The Alters

The Alters Review

Updated: 1 day ago
4.0
Consolidated expert score
261
Review insights
56
Scored features
33
Expert reviews

Bottom Line

Choose The Alters if you want a bold, emotional sci-fi survival-management game with replayable choices. Skip it if heavy stress, mature themes, resource busywork, or technical rough edges will outweigh the story for you.

Best for

Best for players who enjoy narrative-heavy survival management, tense time-and-resource decisions, and morally complicated sci-fi stories with replayable branching outcomes.

Not for

Not for players who dislike stress, resource juggling, repetitive gathering loops, mature themes, or games where technical rough edges can interrupt momentum.

Verdict

The Alters stands out for its unusual cloning premise, rich moral dilemmas, and a strong blend of base management, resource pressure, and character-driven storytelling. Reviewers repeatedly praised the narrative, voice acting, atmosphere, replay value, and the distinct personalities of Jan’s alternate selves. The tradeoff is that the same pressure making the experience memorable can also become stressful, repetitive, or cumbersome, especially during exploration and resource gathering. Technical reports also varied, from smooth performance and zero bugs to crashes, shader waits, and stuck characters. Overall, the evidence points to a bold, emotionally resonant survival-management game with some friction around pacing, polish, and busywork.

Compared in Reviews

Products reviewers directly compared with this model, grouped into quick takeaways.

Alan Wake 2

  • Compared: musical sequence tone The reviewer favorably compares a musical number's energy to Alan Wake 2.

Fallout Shelter

  • Similar: management assignments The reviewer says the crew-assignment management recalls Fallout Shelter.

Frost Punk

  • Compared: challenging decision design The review references Frost Punk alongside This War of Mine as part of 11 bit's decision-making lineage.

Feature Scorecards

Summary

56 reviewed features
  • Very positive 4.5-5.0 38% 21 features
  • Positive 3.5-4.4 36% 20 features
  • Neutral 2.5-3.4 21% 12 features
  • Negative 1.5-2.4 5% 3 features
  • Very negative below 1.5 0% 0 features

