Roborock S8 + Robot Vacuum

Pros

• AI, Smart & App / Automation 4.6 ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ 10 reviews 4.6
  The app and automation features are repeatedly cited as a core strength: scheduling, room/zone routines, no-go zones, and customization are robust. Voice-assistant integration and detailed controls improve hands-off ownership, though some wish for more granular dock behavior options.
• Build quality & durability 4.6 ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ 2 reviews 4.6
  Build quality is frequently praised, with tight fit/finish and a sturdy overall feel. Testers describe materials and assembly as top-notch for the category.
• Clogging & debris prevention 4.6 ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ 2 reviews 4.6
  Dual rubber rollers earn praise for reducing hair tangles and clogs versus bristle rollers. Hair can still collect on the roller ends, but maintenance is usually easy.
• Privacy controls 4.6 ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ 1 review 4.6
  Privacy opinions are helped by the lack of a live-view surveillance camera feature. Some see that as a downside for remote viewing, while others prefer it for privacy.
• Ease of use 4.6 ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ 6 reviews 4.6
  Everyday usability is excellent: setup is easy, controls are intuitive, and app workflows make it simple to run whole-home, room, or zone cleans. Most users describe a low-friction, set-and-forget routine once maps are built.
• Hair‑Wrap / Tangle Resistance 4.6 ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ 4 reviews 4.6
  Tangle resistance is a major highlight: the rubber dual rollers greatly reduce wrap and jamming. Hair may collect at roller ends, but removal is quick and doesn’t usually interrupt cleaning.
• Map & Path Efficiency (Robot Vacuums) 4.6 ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ 9 reviews 4.6
  LiDAR-based mapping is consistently praised for accuracy, speed, and room/zone control. Most reviewers highlight strong pathing efficiency, editable maps, and useful visualization (2D/3D).
• Assembly and Setup 4.6 ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ 4 reviews 4.6
  Setup is widely described as quick and straightforward, often guided smoothly by the app. Dock assembly is simple (screws/driver included) and initial mapping tends to be fast.
• Suction & Airflow 4.5 ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ 7 reviews 4.5
  Reviews consistently praise strong pickup and suction, especially for routine dust and pet hair. A lab-style test notes deep-in-fiber and tight crevice extraction can lag behind the very best, even if overall cleaning remains strong.
• Area Rug Handling 4.5 ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ 3 reviews 4.5
  Area rugs are handled well thanks to carpet detection and automatic power adjustments, and the mop-lift helps avoid wetting rugs in mixed runs. Some advise refining carpet boundaries in-app for best results.
• Overall opinion 4.5 ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ 10 reviews 4.5
  Overall sentiment is strongly positive for vacuum-first performance, mapping, and convenience. Common reservations center on mopping limitations, price, and the loud dock emptying cycle.
• Child lock 4.5 ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ 2 reviews 4.5
  Child lock support is viewed as a thoughtful, effective safety feature that prevents accidental button presses. Families and pet owners mention it as a practical safeguard.
• Aesthetic design & finish 4.4 ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ 3 reviews 4.4
  Design is repeatedly described as sleek and modern, with finishes that blend well in living spaces. Some owners note glossy surfaces can show scratches over time, depending on use and contact with furniture.
• Edge & Baseboard Cleaning (Hard Floors) 4.4 ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ 5 reviews 4.4
  Edge and baseboard cleaning is a standout strength in multiple reviews, with notably better pickup along walls than many competitors. A mopping-focused test still observes a typical unclean band near baseboards during wet cleaning.
• Low-profile design 4.4 ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ 1 review 4.4
  The low-profile form factor helps under-furniture access, and reviewers note fewer worries about the top module catching. It won’t fit everywhere, but clearance is competitive.
• Bin & Bag 4.4 ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ 6 reviews 4.4
  The bin/bag system is a convenience win: the dock bag can last around seven weeks to up to roughly two months in lighter use. A few point out the onboard dustbin is relatively small, but that’s typical for a self-emptying model.
• Stuck resistance 4.4 ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ 2 reviews 4.4
  The robot is rarely reported as getting stuck, and reviewers note solid threshold handling and sensible no-go/avoidance tools. Messy floors (wires, socks) can still trigger occasional issues.
• Obstacle Avoidance (Robot) 4.3 ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ 8 reviews 4.3
  Obstacle avoidance is generally strong for common items like shoes and cords, with reliable navigation even in low light. A tough-case test shows occasional misses (including a pet mess scenario on a first pass), so basic floor tidying still helps.
• Battery & Charging 4.3 ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ 3 reviews 4.3
  Battery life is generally strong for the class, with long runs possible in quieter/low modes and smart recharge-and-resume behavior when needed. High-power modes shorten runtime, but coverage remains competitive.
• Filtration / Dust Containment 4.3 ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ 2 reviews 4.3
  Filtration and dust containment are viewed positively, with HEPA-style filtering and effective containment during auto-emptying. Washable filters and lifespan counters are appreciated, though consumables still need periodic replacement.
• Support & Reliability 4.3 ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ 2 reviews 4.3
  Reliability feedback is largely positive: good day-to-day consistency, solid docking behavior, and few reported operational issues. Long-term confidence is tempered by consumables, occasional large-debris dock struggles, and the usual robot-vac edge cases.
