-
4.5
based on 6 reviews
Dried-On Stain Removal: 4.5, based on 6 reviews
Dried-on stain removal is generally rated above average for a robot, with multiple reviews noting strong scrubbing from the roller mop. Some reports mention minor residue or smearing on tougher messes, depending on settings and cleanup scenario.
-
4.4
based on 1 review
Edge and Baseboard Cleaning (Hard Floors): 4.4, based on 1 review
Edge and baseboard cleaning on hard floors is generally described as good, aided by side-brush behavior and the robot’s shape. Edge mopping is more mixed, with some reviews calling it only average at the perimeter.
-
4.4
based on 5 reviews
Fresh Liquid Pickup Speed: 4.4, based on 5 reviews
The roller-style mop and onboard dirty-water handling are repeatedly cited as enabling wet spill pickup that many pad-based robots struggle with. Users still note that very messy liquid events can require extra cleanup or post-run maintenance.
-
4.3
based on 5 reviews
Corner Cleaning (Robot): 4.3, based on 5 reviews
Corner cleaning is frequently praised due to an extending brush/edge mechanism that improves reach into corners compared to many round robots. Corner coverage is commonly noted as a strength on hard floors.
-
4.3
based on 9 reviews
AI, Smart, App and Automation: 4.3, based on 9 reviews
App and automation features are widely described as feature-rich, including schedules, room/zone cleaning, adjustable suction/water, do-not-disturb for emptying, and experimental modes. Smart home support (including Matter in some reviews) is considered a plus, though usability quirks and occasional confusion are noted.
-
4.3
based on 1 review
Privacy controls: 4.3, based on 1 review
Privacy controls are discussed mostly in the context of the onboard camera and smart features. One review highlights an approach focused on onboard analysis with limited user access to camera data, while others do not raise privacy as a primary concern.
-
4.3
based on 9 reviews
Controls and UI: 4.3, based on 9 reviews
Controls and UI are generally described as user-friendly with strong customization and map tools. A few users mention minor app errors or learning curve in map editing, but overall sentiment is positive.
-
4.3
based on 11 reviews
Mopping performance: 4.3, based on 11 reviews
Most reviews describe the roller mop system as a standout: strong scrubbing, good everyday soil removal, and effective automated washing/drying through the dock. A minority describe mopping as only average in certain real-world messes without the recommended solution, but overall sentiment skews positive.
-
4.3
based on 2 reviews
Assembly and Setup: 4.3, based on 2 reviews
-
4.2
based on 5 reviews
Hard Floor — Large Debris Intake: 4.2, based on 5 reviews
Large debris pickup on hard floors is widely described as strong, helped by dual side-brush behavior and edge sweeping. Some reviews note the robot can misclassify clustered debris as obstacles in certain situations.
-
4.2
based on 9 reviews
Map and Path Efficiency (Robot Vacuums): 4.2, based on 9 reviews
Mapping and path efficiency are usually rated above average, with fast mapping and orderly coverage patterns. A few accounts mention the robot learns problem areas over time via keep-out zones and can be efficient once zones are set.
-
4.2
based on 6 reviews
Docking and Auto-Empty Reliability (Robot): 4.2, based on 6 reviews
Auto-emptying and dock self-maintenance are generally viewed as effective and reliable, including mid-run emptying for some users. The most consistent negative is not reliability but how loud the dock can be while performing these tasks.
-
4.2
based on 2 reviews
Carpet — High-Pile Pickup: 4.2, based on 2 reviews
High-pile/deeper carpet cleaning is reported as strong in at least one standardized deep-clean test, placing it above average. However, some sources still report weaker fine-debris extraction under certain default configurations.
-
4.1
based on 10 reviews
Upholstery / Above-Floor Pickup: 4.1, based on 10 reviews
The detachable spot cleaner is consistently cited as effective for upholstery and above-floor stains, with strong convenience because it is docked, charged, and ready. Limits include hose reach, weight/handling, and that it is better for stains than for surface-level vacuuming of loose hair or debris on fabric.
-
4.1
based on 1 review
Carpet — Medium-Pile Pickup: 4.1, based on 1 review
Medium-pile carpet results are generally favorable for everyday debris and hair maintenance, though not always class-leading on fine particulates. Performance is commonly described as solid but with edge limitations on carpeted rooms.
-
4.0
based on 10 reviews
Obstacle Avoidance (Robot): 4.0, based on 10 reviews
Obstacle avoidance is often a highlight, with strong object recognition in multiple tests, but it is not perfectly consistent. Some reviews report it can still run over, drag, or mis-handle certain items and can also over-avoid debris it should vacuum.
-
4.0
based on 5 reviews
Hair‑Wrap / Tangle Resistance: 4.0, based on 5 reviews
Tangle resistance is often praised on the main rollers in normal use, with many reporting minimal brush tangles. However, long hair can still clump behind the brush housing in some testing, creating cleanup needs for very long hair environments.
-
4.0
based on 3 reviews
Solution / Liquid system: 4.0, based on 3 reviews
The system’s water and detergent handling is a major convenience point: automatic mixing/dispensing and shared reservoirs support both mopping and spot cleaning. Some note solution availability or the need to follow brand guidance, and heavy spot-cleaning can consume water quickly.
-
4.0
based on 1 review
Packaging quality: 4.0, based on 1 review
-
3.9
based on 1 review
Filtration / Dust Containment: 3.9, based on 1 review
Dust containment is typically considered solid for a self-emptying system, with the sealed bag approach reducing direct contact with debris. Some reviews note limitations tied to vacuum performance on fine debris, but containment itself is generally not the core issue.