Pros

  • 5.0
    based on 3 reviews
    sound design: 5.0, based on 3 reviews
    Sound design evidence was strongly positive, emphasizing exceptional audio, tension-building environmental sound, and fantastic sound design.
  • 5.0
    based on 2 reviews
    art direction: 5.0, based on 2 reviews
    Art direction received strong praise for the alien planet, visual design, and Jan/Alter presentation.
  • 5.0
    based on 2 reviews
    side character depth: 5.0, based on 2 reviews
    Side character depth was praised in the reviews that addressed it, with the Alters described as distinct and fully realized.
  • 5.0
    based on 1 review
    controls responsiveness: 5.0, based on 1 review
    One reviewer specifically praised the controls on both controller and mouse/keyboard, with no conflicting control-responsiveness evidence.
  • 5.0
    based on 1 review
    facial animations: 5.0, based on 1 review
    Facial animation evidence was positive, with one reviewer specifically praising how faces reflect current attitude.
  • 5.0
    based on 1 review
    onboarding experience: 5.0, based on 1 review
    Onboarding was praised for introducing many systems without overwhelming the player.
  • 4.9
    based on 6 reviews
    atmosphere: 4.9, based on 6 reviews
    Atmosphere was consistently praised as isolating, eerie, tense, symbolic, and thrilling.
  • 4.9
    based on 6 reviews
    emotional impact: 4.9, based on 6 reviews
    Emotional impact was consistently strong, with reviewers describing thought-provoking, personal, vulnerable, and resonant moments.
  • 4.9
    based on 4 reviews
    value for money: 4.9, based on 4 reviews
    Value for money was praised, especially around the $35 price and replayable mid-sized scope.
  • 4.8
    based on 12 reviews
    voice acting: 4.8, based on 12 reviews
    Voice acting was strongly praised across many reviews, especially Alex Jordan’s work differentiating the many Jans, with only one mild delivery caveat.
  • 4.8
    based on 4 reviews
    frame rate stability: 4.8, based on 4 reviews
    Frame rate stability was generally strong, with reviewers citing consistent 60+ fps, 120 fps, or stable 60 fps with only occasional drops.
  • 4.8
    based on 2 reviews
    environmental detail: 4.8, based on 2 reviews
    Environmental detail was praised for adorable base rooms, dinky detail, and visually distinct alien landscapes.
  • 4.8
    based on 2 reviews
    innovation: 4.8, based on 2 reviews
    Innovation was praised through the game’s unusual genre blend and standout sci-fi structure.
  • 4.7
    based on 19 reviews
    narrative quality: 4.7, based on 19 reviews
    Narrative quality was one of the strongest areas, with many reviewers praising the story as compelling, thoughtful, philosophical, or emotionally resonant.
  • 4.7
    based on 8 reviews
    originality: 4.7, based on 8 reviews
    Originality was strongly praised, with reviewers calling the concept unique, uncategorizable, ambitious, or unlike anything else.
  • 4.7
    based on 10 reviews
    graphics quality: 4.7, based on 10 reviews
    Graphics were praised repeatedly, with reviewers calling the game gorgeous, detailed, good-looking, or visually distinctive.
  • 4.5
    based on 5 reviews
    fun factor: 4.5, based on 5 reviews
    Fun factor was positive, with reviewers describing the game as entertaining, a blast, hard to put down, or excellent from start to finish.
  • 4.5
    based on 4 reviews
    soundtrack quality: 4.5, based on 4 reviews
    Soundtrack quality was praised for its synth mood, Piotr Musial’s work, and enjoyable/chill music.
  • 4.5
    based on 3 reviews
    world-building: 4.5, based on 3 reviews
    World-building was praised for its strange sci-fi setting, cultural detail, and labor/corporate themes.
  • 4.5
    based on 2 reviews
    immersion: 4.5, based on 2 reviews
    Immersion was strong but intense, with reviewers describing deep involvement and a claustrophobic, absorbing feel.
  • 4.5
    based on 1 review
    crafting system: 4.5, based on 1 review
    The crafting and production automation earned positive evidence for reducing food and essential-goods micromanagement.
  • 4.4
    based on 9 reviews
    character development: 4.4, based on 9 reviews
    Character development was broadly praised for distinct, evolving Jans, though one reviewer felt the alters leaned into caricature.
  • 4.4
    based on 11 reviews
    gameplay mechanics: 4.4, based on 11 reviews
    Most reviewers praised the blended survival, management, and narrative mechanics as polished or inventive, though a few found the underlying gameplay basic.
  • 4.3
    based on 9 reviews
    core gameplay loop: 4.3, based on 9 reviews
    The core loop was often described as compelling, addictive, or well-designed, with one dissenting review arguing the hybrid systems failed to cohere.
  • 4.3
    based on 6 reviews
    performance optimization: 4.3, based on 6 reviews
    Performance optimization was mostly praised on reviewed builds, though one PC review reported dreadful performance.
  • 4.3
    based on 3 reviews
    animation quality: 4.3, based on 3 reviews
    Animation quality was mostly praised for character design and subtle idle movement, though one reviewer found some animations rough.
  • 4.3
    based on 3 reviews
    map and navigation design: 4.3, based on 3 reviews
    Map and navigation design was praised for clever fast travel and tense maze-like routing that reduced backtracking.
  • 4.3
    based on 18 reviews
    replay value: 4.3, based on 18 reviews
    Replay value was widely praised because alternate Alters, choices, endings, and remembered dialogue paths encourage repeat runs, though a few reviewers saw replay fatigue.
  • 4.3
    based on 6 reviews
    content variety: 4.3, based on 6 reviews
    Reviewers generally praised the variety created by survival, puzzles, exploration, branching side quests, and genre mixing, with one caveat about restrictive base building.
  • 4.3
    based on 2 reviews
    character roster: 4.3, based on 2 reviews
    The Alter roster was mostly praised for distinct variants, though one reviewer felt not all Alters were equally useful or nuanced.
  • 4.3
    based on 2 reviews
    level design: 4.3, based on 2 reviews
    Level and map design were praised for dense, hand-crafted layouts and well-crafted act-specific maps.
  • 4.2
    based on 5 reviews
    user interface design: 4.2, based on 5 reviews
    UI design was mostly praised as clean, tactile, and not intrusive, with some interface quirks noted.
  • 4.1
    based on 9 reviews
    economy and resource balance: 4.1, based on 9 reviews
    Resource balance was mostly praised for satisfying pressure and strong management hooks, though some reviewers found it irritating or overly punishing.
  • 4.0
    based on 5 reviews
    writing quality: 4.0, based on 5 reviews
    Writing was mostly praised as authentic, human, or excellent, though one negative review called it shallow and another noted occasional creaking.
  • 4.0
    based on 1 review
    enemy variety: 4.0, based on 1 review
    Enemy or hazard variety had limited but positive evidence, with anomaly variants helping keep exploration tense.
  • 4.0
    based on 1 review
    handheld play suitability: 4.0, based on 1 review
    Handheld suitability had limited but positive evidence, with Steam Deck described as playable with decent image quality.
  • 3.9
    based on 5 reviews
    menu usability: 3.9, based on 5 reviews
    Menu usability was generally positive thanks to quality-of-life tools, though some reviewers found navigation old or menu-jumping cumbersome.
  • 3.7
    based on 3 reviews
    protagonist appeal: 3.7, based on 3 reviews
    Jan’s appeal was mixed: some found him more complete, plausible, and sympathetic, while one reviewer found him unpleasant.
  • 3.6
    based on 11 reviews
    exploration quality: 3.6, based on 11 reviews
    Exploration divided reviewers: several found it atmospheric, tactile, or satisfying, while others found it basic, repetitive, or chore-like.
  • 3.5
    based on 2 reviews
    puzzle design: 3.5, based on 2 reviews
    Puzzle evidence was mixed: environmental puzzles earned praise, but the probe-based resource puzzle was criticized as fiddly and low-value.
  • 3.5
    based on 11 reviews
    bug frequency: 3.5, based on 11 reviews
    Bug evidence was mixed: several reviewers saw minor bugs, glitches, or stuck characters, while one reported zero bugs and another saw more disruptive issues.

