Roborock S8 Pro Ultra Robot Vacuum and Mop

3.9

(11)

Bottom Line

Choose the S8 Pro Ultra if you want a near hands-off vacuum+mop with strong navigation and a self-washing dock; Skip if you have lots of plush carpets or need flawless cord avoidance—its mop mount and obstacle handling can still be finicky.

Best for

Homes that want maximum automation: frequent vacuuming plus regular maintenance mopping with minimal daily interaction, especially on hard floors and low-pile rugs. Also ideal for users who value advanced mapping, routines, and per-room customization.

Not for

Homes dominated by plush/medium-high pile carpeting or households with lots of exposed cords and tassel rugs where perfect obstacle avoidance matters. Also not ideal if you want premium performance without premium ongoing costs (bags, mop pads, accessories).

Verdict

Roborock’s S8 Pro Ultra delivers a true flagship experience: strong pickup on hard floors and carpets, excellent day-to-day mopping, and one of the most automated docks available (auto-empty, mop washing, refilling, and hot-air drying). Mapping and route efficiency are consistently praised, and the app offers deep scheduling and per-room control. The tradeoff is that real-world obstacle avoidance can be inconsistent around cords and certain small items, and the non-detachable mop module plus limited lift height can be a drawback for medium/high-pile rugs. It’s also expensive, and some reviewers note edge cases like smearing heavier spills or potential floor scuffing concerns at aggressive scrub settings. Source: fileciteturn0file0

Pros

Ease of use 4.8 ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ 2 reviews 4.8

Ease of use is a key strength: setup is commonly described as quick, daily upkeep is low thanks to the dock, and scheduling makes it close to ‘set-and-forget’ for many homes. A minority report app learning curve or occasional intervention for tangles/stuck events.
Assembly and Setup 4.7 ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ 1 review 4.7

Assembly and setup are generally described as straightforward, with minimal physical assembly and simple app pairing, though some users spend time refining room splits and map edits to their liking.
Self-cleaning cycle 4.6 ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ 4 reviews 4.6

Self-cleaning behavior (mop washing and dock cleaning routines) is widely praised, with multiple sources highlighting that the mop is cleaned during/after runs and dries over time to reduce odors and upkeep.
Floor Drying Time 4.6 ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ 1 review 4.6

Floor drying time is generally reported as fast, with only a light amount of water left behind in typical mopping, and the dock’s drying system helps keep the mop pad dry between runs.
Docking & Auto-Empty Reliability (Robot) 4.6 ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ 10 reviews 4.6

Across reviews, the RockDock Ultra is consistently described as reliable and genuinely automating ownership: auto-emptying, mop washing, water refilling, dirty water collection, and hot-air drying generally work as intended, with only occasional complaints about edge-case behavior or loud emptying.
Maintenance requirements 4.5 ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ 4 reviews 4.5

Maintenance requirements are lower than typical robot vac+mop combos due to automated dock tasks, but periodic work remains: water tanks, dust bags, wiping sensors, and occasional hair/brush cleaning.
Carpet — Low-Pile Pickup 4.4 ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ 3 reviews 4.4

Low-pile carpet pickup is often reported as above-average to excellent in standardized testing and daily use, though not always class-leading in deep-clean style tests.
Bin & Bag 4.4 ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ 4 reviews 4.4

Bin and bag design is viewed favorably for hands-off use: the internal bin is supported by reliable auto-emptying into a larger dock bag, reducing manual emptying frequency. Some wish for better in-run fullness handling or clearer indicators.
Water tank 4.4 ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ 4 reviews 4.4

Water tank capacity and the clean/dirty tank system are repeatedly described as generous and convenient, enabling multiple cleans before intervention. Users still need to refill/empty on a cadence based on home size and mop settings.
Controls & UI 4.4 ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ 6 reviews 4.4

Controls and UI are broadly viewed as feature-rich and usable. The app supports fine-grained control (zones, rooms, power/scrub settings, dock behavior), though a few reviewers describe some menus or map edits as finicky.
AI, Smart & App / Automation 4.3 ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ 8 reviews 4.3

Smart features are a major strength: routines, per-room customization, schedules, multi-map support, 3D mapping options, and voice assistant compatibility are frequently mentioned. A minority report friction with assistant setup or firmware quirks.
Map & Path Efficiency (Robot Vacuums) 4.3 ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ 6 reviews 4.3

