-
Handling is a standout strength: reviewers repeatedly call it lightweight, easy to push forward and backward, and highly maneuverable around furniture compared with full-size carpet cleaners.
-
-
Weight
4.7
★
★
★
★
★
★
★
★
★
★
4 reviews
4.7
Weight is repeatedly highlighted as a major advantage, commonly described around 12–13 lb empty and easy to carry between rooms or floors.
-
Consistently described as ideal for small spaces and quick cleanups, with reviewers emphasizing it is best for small patches, rugs, and localized messes rather than whole-house cleaning.
-
Frequently praised for being compact and easy to store, with owners noting it fits well in small homes and is convenient to pull out for quick cleanups.
-
Assembly and initial setup are consistently described as easy and quick, typically limited to attaching the handle and filling to clear water and solution lines.
-
Price & Value
4.4
★
★
★
★
★
★
★
★
★
★
6 reviews
4.4
Value is a major theme: many reviewers call it inexpensive and impressive for the price, especially for spot and small-area cleaning, though some say maintenance drawbacks reduce overall value compared with similarly priced competitors.
-
Reviews commonly describe strong suction at the nozzle for a compact unit, with good liquid extraction that can leave carpets only lightly damp after additional dry passes, though base suction is described as below average in one instrumented test.
-
Ease of use
4.3
★
★
★
★
★
★
★
★
★
★
8 reviews
4.3
Most users find it easy to operate and maneuver, with simple triggers and controls. Ease-of-use scores are boosted by light weight and straightforward tank removal, but reduced by post-cleaning maintenance hassle for some.
-
Hose length
4.2
★
★
★
★
★
★
★
★
★
1 review
4.2
Most reviews state there is no hose on the standard model, so hose length is effectively not applicable there; one review describes a different PowerDash variant with a longer hose for spot cleaning.
-
Positioned repeatedly as a pet-mess helper: reviewers highlight effectiveness on common pet accidents and the appeal of an upright spot-cleaning style that avoids hands-and-knees scrubbing.
-
Cord wrap and storage are generally viewed as simple and workable for a compact machine, helping with tidy storage even if the cord itself is not long.
-
Drying outcomes range from average to very good depending on technique. Several tests note good water extraction and improved dryness after extra dry passes, but heavy saturation or repeated tank usage in a small area can stay wet for over 24 hours.
-
Noise level
3.8
★
★
★
★
★
★
★
★
★
1 review
3.8
Noise is generally described as typical for carpet cleaners, with one lab-style review noting it was better than most machines tested, but not truly quiet.
-
Odor control
3.8
★
★
★
★
★
★
★
★
★
1 review
3.8
Odor control is not a primary feature focus, but users cleaning pet accidents and spills often report fresher results after extraction, depending on the cleaning solution used.
-
Stain results vary by stain type and depth: ketchup and mustard are often reported as coming out well, chocolate can be stubborn, and deep-penetrating stains may remain underneath even when the surface looks improved.
-
In direct comparisons, performance on stains is often competitive for its size and price, but multiple reviewers still pick a competing compact model as the better overall buy due to easier cleaning and maintenance.
-
Longer-term owners often describe some parts as cheaply made, but several report multiple years of use without breakage, suggesting acceptable durability for a budget compact cleaner if maintained.