Shark Vertex Pro Cordless Vacuum Cleaner

3.7

(12)

Bottom Line

Choose for standout hard‑floor pickup and a versatile DuoClean head that moves easily between carpets and bare floors; Skip if you’re sensitive to noise or want low‑maintenance filters/brush rolls.

Best for

Homes with a mix of hard floors and area rugs—especially pet owners—who want strong pickup, sealed filtration, and a foldable wand that reaches under furniture and stores compactly.

Not for

People who prioritize quiet cleaning, dislike regular filter/brush maintenance, or need a very light, well‑balanced handheld for lots of stairs and above‑cabinet work.

Verdict

The Shark Vertex Pro Cordless stands out for its DuoClean dual‑roller head that excels on hard floors and remains very capable on carpet, including thicker rugs, while also handling pet hair well. The MultiFLEX wand improves reach under furniture and folds for compact storage, and multiple reviews highlight strong sealed HEPA filtration. The main tradeoff is comfort and upkeep: the unit can feel heavy or off‑balance in handheld use, it runs loud on higher power, and fine dust may load the pre‑filter quickly, requiring more frequent cleaning. Runtime is decent in Eco but drops sharply in Boost unless you add a second battery. reviews

Pros

Filtration / Dust Containment 4.6 ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ 6 reviews 4.6

Filtration is repeatedly praised: sealed HEPA-style systems perform well in fog/particle tests and are positioned as allergy-friendly with minimal leakage.
Versatility 4.5 ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ 4 reviews 4.5

Versatility is a key strength: strong performance across hard floors and carpets without head swaps, plus folding/handheld configurations for varied cleaning tasks.
Assembly and Setup 4.5 ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ 2 reviews 4.5

Setup is frequently described as quick and straightforward, with components that click into place without much fuss.
Packaging quality 4.5 ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ 2 reviews 4.5

Packaging is praised for using recyclable paper/cardboard materials rather than excessive plastic.
Carpet — High-Pile Pickup 4.5 ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ 3 reviews 4.5

Several tests highlight unusually good high‑pile/shag rug pickup for a cordless, but the heavier head can feel sticky or harder to push on deep pile.
Cordless convenience 4.5 ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ 8 reviews 4.5

Cordless operation and a removable battery make quick cleanups easier and reduce the need to store the whole vacuum near an outlet.
Hard Floor — Fine Dust Pickup 4.4 ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ 5 reviews 4.4

Across multiple tests and reviews, fine dust pickup on hard floors is a standout strength, with near‑perfect results frequently reported.
Support & Reliability 4.4 ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ 2 reviews 4.4

Brand support is viewed positively, with multiple mentions of long warranties (often 5 years) and replacement parts availability.
Ease of use 4.3 ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ 3 reviews 4.3

Ease of use is rated high overall thanks to intuitive controls and not needing to swap heads between floors, but weight, mode defaults, and maintenance can reduce day-to-day convenience.
Hair Pickup — Hard Floors 4.3 ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ 2 reviews 4.3

Hair pickup on hard floors is consistently strong, aided by the dual‑roller design.
Carpet — Low-Pile Pickup 4.2 ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ 4 reviews 4.2

Low‑pile carpet performance is strong in testing, with remaining debris typically being fine sand or grit embedded in fibers.
Innovation compared to competitors 4.2 ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ 1 review 4.2

Noted differentiators include the DuoClean dual‑roller system, MultiFLEX folding wand, and anti‑hair‑wrap features; the main missing ‘innovation’ versus newer rivals is automatic dirt sensing and auto-suction adjustment.
Pet-Ready Features 4.2 ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ 4 reviews 4.2

Pet performance is a highlight in many reviews thanks to strong hair pickup and (in some bundles) pet-focused tools, but heavy-shedding homes may see more brush/filter upkeep.
Tool-change simplicity 4.2 ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ 3 reviews 4.2

Tool swapping and basic disassembly are generally straightforward, with some reviewers highlighting convenient attachment changes; however, deeper cleaning (rollers/wheels) may still take time depending on the variant.
Storage footprint & upright-stand stability 4.2 ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ 8 reviews 4.2

Folding storage is a consistent win, enabling compact closet parking; however, some reviewers note it may not truly stand fully upright without leaning depending on the setup.
Headlight & LED lights 4.1 ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ 6 reviews 4.1

LED headlights are widely appreciated for spotting debris in darker areas, even if they’re less revealing than laser-style illumination on some competitors.
Build quality & durability 4.1 ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ 2 reviews 4.1

