-
4.8
based on 6 reviews
Hair‑Wrap / Tangle Resistance: 4.8, based on 6 reviews
Tangle resistance is one of the most praised features: multiple reviewers report little to no hair wrapping on the main brush, with only occasional side-brush cleanup.
-
4.8
based on 1 review
Build quality and durability: 4.8, based on 1 review
Build quality is generally described as premium and well-assembled for both robot and dock, with sturdy plastics and solid fit-and-finish.
-
4.7
based on 1 review
Assembly and Setup: 4.7, based on 1 review
Setup is generally described as straightforward (app pairing, Wi-Fi, mapping), though some users wanted clearer instructions and find map editing takes practice.
-
4.7
based on 2 reviews
Aesthetic design and finish: 4.7, based on 2 reviews
Design and finish get frequent praise: the base station looks sleek/futuristic and hides the robot well compared with many bulky docks.
-
4.6
based on 1 review
Mop lifting system: 4.6, based on 1 review
Mop pads lift around 12 mm on carpet in most reports, enabling vacuum+mop workflows with less risk of wet rugs; a few note slight dragging on some carpets/rug edges.
-
4.6
based on 6 reviews
Noise level: 4.6, based on 6 reviews
Day-to-day running noise is repeatedly called out as very quiet for a flagship combo, making it easier to run while working or sleeping.
-
4.5
based on 2 reviews
Self-cleaning cycle: 4.5, based on 2 reviews
Dock-driven self-cleaning is a core strength: automatic mop pad washing and heated/air drying reduce odors and day-to-day mop maintenance; some note longer cycles due to frequent washing.
-
4.4
based on 13 reviews
Mopping performance: 4.4, based on 13 reviews
Strong, mop-first performance: triangular spinning pads with higher pressure and frequent pad washing deliver consistently good hard-floor cleaning; thick/sugary messes and grout can still take extra passes.
-
4.4
based on 2 reviews
Comparative performance: 4.4, based on 2 reviews
Comparisons often position it as stronger at mopping and hair handling than many rivals, but behind the best all-around flagships for dust auto-empty and consistent obstacle avoidance.
-
4.4
based on 1 review
Carpet — High-Pile Pickup: 4.4, based on 1 review
High-pile carpet performance is reported as decent to strong in some testing, though climbing on/off thick rugs or thresholds can slow cycles.
-
4.3
based on 5 reviews
Suction and Airflow: 4.3, based on 5 reviews
Suction is widely described as powerful for a combo unit (often cited around the 8,200 Pa class) with good surface pickup; some reviews still want stronger carpet boost behavior.
-
4.3
based on 2 reviews
Hair Pickup — Hard Floors: 4.3, based on 2 reviews
Hard-floor pickup is consistently strong for dust, cereal, and pet hair, with good overall coverage during vacuum+mop routines.
-
4.3
based on 1 review
Odor control: 4.3, based on 1 review
Odor control is generally good thanks to mop drying and dirty-water handling; several reviewers report minimal lingering smell after mopping cycles.
-
4.3
based on 2 reviews
Battery and Charging: 4.3, based on 2 reviews
Battery life is commonly reported as strong, with long runtimes and the ability to cover large areas; long, meticulous mopping cycles can still trigger recharge-and-resume in big spaces.
-
4.2
based on 4 reviews
AI, Smart, App and Automation: 4.2, based on 4 reviews
Automation features (dirt sensing / Freo mode, adaptive passes, scheduling, voice control integrations) are a major value-add, though ‘smart’ behavior can be inconsistent depending on firmware and setup.
-
4.1
based on 4 reviews
Edge and Baseboard Cleaning (Hard Floors): 4.1, based on 4 reviews
Edge/baseboard cleaning is improved by edge-focused behaviors and pad geometry, but reports vary—some praise edges while others still see missed mopping along tight baseboards.
-
4.0
based on 3 reviews
Solution / Liquid system: 4.0, based on 3 reviews
Detergent/solution support is a differentiator (often included and auto-dispensed). Some reviewers like the cleaning boost; others dislike being nudged toward proprietary refills.
-
4.0
based on 1 review
Dock noise: 4.0, based on 1 review
Dock noise is generally described as low for washing/drying compared with auto-empty docks; water pumping can be the most noticeable sound.
-
4.0
based on 5 reviews
Maintenance requirements: 4.0, based on 5 reviews
Maintenance load is reduced by mop washing/drying, but you still have recurring tasks: manage water tanks, periodically clean trays/brushes, and replace bags/filters/pads over time.
-
3.9
based on 5 reviews
Dried-On Stain Removal: 3.9, based on 5 reviews
Above-average dried-stain removal in several tests (coffee/juice and set-on messes), but not always the very top performer; jam/BBQ-style residues may require multiple runs.