Cons

  • 3.4
    based on 4 reviews
    dialogue quality: 3.4, based on 4 reviews
    Dialogue quality was mixed: some praised meaningful character conversations, while others found the script or conversations flat and stilted.
  • 3.3
    based on 7 reviews
    pacing: 3.3, based on 7 reviews
    Pacing was mixed, with praise for quick days and well-timed beats offset by complaints about cyclical acts, clocks, and difficult bad-end pressure.
  • 3.3
    based on 8 reviews
    difficulty balance: 3.3, based on 8 reviews
    Difficulty balance was mixed: several reviewers valued the pressure, but others found the stress overwhelming or the economy hard for newcomers.
  • 3.3
    based on 2 reviews
    polish: 3.3, based on 2 reviews
    Polish was mixed, with notes about lacking presentation and unskippable scenes despite otherwise strong execution.
  • 3.1
    based on 5 reviews
    combat system: 3.1, based on 5 reviews
    Combat-like anomaly encounters were generally seen as simple or secondary; some found them fitting, while others called them weak or uneven.
  • 3.0
    based on 2 reviews
    accessibility options: 3.0, based on 2 reviews
    Accessibility evidence was limited and mixed, with reviewers noting useful settings but also describing the overall accessibility approach as limited.
  • 3.0
    based on 2 reviews
    save system reliability: 3.0, based on 2 reviews
    Save reliability was mixed: one reviewer lost progress due to daily saves and crashes, while another appreciated nightly/location auto-saves.
  • 3.0
    based on 1 review
    mission design: 3.0, based on 1 review
    Mission design received mixed evidence because one reviewer felt survival objectives and narrative goals could work against each other.
  • 3.0
    based on 1 review
    visual effects quality: 3.0, based on 1 review
    Visual effects evidence was mixed-to-negative in one review because close-up scenes sometimes became pixelated.
  • 2.8
    based on 2 reviews
    movement feel: 2.8, based on 2 reviews
    Movement drew mixed-to-negative notes, with one reviewer calling traversal cumbersome and another saying Jan could feel awkward or get stuck.
  • 2.5
    based on 2 reviews
    load times: 2.5, based on 2 reviews
    Load-time evidence was mixed-to-negative because shader precompilation was called long or repeatedly required on launch.
  • 2.5
    based on 1 review
    progression system: 2.5, based on 1 review
    Progression drew criticism from one reviewer who felt unlocks mostly reduced earlier friction rather than adding exciting new capabilities.
  • 2.0
    based on 2 reviews
    grind level: 2.0, based on 2 reviews
    Grind level drew negative evidence, with reviewers criticizing repetitive busywork and mindless material loops.
  • 2.0
    based on 1 review
    age appropriateness: 2.0, based on 1 review
    Age appropriateness evidence points to mature themes, with one reviewer warning about substance abuse, suicide, and self-harm.
  • 1.5
    based on 1 review
    crash stability: 1.5, based on 1 review
    Crash stability was a major issue in one PC review, which reported frequent crashes around the Quantum Computer.

