-
Retractable mop lifting system is repeatedly cited as best-in-class for protecting rugs: the pad fully stows on top rather than hovering close to carpet, reducing drips and cross-contamination concerns.
-
Fine dust pickup on hard floors is generally strong in everyday cleaning, contributing to a noticeably cleaner baseline between deep cleans.
-
Obstacle avoidance is a core strength: consistently strong on cords and common clutter, with pet-waste avoidance highlighted; not perfect, as some odd items (mugs, drapes, tiny toys, straps) can still be pushed or snagged.
-
Setup is usually described as straightforward with guided app onboarding and mapping runs; mapping can take more than one pass and may be slower than LiDAR-based bots in initial setup.
-
Included accessories commonly noted: extra filters/side brushes, mop pads, and cleaning solution samples; overall kit is seen as complete for getting started.
-
Build quality is commonly described as sturdy and well-finished, with thoughtful design touches; long-term durability perceptions vary mostly with software/navigation reliability rather than physical wear.
-
Noise level
4.4
★
★
★
★
★
★
★
★
★
★
1 review
4.4
During cleaning, noise is commonly described as moderate to fairly quiet for a robot vacuum, especially on carpet; the main noise complaint centers on the dock, not the robot itself.
-
Strong smart feature set: scheduling, room/zone routines, recommendations, and learning-based adjustments are frequently praised; some reviewers still want finer manual controls (for example, suction) or better job-queue flexibility, and a few note occasional app quirks/crashes.
-
Low-pile carpet pickup is typically strong for a Roomba, though a few tests note small misses with certain fine debris and occasional need for extra passes.
-
Suction/airflow performance is generally perceived as strong in day-to-day pickup (especially when paired with dual rollers), though some reviewers note it can lag high-suction competitors on heavy spillages or deep crevices.
-
Docking and auto-empty are generally reliable and convenient, though a few reports describe occasional emptying failures or hardware issues with a unit/base; most users still find the dock a major usability upgrade.
-
High-pile carpet and pet-hair pickup are frequently rated very good to excellent, though ultra-plush rugs and embedded debris may still benefit from multiple passes.
-
Mapping and systematic coverage are often described as accurate and reliable once trained, but camera-based navigation can be less time-efficient than LiDAR in complex spaces and a minority of experiences report stalled/errored runs.
-
Mopping is generally rated good for routine upkeep and light messes, leaving floors shinier; it is commonly described as less aggressive than true scrubbing systems and may need multiple passes for tougher stains.
-
Large debris intake is good for routine messes, but several reviewers note it can be overwhelmed by big, dense spillages (flour/rice/oats), sometimes pushing or scattering debris before recovering.
-
Ongoing costs mainly come from disposable dock bags and occasional replacement brushes/filters; several reviews view bags as convenient and cleaner to handle, but they add recurring expense versus bagless docks.
-
Price & Value
3.5
★
★
★
★
★
★
★
★
★
8 reviews
3.5
Value depends heavily on sale pricing: at full MSRP it is considered premium and missing some dock automation features, but discounts can make it a compelling buy for its avoidance and carpet performance.