-
4.6
based on 10 reviews
AI, Smart, App and Automation: 4.6, based on 10 reviews
The app and automation features are repeatedly cited as a core strength: scheduling, room/zone routines, no-go zones, and customization are robust. Voice-assistant integration and detailed controls improve hands-off ownership, though some wish for more granular dock behavior options.
-
4.6
based on 2 reviews
Build quality and durability: 4.6, based on 2 reviews
Build quality is frequently praised, with tight fit/finish and a sturdy overall feel. Testers describe materials and assembly as top-notch for the category.
-
4.6
based on 2 reviews
Clogging and debris prevention: 4.6, based on 2 reviews
Dual rubber rollers earn praise for reducing hair tangles and clogs versus bristle rollers. Hair can still collect on the roller ends, but maintenance is usually easy.
-
4.6
based on 1 review
Privacy controls: 4.6, based on 1 review
Privacy opinions are helped by the lack of a live-view surveillance camera feature. Some see that as a downside for remote viewing, while others prefer it for privacy.
-
4.6
based on 6 reviews
Ease of use: 4.6, based on 6 reviews
Everyday usability is excellent: setup is easy, controls are intuitive, and app workflows make it simple to run whole-home, room, or zone cleans. Most users describe a low-friction, set-and-forget routine once maps are built.
-
4.6
based on 4 reviews
Hair‑Wrap / Tangle Resistance: 4.6, based on 4 reviews
Tangle resistance is a major highlight: the rubber dual rollers greatly reduce wrap and jamming. Hair may collect at roller ends, but removal is quick and doesn’t usually interrupt cleaning.
-
4.6
based on 9 reviews
Map and Path Efficiency (Robot Vacuums): 4.6, based on 9 reviews
LiDAR-based mapping is consistently praised for accuracy, speed, and room/zone control. Most reviewers highlight strong pathing efficiency, editable maps, and useful visualization (2D/3D).
-
4.6
based on 4 reviews
Assembly and Setup: 4.6, based on 4 reviews
Setup is widely described as quick and straightforward, often guided smoothly by the app. Dock assembly is simple (screws/driver included) and initial mapping tends to be fast.
-
4.5
based on 7 reviews
Suction and Airflow: 4.5, based on 7 reviews
Reviews consistently praise strong pickup and suction, especially for routine dust and pet hair. A lab-style test notes deep-in-fiber and tight crevice extraction can lag behind the very best, even if overall cleaning remains strong.
-
4.5
based on 3 reviews
Area Rug Handling: 4.5, based on 3 reviews
Area rugs are handled well thanks to carpet detection and automatic power adjustments, and the mop-lift helps avoid wetting rugs in mixed runs. Some advise refining carpet boundaries in-app for best results.
-
4.5
based on 10 reviews
Overall opinion: 4.5, based on 10 reviews
Overall sentiment is strongly positive for vacuum-first performance, mapping, and convenience. Common reservations center on mopping limitations, price, and the loud dock emptying cycle.
-
4.5
based on 2 reviews
Child lock: 4.5, based on 2 reviews
Child lock support is viewed as a thoughtful, effective safety feature that prevents accidental button presses. Families and pet owners mention it as a practical safeguard.
-
4.4
based on 3 reviews
Aesthetic design and finish: 4.4, based on 3 reviews
Design is repeatedly described as sleek and modern, with finishes that blend well in living spaces. Some owners note glossy surfaces can show scratches over time, depending on use and contact with furniture.
-
4.4
based on 5 reviews
Edge and Baseboard Cleaning (Hard Floors): 4.4, based on 5 reviews
Edge and baseboard cleaning is a standout strength in multiple reviews, with notably better pickup along walls than many competitors. A mopping-focused test still observes a typical unclean band near baseboards during wet cleaning.
-
4.4
based on 1 review
Low-profile design: 4.4, based on 1 review
The low-profile form factor helps under-furniture access, and reviewers note fewer worries about the top module catching. It won’t fit everywhere, but clearance is competitive.
-
4.4
based on 6 reviews
Bin and Bag: 4.4, based on 6 reviews
The bin/bag system is a convenience win: the dock bag can last around seven weeks to up to roughly two months in lighter use. A few point out the onboard dustbin is relatively small, but that’s typical for a self-emptying model.
-
4.4
based on 2 reviews
Stuck resistance: 4.4, based on 2 reviews
The robot is rarely reported as getting stuck, and reviewers note solid threshold handling and sensible no-go/avoidance tools. Messy floors (wires, socks) can still trigger occasional issues.
-
4.3
based on 8 reviews
Obstacle Avoidance (Robot): 4.3, based on 8 reviews
Obstacle avoidance is generally strong for common items like shoes and cords, with reliable navigation even in low light. A tough-case test shows occasional misses (including a pet mess scenario on a first pass), so basic floor tidying still helps.
-
4.3
based on 3 reviews
Battery and Charging: 4.3, based on 3 reviews
Battery life is generally strong for the class, with long runs possible in quieter/low modes and smart recharge-and-resume behavior when needed. High-power modes shorten runtime, but coverage remains competitive.
-
4.3
based on 2 reviews
Filtration / Dust Containment: 4.3, based on 2 reviews
Filtration and dust containment are viewed positively, with HEPA-style filtering and effective containment during auto-emptying. Washable filters and lifespan counters are appreciated, though consumables still need periodic replacement.
-
4.3
based on 2 reviews
Support and Reliability: 4.3, based on 2 reviews
Reliability feedback is largely positive: good day-to-day consistency, solid docking behavior, and few reported operational issues. Long-term confidence is tempered by consumables, occasional large-debris dock struggles, and the usual robot-vac edge cases.
