-
Mapping and path efficiency sit around the test average with coverage speed similar to the Yeedi S14 and no major navigation advantages noted.
-
As a more expensive flagship with similar features to the Yeedi S14 but weaker cleaning in key areas, the Saros 10 offers only middling value in direct comparison.
-
Deep cleaning of embedded sand in medium pile carpet is a bit below average, matching the Yeedi S14’s underperforming score rather than excelling.
-
Floors remain wetter for longer after mopping compared with roller type systems, since the Saros 10’s pad does not reclaim water into a separate tank.
-
Fresh liquid pickup is slower and messier than the S14, as the pad design tends to spread wet spills without efficiently recovering the excess water.
-
Carpet pet hair pickup trails the S14, with the Saros 10 posting noticeably worse 2.5 inch hair test results and ranking below the best performers in this metric.
-
The single pad style mop delivers weaker mopping than the S14’s roller system, spreading more liquid and earning much lower dried stain scores in side by side tests.
-
Pad based mopping on the Saros 10 is more prone to streaking and residue, smearing dirty water compared with the cleaner finish from roller style mops.