Roborock Qrevo MaxV Robot Vacuum and Mop

4.2

(10)

Bottom Line

Choose Qrevo MaxV for excellent day-to-day vacuuming and mopping; Skip if long-hair maintenance or an onboard camera is a dealbreaker.

Best for

Busy homes that want automated daily floor upkeep on mixed hard floors and rugs, especially if you care about hands-off mop maintenance and strong edge coverage.

Not for

Anyone who leaves lots of cords/small clutter out, dislikes periodic brush/hair cleaning, or prefers a robot without an onboard camera should look elsewhere.

Verdict

Across tests, the Qrevo MaxV stands out for reliable debris pickup and a strong rotating-mop system, backed by a dock that handles emptying plus hot-water pad washing and drying. The Roborock app is a differentiator, with strong mapping tools and granular room-by-room control. The tradeoff is that navigation can be slower than some peers and object avoidance has been inconsistent in early testing (though later firmware improved it), so occasional pre-tidying still helps. For most homes, it delivers a highly automated daily-clean routine without needing a top-priced flagship. reviews

Pros

Hard Floor — Fine Dust Pickup 4.7 ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ 3 reviews 4.7

Hard-floor fine debris pickup is consistently excellent in tests and daily use.
Edge & Baseboard Cleaning (Hard Floors) 4.6 ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ 8 reviews 4.6

Edge/baseboard mopping is a standout due to the extending mop, with repeated mentions of near wall-to-wall coverage.
Assembly and Setup 4.6 ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ 2 reviews 4.6

Setup is repeatedly described as quick: minimal assembly, straightforward app onboarding, and fast initial mapping.
Emptying & Mess Control 4.6 ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ 1 review 4.6

Auto-emptying is described as clean and convenient; you still need to replace bags and manage dirty water.
Packaging quality 4.6 ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ 1 review 4.6

Packaging is praised as well organized in at least one review, making unboxing/setup smoother.
Hard Floor — Large Debris Intake 4.6 ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ 5 reviews 4.6

Large-debris pickup on hard floors is a strength, though tight inside corners can still be a weak spot.
Mop lifting system 4.6 ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ 5 reviews 4.6

Mop lift height (often cited around 10 mm) is repeatedly praised for keeping carpets/rugs drier during mixed runs.
Hair Pickup — Carpets 4.6 ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ 2 reviews 4.6

Carpet hair pickup is strong overall, though occasional clumps/fluff can still need a quick touch-up.
Hair Pickup — Hard Floors 4.6 ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ 2 reviews 4.6

Hard-floor hair pickup is frequently praised, including for pet hair.
Streaking / Residue 4.6 ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ 2 reviews 4.6

Streaking is generally low, with settings/features that help keep finish even; deep-scrub expectations may still require tuning.
Docking & Auto-Empty Reliability (Robot) 4.5 ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ 8 reviews 4.5

The dock is a core strength (auto-empty + hot-water mop washing + drying), but it still requires water-tank service and occasional tray/plate cleaning.
Dirty water sensor 4.5 ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ 2 reviews 4.5

Dirty-water/dirt sensing is cited as useful for triggering extra mop washing when pads are especially dirty.
Area Rug Handling 4.5 ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ 1 review 4.5

Mixed-floor homes benefit from mop-lift + carpet detection, letting it clean rugs without soaking them in many cases.
Floor Drying Time 4.5 ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ 1 review 4.5

Mopping leaves a thin layer that dries quickly, and the dock’s pad drying helps reduce lingering dampness.
Software-update support / feature longevity 4.5 ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ 1 review 4.5

A documented firmware update improved obstacle avoidance in testing, suggesting active software tuning and support.
Under-Furniture Pickup 4.5 ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ 1 review 4.5

Under-furniture/toe-kick reach is highlighted as better than average in hands-on use.
Suction & Airflow 4.5 ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ 9 reviews 4.5

