Instrument separation

#1
Driver tuning and the Gen-2 TriForce design are repeatedly credited with strong tonal separation, helping players pick apart overlapping effects and, in music, distinguish individual instruments. Even reviewers with other complaints still note clear localization and layering, though a few mention separation can collapse in very intense, noisy firefights.
#2
Instrument separation is consistently highlighted as exceptional, with clear spacing and layering that keeps complex arrangements intelligible. Reviewers repeatedly mention precise placement and an effortless ability to follow individual parts without congestion.
#3
Instrument separation and imaging are consistently praised, with reviewers describing clearly located elements, strong layering, and good ability to keep dense mixes intelligible. This separation is often credited to the headphone’s controlled bass and detailed treble, which prevent masking and help textures stand out. Some sources position the PX7 S3 as unusually resolving for the mainstream wireless ANC category, though absolute leaders in open, high-end wired listening still surpass them.
#4
Imaging and instrument separation are a strong suit: layering stays organized and it is easy to locate instruments in complex mixes. Multiple reviewers highlight precise localization and clean delineation between elements.
#5
Instrument separation and layering are repeatedly described as excellent, keeping complex mixes organized and placing elements in distinct positions; this complements the wide soundstage and contributes to an immersive presentation.
#6
Instrument separation and imaging are strong, with clean layering that keeps complex mixes from turning muddy. A few critiques focus more on rhythmic cohesion and dynamics than on separation itself.
#7
The P100 present mixes with strong separation between instruments, making it easy to distinguish melodies, percussion and backing parts even in dense arrangements, which contributes to their engaging, hi fi character.
#8
Instrument separation is strong, keeping busy mixes organized so drums, bass, guitars, and vocals remain easy to follow as tracks build. Multiple comparisons place it at or above key rivals in maintaining clarity and cohesion.
#9
Strong separation and layering are repeatedly noted, with complex tracks staying intelligible; consistency is best with good seal and default tuning.
#10
Instrument separation is above average for the price, keeping vocals and percussion distinct even in busy mixes.
#11
Reviews mention strong 3D layering and separation, helping vocals and instruments stay distinct within the wide stage. Even with bass-boosting options like DynamEQ, detail retrieval and spatial definition remain a standout.
#12
Separation is strong for the category, with reviewers noting clearly delineated mids and lows and the ability to pick out fine mix details and even small editing blips.
#13
Multiple reviews describe strong separation and layering that helps instruments and vocals occupy distinct space, creating a convincing three-dimensional image, though some note slight compression compared with the absolute top performers and occasional channel-matching quirks that can blur spatial cues.
#14
Instrument separation and imaging are frequently praised, with the dual-driver design helping keep details distinct. Spatial processing can change timbre and separation perception depending on track and settings.
#15
Separation and organization are usually excellent, helping complex tracks stay intelligible; a few comparisons still place layering or spaciousness behind the very best true-wireless rivals.
#16
Instrument separation is strong, with clear layering and the ability to distinguish vocals, effects, and instruments even in complex scenes or mixes.
#17
Instrument separation and layering are generally strong, supported by the dual-driver design and spacious staging. Reviewers commonly noted good stereo separation and the ability to pick out details in complex mixes.
#18
Instrument separation and imaging are a consistent strength, keeping complex mixes from sounding cluttered and making small details easy to pick out. A minority of impressions describe the presentation as slightly artificial or compressed compared to wired audiophile headphones, but within the ANC Bluetooth category it is frequently rated above average.
#19
Instrument separation is considered good, with plenty of space in the mix so guitars, strings and other parts remain distinct and engaging even on dense, energetic tracks.
#20
Instrument separation is frequently praised, keeping complex mixes organized so vocals and individual elements remain distinct rather than blending into congestion.
#21
Instrument separation is generally reported as good for a consumer ANC headphone, keeping busy mixes understandable and vocals distinct even with the bass tilt. It’s not positioned as an audiophile detail monster, but clarity is strong enough for everyday listening and travel.
#22
Instrument separation and layering are generally solid for an ANC over-ear, keeping guitars, vocals, and percussion reasonably distinct; some reviewers still describe mixes as a bit cluttered and note that precise placement and depth are only average; overall separation is good, while pinpoint imaging lags the very best competitors.
#23
Instrument placement is clean and easy to follow, especially after EQ tuning; separation is strong for travel listening, though some comparisons still give AirPods Max the edge for layering and openness.
#24
Instrument separation and stereo imaging are praised as above-average at this price, though not as sharply defined as flagship earbuds.
#25
Many reviewers hear strong separation that keeps complex mixes organized, but a minority of audiophile-focused critiques find imaging and separation less distinct than expected and sometimes smeared versus top competitors.
#26
Instrument separation is decent for the price, but denser mixes can sound a little congested and less airy than on higher-end models.
#27
Separation is competent for the price but not class-leading—complex tracks can feel crowded, while simpler mixes retain good control; EQ and disabling ANC can help preserve clarity.
#28
Instrument separation and resolution are often described as good for mainstream use but not class-leading for critical listening, with complex passages sometimes blurring together. Some reviewers note improvements versus the XM4 and that EQ can help clarity, but multiple sources still rank it behind more resolving competitors in the same price tier.