-
Price & Value
4.6
★
★
★
★
★
★
★
★
★
★
8 reviews
4.6
Repeatedly framed as a standout value in the 200–300 dollar range because it delivers LiDAR mapping and room-level controls that often cost more.
-
Hard-floor hair pickup is frequently strong, with several tests noting good collection of pet hair and fuzz.
-
Hard-floor fine debris pickup is a consistent strength, with multiple tests reporting very high capture rates on mixed fine particles.
-
Most reviews praise fast, accurate LiDAR mapping and generally efficient, methodical pathing, though some mention awkward room division or occasional missed areas depending on lighting or map quirks.
-
Setup is typically quick and guided, with simple brush attachment and app pairing; initial mapping runs are also described as easy to start.
-
Large debris pickup on hard floors is generally strong, with little scattering reported when the main and side brushes work together.
-
Edge cleaning is often praised, with good wall-line pickup in tests, though corner reach can depend on side-brush placement and room layout.
-
The app is consistently described as feature-rich for the price, with schedules, room/area cleaning, and no-go zones or virtual walls; however, smart-home voice integrations are inconsistently supported across sources and Wi-Fi is required.
-
Controls & UI
4.3
★
★
★
★
★
★
★
★
★
★
7 reviews
4.3
Controls are usually considered intuitive, with clear map screens and straightforward room selection; a few reviewers note buggy or finicky room-splitting tools.
-
Most reviewers note useful basics in the box such as a spare HEPA filter, extra edge brush, and a small cleaning tool, supporting low-cost upkeep.
-
The app commonly tracks remaining life for brushes and filters and prompts replacements, making consumable maintenance easier.
-
Bin & Bag
4.2
★
★
★
★
★
★
★
★
★
3 reviews
4.2
Dustbin design is generally well-liked and described as secure and larger than average for the class, though it can fill quickly in dusty homes.
-
It generally transitions well between hard floors and rugs, can climb onto taller rugs, and is rated for moderate thresholds, but very tall thresholds or some rug features (e.g., tassels/shag) can cause issues.
-
Debris scatter or blowback appears controlled in most tests, with side and main brushes generally keeping debris moving inward rather than spraying it outward.
-
Several reviews highlight that offering LiDAR mapping and robust app controls at a budget price was unusually competitive when launched and remains a key differentiator.
-
Routine maintenance is manageable: cleaning the brushroll and emptying the bin are described as easy, but hair tangles mean more frequent brush checks for some homes.
-
HEPA filtration and dust containment are commonly mentioned positives, with minimal dust leakage during bin removal when handled normally.
-
Firmware updates are noted to improve behavior over time, and some sources describe the model as holding up well across multiple years.
-
Bin emptying is straightforward and tends to be low-mess, but it requires frequent manual emptying because there is no auto-empty base.
-
Noise level
4.0
★
★
★
★
★
★
★
★
★
6 reviews
4.0
Noise is usually described as acceptable for a robot vacuum, with quieter low modes and moderate loudness on high suction.
-
Suction is strong enough for routine debris and pet hair, but performance drops on deeply embedded grit in carpet compared with higher-end robots.
-
Battery behavior is adequate for small-to-mid-size areas and supports recharge-and-resume; however, some tests report shorter real-world runtime than the marketing claim.
-
Measured runtime varies by mode and test, landing roughly in the 80–110 minute range depending on suction level and environment.
-
Compared with similarly priced competitors, it often wins on mapping and room-level controls, but loses ground on obstacle avoidance, deep carpet cleaning, or battery life against certain Roomba alternatives.
-
Low-pile carpet performance is generally good for surface debris, though fine, embedded material can remain.
-
Pet hair pickup on carpet is reported as good overall, though not best-in-class in some lab comparisons.
-
Medium-pile carpet results are solid for day-to-day cleaning, but not on par with premium deep-clean performers in sand or grit tests.
-
High-pile performance is mixed: it can traverse thicker rugs and remove surface debris, but deep extraction is limited.
-
Corners are average: it can sweep near corners, but several notes mention it may miss debris in tight corner pockets or very close to the apex.
-
The glossy black finish looks more premium than the price suggests, but it shows dust and hair easily.
-
Crevice pickup is described as decent but not class-leading, grabbing debris from shallow grooves rather than deeper gaps.
-
Dock cable handling is mixed, with one report of the cable tangling in the wheel, while another highlights a recessed cord wrap as a nice touch.
-
Privacy-related mentions are limited, but at least one reviewer flags that location-based automation can request precise address/location data; Wi-Fi dependence also affects privacy expectations.