Bissell Zing Canister Bagless Vacuum

3.5
(13)

Bottom Line

Choose if you want strong suction in a compact budget canister; Skip if you need HEPA-grade dust containment or you regularly vacuum large debris that can clog the floorhead.

Best for

Small homes or apartments with mostly hard floors and a few low-pile rugs, where strong suction and light weight matter more than premium filtration.

Not for

Allergy-sensitive households or homes with lots of plush/high-pile carpet and frequent bulky debris, where sealing, powered agitation, and clog resistance matter most.

Verdict

The Zing Bagless is a lightweight, small-space-friendly canister that punches above its price on raw suction, making it a solid grab-and-go vacuum for hard floors, area rugs, and quick pickups. The auto-rewind cord and simple controls keep setup and storage painless, and the dust cup empties quickly. The tradeoff is refinement: filtration is a weak spot for allergy-sensitive homes, and the narrow floorhead can bog down or clog on big debris like cereal. If your home is mostly hard surfaces and you value portability over premium build and sealing, it delivers. Homes with lots of plush carpet or strict dust-containment needs should look higher-end.

Pros

  • Price & Value 5.0 ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ 1 review 5.0
    Value is consistently praised; many reviewers frame it as a strong performer for a very low cost, especially if your needs are light-to-moderate and mostly hard floors.
  • Cord management 4.6 ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ 11 reviews 4.6
    Cord management is a strong point thanks to automatic rewind, though some users report the rewind can be finicky if you pull past the marked limit or let it snap back uncontrolled.
  • Weight 4.5 ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ 4 reviews 4.5
    Weight is repeatedly cited as a major advantage, with many describing it as easy to carry one-handed and convenient for multi-floor homes.
  • Storage footprint & upright-stand stability 4.5 ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ 3 reviews 4.5
    Storage is a strong point: the canister is compact and light, and many users find it easy to tuck in a closet. Some note limited docking/parking convenience for tools and wand.
  • Suitability for small spaces 4.5 ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ 3 reviews 4.5
    The compact canister and light weight make it a good fit for apartments, dorms, and quick cleanups where storage space is limited.
  • Edge & Baseboard Cleaning (Hard Floors) 4.5 ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ 2 reviews 4.5
    Edge and baseboard cleaning on hard floors tests very well, with multiple testers noting strong pickup right along walls.
  • Hose length 4.5 ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ 1 review 4.5
    The hose is generally long enough for above-floor reach, and several reviewers appreciate being able to clean ceilings, corners, and tight spaces without moving the canister constantly.
  • Overall opinion 4.5 ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ 1 review 4.5
    Overall sentiment is positive when expectations match the price: strong suction and portability are the highlights, while filtration, short cord, and big-debris clogs are the common complaints.
  • Suction & Airflow 4.4 ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ 8 reviews 4.4
    Across reviews and tests, suction and airflow are standout strengths for the price, with multiple reviewers measuring or describing very strong pull. Strong suction can also be a downside on delicate fabrics unless you bleed air with the handle vent.
  • Crevice / Groove Pickup (Hard Floors) 4.3 ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ 2 reviews 4.3
    Crevice and groove pickup on hard floors is a highlight, performing well along cracks and tight wall edges in tests.
  • Controls & UI 4.2 ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ 5 reviews 4.2
    Controls are straightforward, with large foot-friendly buttons and a floor switch on the head for hard floor vs carpet mode. Some users note the carpet/hard-floor switch can click loudly.
  • Versatility 4.2 ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ 5 reviews 4.2
    Versatility is solid for a budget canister: works on hard floors and low-to-medium rugs, and can do above-floor cleaning with the hose and tools. It is less ideal for wall-to-wall plush carpet and delicate upholstery without suction management.
  • Bin & Bag 4.1 ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ 6 reviews 4.1
    The 2L-class dust cup is convenient and easy to remove, with a visible fill line on some models. Emptying is quick, but fine dust can puff out and hair can stick inside the bin and filter.
  • Ease of use 4.1 ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ 6 reviews 4.1
    Ease of use is a consistent strength: it is quick to set up, light to carry, and simple to operate with foot controls and an easy-empty bin.
  • Assembly and Setup 4.0 ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ 2 reviews 4.0
    Assembly is generally quick: attach hose, wand, and floorhead and you are ready. Manuals are short but include basic setup and safety guidance.
  • Bag-full indicator 4.0 ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ 1 review 4.0
    A bag-full / pressure-style indicator is mentioned on some Zing variants, but feedback is limited; most users rely on the visible dust cup fill level.
  • Dried-On Stain Removal 3.9 ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ 6 reviews 3.9
    Maneuverability is generally good thanks to a compact body and big wheels, but the floorhead pivot is limited and can lift or feel less fluid when turning side-to-side.
  • Hard Floor — Fine Dust Pickup 3.9 ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ 5 reviews 3.9
    Fine dust pickup on hard floors is generally strong, helped by high suction and good edge performance.
  • Emptying & Mess Control 3.8 ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ 5 reviews 3.8
    Emptying is one-button simple, but mess control varies: fine dust can plume, debris can stick, and dumping hair can be unpleasant without careful technique.
  • Ongoing ownership costs (bags, filters, batteries) 3.8 ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ 2 reviews 3.8
    Ongoing costs are typically low for the bagless version, mainly filters, though bagged variants and optional upgrades (better tools/bags/filters) can add cost.
  • Maintenance requirements 3.5 ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ 4 reviews 3.5
    Maintenance is modest but important: washable filters and periodic cleaning help keep suction up, and hair/dust buildup can make filter care more involved than expected.
  • Stair Cleaning 3.5 ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ 3 reviews 3.5
    Light weight helps on stairs, but the canister width and lack of a dedicated stair/upholstery tool can make stair work less ergonomic than higher-end canisters.
  • Hair Pickup — Carpets 3.5 ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ 2 reviews 3.5
    Pet hair pickup on carpets is mixed: it can do surprisingly well on low pile, but performance drops on high pile and hair can load the bin/filter.

