Review: H2O Audio TRI 2 PRO Headphones

Updated: 14 minutes ago
3.4
Based on methodology below
140
Insights analyzed
25
Grouped by key features
16
From expert reviews
Scores below reflect consolidated expert coverage across these features.
Bottom Line

Choose it for swimming-first workouts, secure comfort, and true underwater playback. Skip it if you care most about above-water sound quality or fuss-free controls and music loading.

Best for

Swimmers, triathletes, and open-ear workout users who need real underwater playback, strong water protection, and a headset that stays comfortable through long training sessions. It makes the most sense when the pool is the priority, not all-purpose music listening.

Not for

Anyone who mostly trains on land, wants richer sound, or expects polished controls and app behavior. It is also a weak fit for shoppers who switch devices often or dislike proprietary charging and loading quirks.

Verdict

The H2O Audio TRI 2 PRO fills a real niche better than most alternatives: it is genuinely useful in the pool, comfortable for long sessions, and far more compelling once you rely on onboard playback instead of Bluetooth. The tradeoff is clear, though. You are paying a premium for waterproof versatility, not for top-tier audio or polished everyday usability. Above water, sound quality is often only fair, and Playlist+ plus the physical controls can feel clumsy compared with more mainstream sport headphones. For swimmers, triathletes, and anyone who wants music without bringing a phone into the water, it makes sense. For runners, gym users, or buyers chasing richer sound and simpler controls, the compromises are harder to justify.

Pros

  • 5.0
    based on 11 reviews
    Water/sweat resistance rating: 5.0, based on 11 reviews
    Water performance is the standout strength. The IPX8 rating and real underwater playback are consistently praised, making these far more convincing for swimmers than most open-ear alternatives.
  • 4.9
    based on 2 reviews
    Weight comfort: 4.9, based on 2 reviews
    These are repeatedly described as lightweight and unobtrusive, which helps during long sessions and makes the headset easy to forget once positioned.
  • 4.4
    based on 6 reviews
    Stability: 4.4, based on 6 reviews
    Once the fit suits your head, stability is excellent. Reviewers regularly say the headset stays put through swimming, running, and vigorous movement, though smaller heads can end up with extra rear loop.
  • 4.3
    based on 2 reviews
    Charging: 4.3, based on 2 reviews
    Charging is straightforward once aligned with the magnetic connector, and case-based charging options add convenience, but the waterproof-focused approach means living with a proprietary setup.
  • 4.2
    based on 10 reviews
    Comfort during long use: 4.2, based on 10 reviews
    Comfort is one of the strongest recurring positives. The open-ear design avoids ear-canal fatigue, vibrations are generally well controlled for the category, and several reviewers found them easy to wear for long swims or runs.
  • 4.2
    based on 8 reviews
    Included accessories: 4.2, based on 8 reviews
    Accessories are a plus. Earplugs and a protective case show up repeatedly as useful inclusions, and they materially improve the swim experience.
  • 4.2
    based on 6 reviews
    Build quality: 4.2, based on 6 reviews
    Build quality comes across as sturdy, flexible, and ready for abuse in the pool or during training. The sealed construction and soft exterior inspire confidence.
  • 4.0
    based on 5 reviews
    Carry case quality: 4.0, based on 5 reviews
    The included cases are generally well regarded. Reviewers call them protective and practical, though some found the standard case bulkier than necessary.
  • 4.0
    based on 10 reviews
    Battery: 4.0, based on 10 reviews
    Battery life is solid for the category, with most reviews landing around the claimed 9 hours over Bluetooth and 6 hours from memory mode, though some testing suggests real-world endurance can fall short of the marketing numbers.
  • 3.9
    based on 5 reviews
    Design and Aesthetics: 3.9, based on 5 reviews
    The design is sporty and practical rather than stylish. Reviewers like the soft-touch finish and purpose-built form, even if it looks more specialized than everyday headphones.
  • 3.9
    based on 5 reviews
    App: 3.9, based on 5 reviews
    The app is useful for firmware, library management, and Playlist+ tasks, but it is basic rather than feature rich and can feel awkward compared with more polished headphone apps.
  • 3.8
    based on 11 reviews
    Offline playback and onboard storage: 3.8, based on 11 reviews
    The local-memory feature is the reason to buy these. Reviewers like the 8GB storage, drag-and-drop loading, and true phone-free swimming, but Playlist+ is often described as clunky, slow, or awkward, and 8GB trails some rivals.
  • 3.5
    based on 2 reviews
    Volume output: 3.5, based on 2 reviews
    There is enough output for workouts and spoken-word listening, but open-ear use in noisy settings often requires higher volume than ideal.

