-
4.6
based on 6 reviews
Noise level: 4.6, based on 6 reviews
Noise is a standout strength: measured levels are relatively low on standard modes and many users describe it as quieter than competing cordless sticks.
-
4.6
based on 4 reviews
Aesthetic design and finish: 4.6, based on 4 reviews
Many reviewers like the sleek, premium look of the vacuum and tower and feel comfortable leaving it out rather than hiding it in a closet.
-
4.6
based on 1 review
Cyclone performance: 4.6, based on 1 review
Testing notes the multi-cyclone design helps keep fine debris from loading up the prefilter quickly, supporting steadier suction on dust-heavy jobs.
-
4.6
based on 11 reviews
Cordless convenience: 4.6, based on 11 reviews
Cordless convenience is consistently praised thanks to swappable batteries, a dock that charges the spare, and easy grab-and-go daily cleaning.
-
4.5
based on 4 reviews
Ease of use: 4.5, based on 4 reviews
Day-to-day use is often described as easy thanks to button controls and docked charging/storage, but some friction points include tower doors, app extras, and hard-floor technique.
-
4.5
based on 6 reviews
Convertible handheld design: 4.5, based on 6 reviews
The vacuum converts quickly to a handheld for cars, stairs, upholstery, and tight spots, and this flexibility is repeatedly called out as a key benefit.
-
4.4
based on 3 reviews
Maneuverability and Handling: 4.4, based on 3 reviews
Handling is generally light and balanced with good swivel action, though the floorhead behavior on hard floors can reduce the feeling of effortless maneuvering for larger debris.
-
4.4
based on 8 reviews
Accessories and Tools: 4.4, based on 8 reviews
Reviews highlight a generous accessory set (including mini motorized and mop options) with convenient storage, but some shoppers report confusion about what is included or wish for additional hard-floor heads.
-
4.3
based on 5 reviews
Pet-Ready Features: 4.3, based on 5 reviews
Pet tools and carpet cleaning earn frequent praise for picking up fur, but heavy shedding can contribute to clogs and some owners report the base or chute struggling with pet hair.
-
4.3
based on 10 reviews
Emptying and Mess Control: 4.3, based on 10 reviews
The auto-empty tower is a major convenience and helps avoid dust clouds, but reliability is inconsistent with reports of incomplete emptying, jams, or messy failures.
-
4.3
based on 4 reviews
Hair Pickup — Carpets: 4.3, based on 4 reviews
Carpet hair pickup is frequently praised, especially with the mini/pet tools, though occasional tangling and maintenance is still reported with long hair.
-
4.3
based on 10 reviews
Battery and Charging: 4.3, based on 10 reviews
Dual batteries and a tower that charges the spare are major positives, but real-world longevity varies and some owners report batteries that degrade, fail, or do not meet advertised claims.
-
4.3
based on 3 reviews
Under-Furniture Pickup: 4.3, based on 3 reviews
Several reviews praise the low-profile reach for getting under furniture and the flexibility to clean along edges and into tighter spaces.
-
4.3
based on 3 reviews
Upholstery / Above-Floor Pickup: 4.3, based on 3 reviews
Above-floor performance is a strong point: mini motorized tools and crevice attachments are praised for sofas, stairs, vehicles, and tight spots.
-
4.2
based on 3 reviews
Crevice / Groove Pickup (Hard Floors): 4.2, based on 3 reviews
Crevice tool results are generally strong, with tests showing good extraction of sand/flour from grooves and owners using it to compensate for chunky-debris issues.
-
4.2
based on 3 reviews
Carpet — High-Pile Pickup: 4.2, based on 3 reviews
High-pile and rug cleaning is generally a strength, with good pickup scores and strong pet-fur results compared with its hard-floor chunky-debris performance.
-
4.2
based on 2 reviews
Carpet — Medium-Pile Pickup: 4.2, based on 2 reviews
Deep-clean tests on carpet show above-average pickup for embedded debris, supporting strong performance on typical medium-pile household carpets.
-
4.2
based on 8 reviews
Suction and Airflow: 4.2, based on 8 reviews
Across tests and owner reports, suction feels strong on carpet and rugs, but overall performance is inconsistent on hard floors and some users report suction drop-offs over time.
-
4.2
based on 7 reviews
Tool-change simplicity: 4.2, based on 7 reviews
Attachments generally click on and off quickly, and the tower storage keeps tools handy, though some reviewers dislike having to swap tools to handle hard-floor debris well.
-
4.2
based on 5 reviews
Maintenance requirements: 4.2, based on 5 reviews
Washable filters and accessible rollers help, but owners frequently mention hands-on maintenance such as unclogging, cleaning passages, and replacing bags.
-
4.2
based on 2 reviews
Water tank: 4.2, based on 2 reviews
The mop attachment tank is easy to fill and includes adjustable flow settings, though capacity is limited as expected for an add-on tool.
-
4.1
based on 1 review
Carpet — Low-Pile Pickup: 4.1, based on 1 review
Low-pile carpet pickup scores well in testing and is commonly described as reliably strong for everyday carpet cleaning.
-
4.1
based on 3 reviews
Weight: 4.1, based on 3 reviews
Weight is around the mid-5 lb range; many find it manageable, but whole-home sessions can still feel tiring compared with lighter sticks.
-
4.1
based on 8 reviews
Controls and UI: 4.1, based on 8 reviews
Button-based controls (no trigger) are often described as ergonomic, but some dislike long-press behavior for max power and the overall number of modes and indicators.
-
4.0
based on 2 reviews
Hair Pickup — Hard Floors: 4.0, based on 2 reviews
Hair pickup on hard floors is usually effective, though long strands and fuzz can still contribute to tangles or clogs that require cleanup.
