If you want better spin-off quality
Choose Spider-Noir, Season 1. It scores 4.4 vs 2.5 for spin-off quality, with a 3.9 overall score.
Stranger Things: Tales From ’85 Review
Bottom Line
Choose it for colorful animation, short episodes, and more time with the young Hawkins crew. Skip it if canon gaps, repetitive monster fights, softened horror, or replacement voices will keep pulling you out.
Best for
Best for younger viewers, franchise completionists, and fans who mainly want more time with the original kids in a lighter, visually vivid monster adventure.
Not for
Not for viewers who need tight canon, serious horror, major consequences, or a fresh expansion of the universe rather than another story centered on the same characters.
Verdict
Tales From '85 works best as a bright, low-stakes return to the friendship-driven early years of Stranger Things. Its snowy Hawkins setting, vivid production design, energetic creature action, strong cliffhangers, and familiar group chemistry give fans plenty to enjoy, while younger viewers get the franchise’s most approachable entry. The tradeoff is that the interquel format sharply limits suspense and character growth. Nikki’s importance, the new threats, and repeated arcs create persistent continuity questions, and many critics find the ten-episode story repetitive, sanitized, or unnecessary. The voice cast and human character designs are especially divisive. Taken as optional nostalgic side content, it can be warm and entertaining; treated as essential canon, its weaknesses become much harder to ignore.
Feature Scorecards
Summary
57 reviewed features-
Very positive 4.5-5.015 (26%)
-
Positive 3.5-4.417 (30%)
-
Neutral 2.5-3.414 (25%)
-
Negative 1.5-2.411 (19%)
Pros
-
The strongest appeal is the return to kids on bikes, small-town mysteries, early friendships, and 1980s atmosphere. Even skeptical viewers often agree that it reconnects with the parts of Stranger Things they once loved.
-
The core group’s chemistry is one of the clearest strengths. The friendships, early romances, and familiar pairings often feel warm, convincing, and closer to the early seasons than the franchise has in years.
-
Production design is a standout strength. Hawkins, the Palace Arcade, homes, snowy streets, and action locations are recreated with rich detail, neon color, and convincing 1980s atmosphere.
-
The best twists genuinely catch viewers off guard, especially the revelations around the central threat. Even mixed reviews often acknowledge that the season finds a few effective surprises.
-
The cleaner language, lighter tone, and younger focus make this the franchise’s most family-friendly entry. It keeps enough monsters and peril to avoid feeling completely toothless.
-
Animated Hawkins is richly realized, preserving familiar locations while adding snowy streets, vivid interiors, and a slightly heightened storybook quality.
Cons
-
Continuity is the most repeated complaint. Nikki’s importance, the new monsters, altered character arcs, and the lack of later references make the story difficult for many viewers to accept as canon.
-
Originality is one of the weakest areas. The interquel repeatedly reuses familiar monsters, character beats, and season formulas instead of taking advantage of animation to explore a genuinely new direction.
-
Character consistency is a major weakness. Many critics say the kids feel sanitized, less intelligent, or simply unlike their live-action counterparts, although one positive review finds most familiar traits intact.
-
The target audience is unclear: longtime fans may find it too juvenile and canon-constrained, while newcomers may lack the context from the first two seasons. Its clearest audience is younger franchise fans and completionists.
-
Dialogue is frequently criticized as sanitized, over-explanatory, and too much like a children’s adventure game. A small amount of witty banter stands out, but most reactions find the characters’ voices less authentic.
-
The continuous ten-chapter structure is widely seen as a missed opportunity. Many wanted shorter standalone mysteries or a true monster-of-the-week format, though one positive take likes the focused, kid-centered episodes.
Cast & Creators
-
Nikki BaxterA’zion’s scratchy, distinctive delivery helps make Nikki the season’s most praised new character. Even mixed critics often describe her as charming, engaging, or the ensemble’s bright spot.
-
DustinQuinney’s Dustin is praised by several critics as uncannily accurate and instantly engaging, though one strongly negative take finds the performance awkward and mismatched.
-
MaxHoang-Rappaport captures Max’s sarcasm and attitude with ease, earning repeated praise as one of the strongest replacement performers.
-
CreatorRobles is widely credited with understanding the early-series tone, bringing playful energy, and richly rebuilding Hawkins. One harsh critic instead includes him in the blame for the misguided serialized structure.
-
Production DesignerPlouffe’s production design is singled out for its gorgeous neon palette, contrasting colors, and richly realized 1980s Hawkins.
-
Nancy WheelerAntonelli’s Nancy Wheeler performance anchors what one critic calls the season’s best episode.
View all 57 feature scores and cast & creators
Compared With Category Average
Compared with other TV Shows, this product is above average in family friendliness, CGI quality, age appropriateness, near average in animation quality, cast chemistry, below average in audience appeal, suspense, plot originality.