Cons

  • 3.4
    based on 11 reviews
    Sound quality: 3.4, based on 11 reviews
    Sound quality is the main compromise. Underwater playback is often described as good or at least satisfying for the category, while above-water listening ranges from merely okay to clearly weak compared with better open-ear or in-ear alternatives.
  • 3.4
    based on 10 reviews
    Button control usability: 3.4, based on 10 reviews
    The controls are the most common complaint. Physical buttons offer tactile feedback, but many reviewers found them too small, too close together, slow on secondary presses, or easy to trigger incorrectly while moving.
  • 3.2
    based on 5 reviews
    Bluetooth connectivity stability: 3.2, based on 5 reviews
    Bluetooth is fine for some above-water use, but stability is not flawless. Multiple reviewers mention stutters, disconnects, or pairing friction, and underwater Bluetooth remains impractical as expected.
  • 3.2
    based on 6 reviews
    Noise isolation (passive): 3.2, based on 6 reviews
    The open-ear design provides almost no passive isolation on its own. The included earplugs make a noticeable difference in the pool by reducing splash noise and improving perceived clarity and bass.
  • 3.1
    based on 7 reviews
    Bass performance: 3.1, based on 7 reviews
    Bass is inconsistent. Some reviewers hear solid or even punchier bass, especially underwater or with earplugs, but others call it hollow, woolly, or nearly absent on land.
  • 3.0
    based on 2 reviews
    Cable quality: 3.0, based on 2 reviews
    The magnetic proprietary cable supports the waterproof design, but it adds one more special accessory to keep track of, and one reviewer reported unreliable wired file transfers.
  • 2.9
    based on 5 reviews
    Midrange clarity: 2.9, based on 5 reviews
    Mids and vocals are serviceable rather than standout. They come through well enough for workouts and can sound more balanced underwater, but several reviews say voices lose body or detail above water.
  • 2.8
    based on 3 reviews
    Microphone quality for calls: 2.8, based on 3 reviews
    Call quality is usable but not a strength. Voices tend to sound quiet, distant, or light on detail, which fits the swim-first design but limits all-purpose appeal.
  • 2.8
    based on 5 reviews
    Treble clarity: 2.8, based on 5 reviews
    Treble is acceptable for exercise use, not refined listening. Highs are often described as rolled off, grainy, or slightly distorted when volume climbs.
  • 2.0
    based on 1 review
    Maximum volume clarity: 2.0, based on 1 review
    Pushing volume too high hurts sound quality. At max levels, reviewers noted distortion, harsher vibrations, and less pleasant listening.
  • 1.0
    based on 1 review
    Equalizer customization: 1.0, based on 1 review
    EQ tuning is essentially missing, so you are mostly stuck with the default sound signature.
  • 1.0
    based on 1 review
    Multipoint connectivity reliability: 1.0, based on 1 review
    Multipoint support is absent, which limits convenience if you switch between devices often.

FAQ

Can the TRI 2 PRO play music underwater without a phone?

Yes. Its onboard memory and Playlist+ or drag-and-drop file loading let you play audio underwater without relying on Bluetooth, which does not work well once submerged.

Does it sound better underwater or on land?

Most reviews say underwater playback is where it shines. Above water, sound is usually described as merely okay to poor compared with better bone conduction or open-ear rivals.

Is it comfortable and secure for swimming?

Usually yes. Comfort and stability are two of the strongest recurring positives, though a few reviewers with smaller heads said the rear loop felt oversized.

Are the controls and Playlist+ easy to use?

Not always. The buttons are a common complaint, and Playlist+ is useful but often described as clunky or time-consuming compared with simply loading files directly.

Reviews we analyzed

Video Reviews

Article Reviews

#1
4.4
Choose Sony WF-1000XM6 for top-tier noise canceling and a spacious, punchy sound; Skip if you struggle with foam-tip comfort/fit or want the most...
Pros: USB-C, LDAC, Codec support, Smudge resistance, Soundstage width, Active noise cancellation effectiveness, Sound quality
Cons: None
#2
4.3
Choose JBL Tour Pro 3 for feature-hungry listeners who want a smart-case transmitter and lively sound. Skip if you need the smallest, most...
Pros: Dongle, Codec support, Ear tip size options, Equalizer customization, LDAC, Android compatibility, Carry case quality
Cons: None
#3
4.3
Choose for top-tier sound and a feature-rich, future-proof codec stack; Skip if you prioritize the very best ANC or consistently clean calls in...
Pros: Codec support, aptX, Sensors, Build quality, Sound quality, Soundstage width, Bass performance
Cons: Spatial audio, Find My
#4
4.2
Choose Nothing Ear (a) if you want standout design, very good sound, and easy daily comfort for under $100. Skip it if you...
Pros: Comfort during long use, Software/setup simplicity, LDAC, Multi-platform compatibility, Design and Aesthetics, Noise cancellation adjustability, Instrument separation
Cons: none