-
4.6
based on 1 review
Runtime (Measured, Default): 4.6, based on 1 review
Runtime is commonly cited around 120–127 minutes, which is good for small to medium spaces. Coverage can still suffer in complex layouts because navigation inefficiency wastes runtime.
-
4.5
based on 2 reviews
Hard Floor — Large Debris Intake: 4.5, based on 2 reviews
Large debris intake on hard floors is also strong in measured tests, making it a good fit for kitchens and entryways.
-
4.4
based on 2 reviews
Hard Floor — Fine Dust Pickup: 4.4, based on 2 reviews
Fine dust pickup on hard floors is very strong in measured testing and aligns with positive user impressions on everyday debris.
-
4.3
based on 1 review
Privacy controls: 4.3, based on 1 review
Privacy is called out as a strength by at least one reviewer, citing iRobot’s comparatively robust data and privacy posture. There is little additional privacy detail in other reviews.
-
4.2
based on 4 reviews
Low-profile design: 4.2, based on 4 reviews
The slim body is repeatedly praised for fitting under furniture and docking neatly. This is one of the most consistently positive design notes.
-
4.2
based on 2 reviews
Battery and Charging: 4.2, based on 2 reviews
Battery life is a standout for the class, commonly reported around two hours. Docking is usually adequate, though a few reviewers note occasional trouble finding or returning to the base.
-
4.2
based on 1 review
Packaging quality: 4.2, based on 1 review
Packaging is praised in at least one review for feeling thoughtful and using less plastic, including cloth-style packaging elements.
-
4.2
based on 3 reviews
Suitability for small spaces: 4.2, based on 3 reviews
Best suited to small homes and apartments: reviews note it can cover compact areas well and the long runtime helps. It is less convincing in large, multi-room layouts where navigation inefficiency and manual upkeep become more noticeable.
-
4.0
based on 4 reviews
Under-Furniture Pickup: 4.0, based on 4 reviews
Low profile helps it reach under beds and sofas, and multiple reviewers highlight this as a strength. In very tight spaces it may bump and scuff while trying to navigate.
-
4.0
based on 2 reviews
Build quality and durability: 4.0, based on 2 reviews
Generally feels solid for a budget model, though bumper-based navigation can lead to knocks and scuffs. Long-term durability impressions are cautiously positive but not premium.
-
4.0
based on 1 review
Support and Reliability: 4.0, based on 1 review
Support is a perceived advantage for some, with one reviewer highlighting iRobot warranty/support policies. Beyond that, the reviews include limited long-term reliability evidence and note occasional app/docking quirks.
-
3.9
based on 2 reviews
Noise level: 3.9, based on 2 reviews
Often described as relatively quiet or fan-like rather than shrill. Not silent, but generally acceptable for apartments and daytime cleaning.
-
3.9
based on 6 reviews
Suction and Airflow: 3.9, based on 6 reviews
Strong on hard floors across reviews and tests, with respectable everyday suction. Performance drops on carpet, where fine debris and deeper pickup are only fair, especially versus higher-end bots.
-
3.8
based on 4 reviews
Accessories and Tools: 3.8, based on 4 reviews
Includes the basics (dock, mop pad(s), side brush, and a small cleaning tool), but the kit is sparse versus premium robots. Some reviewers wanted more spares or more specialized cleaning tools.
-
3.8
based on 4 reviews
Ease of use: 3.8, based on 4 reviews
Daily use is easy for basic starts and schedules, and many find it approachable even without advanced tuning. Ease drops if you expect room targeting, keep-out zones, or fully autonomous whole-home navigation.
-
3.8
based on 2 reviews
Hair‑Wrap / Tangle Resistance: 3.8, based on 2 reviews
Hair-wrap resistance is better than average for the price: the roller design and included cleaning tool help, and reviewers report manageable tangles. Heavy pet hair can still require periodic cleanup.
-
3.8
based on 1 review
Cord management: 3.8, based on 1 review
Dock provides basic cord routing/tidy, helping keep the short cable managed, but placement flexibility remains limited.
-
3.8
based on 2 reviews
Assembly and Setup: 3.8, based on 2 reviews
Setup is usually fast and straightforward through the app, often in minutes. One reviewer found the onboarding and model identification confusing, suggesting setup can be less smooth depending on context.
-
3.7
based on 3 reviews
Pet-Ready Features: 3.7, based on 3 reviews
Adequate for routine pet hair, with several reviewers noting manageable fur pickup. Heavy shedders may still trigger frequent emptying, and some tests rate pet-hair pickup as only average.
-
3.5
based on 4 reviews
Water tank: 3.5, based on 4 reviews
Tank capacity supports light, small-area mopping and needs routine emptying/refilling. Reviews imply it is fine for maintenance passes but not designed for heavy, wet scrubbing sessions.
