-
4.3
based on 8 reviews
Hard Floor — Large Debris Intake: 4.3, based on 8 reviews
Large debris intake on hard floors is consistently praised, with strong results on tracked-in dirt and common snack-size debris.
-
4.3
based on 5 reviews
Water tank: 4.3, based on 5 reviews
The large, self-refilling water setup supports longer mopping sessions and is repeatedly cited as a practical advantage over smaller hybrid systems.
-
4.3
based on 1 review
Carpet — Medium-Pile Pickup: 4.3, based on 1 review
Medium-pile carpet pickup is generally strong on surface debris, but deep-cleaning performance varies and some reviews mention needing extra passes.
-
4.3
based on 1 review
Dried-On Stain Removal: 4.3, based on 1 review
Dried-on mess performance is better than typical robot mop combos in several tests, though it is not a full replacement for manual scrubbing on heavy grime.
-
4.3
based on 4 reviews
Suction and Airflow: 4.3, based on 4 reviews
Across reviews, suction is generally above average and strong enough for everyday debris, though a few tests note weaker results on very fine powder or certain carpets.
-
4.2
based on 2 reviews
Assembly and Setup: 4.2, based on 2 reviews
Setup is usually described as straightforward, with guided app steps; mapping can take a bit of time but is not typically a blocker.
-
4.2
based on 10 reviews
Stuck resistance: 4.2, based on 10 reviews
Stuck resistance is often a strength thanks to threshold handling and lift behavior, but there are scattered reports of hesitations on low furniture or tricky transitions.
-
4.2
based on 6 reviews
Carpet — Low-Pile Pickup: 4.2, based on 6 reviews
Low-pile carpet pickup is usually strong for day-to-day debris, though some reviewers mention it occasionally needs a second pass to finish the job.
-
4.1
based on 3 reviews
Filtration / Dust Containment: 4.1, based on 3 reviews
HEPA filtration and good dust containment are commonly highlighted, with several sources positioning it as a solid option for allergy-conscious homes.
-
4.1
based on 8 reviews
Mop lifting system: 4.1, based on 8 reviews
The mop lifting and pad-drop approach is a key benefit for mixed flooring, though some reviewers note lag or that it is less refined than the best-in-class systems.
-
4.1
based on 12 reviews
Mopping performance: 4.1, based on 12 reviews
Mopping is one of the strongest aspects in many reviews, with good agitation and stain handling, though it can run a bit wet and won’t replace deep manual scrubbing.
-
4.1
based on 10 reviews
Obstacle Avoidance (Robot): 4.1, based on 10 reviews
Obstacle avoidance ranges from average to excellent: it often avoids larger items, but some reports include cord run-overs or hesitation around unrecognized obstacles.
-
4.0
based on 4 reviews
Streaking / Residue: 4.0, based on 4 reviews
Many reviews report minimal streaking and better-than-average wipe-and-lift behavior, but a few saw smearing when the pad was very wet or the pass was shallow.
-
4.0
based on 12 reviews
Docking and Auto-Empty Reliability (Robot): 4.0, based on 12 reviews
Docking and hands-free automation are major strengths, yet a minority of reviews cite reliability issues with auto-empty strength or the thoroughness of pad drying.
-
4.0
based on 4 reviews
Hair Pickup — Carpets: 4.0, based on 4 reviews
Carpet hair pickup scores well in some tests, but other reviewers report occasional pet-hair clumps or missed strands on carpet.
-
4.0
based on 2 reviews
Ease of use: 4.0, based on 2 reviews
Day-to-day use is generally easy once set up, but app lag and the occasional navigation quirk can add friction.
-
3.9
based on 9 reviews
Self-cleaning cycle: 3.9, based on 9 reviews
The self-cleaning dock is a standout: it can wash pads automatically, but drying can be noisy and some reviewers wish it were hotter or more thorough.
-
3.9
based on 4 reviews
Odor control: 3.9, based on 4 reviews
The odor-neutralizing cartridge is mentioned as a useful quality-of-life feature, especially in pet homes, though its impact is subjective.