Mapping and path efficiency are repeatedly highlighted as a top-tier trait: fast mapping, accurate tracking, and efficient coverage patterns are common praise points. Some long-term reports note maps can get messy after certain stuck events, but rollback/edits help.
Carpet — High-Pile Pickup 4.3 ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ 4 reviews 4.3

High-pile carpet handling and pickup are frequently described as strong for a robot, but plush carpets can still pose issues due to the mop module design and lift limits when mopping modes are involved.
Mop lifting system 4.3 ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ 7 reviews 4.3

The mop lifting system is a key benefit for mixed floors: many reviews report it keeps carpets mostly dry and enables combined vacuum+mop runs. Limitations are noted for higher-pile rugs where lift height may still allow contact or dampening.
Suction & Airflow 4.3 ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ 3 reviews 4.3

Suction and overall vacuuming performance are usually rated strong, especially for daily debris on mixed surfaces. A few sources note deep-cleaning in specific tests or certain fine debris scenarios can be less impressive than expected for the price.
Aesthetic design & finish 4.3 ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ 2 reviews 4.3

Design and finish are usually described as sleek and premium, with the robot available in black/white and the dock seen as modern but physically large.
Dried-On Stain Removal 4.3 ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ 1 review 4.3

Dried-on stain removal is competitive among premium robot mop systems in comparative testing, with the S8 Pro Ultra placing near the top group in multi-run stain scoring. It is strong, but not always the outright best versus the newest top performers.
Hard Floor — Fine Dust Pickup 4.2 ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ 4 reviews 4.2

Fine dust pickup on hard floors is generally good for everyday use, but flour-like powders can smear or remain in some tests, suggesting performance varies with particle type and whether mopping is enabled.
Hard Floor — Large Debris Intake 4.2 ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ 3 reviews 4.2

Large debris pickup on hard floors is typically strong, with most reviews reporting solid crumb and debris collection. Some edge cases remain (near walls or under low cabinets) depending on layout and clearances.
Privacy controls 4.1 ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ 3 reviews 4.1

Privacy tradeoffs are discussed favorably by some: reduced/changed camera approach and lack of remote home monitoring is seen as a privacy plus, while others consider the removed monitoring feature a downgrade.
Carpet — Medium-Pile Pickup 4.1 ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ 2 reviews 4.1

Medium-pile carpet performance is generally good, but a few reviewers expected more deep-cleaning power versus prior flagships or competitors, especially in sand-embedded style testing.
Mopping performance 4.1 ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ 9 reviews 4.1

Mopping performance is widely described as excellent for daily maintenance (dust, footprints, light smudges) with the vibrating system and frequent mop washing. Multiple sources caution that sticky/heavy spills can smear and may require manual cleanup.
Child lock 4.0 ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ 1 review 4.0
Comparative performance 4.0 ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ 3 reviews 4.0

Comparative performance is generally strong versus many peers and earlier generations, especially for automation and navigation. However, multiple sources note it can be a step back in certain areas (cord avoidance, plush carpet compatibility, or missing monitoring features) depending on what you value.
Battery & Charging 4.0 ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ 4 reviews 4.0
Ongoing ownership costs (bags, filters, batteries) 3.9 ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ 1 review 3.9
Obstacle Avoidance (Robot) 3.8 ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ 10 reviews 3.8

Obstacle avoidance is the most debated area. Many tests show strong performance for common clutter, but cords and certain small objects remain a recurring failure mode, and some long-term users report more snagging than prior camera-based models.
Hair‑Wrap / Tangle Resistance 3.7 ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ 3 reviews 3.7

Hair-wrap resistance is mixed but trends positive: dual rubber rollers help, and removable end caps make hair removal easier. Some tests still find tangling or only mid-pack detangling versus certain alternatives.
Noise level 3.7 ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ 4 reviews 3.7

Cleaning noise is usually characterized as average-to-moderate depending on power mode, with higher suction on rugs/carpet increasing audibility. Several sources note it can disrupt conversation when nearby on higher settings.
Software-update support / feature longevity 3.7 ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ 2 reviews 3.7

Feature longevity via updates is mentioned as important because some shortcomings (obstacle avoidance edge cases, map quirks) appear firmware-related. Several reviewers express hope or expectation that updates can improve behavior over time.