Compared With Category Average

Compared with other Video Games, this product is above average in narrative quality, below average in crash stability, load times, progression system.

Summary

8 compared features
  • Above average 0.4+ pts higher 13% 1 feature
  • Same as average within 0.3 pts 0% 0 features
  • Below average 0.4+ pts lower 88% 7 features
Attribute This product Category average Difference
crash stability 1.5 3.7 -2.2
load times 2.5 4.1 -1.6
progression system 2.5 4.1 -1.6
narrative quality 4.7 3.8 +1.0
visual effects quality 3.0 4.4 -1.4
combat system 3.1 4.3 -1.2
accessibility options 3.0 4.2 -1.2
age appropriateness 2.0 3.2 -1.2

FAQ

Is The Alters more story-driven or systems-driven?

Reviewers generally describe it as both: a survival-management game built around a strongly praised sci-fi narrative, moral choices, and relationships with Jan's alternate selves.

Is The Alters stressful?

Yes. Many reviewers highlight the constant pressure of time, resources, storms, and Alter morale; some loved that tension, while others found it overwhelming.

How replayable is The Alters?

Replay value is one of the most repeated positives. Reviewers point to different Alters, branching choices, alternate endings, and dialogue tracking as reasons to replay.

Does the exploration hold up?

Exploration is divisive. Several reviewers found the planet atmospheric and tactile, while others thought resource gathering, pylons, and traversal became repetitive or chore-like.

How good is the voice acting?

Voice acting is strongly praised, especially Alex Jordan's performance as multiple versions of Jan with distinct personalities, tones, and emotional registers.

Are there technical problems?

Reports are mixed. Some reviewers had smooth performance or zero bugs, while others cited crashes, shader waits, stuck characters, glitches, or visual issues.

Consider This Instead

If you want better age appropriateness

Choose Mario Kart World. It scores 4.7 vs 2.0 for age appropriateness, with a 3.7 overall score.

Compare

Overall Top Video Games Alternatives

#1 Hades II
4.6
25 reviews

Good if you want deeper Hades-style roguelite combat, huge build variety, polished art, and rewarding progression. Skip it if repetition, resource tracking, or a less intimate story than the original...

Pros: world interactivity, side character depth

Cons: grind level

#2 Clair Obscur: Expedition 33
4.3
21 reviews

Best for a stylish, emotional RPG with deep timed combat and exceptional music. Skip it if tight parry timing, weak maps, or awkward platforming would frustrate you.

Pros: world-building, crash stability

Cons: platforming precision, map and navigation design

#3 Dragon Quest I & II HD-2D Remake
4.3
30 reviews

Choose it if you want classic turn-based Dragon Quest modernized with richer stories, gorgeous HD-2D visuals, and helpful quality-of-life options. Skip it if random encounters, grinding, or occasional difficulty spikes...

Pros: visual effects quality, environmental detail

Cons: AI behavior, level design

#4 Absolum
4.3
30 reviews

Best for gorgeous beat-em-up combat, standout music, strong co-op, and replayable buildcrafting. Skip it if grind-heavy roguelite progression, repeated routes, or thin endgame content will wear you down.

Pros: mission design, world interactivity

Cons: quest design, endgame content