-
3.9
based on 3 reviews
Maintenance requirements: 3.9, based on 3 reviews
The dock reduces day-to-day maintenance, but owners still need periodic tray cleaning, sensor wipe-downs, and hair removal—especially in pet or long-hair homes.
-
3.8
based on 3 reviews
Hair Pickup — Hard Floors: 3.8, based on 3 reviews
Hair pickup on hard floors is generally good, though long-hair performance can vary depending on maintenance and brush condition.
-
3.8
based on 4 reviews
Area Rug Handling: 3.8, based on 4 reviews
Area rug handling benefits from mop lift/drop behavior to keep rugs drier, but a few reviewers mention imperfect carpet detection in mixed-floor homes.
-
3.8
based on 2 reviews
Carpet — High-Pile Pickup: 3.8, based on 2 reviews
High-pile carpet results are more variable, with some tests noting leftover loose debris on longer fibers compared to its hard-floor performance.
-
3.7
based on 7 reviews
Corner Cleaning (Robot): 3.7, based on 7 reviews
Corner cleaning improves with edge air-blasts and pad reach, yet multiple reviews still recommend a quick manual touch-up for tight corners.
-
3.7
based on 10 reviews
Edge‑Following Accuracy (Robot): 3.7, based on 10 reviews
Edge following is generally decent and helped by edge-focused features, but several reviewers note it keeps a small buffer from baseboards rather than hugging edges tightly.
-
3.6
based on 4 reviews
Hard Floor — Fine Dust Pickup: 3.6, based on 4 reviews
Fine dust pickup on hard floors is generally good, but a few tests report it can push around small grains or struggle with very fine powder without extra passes.
-
3.6
based on 12 reviews
Map and Path Efficiency (Robot Vacuums): 3.6, based on 12 reviews
Navigation and path efficiency vary widely by reviewer: some praise fast, organized coverage, while others describe slower runs, random patterns, or occasional hesitation.
-
3.6
based on 9 reviews
Floor Drying Time: 3.6, based on 9 reviews
Floor drying is often described as quick after mopping, yet some tests say it can leave floors wetter than preferred and the dock drying cycle can run for hours.
-
3.4
based on 3 reviews
Hair‑Wrap / Tangle Resistance: 3.4, based on 3 reviews
Tangle resistance is mixed: some reviewers say the brush resists wrap well, while others experienced long-hair tangles that required manual cleanup.
-
3.3
based on 7 reviews
Noise level: 3.3, based on 7 reviews
Noise feedback is mixed: some reviewers found the robot quiet enough to run during calls, while others said the vacuum or the mop-pad drying cycle is noticeably loud.
-
3.3
based on 9 reviews
Price and Value: 3.3, based on 9 reviews
Value is polarizing: some reviewers call it compelling for the self-washing dock and mopping results, while others feel the price is hard to justify given app and carpet tradeoffs.
-
3.3
based on 2 reviews
Bin and Bag: 3.3, based on 2 reviews
It uses a bagless system with an auto-empty base, which reduces frequent emptying, but the onboard bin is small and some owners still report occasional manual emptying.
-
3.3
based on 12 reviews
AI, Smart, App and Automation: 3.3, based on 12 reviews
The app covers basics like scheduling, room selection, and no-go zones, but multiple reviews call it laggy or less feature-rich than leading competitors.
-
3.3
based on 3 reviews
Emptying and Mess Control: 3.3, based on 3 reviews
The auto-empty system improves mess control overall, but reliability isn’t perfect—some reviewers report partial emptying or inconsistent suction at the base.
-
3.2
based on 6 reviews
Solution / Liquid system: 3.2, based on 6 reviews
Liquid/solution guidance is inconsistent across reviews: some describe using water or a mix, while others report unclear instructions or avoid cleaning solution altogether.
-
3.1
based on 2 reviews
Dock noise: 3.1, based on 2 reviews
Dock noise is mostly tied to the pad drying fan or hum, which can be loud for some and may run for an extended time.
-
2.3
based on 1 review
Battery and Charging: 2.3, based on 1 review
In at least one detailed test, runtime and efficiency were below average for a flagship-priced robot, especially when compared to top competitors.