Roborock Qrevo S Robot Vacuum

3.9

(11)

Bottom Line

Choose the Roborock Qrevo S if you want strong everyday vacuuming plus reliable spinning-mop cleaning with a mostly hands-off dock at a midrange price; Skip it if your floors have lots of cords/clutter or you demand top-tier edge and deep-carpet results.

Best for

Homes with mostly hard floors or low-pile rugs that want hands-off vacuuming and mopping, strong mapping, and a dock that handles emptying plus mop washing and drying.

Not for

Homes with lots of cords, small clutter, or thick rugs where you need elite small-object avoidance, flawless edge work, or deep carpet pet-hair extraction without extra passes.

Verdict

Across reviews, the Qrevo S stands out as a top midrange robot vacuum-mop combo thanks to fast, efficient LiDAR navigation, a notably stable Roborock app, and a dock that auto-empties while washing and air-drying the spinning pads. Hard-floor pickup is repeatedly rated excellent, and mopping tackles routine grime and many dried stains. The tradeoff is that it’s less bulletproof in real homes: edge cleaning can leave a thin line, carpet performance (especially embedded pet hair) is more variable, and low cables or small clutter can still trigger snags or stop events. Plan on basic floor prep for the smoothest automation.

Pros

Privacy controls 4.8 ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ 1 review 4.8

Privacy notes are mixed: one reviewer states it uses no camera or microphone, while others describe a front camera used for reactive obstacle avoidance. If privacy is a concern, verify your unit’s sensor setup and app settings.
Mop lifting system 4.7 ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ 4 reviews 4.7

Mop lifting is a consistent strength: multiple reviews cite roughly a 10mm lift with water shutoff on carpet, enabling mixed-floor vacuum-and-mop runs.
Crevice / Groove Pickup (Hard Floors) 4.7 ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ 1 review 4.7

One lab-style review reports above-average crevice and groove pickup on hard floors, helping with debris along seams and gaps.
Under-Furniture Pickup 4.7 ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ 2 reviews 4.7

Its relatively low height helps it reach under many sofas and furniture pieces, and multiple reviews highlight good under-furniture cleaning performance.
Ease of use 4.6 ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ 2 reviews 4.6

Ease of use is a key strength once it is set up: scheduling, mapping, and the self-maintaining dock reduce daily effort, though clutter-related interruptions can still happen.
Carpet — High-Pile Pickup 4.6 ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ 1 review 4.6

A deep-clean style test in one review was notably strong, but other reviewers still describe carpet performance as a step behind top-tier robots on more demanding carpets.
Hair Pickup — Hard Floors 4.6 ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ 1 review 4.6

Hard-floor hair pickup is described as strong for daily maintenance, including pet hair, keeping floors looking clean between deeper cleanings.
Scratch resistance 4.6 ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ 1 review 4.6

At least one review highlights floor-safe, scratch-resistant wheels designed to avoid marking hard floors during normal use.
AI, Smart & App / Automation 4.6 ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ 9 reviews 4.6

The Roborock app earns strong marks for stability, responsiveness, and deep customization (maps, no-go zones, routines), although setup can be tripped up by Wi‑Fi requirements for some users.
Emptying & Mess Control 4.6 ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ 2 reviews 4.6

Auto-emptying into a bag keeps dust contained and reduces mess during disposal, though the emptying cycle can be loud for a short time.
Map & Path Efficiency (Robot Vacuums) 4.5 ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ 8 reviews 4.5

Navigation and coverage are widely praised: LiDAR mapping is fast and cleaning paths are efficient and precise, though mirrors or highly reflective surfaces can occasionally confuse mapping.
Hard Floor — Fine Dust Pickup 4.5 ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ 7 reviews 4.5

Fine-dust pickup on hard floors is repeatedly rated excellent, with strong results on flour/dust-style tests, though a few comparisons note minor debris left underneath in some runs.
Low-profile design 4.5 ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ 3 reviews 4.5

Reviews repeatedly call out the low-profile build (around 9.6–9.7cm tall), which helps it fit under many sofas, though ultra-slim models can still go lower.
Airflow blowback 4.5 ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ 1 review 4.5

