Roborock Saros 10

Verdict

The Roborock Saros 10 is a more expensive flagship that offers slightly better obstacle avoidance and comparable navigation to the Yeedi S14, but with weaker suction and clearly inferior mopping that leaves more water and streaks. Unless you strongly prefer the Roborock ecosystem, the S14 generally delivers better overall cleaning performance and value in this comparison.

Pros

  • Low-profile design 1 review 4.5
    The Saros 10’s retracting LiDAR tower allows it to stay low enough to reach under more furniture while still raising its sensor mast when needed for full room scanning and navigation.
  • Obstacle Avoidance (Robot) 1 review 4.5
    Obstacle avoidance performance slightly exceeds the Yeedi S14, placing the Saros 10 near the top of tested robots for reliably steering around common hazards.
  • Innovation compared to competitors 1 review 4.0
    Reviews frame the Saros 10 as an innovative step, pairing a retractable LiDAR tower with a threshold lifting chassis to blend slim design with features usually found on taller flagships.
  • Stuck resistance 1 review 4.0
    The Saros 10 shares the lineup’s lift up threshold system, helping it climb larger doorway lips and other floor transitions so it is less likely to get stuck when crossing between rooms.
  • Suction & Airflow 1 review 3.5
    Suction on the Saros 10 is adequate but clearly weaker than the Yeedi S14, which is described as having significantly above average power on max.

Cons

  • Map & Path Efficiency (Robot Vacuums) 1 review 3.0
    Mapping and path efficiency sit around the test average with coverage speed similar to the Yeedi S14 and no major navigation advantages noted.
  • Price & Value 1 review 3.0
    As a more expensive flagship with similar features to the Yeedi S14 but weaker cleaning in key areas, the Saros 10 offers only middling value in direct comparison.
  • Carpet — Medium-Pile Pickup 1 review 2.5
    Deep cleaning of embedded sand in medium pile carpet is a bit below average, matching the Yeedi S14’s underperforming score rather than excelling.
  • Floor Drying Time 1 review 2.5
    Floors remain wetter for longer after mopping compared with roller type systems, since the Saros 10’s pad does not reclaim water into a separate tank.
  • Fresh Liquid Pickup Speed 1 review 2.5
    Fresh liquid pickup is slower and messier than the S14, as the pad design tends to spread wet spills without efficiently recovering the excess water.
  • Hair Pickup — Carpets 1 review 2.5
    Carpet pet hair pickup trails the S14, with the Saros 10 posting noticeably worse 2.5 inch hair test results and ranking below the best performers in this metric.
  • Mopping performance 1 review 2.5
    The single pad style mop delivers weaker mopping than the S14’s roller system, spreading more liquid and earning much lower dried stain scores in side by side tests.
  • Streaking / Residue 1 review 2.5
    Pad based mopping on the Saros 10 is more prone to streaking and residue, smearing dirty water compared with the cleaner finish from roller style mops.