-
5.0
based on 1 review
Privacy controls: 5.0, based on 1 review
Privacy protections are reassuring where mentioned. Camera features are opt-in, locks are available, and one review highlighted TÜV-backed security credentials.
-
4.7
based on 3 reviews
Aesthetic design and finish: 4.7, based on 3 reviews
Design is a standout. Reviewers repeatedly praised the curved dock and glossy white finish as unusually attractive for a robot vacuum.
-
4.6
based on 9 reviews
Hair‑Wrap / Tangle Resistance: 4.6, based on 9 reviews
Hair-wrap resistance is excellent. The DuoDivide brush system repeatedly earned praise and strong test results for keeping long hair from tangling badly.
-
4.5
based on 10 reviews
Pet-Ready Features: 4.5, based on 10 reviews
It is a strong fit for pet homes. Good fur pickup, strong anti-tangle behavior, and useful pet-viewing or pet-detection features came up often.
-
4.5
based on 5 reviews
Assembly and Setup: 4.5, based on 5 reviews
Setup is consistently easy. Pairing, mapping, and getting the dock ready were described as straightforward even for first-time use.
-
4.5
based on 4 reviews
Build quality and durability: 4.5, based on 4 reviews
Build quality feels premium. The robot and dock were described as sturdy, polished, and thoughtfully designed for regular use.
-
4.5
based on 4 reviews
Carpet — Medium-Pile Pickup: 4.5, based on 4 reviews
Medium-pile carpet pickup is one of its stronger vacuuming traits, with multiple tests showing above-average deep-clean results.
-
4.5
based on 3 reviews
Innovation compared to competitors: 4.5, based on 3 reviews
Roborock’s first roller-mop design is seen as a meaningful step forward for the brand, even if some reviewers felt competitors are already further along on mopping refinement.
-
4.5
based on 2 reviews
Hair Pickup — Hard Floors: 4.5, based on 2 reviews
Hard-floor hair pickup is very good. On tile, wood, and similar surfaces it consistently handles pet fur and fluff well.
-
4.5
based on 1 review
Packaging quality: 4.5, based on 1 review
Packaging quality was viewed positively where discussed, with secure protection and little unnecessary excess.
-
4.5
based on 12 reviews
Mop lifting system: 4.5, based on 12 reviews
Carpet protection is one of its best ideas. The roller lifts and the shield keeps many carpets dry, though a few classification errors still occur.
-
4.5
based on 11 reviews
Self-cleaning cycle: 4.5, based on 11 reviews
The self-cleaning system is a real advantage. Hot-water washing, warm-air drying, and easy access to the roller hardware reduce day-to-day mop maintenance.
-
4.4
based on 7 reviews
Hard Floor — Large Debris Intake: 4.4, based on 7 reviews
It handles larger dry debris very well. Cereal, litter, crumbs, rice, and similar messes are usually picked up with little drama.
-
4.4
based on 6 reviews
Controls and UI: 4.4, based on 6 reviews
The controls are powerful and polished. Reviewers liked the app’s layout and flexibility, although some menus are deeper than they need to be.
-
4.4
based on 14 reviews
AI, Smart, App and Automation: 4.4, based on 14 reviews
The software experience is a major strength. Mapping, room control, no-go zones, routines, remote viewing, and deep customization are widely praised, though some reviewers found SmartPlan or buried settings less reliable than manual tuning.
-
4.3
based on 9 reviews
Map and Path Efficiency (Robot Vacuums): 4.3, based on 9 reviews
Navigation and route planning are consistently strong. It maps quickly, covers rooms efficiently, and usually returns to the dock without drama.
-
4.3
based on 6 reviews
Docking and Auto-Empty Reliability (Robot): 4.3, based on 6 reviews
Docking and automated dock functions are a clear strength. Returning to base, washing, drying, and bagged emptying are usually reliable, with only occasional debris-chute complaints.
-
4.3
based on 6 reviews
Maintenance requirements: 4.3, based on 6 reviews
Maintenance is better thought out than average. Key parts are easy to remove and clean, but owners still need to check rollers, tanks, trays, and occasional clumps.
-
4.3
based on 8 reviews
Hard Floor — Fine Dust Pickup: 4.3, based on 8 reviews
Fine-dust pickup on hard floors is strong. Repeated real-world and test feedback says it leaves hard floors looking clean and polished.
-
4.2
based on 3 reviews
Water tank: 4.2, based on 3 reviews
The onboard and dock water setup is practical. Tanks are easy to access and generally sized well for routine cleaning, though the onboard dirty-water tank still needs periodic attention.
-
4.2
based on 17 reviews
Overall opinion: 4.2, based on 17 reviews
Taken together, the review set lands on a positive but not unanimous verdict: strong vacuuming, navigation, and automation, with mopping brilliance on everyday messes but clear caveats on tougher stains.
-
4.1
based on 13 reviews
Edge and Baseboard Cleaning (Hard Floors): 4.1, based on 13 reviews
Edge mopping is strong. The extending roller gets close to walls and baseboards, though it still cannot fully overcome the limits of a round robot body.
-
4.1
based on 4 reviews
Bin and Bag: 4.1, based on 4 reviews
Dust handling is solid overall. The larger bin and bagged dock are positives, though a few reviewers noted outlet clogging or hair clumps near the dock.