At least one review notes it picked up flour without spreading it around the house, suggesting good scatter and blowback control on fine debris.
Docking & Auto-Empty Reliability (Robot) 4.5 ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ 7 reviews 4.5

Docking and auto-empty performance is reviewed positively overall, with reliable returns to dock and effective emptying plus mop washing/drying that supports hands-off ownership.
Hard Floor — Large Debris Intake 4.5 ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ 6 reviews 4.5

Large-debris pickup on hard floors is strong (crumbs, cereal, rice), generally with minimal scatter; some tests note a few pieces may be left behind depending on conditions.
Water tank 4.5 ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ 6 reviews 4.5

The dock’s clean/dirty water tanks are large in reviews (commonly 4–5L), enabling hands-off mopping for long stretches, though you still need to empty dirty water and refill clean water periodically.
Assembly and Setup 4.5 ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ 2 reviews 4.5

Setup is typically quick via the app/QR code, but some reviewers flag practical hurdles like needing 2.4GHz Wi‑Fi, Bluetooth pairing, or a longer initial mapping run.
Battery & Charging 4.4 ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ 4 reviews 4.4

Runtime is reported as long in real and lab-style use (often cited around 120–180 minutes depending on mode), with efficient coverage that can handle larger spaces per charge.
Aesthetic design & finish 4.4 ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ 1 review 4.4

The robot and dock are described as minimalist and premium-looking, with clean lines and a tidy finish that blends into most homes.
Self-cleaning cycle 4.4 ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ 6 reviews 4.4

The dock automates mop washing and air drying along with auto-emptying, greatly reducing hands-on work; some reviews still note periodic manual cleaning of the base/tray and the absence of hot-water washing.
Suction & Airflow 4.4 ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ 4 reviews 4.4

Reviewers consistently report strong suction for a midrange combo robot, with impressive hard-floor performance and generally solid carpet results, though it is not always the absolute best on tougher carpets.
Ongoing ownership costs (bags, filters, batteries) 4.4 ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ 2 reviews 4.4

Long-term costs are viewed as reasonable: bags and filters are straightforward to replace, and one comparison ranked its ownership costs among the lowest in the group tested.
Mopping performance 4.3 ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ 8 reviews 4.3

Spinning-mop performance is widely praised for everyday cleaning, with adjustable water flow and good results on common messes; heavy or sticky messes may need extra passes.
Bin & Bag 4.3 ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ 6 reviews 4.3

The dock uses disposable dust bags (roughly 2.7–3L in reviews) that can last weeks at a time, keeping emptying tidy; the onboard bin is smaller but is managed by frequent auto-empty cycles.
Comparative performance 4.3 ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ 2 reviews 4.3

In comparisons and tier lists, it is frequently positioned as a top midrange option, beating or matching key rivals on navigation/app experience but trailing premium models on tougher edge, carpet, or obstacle scenarios.
Price & Value 4.2 ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ 7 reviews 4.2

Value is a major theme: reviewers call it an excellent buy when discounted (especially under about $500), but less compelling closer to MSRP given missing premium features.
Dried-On Stain Removal 4.2 ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ 6 reviews 4.2

Dried-on stain performance is above average: reviews cite successful removal of dried coffee, jelly, and other marks, but sticky or heavy stains (e.g., mud/ketchup) may need extra passes or manual cleanup.
Support & Reliability 4.1 ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ 1 review 4.1

Reliability is generally described as good, and one reviewer reports customer support was friendly and resolved an issue, but replacement/service can take time.
Noise level 4.1 ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ 4 reviews 4.1

Noise is generally described as relatively quiet for a robot vacuum, with one review measuring around the high‑50 dB range; it is audible but not usually disruptive.
Automatic shutoff for obstructions 4.1 ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ 2 reviews 4.1

When something goes wrong (such as a mop pad detaching), reviews describe the robot stopping and alerting you, which helps prevent damage but can interrupt a run.
Maintenance requirements 4.0 ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ 4 reviews 4.0

Maintenance is generally low thanks to the dock, but owners still need to change bags, refill/empty water tanks, wipe the tray, and occasionally remove hair from the brush; keeping cords picked up improves reliability.
Carpet — Low-Pile Pickup 3.8 ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ 6 reviews 3.8

Low-pile carpet pickup is generally good, but reviews disagree on consistency: some report excellent results, while others find embedded debris and pet hair on rugs may require extra passes or a separate vacuum.
Dock noise 3.7 ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ 2 reviews 3.7