Strong 7,000‑Pa-class suction in reviews, with solid pickup across surfaces; a few note flagships can still edge it on deepest crevices or thick carpet.
AI, Smart & App / Automation 4.5 ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ 9 reviews 4.5

The Roborock app is widely praised for deep customization, schedules, and map edits; a few mention missing/quirky workflows (e.g., open-plan room splitting).
Mopping performance 4.5 ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ 10 reviews 4.5

Mopping is widely rated excellent for daily maintenance and coverage; a few compare it as slightly less ‘deep scrub’ than top sonic/vibrating systems.
Carpet — Low-Pile Pickup 4.5 ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ 2 reviews 4.5

Low-pile rugs are handled very well in both tests and everyday cleaning.
Battery & Charging 4.4 ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ 5 reviews 4.4

Battery life is commonly cited around 180 minutes, with reliable recharge-and-resume behavior and good efficiency.
Ease of use 4.4 ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ 3 reviews 4.4

Overall usability is high once configured, but convenience drops if you regularly need to pre-tidy cords or de-tangle long hair.
Dried-On Stain Removal 4.4 ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ 6 reviews 4.4

Dried-on stain results are strong (coffee/grape/sauce), sometimes ranking near the top; the most stubborn spots may need extra passes.
Stuck resistance 4.4 ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ 2 reviews 4.4

Reviews often report few rescues, with good threshold handling and less tendency to get stranded or stuck.
Filtration / Dust Containment 4.4 ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ 1 review 4.4

HEPA-style filtration and sealed dust handling are mentioned as effective, with no major dust-containment complaints.
Bin & Bag 4.4 ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ 4 reviews 4.4

Bagged auto-emptying and onboard bin capacity are viewed as convenient, with reports of weeks-long bag life in typical use.
Pet-Ready Features 4.4 ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ 4 reviews 4.4

Pet hair pickup is a frequent highlight, and some reviews mention pet-focused modes/behaviors and monitoring features.
Noise level 4.3 ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ 4 reviews 4.3

Often described as quiet for its performance (some measurements/estimates around low‑50 dB), though max power is still noticeable.
Carpet — Medium-Pile Pickup 4.3 ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ 3 reviews 4.3

Carpet performance is generally strong, though at least one test reported weaker results on medium-pile compared with low-pile or top competitors.
Carpet — High-Pile Pickup 4.3 ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ 2 reviews 4.3

Deep/high-pile carpet cleaning is strong for a single-roller bot, but some reviewers say dual-roller flagships still clean thicker carpets better.
Support & Reliability 4.3 ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ 2 reviews 4.3

Reliability notes are mostly positive (stable operation/connectivity), though obstacle/cable situations can still cause interruptions if floors aren’t prepped.
Water tank 4.3 ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ 4 reviews 4.3

Large dock tanks reduce refill frequency in some homes, but dirty-water emptying can be frequent if you mop often.
Controls & UI 4.2 ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ 9 reviews 4.2

The app controls are generally clear and feature-rich; the built-in voice assistant is seen as helpful by some but limited/overly sensitive by others.
Comparative performance 4.2 ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ 6 reviews 4.2

Comparative testing often places it near the top for overall vacuum+mop combos, with tradeoffs mainly versus pricier flagships.
Headlight & LED lights 4.2 ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ 2 reviews 4.2

Headlights/LEDs are noted as helpful in low light, supporting more consistent cleaning in darker rooms.
Map & Path Efficiency (Robot Vacuums) 4.2 ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ 6 reviews 4.2

Maps are detailed and coverage is efficient, but some tests note slower overall run times and occasional quirks segmenting open floor plans.
Aesthetic design & finish 4.1 ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ 5 reviews 4.1

Design feedback is mixed: many like the clean white look, while others find it basic or worry the glossy finish shows marks/scratches.
Crevice / Groove Pickup (Hard Floors) 4.1 ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ 3 reviews 4.1

Crevice pickup is generally above average, with some tests showing it can pull debris from fairly deep cracks.
Hair‑Wrap / Tangle Resistance 4.0 ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ 3 reviews 4.0