-
4.0
based on 2 reviews
Packaging quality: 4.0, based on 2 reviews
Packaging is usually adequate, but there are reports of cracked or damaged tower components arriving out of the box.
-
4.0
based on 1 review
Debris illumination: 4.0, based on 1 review
Debris illumination is inconsistently reported: one roundup notes LEDs on the mop attachment, while many owners still wish the primary floorhead included lighting.
-
3.9
based on 8 reviews
Storage footprint and upright-stand stability: 3.9, based on 8 reviews
The freestanding all-in-one tower is praised for storing tools and charging a spare battery, but multiple reviewers call it bulky and note the doors and clearances can be awkward in tight spaces.
-
3.9
based on 8 reviews
Filtration / Dust Containment: 3.9, based on 8 reviews
The multi-stage system and HEPA bag can contain dust well, yet one lab-style test reports leakage and some owners describe dust plumes or smell during auto-emptying.
-
3.8
based on 4 reviews
Runtime (Measured, Default): 3.8, based on 4 reviews
Measured runtimes vary widely by mode and head, but many users see roughly half an hour to an hour per battery in standard use, with the second battery extending total time.
-
3.7
based on 5 reviews
Hair‑Wrap / Tangle Resistance: 3.7, based on 5 reviews
Tangle resistance is mixed: short hair often causes little wrap, but long hair can wrap heavily and may require regular brush-roll cleaning.
-
3.7
based on 2 reviews
Assembly and Setup: 3.7, based on 2 reviews
Setup is usually straightforward, though some owners say the instructions are unclear and the tower doors or alignment can be finicky.
-
3.7
based on 8 reviews
Bin and Bag: 3.7, based on 8 reviews
The onboard bin is small and the Kompressor can compact fluffy debris, while the self-empty tower relies on proprietary bags that add convenience but also cost and occasional mechanical complaints.
-
3.6
based on 5 reviews
Mopping performance: 3.6, based on 5 reviews
The mop attachment can help with light spot cleaning and shine, but it is not a full mop replacement and some owners report poor results or mechanical issues.
-
3.5
based on 4 reviews
Solution / Liquid system: 3.5, based on 4 reviews
The spinning mop system is water-focused with adjustable output and typically discourages detergent use; it is best for light, fresh messes rather than deep cleaning.
-
3.4
based on 4 reviews
AI, Smart, App and Automation: 3.4, based on 4 reviews
The LG ThinQ/Wi-Fi features provide status and usage history, but many reviewers consider the app optional and a few report pairing or usefulness frustrations.
-
3.4
based on 4 reviews
Hard Floor — Fine Dust Pickup: 3.4, based on 4 reviews
Fine dust on hard floors is mixed: some tests show excellent pickup on sugar/flour, while other owners report pushing debris around depending on head design and technique.
-
3.3
based on 2 reviews
Build quality and durability: 3.3, based on 2 reviews
Build impressions vary: some praise a premium feel, but customer reviews include repeated reports of breakage, tower failures, overheating, or motor problems over months of use.
-
3.0
based on 4 reviews
Comparative performance: 3.0, based on 4 reviews
Compared with Dyson and Samsung rivals, it competes well on carpet and convenience and can be quieter, but falls behind on hard-floor chunky debris and long-term consistency.
-
3.0
based on 4 reviews
Clogging and debris prevention: 3.0, based on 4 reviews
Clogging feedback is split: the cyclone design can resist fine-dust prefilter clogging, but many users and tests report jams or blockages with larger debris like cereal or kibble.
-
2.8
based on 4 reviews
Runtime (Measured, Boost/Turbo): 2.8, based on 4 reviews
Turbo runtime is short and best treated as a burst mode; several reviews cite single-digit minutes of high power before needing a recharge or battery swap.
-
2.6
based on 2 reviews
Ongoing ownership costs (bags, filters, batteries): 2.6, based on 2 reviews
Ongoing costs can be higher than bagless rivals due to proprietary dust bags and replacement parts, and some mention paying extra for certain accessories.
-
2.5
based on 4 reviews
Floorhead design: 2.5, based on 4 reviews
The universal power nozzle works across surfaces but is frequently criticized for pushing chunky debris on hard floors, and several reviewers wish it had a soft roller and/or headlight.
-
2.5
based on 1 review
Odor control: 2.5, based on 1 review
A few users mention noticeable odors, particularly during auto-empty cycles, while others do not report smell issues.
-
2.4
based on 1 review
Scratch resistance: 2.4, based on 1 review
Some owners warn that dragging hard grit or pebbles can scratch wood floors if not picked up cleanly, so careful technique matters on delicate surfaces.
-
2.3
based on 2 reviews
Price and Value: 2.3, based on 2 reviews
Value is polarizing: some feel the auto-empty convenience justifies the premium, while many owners call it overpriced given hard-floor shortcomings and reliability complaints.
-
2.2
based on 6 reviews
Hard Floor — Large Debris Intake: 2.2, based on 6 reviews
Large debris on hard floors is the most consistent weakness; multiple reviews note cereal, Cheerios, and kibble being pushed, left behind, or causing jams.
-
1.8
based on 1 review
Airflow blowback: 1.8, based on 1 review
At least one reviewer reports debris scatter or blowback on hard floors (especially with light, bulky bits), contributing to frustration with messy pickups.
-
1.8
based on 1 review
Support and Reliability: 1.8, based on 1 review
Support experiences are mixed; several owners report frustrating warranty processes, slow turnaround, or being required to ship the full unit for service.
-
1.7
based on 2 reviews
Headlight and LED lights: 1.7, based on 2 reviews
Multiple reviewers note the main floorhead lacks a headlight, and some mention LEDs only on certain attachments, creating expectation mismatches.