Cons

Storage footprint & upright-stand stability 3.4 ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ 2 reviews 3.4

Storage footprint is a frequent complaint: the dock is large and needs clearance to operate comfortably, which can be an eyesore or space issue in smaller homes.
Edge & Baseboard Cleaning (Hard Floors) 3.4 ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ 1 review 3.4

Edge and baseboard cleaning is generally good but not perfect; some real-home reports note crumbs near walls or under cabinet toe-kicks can be missed depending on clearances and layout.
Price & Value 3.3 ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ 8 reviews 3.3

Price and value are consistently framed as premium and expensive. Many feel the automation justifies the cost, while others believe quirks (cords, plush carpet limitations, or missing extras) make it harder to justify at full MSRP.
Dock noise 3.3 ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ 5 reviews 3.3

Dock noise is a common downside: auto-emptying is repeatedly described as very loud for a short burst, while mop washing can add noticeable gurgling/operational sounds. Day-to-day dock function is valued despite the noise.
Area Rug Handling 3.3 ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ 1 review 3.3

Area rug handling is generally solid on common rugs, but tassel/fringe rugs and some cords can still trap or snag the robot, leading to notifications or manual rescue in certain homes.
Emptying & Mess Control 3.3 ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ 1 review 3.3
Accessories & Tools 3.2 ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ 1 review 3.2

Included accessories are often viewed as light for the price (limited spares like filters/mops), though replacement parts are widely available from official and third-party sources.
Clogging & debris prevention 3.2 ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ 1 review 3.2

Clogging/debris prevention is usually solid, but a few reports mention rare events like clumps left behind or jams that required intervention, especially when encountering cords, socks, or concentrated debris.
Crevice / Groove Pickup (Hard Floors) 3.2 ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ 1 review 3.2

Crevice/groove pickup is inconsistent across evaluations, with at least one test source calling it weaker than expected versus prior Roborock models, suggesting certain edge-case pickup scenarios may lag overall performance strengths.
Under-Furniture Pickup 3.2 ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ 1 review 3.2

Under-furniture pickup is limited by clearance: several users report it performs well under many items, but cannot reach under very low cabinets or tight toe-kick spaces, leaving some debris behind.
Streaking / Residue 2.9 ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ 1 review 2.9

Streaking/residue concerns appear mostly in heavier spill or smear scenarios (e.g., sticky foods). For normal mopping, most report clean-looking floors with minimal residue when settings are appropriate.
Fresh Liquid Pickup Speed 2.8 ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ 1 review 2.8

Fresh liquid pickup speed is not a standout: multiple reviews note larger wet spills or sticky liquids can be spread rather than quickly lifted/contained, which is typical for many robot mop systems.
Scratch resistance 2.5 ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ 1 review 2.5

Scratch resistance gets mixed attention: at least one test source raised concerns about potential floor scratching at high scrub settings, while others did not report damage. Cautious settings and monitoring on delicate floors are commonly advised.
Bag-full indicator 2.0 ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ 1 review 2.0

Bag-full indication is a weak spot in reviewer expectations: some call out wanting clearer notifications or indicators for capacity-related events, especially given the premium price.

FAQ

Can it vacuum and mop in one run without soaking rugs?

It can lift the mop and adjust behavior on carpet, which helps mixed-floor homes. However, multiple reviews note the lift system and non-detachable mop module can still be a concern for medium/high-pile or plush rugs.

Is the dock truly hands-off?

Mostly. It auto-empties, washes and dries the mop, and manages clean/dirty water transfers, but you still need to refill clean water, empty dirty water, and replace the dust bag periodically.

How good is obstacle avoidance for cords and small clutter?

Mixed. Some testing and long-term use reports show it identifies obstacles and avoids many items, but cords and certain small objects are recurring problem cases.

Is it good for pet hair and long hair?

Generally yes for pickup, and the dual-roller design plus removable end caps can make cleaning tangles easier. That said, some reviewers still observed hair tangling or only mid-tier detangling versus other Roborock models.

Does it handle big spills or sticky messes well?

It’s strong for everyday dust and light smudges, but heavier wet/sticky spills can smear and may require manual cleanup or a different cleaning approach.