Main-brush tangling is usually well controlled, but long hair can still wrap the side brush and needs periodic clearing.
Corner Cleaning (Robot) 4.0 ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ 7 reviews 4.0

Corners remain a common limitation (round body + geometry), even though edge cleaning is strong.
Self-cleaning cycle 4.0 ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ 3 reviews 4.0

Automatic mop washing/drying is strong, but some reviewers note the wash plate/board gets dirty and needs manual cleaning; periodic pad washing helps.
Low-profile design 4.0 ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ 1 review 4.0

A relatively low body for a LiDAR robot helps it reach under more furniture, though the sensor turret still limits very low clearances.
Price & Value 3.9 ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ 9 reviews 3.9

Value depends heavily on sale price: several call it feature-packed for the money, but many still label it expensive at MSRP.
Maintenance requirements 3.9 ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ 7 reviews 3.9

Automation reduces upkeep, but reviewers still mention periodic brush hair removal and cleaning the wash tray/plate.
Build quality & durability 3.9 ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ 2 reviews 3.9

Build quality impressions vary: some find it solid, while others say materials feel less premium than Roborock’s flagship lines.
Ongoing ownership costs (bags, filters, batteries) 3.7 ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ 1 review 3.7

Ongoing costs mainly come from dust bags and wear items; some reviewers explicitly flag bag replacement as a recurring expense.
Obstacle Avoidance (Robot) 3.6 ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ 8 reviews 3.6

Obstacle avoidance is mixed: some report cable/small-item misses, while others (especially post-update) see meaningful improvement.
Accessories & Tools 3.6 ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ 2 reviews 3.6

Accessories vary by package: some reviewers got spare bags/mop parts, while others reported few or no extra consumables.
Storage footprint & upright-stand stability 3.5 ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ 2 reviews 3.5

The dock is tall/space-hungry and needs a dedicated spot, even if it’s slimmer than some competitors’ stations.

Cons

Solution / Liquid system 3.0 ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ 4 reviews 3.0

Multiple reviews call out limited/no detergent dosing (or not being able to use solution), a notable gap versus some rivals.
Hair-removal channel issues 3.0 ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ 1 review 3.0

Long-hair wrap on the side brush is a recurring complaint and can be time-consuming to clean.
Privacy controls 3.0 ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ 1 review 3.0

The camera enables remote viewing/video calls; at least one reviewer flags camera-equipped robots as a privacy dealbreaker and suggests choosing camera-free if concerned.

FAQ

Does it remove dried-on stains well?

Multiple reviewers found it can clear dried-on coffee, grape/sauce stains, and everyday tracked-in messes, often in a run or two. For the most stubborn dried spots, some tests noted it may need extra passes compared with the very best scrubbers.

How good is obstacle avoidance, especially with cables?

Results are mixed. Some early tests reported weaker obstacle avoidance (notably around cables and small items), while later firmware updates improved performance; it’s still safest to pick up cords and tiny clutter before a run.

Is the mopping good enough for deep cleaning?

Reviews generally praise it for daily maintenance mopping and for reaching along edges/baseboards. A few reviewers still recommend a periodic manual deep clean for ground-in grime or tight inside corners.

What maintenance does the dock not eliminate?

The dock automates dust emptying and mop washing/drying, but you still have to empty dirty water, refill clean water, replace the dust bag periodically, and occasionally clean the wash tray/plate. Long hair can also require you to clear the side brush/roller from time to time.

Should I worry about privacy because it has a camera?

Several reviews highlight the onboard camera for obstacle recognition and remote viewing/video calls. If you’re privacy-sensitive, you may prefer a camera-free model or keep remote-view features disabled.

Any app or mapping quirks to know about?

Mapping is widely described as detailed and efficient, but one tester found partitioning rooms in an open floor plan frustrating and noted that ad-hoc zone selections may not be remembered. Traditional room layouts tend to be smoother to manage.