Dock noise is typically described as loud during the brief auto-empty step but relatively quiet during mop washing and drying.
Hair‑Wrap / Tangle Resistance 3.6 ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ 4 reviews 3.6

Hair wrap performance varies by reviewer: some report minimal tangling and easy brush cleanout, while others report wrapping and weaker detangling results. It appears better than many robots but not tangle-proof.
Storage footprint & upright-stand stability 3.5 ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ 3 reviews 3.5

Multiple reviews note the all-in-one dock is large and takes up noticeable floor space, so it works best if you have a dedicated spot for it.

Cons

Area Rug Handling 3.4 ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ 3 reviews 3.4

Area rug handling is mixed: the mop-lift helps protect rugs, but several reviews mention low cables and rug edges can snag the mop assemblies, and at least one review reports pads can pop off on rug edges.
Edge & Baseboard Cleaning (Hard Floors) 3.4 ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ 4 reviews 3.4

Edge and baseboard cleaning is a recurring weak spot, with multiple reviews describing a thin line of debris or unmopped area left along walls or toe-kicks and noting the lack of edge-extending hardware.
Innovation compared to competitors 3.2 ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ 1 review 3.2

Reviewers characterize it as a value-focused model rather than the most innovative, missing premium extras like hot-water washing, detergent dosing, edge-extending arms, or higher-tier obstacle systems.
Weight 3.2 ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ 1 review 3.2

The dock/robot system is described as heavy enough that carrying it between floors or repositioning the dock can be inconvenient.
Obstacle Avoidance (Robot) 3.1 ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ 8 reviews 3.1

Obstacle avoidance is the most polarizing topic: several reviews praise avoidance of common objects, but others report poor performance with small/low obstacles like cables and note occasional stops or mop pad detachments.
Hair Pickup — Carpets 2.6 ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ 1 review 2.6

Carpet hair pickup can be a weak point on some rugs, especially for embedded or matted pet hair, and some reviewers still rely on an upright/stick vacuum for deep carpet hair.
Odor control 2.5 ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ 1 review 2.5

Odor control depends on good drying: when the dock drying cycle runs normally, odors are minimized, but one reviewer reported mop pads could smell if the robot got stuck and stayed wet/dirty.
Stuck resistance 2.5 ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ 1 review 2.5

Stuck resistance is mixed: it can handle typical furniture layouts, but low cables, small toys, and clutter can still snag the robot or cause it to stop, making floor prep important.
Heating element 1.5 ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ 4 reviews 1.5

Several reviews note it does not wash mops with hot or warm water, which is reserved for higher-end models; however, some reviewers mention warm/hot air drying in the dock.
Solution / Liquid system 1.2 ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ 1 review 1.2

Reviews note the system is water-only with adjustable water flow and lacks detergent dispensing, which higher-end docks may include.
Dirty water sensor 1.0 ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ 2 reviews 1.0

Multiple reviewers point out the dock lacks a dirt/detection sensor (or similar) to automatically vary mop-washing based on how dirty the pads or water are; cleaning intervals are set manually.

FAQ

Can the Roborock Qrevo S vacuum and mop in the same run?

Yes. Reviews describe it vacuuming and mopping together, with spinning pads and a mop-lift system that raises the pads (about 10mm in multiple reviews) and shuts off water when it detects carpet.

How hands-off is the dock day to day?

It typically auto-empties into a dust bag and washes and air-dries the mop pads. You still need to refill clean water, empty dirty water, and replace the bag periodically, but daily maintenance is minimal.

Is obstacle avoidance good enough for cords and small items?

Mixed. Some reviewers found it avoided common obstacles well, while others reported problems with low cables, small clutter, and occasional mop-pad detachments. Picking up cords and using no-go zones improves reliability.

Does it use hot water or detergent for mopping?

Reviews commonly note it does not wash mops with hot or warm water and it lacks detergent dispensing. Water flow is adjustable, but the system is generally water-only.

How does it do on carpets, especially with pet hair?

Carpet pickup is generally good on easier carpets, but several reviews say embedded pet hair and some rugs need more passes and may still require a dedicated vacuum for deep cleaning.