The Rogue Prince of Persia

The Rogue Prince of Persia Review

Brand: Ubisoft
Released: April 10, 2026
Updated: 2 months ago
4.0
Overall review score
407
Review evidence points
72
Scored features
31
Expert reviews

Bottom Line

Choose The Rogue Prince of Persia for slick parkour, strong combat flow, and a standout soundtrack. Skip it if you need deep storytelling, huge endgame variety, or flawless technical polish.

Best for

Best for players who want a fast, movement-first roguelite where wall-running, vaulting, and short runs matter more than dense storytelling. It also suits Prince of Persia fans who value parkour identity and newcomers who want an approachable challenge.

Not for

Not for players seeking Hades-level character writing, deep endgame variety, multiplayer, or a roguelite built around heavy buildcraft. It may also frustrate players sensitive to load times or repeated dialogue.

Verdict

The review set points to a polished, movement-first roguelite whose best moments come from chaining wall-runs, vaults, kicks, and attacks into a fast rhythm. Combat is generally satisfying and bosses often use the parkour identity well, while the soundtrack and art direction give runs strong personality. The tradeoff is that the surrounding roguelite scaffolding is not equally strong: narrative, dialogue, side characters, and some build systems draw repeated criticism, and several reviewers wanted more content or deeper long-term variety. Final-release impressions are notably more enthusiastic than early-access ones, especially on Switch 2, but platform load times and occasional UI or online annoyances still appear.

Feature Scorecards

Summary

72 reviewed features
  • Very positive 4.5-5.0
    20 (28%)
  • Positive 3.5-4.4
    35 (49%)
  • Neutral 2.5-3.4
    8 (11%)
  • Negative 1.5-2.4
    9 (13%)

Pros

  • 4.7
    24 reviews strong consensus
    movement feel: 4.7, 24 reviews, strong consensus
    Movement was the strongest consensus highlight, repeatedly praised for fluid wall-running, parkour flow, and satisfying momentum.
  • 4.5
    18 reviews strong consensus
    soundtrack quality: 4.5, 18 reviews, strong consensus
    The soundtrack was one of the strongest points, repeatedly praised as energetic, dynamic, Persian-inflected, and memorable.
  • 4.5
    14 reviews strong consensus
    platforming precision: 4.5, 14 reviews, strong consensus
    Platforming was praised for precision, flow, and expressive parkour, with only occasional complaints about awkward interactions or puzzle repetition.
  • 4.5
    13 reviews strong consensus
    core gameplay loop: 4.5, 13 reviews, strong consensus
    The core loop was widely praised as addictive, slick, and rewarding, with a few caveats around repetition or shorter staying power.
  • 4.9
    6 reviews strong consensus
    frame rate stability: 4.9, 6 reviews, strong consensus
    Frame rate stability was strongly praised across several Switch 2 and technical impressions.
  • 4.4
    13 reviews strong consensus
    fun factor: 4.4, 13 reviews, strong consensus
    Fun factor was high overall, with many reviewers calling the game addictive, satisfying, or a blast despite caveats.

Cons

  • 2.1
    4 reviews strong consensus
    dialogue quality: 2.1, 4 reviews, strong consensus
    Dialogue quality was weak overall because reviewers repeatedly cited repetition, unvoiced exchanges, and low charm.
  • 2.2
    3 reviews strong consensus
    voice acting: 2.2, 3 reviews, strong consensus
    Voice acting was a limitation in early-access impressions and story critiques, with unvoiced dialogue making characters feel flatter.
  • 2.4
    5 reviews moderate consensus
    side character depth: 2.4, 5 reviews, moderate consensus
    Side character depth was mixed-to-negative: one review liked distinct personalities, but several called the cast shallow or generic.
  • 2.0
    2 reviews limited evidence
    bug frequency: 2.0, 2 reviews, limited evidence
    Bug frequency hurt early-access impressions, especially around forge/unlock glitches.
  • 2.0
    1 review
    character development: 2.0, 1 review
    Character development was scored negatively where characters were described as broad, predictable archetypes.
  • 2.0
    1 review
    visual effects quality: 2.0, 1 review
    Visual effects had one negative note where an effect obscured enemies and hurt readability.

Compared With Category Average

Compared with other Video Games, this product is above average in crash stability, HUD clarity, platforming precision, near average in boss design, soundtrack quality, below average in visual effects quality, voice acting, character development.