-
3.9
based on 4 reviews
Carpet — Low-Pile Pickup: 3.9, based on 4 reviews
Low-pile carpet pickup is usually described as good for routine maintenance, with strong surface pickup and decent grooming. A few tests still find weaknesses on fine, heavy debris when relying on default smart boosting rather than maximum suction.
-
3.9
based on 4 reviews
Hard Floor — Fine Dust Pickup: 3.9, based on 4 reviews
Fine-dust performance is the most polarizing part of vacuuming. Some reports describe occasional missed dust bunnies or weak fine debris pickup in standardized testing, particularly on carpet, even when larger debris pickup is good.
-
3.8
based on 4 reviews
Water tank: 3.8, based on 4 reviews
Water tank capacity and handling are generally viewed as adequate for routine mopping and occasional spot cleaning, but extended deep-clean use can drain a tank quickly. Shared tank design is convenient but ties the spot cleaner and robot to the same refill/empty cycle.
-
3.7
based on 3 reviews
Battery and Charging: 3.7, based on 3 reviews
Battery life is typically described as sufficient for most homes, with efficient coverage per charge. Some tests characterize battery efficiency as slightly below average, but practical runtime and completion rates are generally acceptable.
-
3.7
based on 7 reviews
Suction and Airflow: 3.7, based on 7 reviews
Suction and airflow impressions vary: some reviews describe strong general pickup, while others report underwhelming results on tougher fine debris (notably sand on carpet) and bench measurements that feel average for the price tier.
-
3.6
based on 7 reviews
Maintenance requirements: 3.6, based on 7 reviews
Maintenance is described as low day-to-day due to the dock washing/drying and auto-emptying, but not maintenance-free. Spot cleaner use can add upkeep (hose flushing, drying, and handling trapped water), and some users report periodic manual checks for hair buildup behind the brush housing.
-
3.4
based on 1 review
Stuck resistance: 3.4, based on 1 review
Most accounts report the robot usually avoids getting stuck, but there are examples of wedging into corners, snagging on rugs, or repeatedly attempting to enter low-clearance spaces, indicating occasional intervention may be needed in cluttered or changeable layouts.
-
3.4
based on 4 reviews
Floor Drying Time: 3.4, based on 4 reviews
Floor drying is commonly described as leaving floors mildly damp rather than soaked, but a few reviews mention extra water left behind and occasional dampening near rugs or around the base area after mop activity.
-
3.3
based on 3 reviews
Price and Value: 3.3, based on 3 reviews
Value depends heavily on whether you will use the spot cleaner and prioritize mopping. Several reviewers see strong value versus premium rivals given features, while at least one critic argues the street price is hard to justify given noise, upkeep, and vacuuming tradeoffs.
-
3.1
based on 4 reviews
Bin and Bag: 3.1, based on 4 reviews
The robot’s onboard bin is described as relatively small in at least one test, but the dock’s auto-emptying reduces the practical impact. Expect more frequent dock visits during large jobs, especially in debris-heavy homes.
-
3.1
based on 4 reviews
Storage footprint and upright-stand stability: 3.1, based on 4 reviews
The base station is commonly described as large and space-hungry, and the modular top can prevent the unit from sitting flush to a wall. It looks neat for what it is, but placement needs more clearance than simpler docks.
-
3.1
based on 4 reviews
Streaking / Residue: 3.1, based on 4 reviews
Several sources mention potential streaking or residue, often tied to higher water output or the mop leaving more moisture than average. Others report shiny floors and minimal residue in everyday use, suggesting results vary by floor type, settings, and mess severity.
-
3.0
based on 1 review
Low-profile design: 3.0, based on 1 review
Clearance is generally decent, but the LiDAR turret height can prevent entry under certain furniture and can cause repeated bumping attempts in low-clearance zones. Most homes will be fine, but specific tight furniture can be problematic.
-
2.9
based on 2 reviews
Area Rug Handling: 2.9, based on 2 reviews
Area rugs can be a weak spot: some reviews report occasional dampening of rugs or snagging and dragging a rug edge, especially during combined runs. Settings like carpet avoidance or vacuum-first can reduce risk but do not eliminate it in every account.
-
2.9
based on 2 reviews
Weight: 2.9, based on 2 reviews
Weight and handling are mainly discussed for the removable spot-clean module, which can feel heavy or cumbersome to move around during cleaning. The full system is also described as bulky compared to more compact robot+dock setups.
-
2.8
based on 1 review
Accessories and Tools: 2.8, based on 1 review
-
2.6
based on 6 reviews
Dock noise: 2.6, based on 6 reviews
Dock noise is a frequent complaint. Auto-emptying and some cleaning cycles are described as very loud, prompting use of do-not-disturb scheduling or disabling certain dock behaviors overnight.
-
2.5
based on 1 review
Cord management: 2.5, based on 1 review
-
2.4
based on 1 review
Odor control: 2.4, based on 1 review
Odor control feedback is mixed: most do not flag it as an issue, but at least one review reports unpleasant odors during dock vacuuming/emptying and concern about trapped water in the spot-cleaner hose leading to smells if not flushed/dried properly.
-
2.1
based on 2 reviews
Hair-removal channel issues: 2.1, based on 2 reviews
A recurring specific risk is hair collecting behind the brush into dense clumps in long-hair testing or certain scenarios. This is described as unit- and hair-length-dependent, but it is the most notable hair-channeling concern across critical reviews.