Comparison summary
57 compared features-
Above average 0.4+ pts higher16 (28%)
-
Same as average within 0.3 pts13 (23%)
-
Below average 0.4+ pts lower28 (49%)
Largest category differences
| Attribute | This product | Category average | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| family friendliness | 4.4 | 2.2 | +2.2 |
| audience appeal | 1.9 | 3.9 | -2.0 |
| suspense | 2.6 | 4.2 | -1.6 |
| plot originality | 1.7 | 3.5 | -1.8 |
| continuity | 1.7 | 3.2 | -1.5 |
| realism | 1.5 | 3.5 | -2.0 |
| dialogue quality | 1.8 | 3.5 | -1.7 |
| acting quality | 3.1 | 4.4 | -1.3 |
Consider This Instead
If you want better supporting cast performance
Choose The Testaments, Season 1. It scores 5.0 vs 3.0 for supporting cast performance, with a 3.8 overall score.
If you want better visual style
Choose Every Year After, Season 1. It scores 4.4 vs 3.6 for visual style, with a 3.6 overall score.
If you want better continuity
Choose Daredevil: Born Again, Season 2. It scores 4.5 vs 1.7 for continuity, with a 4.0 overall score.
Compared in Reviews
Products reviewers directly compared with this model, grouped into quick takeaways.
The Real Ghostbusters
- Compared: polish versus charm It is more polished than the older cartoon but also judged blander.
- Compared: animation style The newer 3D animation is technically advanced but considered less charming than its retro inspiration.
Camp Cretaceous
- Better: child-friendly suspense Camp Cretaceous is judged more successful at making children's peril feel serious.
Jurassic World: Chaos Theory
- Better: danger and suspense Tales From '85 feels less dangerous because its story is more constrained by canon.
FAQ
Does it feel like early Stranger Things?
Often, yes. The kids-on-bikes focus, small-town mystery, friendships, and 1980s atmosphere repeatedly remind viewers of the first two seasons.
Is it suitable for children?
It is the franchise’s most kid-friendly entry, with cleaner language and less blood. Monsters, kidnappings, jump scares, and peril may still be intense for sensitive children.
Is the animation good?
The environments, lighting, colors, monsters, and action are widely praised. The human faces and movement are much more divisive, with some viewers finding them beautiful and others stiff or doll-like.
Do the new voice actors work?
Opinions are split. Braxton Quinney and Jolie Hoang-Rappaport receive frequent praise, but several critics feel the cast sounds like uneven imitations of the original performers.
Does the story fit established canon?
That is the biggest point of criticism. Nikki, the new monsters, repeated character arcs, and the lack of later references make the timeline difficult for many viewers to accept.
Is the season bingeable?
Strong cliffhangers and short episodes make it easy to continue, but repeated chase-and-rescue patterns can make the middle stretch feel tiring.
Does the ending leave room for another season?
Yes. The finale leaves threads open, and some viewers found that promising, while others felt the canon problems gave them little reason to continue.
Sample Expert Reviews We Analyzed
These are a few of the reviews included in our analysis.
Video Reviews
Article Reviews
podcast.ausha.co
The series takes place between the events of the second and third seasons of Stranger Things, and depicts the children – Eleven, Mike...
- Review score
- 2.5
pluggedin.com
While Netflix says that the animated ‘Stranger Things: Tales From ’85’ is a kinder, gentler sort of ‘Stranger Things’ show, that hardly makes...
- Review score
- 3.8
comicsbeat.com
The animated interquel is well-made, but how is its target audience not supposed to feel lost without watching the original series?
- Review score
- 3.7
nuhahassan.medium.com
Stranger Things has always been between a high and a low for me. The second season was the biggest high for me; the series finale was…
- Review score
- 4.0
thereviewgeek.com
Season 1 Episode Guide Episode 1 -| Review Score – 2.5/5 Episode 2 -| Review Score – 2/5 Episode 3 -| Review Score – 2.5/5 Episode 4 -|...
- Review score
- 1.7
Top TV Shows to Consider
Choose The Pitt Season 2 for a gripping, realistic medical drama with superb acting and emotional depth. Skip it if graphic procedures, unresolved arcs, or slower character-driven pacing bother you.
Pros: episode structure, main cast performance
Cons: age appropriateness, plot clarity
Choose Kylie for a heartfelt, candid music documentary with rich archives, sharp editing, and big emotional payoff. Skip it if you need a fully exhaustive career chronology or dislike authorized...
Pros: episode pacing, season finale quality
Cons: episode structure, season pacing
Best for heartfelt family drama, strong performances, natural faith themes, and an easy binge. Skip it if you need fast pacing, strict doctrinal portrayals, or a satisfying romantic resolution.
Pros: season finale quality, screenplay quality
Cons: character consistency, continuity
Best for exceptional performances, heartfelt family chemistry, and a humane take on motherhood and sex work. Skip it if you need gritty realism, fast setup, or perfectly cohesive tone.
Pros: episode structure, dialogue quality
Cons: plot twists, season finale quality