Roborock Qrevo MaxV Robot Vacuum and Mop

Verdict

The Roborock Qrevo MaxV is an outstanding robot vacuum-mop that delivers top-tier sweeping and mopping performance, backed by a powerful self-cleaning dock and one of the best apps in the category. Its main drawbacks are slower-than-expected navigation and merely decent obstacle avoidance, so it is an excellent high-end choice at the right price but not an essential upgrade if you already own the original Q Revo.

Pros

  • AI, Smart & App / Automation 1 review 5.0
    The Roborock app and onboard smarts offer deep control over cleaning modes plus perks like targeted extra passes on visible stains and even remote video access.
  • Docking & Auto‑Empty Reliability (Robot) 1 review 5.0
    Owners benefit from a dock that reliably auto-empties the dust bin and handles pad washing, drying, and tank refilling with minimal intervention.
  • Hair Pickup — Carpets 1 review 5.0
    Reviewers say it effectively removes both pet and human hair from carpets, leaving them looking clean after runs.
  • Hard Floor — Fine Dust Pickup 1 review 5.0
    On hard floors the Qrevo MaxV almost completely clears fine dust, leaving very little residue even in tougher tests.
  • Hard Floor — Large Debris Intake 1 review 5.0
    Tests show that large crumbs and other big debris are swept up cleanly on hard floors, with only minimal leftovers.
  • Mop lifting system 1 review 5.0
    Its mop pads automatically lift higher than on the older Q Revo, letting it vacuum and mop mixed hard floors and carpets in one pass without soaking rugs.
  • Self-cleaning cycle 1 review 5.0
    Hot-water pad washing, a dirty-water sensor, and a removable tray combine to keep the system cleaner while reducing hands-on scrubbing.
  • Suction & Airflow 1 review 5.0
    Reviews highlight exceptional suction, with nearly flawless pickup from fine dust to large debris on both hard floors and carpets.
  • Mopping performance 2 reviews 4.8
    Dual spinning pads, an edge-reaching flexi arm, and smart mopping modes give the Qrevo MaxV excellent everyday mopping, effortlessly handling dried coffee and grape stains with minimal streaking.
  • Dried-On Stain Removal 2 reviews 4.7
    Effortlessly removes dried coffee and grape stains, placing it with the top performers for tackling set-in messes.
  • Overall opinion 2 reviews 4.5
    Overall, the Qrevo MaxV is viewed as a high-end robot that combines outstanding sweeping and mopping with a great app and dock, but its slower navigation and middling obstacle avoidance mean it is best bought at a good price and is not a must-upgrade over the original Q Revo.
  • Corner Cleaning (Robot) 1 review 4.5
    The flexi arm feature extends a mop pad into edges and corners, improving coverage along walls compared with standard round robots.
  • Maintenance requirements 1 review 4.5
    Maintenance is relatively easy thanks to the self-cleaning dock features and the removable tray, which makes it simpler to rinse away grime.
  • Runtime (Measured, Default) 1 review 4.5
    With an above-average 180-minute battery rating and efficient power use, the Qrevo MaxV can comfortably cover typical homes on a single charge.
  • Streaking / Residue 1 review 4.5
    The mopping system leaves very little streaking, especially when using the with-the-grain cleaning mode, so floors dry looking uniformly clean.
  • Crevice / Groove Pickup (Hard Floors) 1 review 4.0
    Crevice tests rate the Qrevo MaxV a bit above average, pulling more debris from floor gaps than many competitors but not topping the charts.
  • Price & Value 1 review 4.0
    As a midlevel model that carries most flagship features, it offers strong value for first-time buyers, though the improvements may not justify upgrading from the original Q Revo.
  • Map & Path Efficiency (Robot Vacuums) 1 review 3.5
    Lidar mapping produces orderly rows and complete coverage, but overall cleaning runs can take longer than comparable Roborock models.

Cons

  • Obstacle Avoidance (Robot) 1 review 2.0
    Obstacle avoidance is serviceable but among the weakest parts of the system, trailing Roborock’s S8 series and only modestly improving on robots without active avoidance.