
★
★
★
★
★
3 reviews
4.6
The vacuum is consistently described as bagless with a large dustbin that supports longer cleaning sessions before emptying.
-
Weight
4.6
★
★
★
★
★
★
★
★
★
★
2 reviews
4.6
Weight is repeatedly framed as a benefit, described as lightweight for a canister (though one review reports a heavier measured weight than another).
-
Fine dust pickup on hard floors is consistently strong, with reviews reporting quick removal of flour/sugar-like debris in one pass in testing.
-
Overall sentiment trends positive for hard-floor use and convenience, with clear caveats about rugs/carpets, under-furniture access, and occasional clogging.
-
Ease of use
4.3
★
★
★
★
★
★
★
★
★
★
3 reviews
4.3
Ease of use is generally rated high thanks to lightweight handling, simple controls, and straightforward emptying, tempered by tipping risk and soft-floor awkwardness.
-
Maneuverability is often praised for lightweight rolling and canister flexibility, but real-use notes include tipping when pulled at an angle and awkward movement on rugs.
-
Build quality is characterized as solid for the price in testing-style reviews, though there are practical handling complaints (tipping, nozzle clogging) that affect day-to-day confidence.
-
Tool changes are generally quick and straightforward, with users swapping floorheads and small tools without much hassle once assembled.
-
-
Hose length
4.2
★
★
★
★
★
★
★
★
★
2 reviews
4.2
Hose length is reported as moderate, with some sources citing roughly 6–7 feet, supporting above-floor reach but not class-leading.
-
Onboard tool storage is helpful when present (wand-mounted holder), but storage convenience is imperfect because spare floorheads may not have a dedicated spot.
-
Included tools are generally seen as useful basics (crevice and dusting tools plus multiple floorheads), with mixed notes about completeness and storage convenience depending on the review.
-
Reliability impressions are mostly positive for a mainstream brand and a straightforward corded design, but real-world usability drawbacks (tipping, clogging) are the main concerns.
-
Above-floor cleaning is supported by the hose/wand and small tools, though there are conflicting notes about upholstery coverage depending on the review.
-
Cord length
3.9
★
★
★
★
★
★
★
★
★
2 reviews
3.9
Cord length is noted around 18 feet, which can feel adequate but somewhat limiting compared with longer-reach canisters in larger spaces.
-
Controls & UI
3.9
★
★
★
★
★
★
★
★
★
3 reviews
3.9
Controls are simple and minimal, typically centered on an on/off foot control and a single suction level, which limits fine-tuning across different surfaces.
-
Setup is often described as straightforward and intuitive, but one review reported unclear hose connection directions that slowed initial assembly.
-
Maintenance focuses on periodic filter washing/replacement; reviewers note predictable upkeep, with some mentioning meaningful annual filter costs depending on replacement cadence.
-
Dust containment is generally good for typical household debris, but at least one review flags that filtration is not True HEPA for allergy-focused buyers.