Garmin Approach S62

Garmin Approach S62 Review

Brand: Garmin
Released: January 21, 2020
Updated: 2 months ago
3.9
Overall review score
201
Review evidence points
49
Scored features
15
Expert reviews

Bottom Line

Choose the Garmin Approach S62 if you want premium golf GPS maps, strong battery life, shot tracking and useful course tools in a daily wearable. Skip it if price, sleeker smartwatch features, calls or simpler yardages matter more.

Best for

Best for serious golfers who want accurate GPS yardages, rich hazard and hole maps, scoring, shot data, and a watch they can also wear for fitness. It especially fits users willing to manage Garmin Golf data after rounds.

Not for

Not for casual golfers who only want front-middle-back yardages, people who need Apple Watch-level apps and calls, or users who dislike manual score and club data cleanup.

Verdict

Reviewers describe the Garmin Approach S62 as a premium golf-first watch that earns much of its reputation through accurate GPS yardages, rich hazard and hole mapping, useful scoring, strong battery life, and enough fitness features to stay on the wrist beyond a round. The main tradeoff is that its best golf tools reward engaged users who are willing to enter clubs, manage score data, and learn the interface. Virtual Caddie and shot tracking can be genuinely helpful, but they are not flawless, especially with inconsistent swings, chips, putts, or limited data. As a smartwatch, it is capable but not as polished as Apple Watch-style devices for calls, app choice, notifications, or display quality.

Current model
Garmin Approach S70
Garmin Approach S70
4.2 May 31, 2023
View current model

Feature Scorecards

Summary

49 reviewed features
  • Very positive 4.5-5.0
    8 (16%)
  • Positive 3.5-4.4
    27 (55%)
  • Neutral 2.5-3.4
    7 (14%)
  • Negative 1.5-2.4
    7 (14%)

Pros

  • 4.6
    11 reviews strong consensus
    battery life: 4.6, 11 reviews, strong consensus
    Battery life was one of the clearest strengths, with repeated praise for multiple rounds, long GPS use, and minimal charging needs.
  • 4.6
    7 reviews strong consensus
    GPS accuracy: 4.6, 7 reviews, strong consensus
    GPS accuracy was one of the strongest areas, with reviewers repeatedly saying yardages matched lasers, rangefinders, or real on-course expectations.
  • 4.3
    12 reviews strong consensus
    mapping and navigation: 4.3, 12 reviews, strong consensus
    Mapping and navigation were major strengths, especially hazard views, hole maps, PinPointer, layup targeting, and on-watch course planning.
  • 4.7
    6 reviews strong consensus
    style and design: 4.7, 6 reviews, strong consensus
    Style and design were a standout, with several reviewers calling it stylish, modern, premium, or among the best-looking golf watches.
  • 4.2
    7 reviews strong consensus
    workout tracking variety: 4.2, 7 reviews, strong consensus
    Reviewers consistently liked the breadth of workout modes, treating the S62 as a legitimate multisport or fitness watch rather than only a golf device.
  • 4.1
    10 reviews strong consensus
    activity auto-detection: 4.1, 10 reviews, strong consensus
    Automatic shot and activity detection was usually praised, but reviewers noted manual club entry and missed chips or putts kept it from being fully automatic.

Cons

  • 1.8
    2 reviews limited evidence
    health tracking accuracy: 1.8, 2 reviews, limited evidence
    Health-tracking accuracy was questioned in video reviews where abnormal or implausible heart-rate behavior made the wellness alerts feel unreliable.
  • 1.8
    2 reviews limited evidence
    heart rate accuracy: 1.8, 2 reviews, limited evidence
    Heart-rate accuracy drew concern in two video transcripts, including a frightening abnormal-rate alert and a reading while the watch was not being worn.
  • 2.0
    2 reviews limited evidence
    charging convenience: 2.0, 2 reviews, limited evidence
    Charging convenience was a repeated complaint because Garmin's proprietary connector frustrated reviewers.
  • 1.5
    1 review
    onboard music storage: 1.5, 1 review
    Onboard music storage was a clear weakness because one review listed lack of music storage as a con.
  • 1.5
    1 review
    voice assistant quality: 1.5, 1 review
    Voice assistant quality was poor in the evidence because the watch lacked a Siri-style assistant.
  • 2.3
    2 reviews limited evidence
    call handling: 2.3, 2 reviews, limited evidence
    Call handling was limited because reviewers noted you cannot take calls on the watch, with some response options restricted to Android.