• Docking & Auto-Empty Reliability (Robot) 4.2 ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ 10 reviews 4.2
  Docking and auto-empty reliability is mostly good, with strong performance on typical dust, sand, and hair. A more rigorous test indicates the dock can struggle with some larger mixed debris loads, making it best for routine maintenance rather than big chunky spills.
• Mop lifting system 4.2 ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ 6 reviews 4.2
  Mop lifting works well for mixed hard-floor and rug homes, reducing accidental wetting. The lift height isn’t the largest in the category, so very thick carpets may still benefit from avoidance settings.
• Hard Floor — Fine Dust Pickup 4.2 ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ 2 reviews 4.2
  Hard-floor fine dust pickup is very strong, with tests showing high efficiency on smooth surfaces. Minor residual dust can remain near edges or in the middle of a test lane depending on pass patterns.
• Hard Floor — Large Debris Intake 4.2 ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ 2 reviews 4.2
  Large debris intake on hard floors is usually excellent for typical crumbs and tracked-in grit. One dock-focused test found the system can be less consistent when dealing with certain bulky mixed debris during auto-empty.
• Accessories & Tools 4.2 ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ 1 review 4.2
  Included essentials (spare bag/manuals/mop cloth) are generally described as sufficient to get started immediately. Some wish for more extras, but most consider the in-box kit practical rather than lavish.
• Hair Pickup — Hard Floors 4.2 ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ 1 review 4.2
  Hard-floor hair pickup is consistently praised, especially paired with the dual-roller design that avoids spreading clumps. Pet and human hair are typically collected cleanly into the bin.
• Noise level 4.2 ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ 8 reviews 4.2
  Most reviewers find the robot itself fairly quiet in normal operation, with louder sound mainly tied to higher suction modes. Several call it quieter than some premium peers, but volume rises noticeably when you push max power.
• Corner Cleaning (Robot) 4.1 ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ 3 reviews 4.1
  Corner performance is above average for a round robot thanks to effective edge behavior, but it still can’t fully reach tight 90-degree corners. Side-brush behavior can leave small leftovers at the very edge in some cases.
• Carpet — Low-Pile Pickup 4.1 ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ 1 review 4.1
  Low-pile carpet pickup is strong for maintenance, with good surface cleaning and hair removal. Deep extraction is less emphasized than pathing and consistency.
• Comparative performance 4.1 ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ 1 review 4.1
  Compared to prior generations and several competitors, reviewers often call the S8+ a meaningful step up in everyday vacuuming and navigation. Some still rate certain older flagships or specific rivals higher in edge cases like obstacle differentiation or deep carpet extraction.
• Maintenance requirements 4.0 ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ 3 reviews 4.0
  Routine maintenance is manageable: rollers and filters are easy to clean, and consumable tracking helps. Mop pads and filters still require regular attention, especially with frequent mopping.
• Mopping performance 4.0 ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ 10 reviews 4.0
  Mopping is better than many drag-pad hybrids thanks to sonic/vibration scrubbing, and it can handle light stains and surface grime. The common limitation is sticky/set-in messes and zone/edge precision, sometimes requiring multiple runs or a manual follow-up.
• Emptying & Mess Control 4.0 ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ 2 reviews 4.0
  Auto-emptying significantly reduces mess and day-to-day bin handling. Some owners prefer triggering emptying manually to avoid noise or frequency, and performance can vary with certain larger debris mixes.
• Price & Value 3.9 ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ 8 reviews 3.9
  Value is strong if you prioritize automation and vacuum performance, but many flag the price as premium for a dock that only self-empties (not full wash/refill). Sales pricing helps the proposition; budget buyers may find it overkill.
• Hair Pickup — Carpets 3.8 ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ 1 review 3.8
  Carpet hair pickup is strong for many users, with some reviewers calling it among the best they’ve tested for surface hair. A stricter lab test still finds room for improvement in deep carpet fibers.
• Water tank 3.8 ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ 4 reviews 3.8
  The water tank approach works for routine wet cleaning, but several reviewers want an official cleaning-solution option and note tank capacity/cloth management can limit larger jobs. Users who pre-wet or refresh the pad mid-clean get better results.
• Carpet — Medium-Pile Pickup 3.7 ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ 2 reviews 3.7
  Medium-pile carpet results are generally good for surface cleaning, though at least one test notes deeper debris can remain and multiple passes may be needed. It’s strong for maintenance, less so for restorative carpet cleaning.
• Scratch resistance 3.7 ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ 1 review 3.7
  Scratch resistance is mixed: some users see cosmetic scuffs on glossy areas after months of use. Functionality is unaffected, but appearance-focused buyers may notice wear.
• Ongoing ownership costs (bags, filters, batteries) 3.7 ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ 2 reviews 3.7
  Ongoing costs are a notable consideration: bags, brushes, filters, and mop pads add recurring spend. Owners generally accept the costs as the price of convenience, but it should be budgeted.
• Carpet — High-Pile Pickup 3.5 ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ 1 review 3.5
  High-pile carpet performance is serviceable but can require extra passes and still leave some debris in deeper fibers. Owners with lots of plush carpet may want a more carpet-specialized robot or supplement with a full-size vacuum.