-
4.8
based on 1 review
Hard Floor — Large Debris Intake: 4.8, based on 1 review
Large debris pickup on hard floors is described as excellent, with strong results on cereal, cabbage, and other chunky messes.
-
4.8
based on 1 review
Low-profile design: 4.8, based on 1 review
The floorhead is repeatedly described as thin/low-profile, intended to help reach under cabinets and low-clearance areas.
-
4.7
based on 2 reviews
Assembly and Setup: 4.7, based on 2 reviews
Setup is described as straightforward, with key parts (like the handle) snapping/clicking into place and minimal assembly friction.
-
4.7
based on 2 reviews
Tool-change simplicity: 4.7, based on 2 reviews
Tool/part changes are described as simple—brushroll and guards come off via tabs/buttons, and reassembly is portrayed as quick and intuitive.
-
4.6
based on 4 reviews
Maneuverability and Handling: 4.6, based on 4 reviews
Handling is frequently praised: it “glides” easily, turns well once the big mess is handled, and feels easy to steer around corners.
-
4.5
based on 2 reviews
Cordless convenience: 4.5, based on 2 reviews
Cordless operation is repeatedly described as a major convenience for whole-home cleaning, reducing outlet-hopping and saving time versus separate vacuuming and mopping steps.
-
4.5
based on 2 reviews
Versatility: 4.5, based on 2 reviews
The ‘3-in-1’ concept comes through in use: vacuum + mop simultaneously, plus a self-clean routine; some also emphasize a suction-only mode for quicker jobs.
-
4.5
based on 1 review
Hard Floor — Fine Dust Pickup: 4.5, based on 1 review
Fine debris pickup on hard floors is portrayed positively, including strong performance on coffee grounds in at least one test.
-
4.5
based on 1 review
Onboard tool storage: 4.5, based on 1 review
At least one review notes thoughtful storage: the cleaning tool can click into a holder so it’s less likely to get misplaced, and the base is used as an organizing station.
-
4.5
based on 6 reviews
Edge and Baseboard Cleaning (Hard Floors): 4.5, based on 6 reviews
Edge cleaning is a consistent strength—multiple reviewers say it gets closer to walls/baseboards than at least one key competitor and cleans right up to the edge.
-
4.4
based on 5 reviews
Ease of use: 4.4, based on 5 reviews
Ease-of-use is a standout theme: automatic dispensing (no trigger), clear mode switching, and convenient docking/self-cleaning workflows reduce hands-on effort.
-
4.4
based on 4 reviews
Accessories and Tools: 4.4, based on 4 reviews
Reviews highlight a strong accessory bundle: an extra brushroll, cleaning tools/brushes (including hair-cutting features in one unboxing), and a starter cleaning solution.
-
4.4
based on 4 reviews
Mopping performance: 4.4, based on 4 reviews
Mopping performance is praised on common household messes (muddy paw prints, sticky sauces, mayo/green liquid), often needing a couple passes for the toughest spots but leaving floors looking very clean.
-
4.4
based on 3 reviews
Fresh Liquid Pickup Speed: 4.4, based on 3 reviews
Fresh liquid pickup is repeatedly shown as strong, with reviewers calling wet spill cleanup easy and impressively effective in real-time tests.
-
4.3
based on 2 reviews
Noise level: 4.3, based on 2 reviews
Noise is generally framed as reasonable/quiet by at least one hands-on unboxing, while another source cites around ~70 dB, suggesting a moderate sound level for the category.
-
4.3
based on 5 reviews
Self-cleaning cycle: 4.3, based on 5 reviews
Self-cleaning is consistently presented as a real convenience feature; users describe a short docked cycle that flushes the roller and reduces manual brushroll cleanup.
-
4.2
based on 2 reviews
Dirty water sensor: 4.2, based on 2 reviews
-
4.2
based on 2 reviews
Suction and Airflow: 4.2, based on 2 reviews
Suction is portrayed as strong for a wet/dry floor cleaner, including a suction-only mode and at least one report of it pulling in debris from slightly off to the side.
-
4.2
based on 1 review
Build quality and durability: 4.2, based on 1 review
Build impressions are generally positive (e.g., aluminum components called out as lightweight/solid), but longer-term durability confidence is mixed based on some reported failures over time.
-
4.2
based on 1 review
Comparative performance: 4.2, based on 1 review
In direct comparisons (notably vs. Shark HydroVac), reviewers often characterize Kenmore as the more advanced pick due to edge reach, tank size, and brushroll drying features.
-
4.2
based on 1 review
Dried-On Stain Removal: 4.2, based on 1 review
Dried-on mess removal is reported as good—one reviewer shows it lifting a nasty dried spot “pretty good,” especially when using a higher mopping setting.
-
4.2
based on 1 review
Filtration / Dust Containment: 4.2, based on 1 review
One source specifically calls out HEPA filtration and a separated dirty tank; users also mention a filter that needs periodic washing and thorough drying before reinstalling.
-
4.2
based on 1 review
Solution / Liquid system: 4.2, based on 1 review
The solution system is described as automatic (no trigger), with multiple modes that change how much solution is applied during cleaning.
-
4.2
based on 5 reviews
Floor Drying Time: 4.2, based on 5 reviews
Dock-based air drying is frequently highlighted: the base blows air onto the brushroll for hours after cleaning, and one tester reported the mop head was dry by the next morning.
-
4.1
based on 5 reviews
Water tank: 4.1, based on 5 reviews
The two-tank setup (clean vs. dirty) is repeatedly discussed as practical and easy to remove; some comparisons suggest Kenmore’s tanks feel larger than Shark’s.
-
4.1
based on 4 reviews
Price and Value: 4.1, based on 4 reviews
Value is generally viewed as competitive in the mid-tier range—often cited around ~$270 on sale/coupon—with reviewers saying the feature set can justify costing more than lower-priced rivals.
-
4.0
based on 5 reviews
Battery and Charging: 4.0, based on 5 reviews
-
4.0
based on 3 reviews
Odor control: 4.0, based on 3 reviews
Odor control is tied to the air-dry + self-clean routine: reviewers specifically note that keeping the roller from staying wet helps reduce the “stink” that can develop in wet cleaners.
-
3.9
based on 6 reviews
Weight: 3.9, based on 6 reviews
Weight feedback varies: one reviewer calls it light at about 9.5 lb, while another source lists it closer to ~13 lb; most still frame it as manageable rather than ultra-featherweight.
-
3.9
based on 2 reviews
Runtime (Measured, Default): 3.9, based on 2 reviews
Runtime is commonly referenced at around 35 minutes, framed as enough for many standard cleaning sessions but not necessarily for very large spaces on a single charge.
-
3.9
based on 4 reviews
Maintenance requirements: 3.9, based on 4 reviews
Despite self-cleaning, routine maintenance is still necessary—empty/rinse the dirty tank, periodically clean the filter and ensure it dries, and occasionally detail-clean gunk buildup.
-
3.8
based on 2 reviews
Emptying and Mess Control: 3.8, based on 2 reviews
Emptying is generally straightforward, but reviewers still emphasize rinsing/cleaning the dirty tank to prevent buildup; at least one comparison suggests Kenmore’s tank is simpler to fully clean than a rival’s design.
-
3.8
based on 5 reviews
Controls and UI: 3.8, based on 5 reviews
The display and alerts are considered helpful (battery %, tank full/empty, tangle, air-dry), but more than one reviewer says the screen is dim or hard to read.