-
4.1
based on 15 reviews
Mopping performance: 4.1, based on 15 reviews
Overall mopping is good to very good for daily hard-floor upkeep, especially wet spills and everyday grime. It is less convincing when asked to scrub stubborn, dried-on messes.
-
4.1
based on 7 reviews
Area Rug Handling: 4.1, based on 7 reviews
Rug handling is generally good thanks to automatic mop lift and the protective shield, but classification mistakes and troublesome mats still show up in some homes.
-
4.0
based on 15 reviews
Suction and Airflow: 4.0, based on 15 reviews
Vacuum performance is stronger than the bench numbers suggest. Real-world debris pickup is widely praised, even though a few lab-style airflow and suction metrics were only average.
-
3.8
based on 14 reviews
Price and Value: 3.8, based on 14 reviews
Value depends on priorities. At sale pricing it is widely seen as compelling, but at full price some reviewers wanted better stain performance or more flagship hardware.
-
3.8
based on 8 reviews
Stuck resistance: 3.8, based on 8 reviews
Stuck resistance is fairly good in real homes. It usually avoids rescues, but strings, craft materials, cables, mats, and tricky transitions can still catch it out.
-
3.8
based on 2 reviews
Carpet — Low-Pile Pickup: 3.8, based on 2 reviews
On lower-pile carpet it does a respectable job, especially with routine maintenance cleaning, but it is not a category leader on carpet overall.
-
3.7
based on 5 reviews
Hair Pickup — Carpets: 3.7, based on 5 reviews
Carpet hair pickup is decent but not elite. It manages pet hair better than many robots, yet some tests still showed leftovers on more challenging carpet.
-
3.7
based on 3 reviews
Adaptive chassis lift: 3.7, based on 3 reviews
Threshold performance is adequate rather than class-leading. It handled common 1–2 cm transitions in several homes, but it lacks the more aggressive chassis-lift tricks seen on higher-end rivals.
-
3.6
based on 7 reviews
Streaking / Residue: 3.6, based on 7 reviews
Residue control is mixed. Some users saw clean, shiny, low-residue floors, while others reported streaking until water levels or routes were adjusted.
-
3.6
based on 8 reviews
Battery and Charging: 3.6, based on 8 reviews
Battery life is serviceable but mixed. Some testers got strong runtime and efficient coverage, while others found recharge speed and large-job endurance only average.
-
3.5
based on 11 reviews
Dried-On Stain Removal: 3.5, based on 11 reviews
Dried-on stain removal is the most divisive part of the product. Some reviewers saw impressive real-world stain cleanup, while several controlled tests found it notably weaker than expected.
-
3.5
based on 1 review
Emptying and Mess Control: 3.5, based on 1 review
Mess handling at the dock is improved over simpler systems, but not spotless. A few reviewers still reported damp clumps or debris left near the station.
-
3.5
based on 16 reviews
Obstacle Avoidance (Robot): 3.5, based on 16 reviews
Obstacle avoidance is adequate rather than best-in-class. It usually handles larger clutter, pets, and furniture well, but small cables, strings, toys, and flat objects remain risky.
-
3.3
based on 3 reviews
Dock noise: 3.3, based on 3 reviews
Dock noise is acceptable but noticeable. Drying is often described as a background hum, though some reviewers found the station louder than competing docks over long drying cycles.
-
3.3
based on 4 reviews
Noise level: 3.3, based on 4 reviews
In use, noise is moderate. Vacuum noise is not a major complaint, but max suction and dock maintenance cycles can be more noticeable.
-
3.1
based on 8 reviews
Corner Cleaning (Robot): 3.1, based on 8 reviews
Corner cleaning is only average. Dual side brushes help, but the lack of an extending side brush leaves some corners less thoroughly cleaned than the best competitors.
-
3.0
based on 1 review
Clogging and debris prevention: 3.0, based on 1 review
Clog resistance is decent but not perfect. The removable roller and scraper help, yet hair clumps, kibble, cords, and tiny objects can still create trouble.
-
3.0
based on 1 review
Wool carpet compatibility: 3.0, based on 1 review
Wool or shedding carpet can be troublesome. At least one reviewer saw clumps left behind on a wool rug during early runs.
-
2.9
based on 8 reviews
Solution / Liquid system: 2.9, based on 8 reviews
The liquid system is functional but imperfect. The separate dirty-water path and fresh-water roller feed are smart, yet several reviewers disliked the lack of automatic detergent dispensing or simple mop-only workflows.
-
2.8
based on 2 reviews
Carpet — High-Pile Pickup: 2.8, based on 2 reviews
High-pile or dense carpet is not this robot’s sweet spot. Several reviews said deep or fluffy carpet performance trails its otherwise strong hard-floor behavior.
-
2.5
based on 1 review
Accessories and Tools: 2.5, based on 1 review
Included extras look thin. One reviewer specifically called out the lack of spare bags, filters, and cleaning solution in the box.
-
2.4
based on 7 reviews
Low-profile design: 2.4, based on 7 reviews
This is a relatively tall robot. The non-retracting LiDAR turret and larger body hurt clearance compared with slimmer premium models.
-
2.3
based on 4 reviews
Under-Furniture Pickup: 2.3, based on 4 reviews
Under-furniture reach is limited by the robot’s height. Several reviewers flagged this as a meaningful downside versus lower-profile competitors.