Build quality is generally described as sturdy and well-made, though one review calls the flex feature a bit flimsy in feel.
Under-Furniture Pickup 4.1 ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ 10 reviews 4.1

The MultiFLEX/bendable wand improves reach under furniture and reduces bending, though head thickness can still limit clearance under very low appliances in some homes.
Dried-On Stain Removal 4.1 ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ 8 reviews 4.1

Handling is often described as nimble with responsive swivel, though the heavier head can create resistance on deep carpet and make stair or lift-up movements more fatiguing.
Upholstery / Above-Floor Pickup 4.1 ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ 2 reviews 4.1

With included tools, above-floor and upholstery cleaning is generally effective (pillows/couches/stairs), though occasional minor residue is noted in some testing.
Edge & Baseboard Cleaning (Hard Floors) 4.0 ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ 2 reviews 4.0

Edge/baseboard cleaning can be strong—especially with parallel passes—yet some reviews note it’s less effective when approached head‑on.
Carpet — Medium-Pile Pickup 4.0 ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ 1 review 4.0

Deep‑clean style evaluations show very good embedded debris removal with multiple passes, though not always a perfect clean in one go.
Overall opinion 4.0 ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ 12 reviews 4.0

Most reviews are positive and position it as an all-around mid-range cordless, but at least one review is notably negative due to rapid filter clogging and below-average power metrics.
Hair Pickup — Carpets 4.0 ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ 3 reviews 4.0

Hair pickup on carpets is generally good, though not always best‑in‑class; some tests report clumping or the need for extra passes in heavy hair situations.
Hair‑Wrap / Tangle Resistance 4.0 ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ 9 reviews 4.0

Many reviewers praise anti‑hair‑wrap performance, but some still observe wrap or clumping around certain areas (like wheels or a non‑removable roller), especially with long hair.
Hard Floor — Large Debris Intake 4.0 ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ 5 reviews 4.0

Large debris pickup on hard floors is generally strong, but a few reviewers report scatter/flicking of bigger particles and occasional pieces sticking to the head, requiring extra passes.
Bin & Bag 3.9 ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ 7 reviews 3.9

Bagless bin capacity is often described as larger than many cordless rivals (around 1 quart in US versions), though some configurations still require frequent emptying during heavy cleaning.
Suction & Airflow 3.9 ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ 9 reviews 3.9

Everyday suction feels powerful for surface cleaning, but at least one measurement-focused review reports airflow/suction as slightly below average and notes performance drops as filters load with fine dust.
Floorhead design 3.9 ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ 5 reviews 3.9

The DuoClean/PowerFins dual‑roller head is widely praised for all‑surface pickup and visibility, but it can be heavy and some components (wheels/rollers) aren’t fully removable for cleaning.
Price & Value 3.9 ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ 6 reviews 3.9

Value perceptions are split. Many call it a sweet-spot or mid-range winner, while others note MSRP is high for an older model and that newer Sharks can offer more automation at similar prices.
Emptying & Mess Control 3.8 ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ 5 reviews 3.8

Emptying is often described as easy and low-contact via an eject mechanism, but a few reviews report debris sticking or clogs that require manual pulling—especially with hair.
Aesthetic design & finish 3.8 ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ 3 reviews 3.8

Design impressions vary: some call it sleek and high-end, while others find it bulky or less streamlined than competitors.
Controls & UI 3.8 ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ 9 reviews 3.8

Controls and display are generally liked (battery percentage and mode indicators), but some dislike manual toggling between modes/surfaces, handle comfort can be mixed, and there’s no brushroll on/off on some variants.
Battery & Charging 3.8 ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ 11 reviews 3.8

The removable/swappable battery is convenient, with recharge times around ~3.5–4 hours mentioned. Runtime is very mode-dependent, and some bundles include a second battery that meaningfully extends whole-home cleaning.
Comparative performance 3.7 ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ 7 reviews 3.7

Often framed as a Dyson alternative: competitive pickup and features for the price, but typically weaker raw suction/automation and more maintenance; one testing-heavy review recommends other options due to filter clogging.
Runtime (Measured, Default) 3.6 ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ 8 reviews 3.6

Default/Eco-style runtime is often described as roughly mid‑40s to ~60 minutes depending on surface and attachments, with around ~30 minutes commonly cited when using carpet settings.
Convertible handheld design 3.6 ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ 6 reviews 3.6

Handheld / lift-away style use adds flexibility for above-floor cleaning, but multiple reviews mention it can feel heavy or off-balance when used handheld for long periods.
Ongoing ownership costs (bags, filters, batteries) 3.5 ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ 1 review 3.5

Washable filters help control ongoing costs, but owners may still budget for periodic filter replacement and potentially a second battery for longer sessions.