-
4.2
based on 10 reviews
Docking and Auto-Empty Reliability (Robot): 4.2, based on 10 reviews
Docking and auto-empty reliability is mostly good, with strong performance on typical dust, sand, and hair. A more rigorous test indicates the dock can struggle with some larger mixed debris loads, making it best for routine maintenance rather than big chunky spills.
-
4.2
based on 6 reviews
Mop lifting system: 4.2, based on 6 reviews
Mop lifting works well for mixed hard-floor and rug homes, reducing accidental wetting. The lift height isn’t the largest in the category, so very thick carpets may still benefit from avoidance settings.
-
4.2
based on 2 reviews
Hard Floor — Fine Dust Pickup: 4.2, based on 2 reviews
Hard-floor fine dust pickup is very strong, with tests showing high efficiency on smooth surfaces. Minor residual dust can remain near edges or in the middle of a test lane depending on pass patterns.
-
4.2
based on 2 reviews
Hard Floor — Large Debris Intake: 4.2, based on 2 reviews
Large debris intake on hard floors is usually excellent for typical crumbs and tracked-in grit. One dock-focused test found the system can be less consistent when dealing with certain bulky mixed debris during auto-empty.
-
4.2
based on 1 review
Accessories and Tools: 4.2, based on 1 review
Included essentials (spare bag/manuals/mop cloth) are generally described as sufficient to get started immediately. Some wish for more extras, but most consider the in-box kit practical rather than lavish.
-
4.2
based on 1 review
Hair Pickup — Hard Floors: 4.2, based on 1 review
Hard-floor hair pickup is consistently praised, especially paired with the dual-roller design that avoids spreading clumps. Pet and human hair are typically collected cleanly into the bin.
-
4.2
based on 8 reviews
Noise level: 4.2, based on 8 reviews
Most reviewers find the robot itself fairly quiet in normal operation, with louder sound mainly tied to higher suction modes. Several call it quieter than some premium peers, but volume rises noticeably when you push max power.
-
4.1
based on 3 reviews
Corner Cleaning (Robot): 4.1, based on 3 reviews
Corner performance is above average for a round robot thanks to effective edge behavior, but it still can’t fully reach tight 90-degree corners. Side-brush behavior can leave small leftovers at the very edge in some cases.
-
4.1
based on 1 review
Carpet — Low-Pile Pickup: 4.1, based on 1 review
Low-pile carpet pickup is strong for maintenance, with good surface cleaning and hair removal. Deep extraction is less emphasized than pathing and consistency.
-
4.1
based on 1 review
Comparative performance: 4.1, based on 1 review
Compared to prior generations and several competitors, reviewers often call the S8+ a meaningful step up in everyday vacuuming and navigation. Some still rate certain older flagships or specific rivals higher in edge cases like obstacle differentiation or deep carpet extraction.
-
4.0
based on 3 reviews
Maintenance requirements: 4.0, based on 3 reviews
Routine maintenance is manageable: rollers and filters are easy to clean, and consumable tracking helps. Mop pads and filters still require regular attention, especially with frequent mopping.
-
4.0
based on 10 reviews
Mopping performance: 4.0, based on 10 reviews
Mopping is better than many drag-pad hybrids thanks to sonic/vibration scrubbing, and it can handle light stains and surface grime. The common limitation is sticky/set-in messes and zone/edge precision, sometimes requiring multiple runs or a manual follow-up.
-
4.0
based on 2 reviews
Emptying and Mess Control: 4.0, based on 2 reviews
Auto-emptying significantly reduces mess and day-to-day bin handling. Some owners prefer triggering emptying manually to avoid noise or frequency, and performance can vary with certain larger debris mixes.
-
3.9
based on 8 reviews
Price and Value: 3.9, based on 8 reviews
Value is strong if you prioritize automation and vacuum performance, but many flag the price as premium for a dock that only self-empties (not full wash/refill). Sales pricing helps the proposition; budget buyers may find it overkill.
-
3.8
based on 1 review
Hair Pickup — Carpets: 3.8, based on 1 review
Carpet hair pickup is strong for many users, with some reviewers calling it among the best they’ve tested for surface hair. A stricter lab test still finds room for improvement in deep carpet fibers.
-
3.8
based on 4 reviews
Water tank: 3.8, based on 4 reviews
The water tank approach works for routine wet cleaning, but several reviewers want an official cleaning-solution option and note tank capacity/cloth management can limit larger jobs. Users who pre-wet or refresh the pad mid-clean get better results.
-
3.7
based on 2 reviews
Carpet — Medium-Pile Pickup: 3.7, based on 2 reviews
Medium-pile carpet results are generally good for surface cleaning, though at least one test notes deeper debris can remain and multiple passes may be needed. It’s strong for maintenance, less so for restorative carpet cleaning.
-
3.7
based on 1 review
Scratch resistance: 3.7, based on 1 review
Scratch resistance is mixed: some users see cosmetic scuffs on glossy areas after months of use. Functionality is unaffected, but appearance-focused buyers may notice wear.
-
3.7
based on 2 reviews
Ongoing ownership costs (bags, filters, batteries): 3.7, based on 2 reviews
Ongoing costs are a notable consideration: bags, brushes, filters, and mop pads add recurring spend. Owners generally accept the costs as the price of convenience, but it should be budgeted.
-
3.5
based on 1 review
Carpet — High-Pile Pickup: 3.5, based on 1 review
High-pile carpet performance is serviceable but can require extra passes and still leave some debris in deeper fibers. Owners with lots of plush carpet may want a more carpet-specialized robot or supplement with a full-size vacuum.