-
Crevice and groove pickup on hard floors is a standout strength in test-driven reviews, with near-complete debris removal reported in structured crevice lanes.
-
Fine dust pickup on hard floors is typically excellent in structured tests, though a small amount of ultra-fine debris can occasionally be missed in edge cases.
-
Battery life is a recurring strength, with reports of completing large areas on a single charge and support for recharge-and-resume behaviors in the broader Q5 family discussions.
-
Build quality is frequently rated as solid, with durable plastics and sturdy parts. The dock and robot are commonly described as well-constructed for expected long-term use.
-
Large debris intake on hard floors is a consistent strength, with reviewers describing strong pickup of mixed debris sizes in lanes and day-to-day messes.
-
Pet owners generally report strong pet hair pickup and practical everyday performance, but should be aware that weak obstacle avoidance increases the risk of issues with pet accidents or floor clutter.
-
Ease of use
4.7
★
★
★
★
★
★
★
★
★
★
4 reviews
4.7
Day-to-day use is rated highly thanks to app controls, dependable navigation, and reduced manual emptying. The biggest usability friction points come from basic obstacle avoidance and manual mop-pad upkeep.
-
High-pile carpet pickup is generally strong for the price tier in test-style reviews, with consistently high debris removal and positive real-world impressions when carpet boost is enabled.
-
Bin & Bag
4.7
★
★
★
★
★
★
★
★
★
★
4 reviews
4.7
A larger-than-average onboard bin and a sealed bag in the dock reduce frequent emptying. The system is generally effective for routine debris, with occasional edge cases around evacuation behavior and hair buildup.
-
Medium-pile performance is generally reported as strong, aligning more closely with high-pile outcomes than low-pile edge cases in structured testing.
-
Mapping and path efficiency are widely praised, with fast initial mapping, accurate room segmentation, and consistent methodical coverage. Efficient navigation is one of the product line’s most repeated strengths.
-
The app is consistently praised for strong automation and controls: mapping, room/zone cleaning, schedules, no-go zones, do-not-disturb, and firmware support. Some mopping-related controls are limited depending on the reviewer experience.
-
Setup is usually quick and guided (often just a few minutes), though occasional phone/Wi-Fi pairing hiccups are mentioned. Once connected, initial mapping is typically fast and accurate.
-
Controls & UI
4.4
★
★
★
★
★
★
★
★
★
★
4 reviews
4.4
Controls are simple on-device (basic buttons) with most functionality handled through the app. Users generally find UI straightforward and feature-rich once configured.
-
Included extras and components are generally well thought out (spare filters/bags and practical setup pieces show up in unboxings). Most users rely on core robot + dock rather than lots of specialty tools.
-
Design is typically described as sleek and unobtrusive, with a premium-leaning look for the price, though darker finishes can show dust quickly in some homes.
-
Overall sentiment clusters around strong vacuuming and navigation with clear caveats: basic obstacle avoidance and weak mopping. Recommendations are strongest for vacuum-first buyers.
-
-
Edge/baseboard pickup is often described as excellent, with the robot running parallel to edges and using its side brush effectively in structured edge tests.
-
Docking and auto-empty are commonly reliable and effective at removing bin contents, but the dock can be loud and occasional hair-related evacuation issues are reported in harsher home tests.
-
Stuck resistance is generally good in open, mapped spaces, but clutter and small objects (toys/cables) can still cause interruptions due to basic object handling and limited recognition.
-
Dual roller designs are often credited with reducing tangles versus older single-roller systems, but long-hair tangling can still occur and may require occasional roller cleaning.
-
Price & Value
4.1
★
★
★
★
★
★
★
★
★
6 reviews
4.1
Value is usually rated high when judged as a vacuum-first robot with an auto-empty dock, especially on discount. Some reviewers feel the asking price is harder to justify if you expect premium vacuuming plus real mopping.
-
Noise level
4.0
★
★
★
★
★
★
★
★
★
4 reviews
4.0
Vacuum noise is generally around typical robot levels, while the self-empty cycle is noticeably louder. Most describe it as tolerable given the maintenance savings.
-
Maintenance is moderate: bags reduce bin-empty work, but brush/roller checks for hair and manual mop-pad cleaning remain. Lack of mop auto-wash increases hands-on upkeep if you mop often.
-
Mess control is improved by the sealed-bag dock and larger bin. However, heavy hair loads can still demand more frequent runs or manual checks to prevent buildup-related problems.
-
Ongoing costs are mainly bags and consumables (filters/brushes). Some test-driven reviews estimate a modest annual maintenance budget, with costs rising if you replace pads/brushes more often.
-
Low-pile carpet pickup is usually good but can be the comparatively weaker carpet surface in some tests, often tied to seal quality and fine debris embedded deeper in fibers.
-
Debris pathways and dock channels are generally practical to inspect and maintain, but some reports note that hair and fine debris can complicate evacuation if allowed to accumulate.
-
Its LiDAR turret makes it taller than some low-profile bots, which can limit under-furniture access in tighter clearances compared with slimmer models.