Roborock Q5 Max+ Robot Vacuum

4.0
(11)

Bottom Line

Choose the Roborock Q5 Max+ if you want standout vacuuming and an auto-empty dock for a budget price; Skip if you need mopping or reliable small-object and cord avoidance, or if loud emptying will bother you.

Best for

Busy homes that want strong vacuuming on mixed floors (especially pet hair) plus the convenience of auto-emptying, and are willing to keep clutter and cords reasonably picked up.

Not for

Anyone who wants mopping, strong small-object avoidance for toys and cables, or a quieter robot/dock for daytime cleaning in occupied rooms.

Verdict

Across the reviews, the Q5 Max+ stands out as a high-value robot that focuses on vacuuming: strong pickup on hard floors and very competitive carpet performance for the price, plus a roomy auto-empty system that cuts day-to-day maintenance. The app and mapping are repeatedly described as stable, fast, and easy to customize with rooms, schedules, and no-go zones. The biggest tradeoff is that it is vacuum-only and lacks advanced object recognition, so cords, low clutter, and small hazards can still cause problems. Noise is another tradeoff: several reviewers note the robot and especially the dock emptying are on the louder side, making scheduling important.

Pros

  • Controls & UI 4.6 ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ 2 reviews 4.6
    Controls and UI, especially in-app controls, are generally praised for clarity and quick access to core features like suction levels, scheduling, and map editing.
  • Overall opinion 4.6 ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ 2 reviews 4.6
    Overall sentiment is strongly positive when expectations match its focus on vacuuming and auto-empty convenience, with consistent caveats around mopping absence, noise, and small-object avoidance.
  • Price & Value 4.5 ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ 10 reviews 4.5
    Value is one of the most consistent themes: reviewers repeatedly frame the Q5 Max+ as delivering near-flagship vacuuming strengths at a much lower cost, especially when discounted.
  • Hard Floor — Large Debris Intake 4.5 ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ 4 reviews 4.5
    Large debris on hard floors is consistently reported as a strength, with tests showing near-complete pickup and good day-to-day sweeping results.
  • Comparative performance 4.5 ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ 4 reviews 4.5
    In direct comparisons, multiple reviewers place it at or near the top among budget robots for vacuum-only cleaning, particularly when prioritizing carpet and overall pickup performance.
  • Emptying & Mess Control 4.5 ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ 2 reviews 4.5
    Emptying mess control is generally strong, with most reviews describing a clean transfer to the dock bag and minimal leftover in the robot bin, though dense debris can leave a small remainder in corners.
  • Hair Pickup — Carpets 4.4 ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ 3 reviews 4.4
    Hair pickup on carpets is typically rated very highly, with multiple tests showing full or near-full pickup, especially for pet hair and general household hair.
  • Hair Pickup — Hard Floors 4.4 ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ 1 review 4.4
    Hair pickup on hard floors is repeatedly described as very good, helped by the dual-roller design and consistent coverage patterns.
  • Battery & Charging 4.4 ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ 7 reviews 4.4
    Battery performance is frequently described as above average for the price, with efficient cleaning runs and long runtimes supporting larger floor plans.
  • Bin & Bag 4.4 ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ 8 reviews 4.4
    The dock bag capacity is repeatedly cited as generous (around 2.5L), supporting low-maintenance ownership. The internal bin is also described as larger than expected for a self-empty model.
  • Edge & Baseboard Cleaning (Hard Floors) 4.4 ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ 2 reviews 4.4
    Edge and baseboard cleaning is generally solid for a round robot, with good pickup along walls, but corners remain a typical limitation.
  • Runtime (Measured, Default) 4.3 ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ 7 reviews 4.3
    Default runtime is often cited as long and practical, enabling full-floor cleans with fewer interruptions, though real-world duration depends on suction level and layout.
  • Docking & Auto-Empty Reliability (Robot) 4.3 ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ 10 reviews 4.3
    Auto-emptying is widely viewed as a major advantage, usually clearing the onboard bin effectively. A few notes mention occasional leftover debris in corners or timing/behavior quirks that can affect repeat empty cycles.
  • AI, Smart & App / Automation 4.3 ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ 8 reviews 4.3
    The app experience is repeatedly described as stable, responsive, and easy to configure, with robust mapping tools, schedules, room/zone control, and no-go zones.
  • Pet-Ready Features 4.3 ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ 3 reviews 4.3
    Pet readiness is a common highlight: strong pet hair pickup, effective day-to-day cleaning, and reduced maintenance thanks to the auto-empty dock, with the main caveat being long-hair cleanup over time.
  • Edge‑Following Accuracy (Robot) 4.3 ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ 1 review 4.3
    Edge-following behavior is generally accurate and consistent for wall lines, though performance still depends on clutter and the robot’s reliance on bump-based interactions for close passes.
  • Onboard tool storage 4.3 ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ 1 review 4.3
    Dock tool storage is called out as a nice convenience in at least one review, keeping the included screwdriver and wrench easy to find.
  • Privacy controls 4.3 ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ 1 review 4.3
    Privacy is implicitly improved versus camera-based models because several reviews note the lack of advanced camera object recognition or video features, though it still relies on sensors and app connectivity.
  • Map & Path Efficiency (Robot Vacuums) 4.3 ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ 9 reviews 4.3
    Mapping and path efficiency are consistently praised: fast, orderly coverage with reliable multi-level mapping and strong room-based control. The main limitation is that obstacle handling is not advanced on small items.
  • Child lock 4.3 ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ 2 reviews 4.3
    Child lock and family-friendly control options are mentioned as available in the app feature set, supporting safer use in busy households.
  • Hard Floor — Fine Dust Pickup 4.2 ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ 5 reviews 4.2
    Hard-floor fine debris pickup is generally strong, though some reviews mention stubborn fine material may take extra passes and one source notes weaker fine debris performance on carpets.
  • Carpet — Low-Pile Pickup 4.2 ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ 7 reviews 4.2
    Low-pile carpet pickup is often described as excellent for the price, with several tests placing it at or near the top of budget comparisons, though fine debris deep-in-carpet can still be challenging.
  • Aesthetic design & finish 4.2 ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ 1 review 4.2
    Design and finish are generally viewed positively for the category, with a few reviewers appreciating branding details and a dock that is not overly obtrusive.
  • Filtration / Dust Containment 4.2 ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ 1 review 4.2
  • Suction & Airflow 4.2 ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ 6 reviews 4.2
    Reviewers repeatedly describe strong vacuuming performance for the price, with emphasis on effective debris pickup across surfaces and a powerful feel for a budget robot.
  • Accessories & Tools 4.1 ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ 1 review 4.1
    Included extras and tools are noted as helpful in some reviews, including spare bags and basic assembly tools that simplify initial setup and ongoing use.
  • Cord management 4.1 ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ 1 review 4.1
    Cable management features on the dock are mentioned as a practical touch that helps keep the station area tidy.
  • Software-update support / feature longevity 4.1 ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ 1 review 4.1
    Software support and updates are referenced as available through the app, with reviewers generally describing stable operation and ongoing firmware/app management features.
  • Ongoing ownership costs (bags, filters, batteries) 4.1 ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ 3 reviews 4.1
    Ongoing costs are mainly tied to replacing dock bags and occasional filters. Reviewers generally treat the cost as modest, with the convenience outweighing the expense for many owners.
  • Stuck resistance 4.0 ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ 2 reviews 4.0
    Stuck resistance is generally good for the price when floors are reasonably picked up, but small clutter and cords can still lead to trouble spots.
  • Assembly and Setup 4.0 ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ 1 review 4.0
    Setup is generally described as straightforward, including basic dock assembly and app pairing, with most users getting schedules and maps running quickly.
  • Hair‑Wrap / Tangle Resistance 3.9 ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ 9 reviews 3.9
    Tangle resistance is better than many budget rivals, but not perfect. Several sources praise the dual rubber rollers for reducing tangles, while others note long hair can still wrap and require periodic maintenance.
  • Maintenance requirements 3.7 ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ 4 reviews 3.7
    Maintenance is moderate: the auto-empty dock reduces daily effort, but owners still need periodic brush and side-brush cleaning, plus filter and bag replacement.
  • Overall durability/longevity 3.6 ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ 1 review 3.6
    Long-term durability feedback is mostly positive, but there are mentions of minor squeaks developing over time and the usual wear-and-tear maintenance needs around brushes and filters.