Cons

  • Carpet — Low-Pile Pickup 3.3 ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ 7 reviews 3.3
    Low-pile carpet pickup is generally decent for the price, especially for maintenance cleaning, but it can leave behind heavier grit compared with top canisters.
  • Accessories & Tools 3.2 ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ 7 reviews 3.2
    Included tools are basic (floorhead plus crevice/dusting tools) and generally work, but many describe them as cheap-feeling and easy to lose without onboard storage.
  • Build quality & durability 3.1 ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ 4 reviews 3.1
    Build quality is often described as plasticky, especially the hose/wand and floorhead. Durability experiences vary, but several owners report years of use while expecting it to be more of a budget, shorter-term machine.
  • Cord length 3.1 ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ 9 reviews 3.1
    Cord length is commonly described as short (around the 15–16 ft class, with some usable length caveats), which can mean more outlet changes in larger rooms.
  • Tool-change simplicity 3.0 ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ 5 reviews 3.0
    Tool changes are mostly friction-fit and simple, but several reviewers note attachments and wand joints can loosen or pop off if not seated firmly.
  • Area Rug Handling 3.0 ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ 3 reviews 3.0
    Area rugs are a reasonable use case, though thick shag or plush rugs can be harder to push and may benefit from a turbo tool upgrade.
  • Floorhead design 3.0 ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ 1 review 3.0
    The floorhead is simple and light, with a foot switch that extends bristles/squeegee for multi-surface use. The small intake can struggle with bulky debris and can require occasional hair cleanup.
  • Carpet — Medium-Pile Pickup 2.8 ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ 2 reviews 2.8
    Medium-pile carpet results are mixed: acceptable for maintenance cleaning, but not the first choice for deeper grooming without a powered brush.
  • Comparative performance 2.8 ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ 2 reviews 2.8
    In comparisons, it can beat similarly priced canisters on raw suction, but can lose on refinement (filtration, head design, perceived build quality, and carpet performance).
  • Hard Floor — Large Debris Intake 2.7 ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ 3 reviews 2.7
    Large-debris intake on hard floors is the weak spot; bulky pieces like cereal or clumps can clog or be pushed rather than swallowed.
  • Noise level 2.6 ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ 4 reviews 2.6
    Noise is mixed: some testers call it fairly quiet for a canister, but several users describe it as loud or sharp, especially compared with other household vacuums.
  • Carpet — High-Pile Pickup 2.5 ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ 5 reviews 2.5
    High-pile carpet pickup is often below average without a powered brush, and maneuvering on shag can feel effortful even when suction is strong.
  • Energy efficiency (kWh) 2.5 ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ 1 review 2.5
    At least one reviewer perceives it as a power-hungry vacuum (e.g., light flicker on startup), suggesting it may draw more current than expected for its size.
  • Surface safety with attachments 2.5 ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ 1 review 2.5
    Some reviewers caution against using it on delicate or historic hardwood due to wheels/bristle design and potential scratch risk, even if it is fine on laminate, vinyl, and tile.
  • Upholstery / Above-Floor Pickup 2.5 ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ 1 review 2.5
    Above-floor and upholstery cleaning is usable but inconsistent: very strong suction can pull or skid on fabrics, and some testers report pushing debris around without multiple passes.
  • Clogging & debris prevention 2.3 ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ 4 reviews 2.3
    Clogging shows up most with large debris (like cereal) and sometimes hair, especially at the floorhead opening. Smaller debris and fine particles are handled better.
  • Filtration / Dust Containment 2.2 ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ 10 reviews 2.2
    Filtration is a recurring weakness for the bagless model in lab-style tests, with noticeable particle escape and failed smoke/particle checks. It may be acceptable for non-allergy households, but it is not a true HEPA-sealed experience.
  • Onboard tool storage 1.0 ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ 3 reviews 1.0
    Onboard tool storage is limited; multiple reviewers mention there is no good place to keep smaller tools, leading to lost accessories.

FAQ

Does the Bissell Zing Bagless have a HEPA filter?

Most reviews indicate it is not a HEPA-sealed, HEPA-grade filtration vacuum, and lab-style tests report noticeable particle escape. If allergy-grade containment is a priority, consider a sealed HEPA canister instead.

Is it good on carpet?

It can maintain low-to-medium pile carpet reasonably well, but high-pile or plush carpet performance is usually below average without a powered brush. Thick shag can also feel hard to push even when suction is strong.

Does it clog easily?

It is most likely to clog or bog down on large debris (like cereal) or when the floorhead intake is overwhelmed. For everyday dust, sand, and smaller crumbs it tends to do better.

How long is the cord and does it rewind?

Many reviewers describe a short cord in the 15–16 ft class, but it includes automatic cord rewind for quick storage. Avoid pulling past any marked limit to keep the rewind working smoothly.

Is it easy to empty and maintain?

The dust cup removes and dumps quickly, and filters are often washable, but fine dust can puff out and hair can stick inside. Regular filter cleaning and careful emptying help reduce mess.

Reviews we analyzed

Video Reviews

Article Reviews