-
4.8
based on 7 reviews
Mop lifting system: 4.8, based on 7 reviews
Retractable mop lifting system is repeatedly cited as best-in-class for protecting rugs: the pad fully stows on top rather than hovering close to carpet, reducing drips and cross-contamination concerns.
-
4.7
based on 3 reviews
Hard Floor — Fine Dust Pickup: 4.7, based on 3 reviews
Fine dust pickup on hard floors is generally strong in everyday cleaning, contributing to a noticeably cleaner baseline between deep cleans.
-
4.4
based on 13 reviews
Obstacle Avoidance (Robot): 4.4, based on 13 reviews
Obstacle avoidance is a core strength: consistently strong on cords and common clutter, with pet-waste avoidance highlighted; not perfect, as some odd items (mugs, drapes, tiny toys, straps) can still be pushed or snagged.
-
4.4
based on 3 reviews
Assembly and Setup: 4.4, based on 3 reviews
Setup is usually described as straightforward with guided app onboarding and mapping runs; mapping can take more than one pass and may be slower than LiDAR-based bots in initial setup.
-
4.4
based on 1 review
Accessories and Tools: 4.4, based on 1 review
Included accessories commonly noted: extra filters/side brushes, mop pads, and cleaning solution samples; overall kit is seen as complete for getting started.
-
4.4
based on 1 review
Build quality and durability: 4.4, based on 1 review
Build quality is commonly described as sturdy and well-finished, with thoughtful design touches; long-term durability perceptions vary mostly with software/navigation reliability rather than physical wear.
-
4.4
based on 1 review
Noise level: 4.4, based on 1 review
During cleaning, noise is commonly described as moderate to fairly quiet for a robot vacuum, especially on carpet; the main noise complaint centers on the dock, not the robot itself.
-
4.3
based on 9 reviews
AI, Smart, App and Automation: 4.3, based on 9 reviews
Strong smart feature set: scheduling, room/zone routines, recommendations, and learning-based adjustments are frequently praised; some reviewers still want finer manual controls (for example, suction) or better job-queue flexibility, and a few note occasional app quirks/crashes.
-
4.3
based on 2 reviews
Carpet — Low-Pile Pickup: 4.3, based on 2 reviews
Low-pile carpet pickup is typically strong for a Roomba, though a few tests note small misses with certain fine debris and occasional need for extra passes.
-
4.3
based on 1 review
Suction and Airflow: 4.3, based on 1 review
Suction/airflow performance is generally perceived as strong in day-to-day pickup (especially when paired with dual rollers), though some reviewers note it can lag high-suction competitors on heavy spillages or deep crevices.
-
4.2
based on 9 reviews
Docking and Auto-Empty Reliability (Robot): 4.2, based on 9 reviews
Docking and auto-empty are generally reliable and convenient, though a few reports describe occasional emptying failures or hardware issues with a unit/base; most users still find the dock a major usability upgrade.
-
4.2
based on 4 reviews
Carpet — High-Pile Pickup: 4.2, based on 4 reviews
High-pile carpet and pet-hair pickup are frequently rated very good to excellent, though ultra-plush rugs and embedded debris may still benefit from multiple passes.
-
4.0
based on 16 reviews
Map and Path Efficiency (Robot Vacuums): 4.0, based on 16 reviews
Mapping and systematic coverage are often described as accurate and reliable once trained, but camera-based navigation can be less time-efficient than LiDAR in complex spaces and a minority of experiences report stalled/errored runs.
-
3.9
based on 11 reviews
Mopping performance: 3.9, based on 11 reviews
Mopping is generally rated good for routine upkeep and light messes, leaving floors shinier; it is commonly described as less aggressive than true scrubbing systems and may need multiple passes for tougher stains.
-
3.9
based on 3 reviews
Hard Floor — Large Debris Intake: 3.9, based on 3 reviews
Large debris intake is good for routine messes, but several reviewers note it can be overwhelmed by big, dense spillages (flour/rice/oats), sometimes pushing or scattering debris before recovering.
-
3.6
based on 1 review
Ongoing ownership costs (bags, filters, batteries): 3.6, based on 1 review
Ongoing costs mainly come from disposable dock bags and occasional replacement brushes/filters; several reviews view bags as convenient and cleaner to handle, but they add recurring expense versus bagless docks.
-
3.5
based on 8 reviews
Price and Value: 3.5, based on 8 reviews
Value depends heavily on sale pricing: at full MSRP it is considered premium and missing some dock automation features, but discounts can make it a compelling buy for its avoidance and carpet performance.
-
3.4
based on 6 reviews
Battery and Charging: 3.4, based on 6 reviews
Battery feedback is mixed: some tests report long runtimes (especially in vacuum-only mode), while others describe below-average endurance for a premium bot; recharge-and-resume helps mitigate this.
-
3.4
based on 1 review
Crevice / Groove Pickup (Hard Floors): 3.4, based on 1 review
Crevice and edge-line pickup is mixed: capable overall, but some tests note weaker crevice performance versus higher-suction rivals and occasional residue along rug edges.
-
3.3
based on 5 reviews
Maintenance requirements: 3.3, based on 5 reviews
Maintenance workload is moderate: dust emptying is automated, but mop pads and water refills are manual; periodic brush/side-brush cleaning is needed, especially with long hair or heavy debris.
-
3.3
based on 4 reviews
Hair‑Wrap / Tangle Resistance: 3.3, based on 4 reviews
Tangle resistance is generally good on the main rubber rollers versus many rivals, but long hair can still wrap (often on the side brush) and needs regular clearing.
-
3.3
based on 2 reviews
Privacy controls: 3.3, based on 2 reviews
Privacy is periodically raised due to the front camera and cloud-based maps/images; reviewers note opt-in image review and app controls, but privacy-sensitive buyers may still be cautious.
-
3.2
based on 2 reviews
Corner Cleaning (Robot): 3.2, based on 2 reviews
Corner cleaning is adequate but not class-leading; multiple reviews mention missed debris in tight corners or along awkward nooks.
-
3.2
based on 1 review
Bin and Bag: 3.2, based on 1 review
Bagged dock system is viewed as clean and allergy-friendly, with spare-bag storage noted; onboard bin/tank combo is relatively small, contributing to more frequent intervention for mopping.
-
3.2
based on 1 review
Odor control: 3.2, based on 1 review
Odor is mostly contained while the dock is closed, but some users notice a dusty smell when opening the base to swap the bag, similar to other bagged vacuums.
-
3.1
based on 2 reviews
Water tank: 3.1, based on 2 reviews
Water tank is considered small, often requiring frequent refills for larger homes or higher water settings; mopping remains manual-maintenance heavy compared with newer docks that refill automatically.
-
3.0
based on 9 reviews
Dock noise: 3.0, based on 9 reviews
Dock self-emptying noise is a consistent negative, often described as startlingly loud for a short burst, with several measurements around high-80s to around 90+ dB.
-
3.0
based on 2 reviews
Support and Reliability: 3.0, based on 2 reviews
Support and reliability feedback is mixed: some reports mention unit faults or navigation/app instability, while others describe consistent hands-off operation and responsive warranty handling.