-
3.3
based on 4 reviews
Controls and UI: 3.3, based on 4 reviews
Controls are simple, but the UI is limited: reviewers note basic on-robot buttons and a straightforward app. Some also mention missing advanced controls or occasional limitations like not easily commanding a dock return.
-
3.3
based on 6 reviews
Price and Value: 3.3, based on 6 reviews
Value depends heavily on price: many call it a strong deal when discounted for basic vac+mop, while others say it is overpriced at MSRP given the missing smart mapping and hands-off features.
-
3.3
based on 6 reviews
Mopping performance: 3.3, based on 6 reviews
Mopping is best described as light maintenance: decent for fresh spills and routine dusting, but weak on heavy grime and dried-on stains. Carpets and rugs generally need to be blocked off before mopping.
-
3.3
based on 3 reviews
Comparative performance: 3.3, based on 3 reviews
Cleaning on hard floors can compare well to pricier models in some tests, but the feature set lags behind competitors with smart maps or self-empty docks. Multiple reviewers suggest spending more if you want more autonomy or better navigation.
-
3.3
based on 2 reviews
Docking and Auto-Empty Reliability (Robot): 3.3, based on 2 reviews
Standard dock only (no auto-empty). Docking is usually fine, but multiple reviews mention occasional trouble returning to or locating the base, especially in larger or cluttered areas.
-
3.2
based on 4 reviews
Bin and Bag: 3.2, based on 4 reviews
Small, bagless onboard bin that is easy to remove but fills quickly, especially with pets. No bagged system and no self-empty capability.
-
3.1
based on 2 reviews
Streaking / Residue: 3.1, based on 2 reviews
Sticky spills can smear on the first pass and residue can be tracked. It can improve with repeated passes and a clean pad, but it is not consistently streak-free on messier tests.
-
3.1
based on 6 reviews
AI, Smart, App and Automation: 3.1, based on 6 reviews
App automation covers essentials like scheduling, start/stop, and some suction/water adjustments, plus voice assistant support. It lacks advanced features such as room-specific cleaning, saved smart maps, and keep-out/no-go zones.
-
3.0
based on 3 reviews
Filtration / Dust Containment: 3.0, based on 3 reviews
Filtration is functional but not premium: the filter and bin need regular cleaning. One reviewer disliked the small, paper-like filter and the lack of easy washability.
-
2.9
based on 4 reviews
Stuck resistance: 2.9, based on 4 reviews
Works best in tidy spaces: reviewers report getting wedged on furniture legs, cords, plush rugs, or becoming disoriented. Clearing clutter and using barriers improves success.
-
2.8
based on 1 review
Aesthetic design and finish: 2.8, based on 1 review
Clean, low-profile look, but multiple mentions suggest the shell can scuff or scratch from bumping into furniture. Expect cosmetic wear in tight, cluttered spaces.
-
2.8
based on 1 review
Cord length: 2.8, based on 1 review
Dock power cord length is noted as short in at least one review, which can restrict where the dock can be placed.
-
2.7
based on 5 reviews
Emptying and Mess Control: 2.7, based on 5 reviews
Emptying is manual and frequent due to the small bin, with no self-empty dock. Expect more dust exposure and mess potential than higher-end auto-empty systems.
-
2.6
based on 4 reviews
Maintenance requirements: 2.6, based on 4 reviews
Ownership is maintenance-heavy: frequent bin emptying, filter cleaning, pad washing, and occasional brush/roller checks are commonly mentioned. It is not a hands-off robot.
-
2.5
based on 6 reviews
Map and Path Efficiency (Robot Vacuums): 2.5, based on 6 reviews
Mixed pathing: it can run in systematic rows in a room, but it lacks true smart mapping and can miss or repeat areas in larger, multi-room runs. Several reviews describe erratic navigation and occasional getting lost.
-
2.5
based on 1 review
Solution / Liquid system: 2.5, based on 1 review
Liquid system is basic and water-focused; at least one reviewer notes the brand guidance against detergent. This limits cleaning chemistry options and overall stain-fighting strength.
-
2.4
based on 3 reviews
Dried-On Stain Removal: 2.4, based on 3 reviews
Consistently weak on dried-on or set-in stains. The passive pad and limited pressure perform better on fresh spills and light grime than on hardened messes.
-
2.4
based on 1 review
Carpet — Low-Pile Pickup: 2.4, based on 1 review
Carpet pickup on low-pile is generally mediocre, especially on fine sand and deeper debris. It can maintain lightly soiled rugs but is not a deep-clean option.
-
2.3
based on 2 reviews
Obstacle Avoidance (Robot): 2.3, based on 2 reviews
Obstacle avoidance is basic bumper-style, so it can bump into furniture and struggle with cords or low obstacles. Reviews suggest picking up clutter to reduce stalls and damage.
-
2.0
based on 2 reviews
Area Rug Handling: 2.0, based on 2 reviews
Rug handling during mopping is a recurring pain point: it will mop rugs unless you remove them or block the area. Reviews recommend barriers or manual prep when using mop mode.