Cons

Accessories & Tools 3.4 ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ 9 reviews 3.4

Tool sets vary by package/region—from a simple crevice tool to bundles with multiple attachments and extra batteries—so perceived completeness ranges from ‘limited’ to ‘well‑equipped.’
Crevice / Groove Pickup (Hard Floors) 3.4 ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ 2 reviews 3.4

Crevice/groove pickup is mixed: some testing shows above‑average crevice cleaning, while other tests find the dual‑roller head doesn’t seal perfectly over grooves and may leave some residue.
Weight 3.2 ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ 8 reviews 3.2

Weight is a common drawback. Several reviews describe the head/handle as heavy (and handheld use as tiring), with some models/configurations heavier than typical cordless sticks.
Maintenance requirements 3.0 ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ 8 reviews 3.0

Maintenance needs are a recurring theme: filters and brush areas require regular cleaning, and fine dust may load the pre‑filter quickly; some versions also have a roller or wheels that are hard to fully remove/clean.
Floorhead Seal on Hard Floors 3.0 ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ 2 reviews 3.0

Floorhead sealing is good enough for strong general pickup, but performance can dip over tight crevices/grooves where the head may not form a perfect seal.
Stuck resistance 2.8 ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ 1 review 2.8

A few users note it can catch or feel sticky on certain rugs, tassels, or deep pile due to head weight and brush behavior.
Noise level 2.6 ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ 3 reviews 2.6

Noise is frequently flagged: some reviewers tolerate it, but measurements reported in reviews range from the high‑70s dB to the upper‑80s dB on maximum power.
Airflow blowback 2.6 ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ 1 review 2.6

Some reviews note blowback/scatter on hard floors (e.g., larger particles being flicked by the head/wheels) rather than fully captured on the first pass.
Runtime (Measured, Boost/Turbo) 2.5 ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ 6 reviews 2.5

Boost/Max runtime is short—often roughly ~6–12 minutes—so it’s best reserved for quick bursts on tougher messes.
Hair-removal channel issues 2.4 ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ 2 reviews 2.4

Hair can accumulate in head tines, around wheels, or on a non‑removable roller in some variants, making detangling more manual than expected.
Clogging & debris prevention 2.3 ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ 2 reviews 2.3

Fine debris can clog the pre‑motor filter relatively quickly, causing suction drop over time; keeping filters clean is important for consistent performance.
AI, Smart & App / Automation 2.0 ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ 3 reviews 2.0

While it has a display and multiple manual modes, reviews commonly note it lacks newer auto-sensing / auto-adjust suction features found on newer models.
Cyclone performance 2.0 ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ 1 review 2.0

One review attributes faster pre‑filter loading to less effective cyclone-style separation compared with multi‑cyclone competitors, which can reduce sustained suction between cleanings.
Onboard tool storage 1.5 ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ 1 review 1.5

Lack of onboard tool storage is a repeated complaint in at least one hands-on review, adding friction when switching tasks.

FAQ

Does it need different heads for carpet vs. hard floors?

Usually no. The DuoClean dual‑roller floorhead is designed to transition across hard floors and carpets without swapping heads, using surface settings to adjust brush behavior.

What runtime should I expect in real use?

Expect roughly mid‑40s to ~60 minutes in Eco/low depending on the head and surface, around ~30 minutes when using carpet settings, and about ~6–12 minutes in Boost/Max. Bundles with a second battery can roughly double total cleaning time.

Is it good for pet hair, and does it really resist hair wrap?

Most reviews praise strong pet hair pickup and an anti‑hair‑wrap design, but some testing notes clumping or wrap around certain parts (like wheels or a non‑removable roller), so occasional manual cleanup may still be needed.

How is filtration for allergies?

Multiple reviews report sealed HEPA-style filtration with very low visible particle leakage in testing, which is reassuring for allergy‑aware households.

Is it loud or heavy compared with other cordless sticks?

Several reviewers call it heavy or off‑balance in handheld use, and noise readings in reviews range from the high‑70s dB to the upper‑80s dB on maximum power.