Compared With Category Average

Compared with other Smartwatches, this product is above average in mapping and navigation, cross-platform compatibility, Bluetooth connectivity, near average in display quality, wellness insights, below average in health tracking accuracy, heart rate accuracy, voice assistant quality.

Comparison summary

49 compared features
  • Above average 0.4+ pts higher
    14 (29%)
  • Same as average within 0.3 pts
    21 (43%)
  • Below average 0.4+ pts lower
    14 (29%)

Largest category differences

Attribute This product Category average Difference
health tracking accuracy 1.8 3.9 -2.1
heart rate accuracy 1.8 3.9 -2.1
voice assistant quality 1.5 3.0 -1.5
onboard music storage 1.5 2.9 -1.4
operating system experience 2.5 3.8 -1.3
charging convenience 2.0 3.3 -1.3
third-party app support 2.0 3.2 -1.2
mapping and navigation 4.3 3.4 +0.9

Consider This Instead

If you want better onboard music storage

Choose Garmin Fenix 8. It scores 4.7 vs 1.5 for onboard music storage, with a 4.0 overall score.

Compare

If you want better value for money

Choose Amazfit Bip 6. It scores 4.7 vs 3.8 for value for money, with a 3.7 overall score.

Compare

If you want better third-party app support

Choose TicWatch Pro 5. It scores 4.6 vs 2.0 for third-party app support, with a 4.0 overall score.

Compare

Compared in Reviews

Products reviewers directly compared with this model, grouped into quick takeaways.

  • Better: display quality The S62 display is judged behind Apple Watch-level screen quality.
  • Compared: premium golf GPS functionality at lower price The S62 is framed as comparable to TAG Heuer's golf edition while being more affordable.

Apple Watch 5

  • Cheaper: wearable price The review notes the S62 costs more than Apple Watch 5 while still preferring Garmin for daily wrist use.

FAQ

Is the Garmin Approach S62 accurate for golf yardages?

Yes. Multiple reviewers compared its GPS distances with lasers, rangefinders, or on-course expectations and found them accurate or spot on.

How good is the battery life?

Battery life is one of the strongest areas. Reviewers repeatedly described multiple rounds between charges and praised the long GPS and smartwatch-mode endurance.

Is Virtual Caddie worth using?

It can be useful, especially once enough club data is collected, but reviewers were mixed. Some found it impressive, while others distrusted it or found early recommendations inaccurate.

Does the S62 work well as an everyday smartwatch?

It works well enough for notifications, fitness, Garmin Pay, and daily wear, but reviewers said it is not as polished as Apple Watch-style devices for apps, calls, display quality, or notification control.

Are shot tracking and score tracking fully automatic?

No. Long shots and shot distances can be tracked automatically, but several reviewers noted that chips, putts, club selection, and score details often require manual entry or cleanup.

Who gets the most value from the S62?

Serious golfers who will use the maps, hazard views, shot data, Virtual Caddie, and fitness features get the most value. Casual golfers who only need basic yardages may find the price hard to justify.

Sample Expert Reviews We Analyzed

These are a few of the reviews included in our analysis.

Video Reviews

Article Reviews

Top Smartwatches to Consider

#1 Amazfit Active 3 Premium
4.3

Good if you want premium running features, long battery life, and maps for under $200. Skip it if you need flawless heart-rate data, multiband GPS, LTE, or richer app support.

Pros: pairing reliability, brightness

Cons: Wi-Fi connectivity, Bluetooth connectivity

#2 Garmin Forerunner 70
4.3

Best for accurate running metrics, excellent coaching tools, a bright AMOLED display, and dependable battery life. Skip it if you need offline maps, music storage, contactless payments, multi-band GPS, or...

Pros: step counting accuracy, app ecosystem

Cons: Bluetooth connectivity, pairing reliability

#3 Garmin Lily 2 Active
4.3

Good if you want a compact, stylish Garmin with strong GPS, comfort, and week-plus battery life. Skip it if you need richer smartwatch apps, onboard music, bright always-on display, or...

Pros: health tracking accuracy, blood oxygen tracking

Cons: ECG functionality, onboard music storage

#4 Tag Heuer Connected Calibre E4
4.3

Best for luxury-watch styling, vivid TAG faces, solid build, and casual smartwatch use. Skip it if you need top fitness accuracy, call handling, LTE, or strong value.

Pros: contactless payments, pairing reliability

Cons: LTE connectivity, call handling