Comparison summary

72 compared features
  • Above average 0.4+ pts higher
    27 (38%)
  • Same as average within 0.3 pts
    28 (39%)
  • Below average 0.4+ pts lower
    17 (24%)

Largest category differences

Attribute This product Category average Difference
visual effects quality 2.0 4.4 -2.4
voice acting 2.2 4.2 -2.0
character development 2.0 3.9 -1.9
emotional impact 2.4 4.3 -1.9
crash stability 5.0 3.2 +1.8
innovation 2.2 4.0 -1.8
HUD clarity 5.0 3.3 +1.7
platforming precision 4.5 3.2 +1.3

Consider This Instead

If you want better visual effects quality

Choose Saros. It scores 4.9 vs 2.0 for visual effects quality, with a 4.3 overall score.

Compare

If you want better bug frequency

Choose Pragmata. It scores 5.0 vs 2.0 for bug frequency, with a 4.3 overall score.

Compare

If you want better load times

Choose Borderlands 4. It scores 5.0 vs 3.0 for load times, with a 3.6 overall score.

Compare

Compared in Reviews

Products reviewers directly compared with this model, grouped into quick takeaways.

Dead Cells

  • Compared: appeal relative to Dead Cells The reviewer says it delivered things they wanted from Dead Cells.
  • Similar: first impression and structure The video review says the early impression can feel like a Dead Cells skin before its own mechanics emerge.
  • Compared: genre formula LadiesGamers says experienced roguelike players may notice the Dead Cells-like formula.

Hades

  • Similar: death-loop story structure The Switch 2 review says its death-loop story structure resembles Hades.
  • Similar: linear roguelite structure The review says its structure begins linearly, akin to Hades.
  • Better: narrative buildup Worth Playing says it has been spoiled by Hades' run-building narrative.

The Lost Crown

  • Better: scale and impact GamingByte says it does not match The Lost Crown's scale or impact.
  • Better: story and characters COGconnected says players wanting Lost Crown-level story will be disappointed.
  • Worse: movement feel Maxi-Geek feels the movement may slightly surpass The Lost Crown.

FAQ

Is The Rogue Prince of Persia mainly about combat or platforming?

Reviewers describe it as a blend, but movement and parkour are the defining strengths. Combat works best when it uses vaults, kicks, wall-runs, and environmental hazards.

Is the story a major reason to play?

The story setup and Mind Map structure receive some praise, but many reviewers call the narrative thin or secondary. The consensus is that action carries the experience more than writing.

How difficult is it?

Most reviews describe it as approachable and fair rather than punishing. Some skilled roguelite players found it too easy or wished for more late-game challenge, though modifiers can add difficulty.

Does it have strong replay value?

Many reviewers felt the loop had a strong one-more-run pull, especially because movement is fun on its own. Others thought repetition and limited content reduced long-term staying power.

How is performance on Switch 2?

Switch 2 reviews often praised stable 60fps, crisp visuals, and handheld suitability. The main technical complaint was longer-than-expected load times in some impressions.

What are the biggest strengths?

The most consistent strengths are fluid movement, platforming precision, soundtrack quality, attractive art direction, and satisfying combat flow.

What are the biggest weaknesses?

The most repeated weaknesses are thin story, repeated dialogue, shallow side characters, occasional repetition, and some technical or UI annoyances.

Sample Expert Reviews We Analyzed

These are a few of the reviews included in our analysis.

Video Reviews

Article Reviews

Top Video Games to Consider

#1 Hades II
4.6

Good if you want fast, tactical roguelite combat with huge progression depth, striking art, and standout music. Skip it if repetition, resource micromanagement, or a less emotionally satisfying sequel story...

Pros: skill tree depth, dialogue quality

Cons: emotional impact, economy and resource balance

#2 Donkey Kong Bananza
4.5

Best for joyful destruction, dense exploration, and a charming DK-Pauline adventure. Skip it if camera quirks, frame-rate dips, easy bosses, or premium Switch 2 pricing are dealbreakers.

Pros: gameplay mechanics, world interactivity

Cons: economy and resource balance, enemy variety

#3 It Takes Two
4.5

Best for joyful, inventive co-op with a partner, especially on couch. Skip it if divorce themes, uneven story tone, or Switch visual compromises would distract you.

Pros: core gameplay loop, movement feel

Cons: character development, dialogue quality

#4 Clair Obscur: Expedition 33
4.5

Choose Clair Obscur if you want a story-rich RPG with thrilling timed combat, gorgeous art, and standout music. Skip it if poor maps, tight parry timing, or occasional bugs and...

Pros: monetization fairness, microtransaction impact

Cons: platforming precision, menu usability