-
3.9
based on 2 reviews
Edge‑Following Accuracy (Robot): 3.9, based on 2 reviews
Edge-following accuracy is generally strong during vacuuming paths (tight wall tracking), but mopping edge reach varies because the pads don’t extend outward.
-
3.8
based on 3 reviews
Water tank: 3.8, based on 3 reviews
Clean/dirty water tank system works well but can be water-hungry on frequent cleaning—some users report refills every 1–3 days depending on home size and settings.
-
3.7
based on 1 review
Crevice / Groove Pickup (Hard Floors): 3.7, based on 1 review
Crevice/groove pickup on tile and seams is above average in some testing but not perfect—fine grit can require an extra pass in deeper grooves.
-
3.7
based on 5 reviews
Controls and UI: 3.7, based on 5 reviews
App is feature-rich (scheduling, room targeting, modes), but some users find map editing and zoom/room definitions finicky; base-station controls help for basic starts/stops.
-
3.6
based on 5 reviews
Map and Path Efficiency (Robot Vacuums): 3.6, based on 5 reviews
Mapping is usually accurate and paths are methodical, but multiple reviewers mention slower completion times and occasional room-splitting/zone quirks, especially in open layouts.
-
3.5
based on 3 reviews
Corner Cleaning (Robot): 3.5, based on 3 reviews
Corner cleaning is inconsistent: vacuuming corners can be strong thanks to dual side brushes, while mopping corners may still miss without an extending pad.
-
3.5
based on 1 review
Ongoing ownership costs (bags, filters, batteries): 3.5, based on 1 review
Ongoing costs include replacement detergent, dust bags (if used), mop pads, and filters; costs are manageable but should be expected for long-term ownership.
-
3.5
based on 1 review
Streaking / Residue: 3.5, based on 1 review
Residue/streaking is generally controlled thanks to pad design and detergent options, but sticky sauces/honey can leave light tackiness that needs extra passes or manual spot work.
-
3.5
based on 10 reviews
Bin and Bag: 3.5, based on 10 reviews
Onboard bin/bag system emphasizes containment and capacity via compression; convenient for allergies and quieter than dock emptying, but still requires manual bag/bin changes.
-
3.5
based on 2 reviews
Emptying and Mess Control: 3.5, based on 2 reviews
Mess control is good when swapping disposable bags (less dust plume), but the lack of dock emptying means you must stay on top of periodic manual emptying/checks.
-
3.4
based on 12 reviews
Obstacle Avoidance (Robot): 3.4, based on 12 reviews
Obstacle avoidance is mixed: some reviews praise general navigation around clutter, but cords are a common failure mode and a few tests report poor avoidance of low objects.
-
3.3
based on 6 reviews
Price and Value: 3.3, based on 6 reviews
Value perception depends heavily on sale price: many like the performance and mop automation, but several call MSRP expensive given no dust self-empty and mixed obstacle avoidance.
-
3.2
based on 1 review
Under-Furniture Pickup: 3.2, based on 1 review
Low-profile robot can reach many under-furniture areas, but a few reviewers note occasional avoidance of certain furniture bases or tight clearances.
-
3.2
based on 5 reviews
Carpet — Low-Pile Pickup: 3.2, based on 5 reviews
Low-pile carpet pickup is a recurring weak spot in some tests and user reports, especially for deeper grit and fine particles compared with top carpet-focused robots.
-
3.2
based on 2 reviews
Docking and Auto-Empty Reliability (Robot): 3.2, based on 2 reviews
Because there’s no dust auto-empty dock, reliability hinges on docking/charging and mop-service cycles, which are generally stable; the tradeoff is manual dust management.
-
3.1
based on 2 reviews
Area Rug Handling: 3.1, based on 2 reviews
Area rugs can be a pain point for some homes—fringe/corners may get caught or displaced, and cords near rugs increase snag risk.
-
3.0
based on 1 review
Floor Drying Time: 3.0, based on 1 review
Floor surface drying depends on settings and how often the dock refreshes pads; while pads dry at the dock, overall post-clean dryness can take longer on heavy/wet mopping modes.
-
3.0
based on 1 review
Software-update support / feature longevity: 3.0, based on 1 review
Several reviewers expect software/firmware updates to improve smart behaviors (like DirtSense and avoidance). Current experience varies, so longevity depends on ongoing support.
-
3.0
based on 1 review
Storage footprint and upright-stand stability: 3.0, based on 1 review
Base station is often described as sleek but sizable; placement is easiest where the dock footprint and water-tank access aren’t in the way.
-
2.8
based on 1 review
Bag-full indicator: 2.8, based on 1 review
Some users note the app provides reminders for replacing disposable bags, but there isn’t always a clear, foolproof ‘full’ sensor experience compared with docked self-empty systems.
-
2.8
based on 1 review
Stuck resistance: 2.8, based on 1 review
Stuck resistance is usually solid, but there are reports of getting hung up on certain furniture bases or snag-prone situations (especially around cords and rug edges).