Cons

  • Area Rug Handling 3.3 ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ 1 review 3.3
    Area rug handling is generally solid for standard rugs, but thicker or more difficult rugs can reduce performance and increase the chance of errors or slowdowns.
  • Noise level 3.2 ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ 7 reviews 3.2
    Operational noise during cleaning is commonly described as noticeable to loud, with multiple reviewers recommending scheduling runs for when you are out or in another room.
  • Carpet — High-Pile Pickup 3.2 ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ 1 review 3.2
    High-pile and very thick carpet handling is mixed; some tests are done on high-pile and look good, but at least one review reports difficulty climbing onto very thick carpeting.
  • Corner Cleaning (Robot) 3.2 ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ 1 review 3.2
    Corner cleaning is a recurring limitation, with some reports of leftover debris in corners where a round robot cannot fully reach.
  • Crevice / Groove Pickup (Hard Floors) 2.9 ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ 2 reviews 2.9
    Crevice and groove pickup is a recurring weak spot; multiple reviews call out below-average crevice cleaning even when overall pickup is strong.
  • Dock noise 2.6 ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ 3 reviews 2.6
    Dock emptying noise is frequently called loud, often the single biggest annoyance mentioned, especially if you are nearby when it empties.
  • Obstacle Avoidance (Robot) 2.2 ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ 6 reviews 2.2
    Small-object avoidance is a consistent weakness. Reviews repeatedly warn it can bump into or run over low items and can get snagged by cords without careful prep or no-go zones.
  • Mopping performance 1.0 ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ 9 reviews 1.0
    The Q5 Max+ is repeatedly described as not capable of mopping, making it a poor fit for buyers who want a combo mop-vac robot.

FAQ

Does the Roborock Q5 Max+ mop?

No. Multiple reviews emphasize it is vacuum-only, so you will need a different model if mopping is a must.

How well does it handle pet hair and long hair?

Most reviews say pet hair pickup is excellent and the dual rubber rollers help, but long hair can still collect and require periodic brush and side-brush cleaning.

Will it avoid cords, socks, and small clutter?

Not reliably. Several reviewers note it can bump into or run over low objects and can get into trouble with cables, so no-go zones and basic tidying help a lot.

How loud is it?

The robot is often described as fairly loud during cleaning, and the auto-empty dock is commonly called loud, especially during the emptying cycle.

How often do you need to replace the dock bag?

Reviews frequently mention the 2.5L bag can last for weeks and is often cited around a month to nearly two months depending on home size, pets, and run frequency.

Reviews we analyzed

Video Reviews

Article Reviews